After a very work intense RFP with more than 40 venues competing, 17
entries, and two rounds of refinements, we are now happy to announce
the winner:
EuroPython 2019 will be held in
Basel, Switzerland, from July 8 - 14 2019
We will now start work on the contracts
Às 07:11 de 07/12/18, Christian Gollwitzer escreveu:
> Am 07.12.18 um 03:00 schrieb Paulo da Silva:
>> Às 21:15 de 06/12/18, Rick Johnson escreveu:
...
> So instead of complaining about lacking support in Tk, the
> Python community should do their homework and provide wrappers to the
> most c
Hi there.
I blogged a bit today, about my surveil project and activity on this
mailing list:
"""
This morning the internet became unavailable, after also being unavailable
this weekend for several days.
So I decided to take a look at my demo board which does surveillance with a
webcam using the
>>> 00
0
>>> 03
File "", line 1
03
^
SyntaxError: invalid token
>>>
Any particular reason?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Às 01:17 de 08/12/18, jf...@ms4.hinet.net escreveu:
00
> 0
03
> File "", line 1
> 03
> ^
> SyntaxError: invalid token
>
> Any particular reason?
>
Not sure but I think that after 0 it expects x for hexadecimal, o for
octal, b for binary, ... may be others.
0xa
10
0o10
On 2018-12-08 01:17, jf...@ms4.hinet.net wrote:
00
0
03
File "", line 1
03
^
SyntaxError: invalid token
Any particular reason?
Before Python 3, a leading 0 in an integer literal would indicate an
octal (base 8) number.
In Python 2.7:
>>> 010
8
That notation was borrowed
MRAB at 2018/12/8 UTC+8 AM10:04:51 wrote:
> Before Python 3, a leading 0 in an integer literal would indicate an
> octal (base 8) number.
So, the reason is historical.
> The old form is now invalid in order to reduce the chance of bugs.
I encounter this problem on trying to do something like th
On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 1:46 PM wrote:
>
> MRAB at 2018/12/8 UTC+8 AM10:04:51 wrote:
> > Before Python 3, a leading 0 in an integer literal would indicate an
> > octal (base 8) number.
>
> So, the reason is historical.
>
> > The old form is now invalid in order to reduce the chance of bugs.
>
> I e
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 7:47 PM wrote:
>
> MRAB at 2018/12/8 UTC+8 AM10:04:51 wrote:
> > Before Python 3, a leading 0 in an integer literal would indicate an
> > octal (base 8) number.
>
> So, the reason is historical.
>
> > The old form is now invalid in order to reduce the chance of bugs.
>
> I e
jf...@ms4.hinet.net writes:
> MRAB at 2018/12/8 UTC+8 AM10:04:51 wrote:
>> Before Python 3, a leading 0 in an integer literal would indicate an
>> octal (base 8) number.
>
> So, the reason is historical.
>
>> The old form is now invalid in order to reduce the chance of bugs.
>
> I encounter this
On 2018-12-08 03:49, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
jf...@ms4.hinet.net writes:
MRAB at 2018/12/8 UTC+8 AM10:04:51 wrote:
Before Python 3, a leading 0 in an integer literal would indicate an
octal (base 8) number.
So, the reason is historical.
The old form is now invalid in order to reduce the chance
Ian at 2018/12/8 UTC+8 AM11:28:34 wrote:
> What is it exactly that you're trying to accomplish with this? Perhaps
> there's a better way than using eval.
This problem comes from solving a word puzzle,
ab + aa + cd == ce
Each character will be translate to a digit and evaluate the correctness,
I can understand the difficulty of throwing old thing away and accept new one
in human. There seems have a huge inertia there. This phenomenon appears on
every aspects, not only on the transition from Python2 to Python3. But, as a
new comer of Python like me, I have no difficulty to accept it be
On 07Dec2018 20:24, Jach Fong wrote:
Ian at 2018/12/8 UTC+8 AM11:28:34 wrote:
What is it exactly that you're trying to accomplish with this? Perhaps
there's a better way than using eval.
This problem comes from solving a word puzzle,
ab + aa + cd == ce
Each character will be translate to a
[[READERS DIGEST CONDENSED ANSWER: use int("string") ]]
Since we all agree python will not make notations like "05" work
indefinitely, and the need expressed is how to solve a symbolic puzzle (see
message below) then it makes sense to look at alternate representations.
I have a question first. Ho
A comment from the sideline: one could imagine extending the Python syntax
with a (optional) 0d prefix that allows for explicit specification of
decimal values. They would "complete" the family:
* 0b: binary number
* 0o: octal number
* 0d: decimal number
* 0x: hexadecimal number
I understand that
08.12.18 03:17, jf...@ms4.hinet.net пише:
00
0
03
File "", line 1
03
^
SyntaxError: invalid token
In Python 3.8 the error message will be more informative:
03
File "", line 1
SyntaxError: leading zeros in decimal integer literals are not
permitted; use an 0o prefix for o
17 matches
Mail list logo
