On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 18:49, Rob Cliffe via Python-list
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 02/02/2023 09:31, mutt...@dastardlyhq.com wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 18:28:04 +0100
> > "Peter J. Holzer" wrote:
> >> --b2nljkb3mdefsdhx
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >> Content-Disposition: inline
>
[re-sending this to both the list and to Chris, as a prior send to the
list only was bounced back]
On 31/01/2023 22:33, Chris Angelico wrote:
Thanks for clarifying.
Hm. So 'x' is neither in locals() nor in globals(). Which starts me
wondering (to go off on a tangent): Should there be a
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 05:30, Stefan Ram wrote:
>
> Rob Cliffe writes:
> >Does that mean that it is not possible to have a (built-in) function
> >that would construct and return a dictionary of all available variables
> >and their values? If it were possible, it could be useful, and there
>
On 2/7/23 14:53, Weatherby,Gerard wrote:
Yes.
Inspect module
import inspect
class Mine:
def __init__(self):
self.__value = 7
def __getvalue(self):
/"""Gets seven"""
/return self.__value
mine = Mine()
data = inspect.getdoc(mine)
for m in inspect.getmembers(mine):
if '__getvalue' in m[0]:
I've been banging my head on Sphinx for a couple of days now, trying to
get it to include the docstrings of a private (name starts with two
underscores) inner class. All I've managed to do is convince myself
that it really can't do it.
See https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/11181.
Is
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 02:12, Rob Cliffe wrote:
>
> [re-sending this to both the list and to Chris, as a prior send to the
> list only was bounced back]
> On 31/01/2023 22:33, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for clarifying.
> >> Hm. So 'x' is neither in locals() nor in globals(). Which
PyCA cryptography 39.0.1 has been released to PyPI. cryptography
includes both high level recipes and low level interfaces to common
cryptographic algorithms such as symmetric ciphers, asymmetric
algorithms, message digests, X509, key derivation functions, and much
more. We support Python 3.6+,
Yes.
Inspect module
import inspect
class Mine:
def __init__(self):
self.__value = 7
def __getvalue(self):
"""Gets seven"""
return self.__value
mine = Mine()
data = inspect.getdoc(mine)
for m in inspect.getmembers(mine):
if '__getvalue' in m[0]:
d
Stefan Ram wrote:
When one defines a function, sometimes its name is only
half-existent.
One can implicitly evaluate the name of the function:
main.py
def g():
def f():
print( f )
f()
g()
output
.f at ...
, but one gets an error when one tries to
Hello,
I am trying to configure my loggers using dictConfig, but they do not
print anything. Here are more details.
I have several python scripts that use a similar logging setup. I put
the common configuration in a separate module myloggingconf.py:
# myloggingconf.py
import logging
def
On 07/02/2023 08:15, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 18:49, Rob Cliffe via Python-list
wrote:
On 02/02/2023 09:31, mutt...@dastardlyhq.com wrote:
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 18:28:04 +0100
"Peter J. Holzer" wrote:
--b2nljkb3mdefsdhx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On 2023-02-07 17:58:26 -0500, Ivan "Rambius" Ivanov wrote:
> I am trying to configure my loggers using dictConfig, but they do not
> print anything. Here are more details.
[...]
> from myloggingconf import configure_logging
>
> logger = logging.getLogger(os.path.basename(__file__))
[...]
>
> def
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 10:18, Mark Bourne wrote:
>
> Stefan Ram wrote:
> > Mark Bourne writes:
> >> In the second case, eval() only gets the globals and immediate locals,
> >
> >Yes, I think you are right. Curiously, the following program would
> >mislead one to thing that eval /does/ see
Stefan Ram wrote:
Mark Bourne writes:
In the second case, eval() only gets the globals and immediate locals,
Yes, I think you are right. Curiously, the following program would
mislead one to thing that eval /does/ see the intermediate names:
main.py
def f():
x = 22
def
14 matches
Mail list logo
