Re: What is this TEST BANK stuff ?

On 2023-06-21, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 at 02:54, Dan Kolis via Python-list > wrote: >> >> Why do we tolerate this spam ? >> >> this seems most likely a way to inject viruses into people's workflow. >> >> That wiped out usenet. Ahh without an explaination; ( and

Python Issue

Python is unable to open. Exit Code: 1 -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Python Issue

On 22/06/2023 03.28, Pickle Pork via Python-list wrote: Python is unable to open. Exit Code: 1 This is not good. Please give some useful information: - from where did you download Python? - which operating system? - how do you "open" Python? etc. -- Regards, =dn --

What is this TEST BANK stuff ?

Why do we tolerate this spam ? this seems most likely a way to inject viruses into people's workflow. That wiped out usenet. Ahh without an explaination; ( and it woudl have to be a good one ); what is the purpsoe of this, why is it here ? Can it be eliminated ? Regards, Dan --

TKinter in Python - advanced notions

Hi, I've write a huge biotech program ( an IDE for synthetic biology ), and am slowly outgrowing TKINTER. Has anybody out there merged a little bit of TCL direct calls from Python 3.X to get more freedom then TKINTER for just some Windows ? How about bold stories of successes ( yours, not

Re: What is this TEST BANK stuff ?

On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 at 02:54, Dan Kolis via Python-list wrote: > > Why do we tolerate this spam ? > > this seems most likely a way to inject viruses into people's workflow. > > That wiped out usenet. Ahh without an explaination; ( and it woudl have to be > a good one ); what is the purpsoe of

Re: TKinter in Python - advanced notions

On 6/21/23 09:47, Dan Kolis wrote: I've write a huge biotech program ( an IDE for synthetic biology ), and am slowly outgrowing TKINTER. Has anybody out there merged a little bit of TCL direct calls from Python 3.X to get more freedom then TKINTER for just some Windows ? I wish it looked

pip install -e does not build shared libraries

When I try to use `pip install -e .` with llama-cpp-python or bitsandbytes, it doesn't build the shared libraries like `pip install .` does. In the case of llama-cpp-python, there is no _skbuild folder generated at all, just llama_cpp_python.egg-info. This results in an error when I try to import

Re: pip install -e does not build shared libraries

On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 5:45 PM Cebtenzzre wrote: > In the case of bitsandbytes, there is no build folder generated at > all, just bitsandbytes.egg-info. This results in an error when I try > to import it, e.g. "CUDA SETUP: Required library version not found: >