Vulture 0.6 released
vulture - Find dead code
vulture finds unused classes, functions and variables in Python code.
This helps you cleanup and find errors in your programs. If you run it
on both your library and test suite you can find untested code.
Due to Python's dynamic nature it is impossible to find all dead code
for a static code analyzer like vulture, because it ignores scopes and
scans only token names. Additionally some dynamic items that are not
explicitly mentioned in the code may be incorrectly reported as dead code.
Download
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/vulture
Features
- Fast: Uses static code analysis
- Lightweight: Only one module
- Complements pyflakes and has the same output syntax
- Supports Python 2.6, 2.7 and 3.x
News
* Ignore function names starting with test_.
* Parse variable names in new format strings (e.g. This is
{x}.format(x=nice)).
* Only parse alphanumeric variable names in format strings and ignore types.
* Abort with exit code 1 on syntax errors.
* Support installation under Windows by using setuptools (thanks Reuben
Fletcher-Costin).
Cheers,
Jendrik
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-announce-list
Support the Python Software Foundation:
http://www.python.org/psf/donations/
Re: ANN: wxPython 3.0.1.0 release
If I drag a page in the agw.aui notebook I get an exception (it's a traced bug). This is an issue that Andrea has fixed some weeks ago but it seems left out of this build Marco On Sunday, September 7, 2014 6:50:07 AM UTC+2, Robin Dunn wrote: Announcing -- wxPython 3.0.1.0 (classic) has been released and is now available for download at http://wxpython.org/download.php. (Finally! Sorry, but life and work has kept me busy.) No new features to speak of, but there has been lots of bug fixes in wxWidgets and a few on the wxPython side too. Various binaries are available for 32-bit and 64-bit Windows, and also for OSX using the Carbon and Cocoa APIs, for Python 2.6 and 2.7. Source code is also available at http://wxpython.org/download.php of course, for building your own. What is wxPython? - wxPython is a GUI toolkit for the Python programming language. It allows Python programmers to create programs with a robust, highly functional graphical user interface, simply and easily. It is implemented as a set of Python extension modules that wrap the GUI components of the popular wxWidgets cross platform library, which is written in C++. wxPython is a cross-platform toolkit. This means that the same program will usually run on multiple platforms without modifications. Currently supported platforms are 32-bit and 64-bit Microsoft Windows, most Linux or other Unix-like systems using GTK2, and Mac OS X 10.4+. In most cases the native widgets are used on each platform to provide a 100% native look and feel for the application. -- Robin Dunn Software Craftsman http://wxPython.org -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-announce-list Support the Python Software Foundation: http://www.python.org/psf/donations/
devpi-2.0.3, devpi-server-2.0.6 and devpi-web-2.1.0 released
The new devpi releases devpi-2.0.3, devpi-server-2.0.6 and devpi-web-2.1.0 contain several fixes for the private pypi server system/self-updating pypi cache, see the changelog below for details. The major new change in devpi-web is support for theming, see here for more details: http://doc.devpi.net/latest/web.html#themes And general documentation at: http://doc.devpi.net/latest with tutorials and quickstart documents for particular scenarios. Note that no export/import procedure is needed if you are already running a 2.X devpi-server. If upgrading from a 1.2 devpi-server install, you need to upgrade using these instructions: http://doc.devpi.net/latest/quickstart-server.html#versioning-exporting-and-importing-server-state Regards, Florian Schulze devpi-server 2.0.6 -- - log version information of all found plugins on startup. devpi-web 2.1.0 --- - allow overwriting of templates for theming. - show version info for currently active packages/plugins. - fix encoding issue when loading long description with Python 3.4 on Windows. - requires devpi-server 2.0.6. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-announce-list Support the Python Software Foundation: http://www.python.org/psf/donations/
cliff 1.7.0 released
The Oslo team is pleased to release version 1.7.0 of cliff. This release includes: $ git log --oneline --no-merges 1.6.1..1.7.0 42675b2 Add release notes for 1.7.0 86fe20f Fix stable integration tests bf0c611 Updated from global requirements ac1347c Clean up default tox environment list db4eef5 Do not allow wheels for stable tests 6bb6944 Set the main logger name to match the application c383448 CSV formatter should use system-dependent line ending e3bec7b Make show option compatible with Python 2.6. 9315a32 Use six.add_metaclass instead of __metaclass__ 9f331fb fixed typos found by RETF rules d150502 The --variable option to shell format is redundant 69966df Expose load_commands publicly a37ef60 Fix wrong method name assert_called_once 4bdf5fc Updated from global requirements 90ea2b2 Fix pep8 failures on rule E265 Please report issues to the bug tracker: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-cliff Doug -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-announce-list Support the Python Software Foundation: http://www.python.org/psf/donations/
stevedore 1.0.0.0a2 released -- juno rc1
The Oslo team is pleased to release version 1.0.0.0a2 of stevedore, our first release candidate for stevedore for the OpenStack Juno cycle. This release includes: $ git log --oneline --no-merges 1.0.0.0a1..1.0.0.0a2 860bd8f Build universal wheels Please report issues to the stevedore bug tracker: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-stevedore Doug -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-announce-list Support the Python Software Foundation: http://www.python.org/psf/donations/
Re: weakref, memory management and execution slow down in PyQt4
Michael Torrie: On 09/07/2014 01:11 PM, kjs wrote: Thanks for the advice. I commented out the graph generation and PyQt call self.app.processEvents() where in the class __init__ self.app = QtGui.QApplication(sys.argv) This stopped the weakref proliferation. All other objects grow and shrink in number as expected. Can you make an absolute minimal example with no widgets save the graph itself? You could then go to the PyQt folks with that. Could be a bug, or could be an improper use of something by your code. This is one of the problems with using Qt in other languages: it's not a perfect fit for Python's object model as it is C++-based. So you have to think like a C++ programmer, and you might have to manage some resources manually, unlike normal Python objects which for the most part take care of themselves. The code is minimal[0]. The only other widgets are a start button that fires off the plotting and a stop button that calls sys.exit(). Lines 112-114 appear to be causing the weakref proliferation. I do not doubt that I could be using PyQt4 incorrectly. I'll send a message to the pyqt mailing list as well. Also you could try a minimal example using PySide instead of PyQt and see if that also manifests the leak. If so, then the problem could be in Qt itself. Though I suspect the problem is some kind of impedance mismatch between C++ and Python. Thanks much, Kevin [0] https://github.com/kevinjos/kaggle-aes-seizure-prediction/blob/master/explore.py 0x8A61431E.asc Description: application/pgp-keys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: How to turn a string into a list of integers?
On 9/8/2014 1:44 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com: The original question was regarding storage - how PEP 393 says that strings will be encoded in memory in any of three ways (Latin-1, UCS-2/UTF-16, or UCS-4/UTF-32). But even in our world, that is not what a string *is*, but only what it is made of. I'm a bit surprised that kind of CPython implementation detail would go into a PEP. I had thought PEPs codified Python independently of CPython. There are multiple PEP that are not strictly about Python the language: meta-peps, informational peps, and others about the cpython api, implementation, and distribution issues. 393 is followed by 397 Python launcher for Windows Hammond, v. Löwis http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/ The PEP process is a tool for the core development team and the product is documentation of decisions and actions thereby But maybe CPython is to Python what England is to the UK: even the government is having a hard time making a distinction. We don't. -- Terry Jan Reedy -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: We made from water every living thing...
From: Ned Batchelder n...@nedbatchelder.com On 9/7/14 5:41 PM, Tony the Tiger wrote: Now, kindly get the fuck outta here, you fucking retard! /Grrr That was unnecessary, ineffective, and totally outside the bounds of this community's norms: http://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct Behave. He posted via Astraweb to Usenet. He is not using GMane or a listserver. The Python.Org CoC does not extend to Usenet unless a FAQ is properly published for news:comp.lang.python You need to filter out Google Groupers who are the cause of spam and abuse. -- Dave Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: We made from water every living thing...
On 8 September 2014 12:54, David H. Lipman DLipman~nospam~@verizon.net wrote: From: Ned Batchelder n...@nedbatchelder.com On 9/7/14 5:41 PM, Tony the Tiger wrote: Now, kindly get the fuck outta here, you fucking retard! That was unnecessary, ineffective, and totally outside the bounds of this community's norms: http://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct The Python.Org CoC does not extend to Usenet unless a FAQ is properly published for news:comp.lang.python I don't think allowing people to be disrespectful because they accessed the forum in a different way is a good idea. I'd rather we all just be nice. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: We made from water every living thing...
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Joshua Landau jos...@landau.ws wrote: I don't think allowing people to be disrespectful because they accessed the forum in a different way is a good idea. I'd rather we all just be nice. May I just point out that lots of us didn't even see the original post? If Tony the Tiger hadn't bothered to quote it, it would quietly have dropped into oblivion. Let's let this thread finish and have done with the whole matter. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: We made from water every living thing...
On 08/09/2014 14:06, Chris Angelico wrote: On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Joshua Landau jos...@landau.ws wrote: I don't think allowing people to be disrespectful because they accessed the forum in a different way is a good idea. I'd rather we all just be nice. May I just point out that lots of us didn't even see the original post? If Tony the Tiger hadn't bothered to quote it, it would quietly have dropped into oblivion. Let's let this thread finish and have done with the whole matter. ChrisA +1 -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: We made from water every living thing...
On Monday 08 September 2014 09:06:46 Chris Angelico did opine And Gene did reply: On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Joshua Landau jos...@landau.ws wrote: I don't think allowing people to be disrespectful because they accessed the forum in a different way is a good idea. I'd rather we all just be nice. May I just point out that lots of us didn't even see the original post? If Tony the Tiger hadn't bothered to quote it, it would quietly have dropped into oblivion. Let's let this thread finish and have done with the whole matter. ChrisA I am with you on that Chris, nothing with googlegroups in a header last long enough to even be seen by fetchmail, its in a mailfilter rule and gets nuked on the server. And life is much simpler. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order. -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene US V Castleman, SCOTUS, Mar 2014 is grounds for Impeaching SCOTUS -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: We made from water every living thing...
On 2014-09-08, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote: On Monday 08 September 2014 09:06:46 Chris Angelico did opine And Gene did reply: On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Joshua Landau jos...@landau.ws wrote: I don't think allowing people to be disrespectful because they accessed the forum in a different way is a good idea. I'd rather we all just be nice. May I just point out that lots of us didn't even see the original post? If Tony the Tiger hadn't bothered to quote it, it would quietly have dropped into oblivion. Let's let this thread finish and have done with the whole matter. I am with you on that Chris, nothing with googlegroups in a header last long enough to even be seen by fetchmail, its in a mailfilter rule and gets nuked on the server. And life is much simpler. I plonked everything coming from Google Groups years ago. I never regretted it for a second, and can recommend doing so without reservation. All you have to do is toss anything with a Message-ID ending in googlegroups.com. For the benefit of anybody using slrn to read the Usenet group (or presumably reading the mailing list via gmane), here's the .score file rule: [*] Score:: =- Message-ID: .*googlegroups.com -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Now KEN and BARBIE at are PERMANENTLY ADDICTED to gmail.comMIND-ALTERING DRUGS ... -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: We made from water every living thing...
From: Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Joshua Landau jos...@landau.ws wrote: I don't think allowing people to be disrespectful because they accessed the forum in a different way is a good idea. I'd rather we all just be nice. May I just point out that lots of us didn't even see the original post? If Tony the Tiger hadn't bothered to quote it, it would quietly have dropped into oblivion. Let's let this thread finish and have done with the whole matter. ChrisA That true. One should *never* quote spam. -- Dave Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Newer Debian versions of python on older Debian distros?
(I realize that this may be seen as off topic for as a general python question, but given my historical experience with the Debian community’s predilection to answer all questions with a grumpy “go read the very very very very large and ever shifting fine manual”, I’m hoping for better luck here.) Does anyone have experience with using newer versions of python debian packages (in particular, python3 and python3-bson-ext from ‘testing’) on older stable versions (‘wheezy’ in this case)? If someone’s figured out how to do this easily, I’d love to hear the recipe! TIA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Installing Python 3
Hello, My name is Ashley Forman, and I am emailing because I cannot install python onto my Mac laptop! I have installed Active-TCl 8.5 along with Python 3.3 and tried with 3.4, and couldn't figure out a solution to my problem. When I click on IDLE to open, it does not open at all. Therefore, if you have any information that could help me, then I would really appreciate it! Thank you! Best, Ashley Forman -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: weakref, memory management and execution slow down in PyQt4
On 09/07/2014 02:39 PM, kjs wrote: The code is minimal[0]. The only other widgets are a start button that fires off the plotting and a stop button that calls sys.exit(). Unfortunately there are no data files in your git repository so I can't run it. Lines 112-114 appear to be causing the weakref proliferation. Is there a reason you are using setattr and getattr instead of a proper data structure? both of those calls are rather expensive. Would probably be cheaper to use some kind of array, dictionary, or other purpose-built data structure? -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Newer Debian versions of python on older Debian distros?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Travis Griggs travisgri...@gmail.com wrote: Does anyone have experience with using newer versions of python debian packages (in particular, python3 and python3-bson-ext from ‘testing’) on older stable versions (‘wheezy’ in this case)? If someone’s figured out how to do this easily, I’d love to hear the recipe! I don't know about grabbing from testing, because that's fraught with peril... but there's a pretty easy way to get a newer Python: build from source. Basically, the standard incantation: $ sudo apt-get build-dep python3 $ hg clone http://hg.python.org/cpython $ cd cpython $ ./configure make sudo make install (I like to separate the last three steps, but putting them together works too.) Alternatively, you could just run Debian Jessie. I have a few Jessie systems on the network, with a Python 3.4 IIRC, and there've been no stability problems lately. Both options are pretty easy. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: pip install PyOpenGL have problem
On 09/06/2014 11:15 PM, วรรณพงษ์ ภัททิยไพบูลย์ wrote: pip install -U PyOpenGL PyOpenGL_accelerate :( I don't recognize that particular error message... If you require assistance you need to copy and paste the output from the command so people can know exactly what failed. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Installing Python 3
In article cambegteobpypbyuyjnnknb+jwdwp6+axwhah9mxu-novrp-...@mail.gmail.com, Ashley Forman forma...@mail.chapman.edu wrote: My name is Ashley Forman, and I am emailing because I cannot install python onto my Mac laptop! I have installed Active-TCl 8.5 along with Python 3.3 and tried with 3.4, and couldn't figure out a solution to my problem. When I click on IDLE to open, it does not open at all. Therefore, if you have any information that could help me, then I would really appreciate it! Thank you! Clicking on the IDLE icon is fine - unless it is doesn't work, in which case error messages associated with the failure may end up in a system log rather than being display directly to you. It's easier to debug problems like this by launching IDLE from a terminal session than by double-clicking on it. Assuming you installed Python 3.4 (3.4.1 is current) from one of the python.org installers, open a terminal shell window, for example by using the Terminal.app (found in /Applications/Utilities). Then, in the shell window, try typing: /usr/local/bin/idle3.4 If IDLE fails, there should be some sort of error message in the terminal window. If it is not clear what the problem is, copy and paste them to the group here. You can also just try launching Python itself and verify that it works without IDLE: /usr/local/bin/python3.4 Good luck! -- Ned Deily, n...@acm.org -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: weakref, memory management and execution slow down in PyQt4
Thanks for the consideration Michael. If you do get the data, and are able to run the code, let me know if you notice anything interesting. Michael Torrie: On 09/07/2014 02:39 PM, kjs wrote: The code is minimal[0]. The only other widgets are a start button that fires off the plotting and a stop button that calls sys.exit(). Unfortunately there are no data files in your git repository so I can't run it. The data is available from the internet[0] in the form of 3+GB gziped blobs. In case you don't want to register an account with Kaggle and download 3GB to execute the code, I have uploaded a sample file to a Tahoe LAFS grid accessible via tor. If you're interested in downloading the data, please let me know and I'll share the read capability with you. Additionally, I should write some tests the use mock data. I'll let you know if I get around to this. Lines 112-114 appear to be causing the weakref proliferation. Is there a reason you are using setattr and getattr instead of a proper data structure? both of those calls are rather expensive. Would probably be cheaper to use some kind of array, dictionary, or other purpose-built data structure? You're right, a dictionary can do everything I need and more. This happened to be the first thing I thought of, and I didn't imagine it would be very expensive. I figured it was simply a different way of defining and retrieving a class variable. IE setattr(self, foo, True) == self.foo = True. Thanks, Kevin [0] http://www.kaggle.com/c/seizure-prediction/data 0x8A61431E.asc Description: application/pgp-keys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: pip install PyOpenGL have problem
On 09/08/2014 08:18 PM, Michael Torrie wrote: On 09/06/2014 11:15 PM, วรรณพงษ์ ภัททิยไพบูลย์ wrote: pip install -U PyOpenGL PyOpenGL_accelerate :( I don't recognize that particular error message... If you require assistance you need to copy and paste the output from the command so people can know exactly what failed. You might try googling as well: https://www.google.ca/search?q=python3+pip+windows There seems to be a number of pages that talk about installing pip if it's not there (using easy_install if I recall correctly). -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Passing a list into a list .append() method
I have a list with a fixed number of elements which I need to grow; ie. add rows of a fixed number of elements, some of which will be blank. e.g. [['a','b','c','d'], ['A','B','C','D'], ['', 'aa', 'inky', ''], ['', 'bb', 'binky', ''], ... ] This is a reduced representation of a larger list-of-lists problem that had me running in circles today. I think I figured out _how_ to get what I want but I am looking to understand why one approach works and another doesn't. 1) What does NOT work as desired: proc_file = [] proc_file = [['a','b','c','d']] proc_file.append(['A','B','C','D']) blank_r = ['','','',''] qq = ['aa','bb','cc','dd'] rr = ['inky', 'binky', 'pinky', 'clyde'] for i,j in enumerate(zip(qq,rr)): proc_file.append((blank_r)) # Add a row of blanks proc_file[i+2][1] = j[0] proc_file[i+2][2] = j[1] print len(proc_file), blank_r, proc_file print print proc_file 3 ['', 'aa', 'inky', ''] [['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D'], ['', 'aa', 'inky', '']] 4 ['', 'bb', 'binky', ''] [['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D'], ['', 'bb', 'binky', ''], ['', 'bb', 'binky', '']] 5 ['', 'cc', 'pinky', ''] [['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D'], ['', 'cc', 'pinky', ''], ['', 'cc', 'pinky', ''], ['', 'cc', 'pinky', '']] 6 ['', 'dd', 'clyde', ''] [['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D'], ['', 'dd', 'clyde', ''], ['', 'dd', 'clyde', ''], ['', 'dd', 'clyde', ''], ['', 'dd', 'clyde', '']] Out[82]: [['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D'], ['', 'dd', 'clyde', ''], ['', 'dd', 'clyde', ''], ['', 'dd', 'clyde', ''], ['', 'dd', 'clyde', '']] 2) What works as desired: proc_file = [] proc_file = [['a','b','c','d']] proc_file.append(['A','B','C','D']) blank_r = ['','','',''] qq = ['aa','bb','cc','dd'] rr = ['inky', 'binky', 'pinky', 'clyde'] for i,j in enumerate(zip(qq,rr)): proc_file.append(list(blank_r)) # Change it to list(blank_r) and it works proc_file[i+2][1] = j[0] proc_file[i+2][2] = j[1] print len(proc_file), blank_r, proc_file print print proc_file 3 ['', '', '', ''] [['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D'], ['', 'aa', 'inky', '']] 4 ['', '', '', ''] [['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D'], ['', 'aa', 'inky', ''], ['', 'bb', 'binky', '']] 5 ['', '', '', ''] [['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D'], ['', 'aa', 'inky', ''], ['', 'bb', 'binky', ''], ['', 'cc', 'pinky', '']] 6 ['', '', '', ''] [['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D'], ['', 'aa', 'inky', ''], ['', 'bb', 'binky', ''], ['', 'cc', 'pinky', ''], ['', 'dd', 'clyde', '']] Out[83]: [['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D'], ['', 'aa', 'inky', ''], ['', 'bb', 'binky', ''], ['', 'cc', 'pinky', ''], ['', 'dd', 'clyde', '']] Due diligence I've read extensively on how arguments are passed to functions but I don't think they are completely applicable here (though interesting nevertheless) http://www.jeffknupp.com/blog/2012/11/13/is-python-callbyvalue-or-callbyreference-neither/ https://www.udacity.com/wiki/common-python-pitfalls and others. It looks like .append binds blank_r to proc_file in 1). I change proc_file and blank_r changes along with it. Should I expect this? I understand lists are mutable but I didn't expect that they could be associated/bound in this manner. I first tried protecting blank_r by passing it as a tuple. That caused an expected mismatch error. Next, I tried passing it as list(tuple(blank_r)) which worked. Then, I finally settled on 2) where I dispensed with the tuple conversion. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[issue18766] IDLE: Autocomplete in editor doesn't work for un-imported modules
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
This issue is about name completion and not path completion. I have re-reviewed
the patch, current code, current behavior, and the fetch_completions doctstring
that more or less explains why name completion cannot reliably work given how
Idle now works.
I would add to the docstring that even after running the editor file and before
running anything else, there can still be problems. If one adds 'from mod
import SomeClass' and types 'SomeClass.', there will be no help. This patch
will not help either. Getting completions for 'sc.', where 'sc' is an instance
of SomeClass, without running code, is an even harder problem. There is, in a
sense, no substitute for running the code up to the point where name completion
is wanted. Perhaps an explicit Show Completions(Name completion seems fairly
common; I wonder how other editors handle it.)
Idle once ran user code in the idle process, which meant that any module ever
imported by running any editor buffer would still be in sys.modules. Thus
looking for modules in the Idle process sys.modules was more or less guaranteed
to work, and would substitute for the user __main__ module (within the Idle
process) being cleared by running another editor buffer.
Idle now, without the -N option, runs edited files in a *new* user processes.
The problem for name completion (and calltips, and shell interaction with the
old process) is that Idle discards the previous user process. So running file
B discards the information needed for name completion with file A. A possible
solution to this is to keep a user process for each file and not discard
information we may want.
I thought of this idea about a month ago because I am sometimes annoyed when
running any file discards an interactive shell process I am not really done
with. After running a file, I sometimes retype or rerun code to recreate the
bidings I had before running an editor file. This change would also help this
issue and a similar one with calltips. I plan to make this proposal the
subject of another issue.
If I open Idle with Shell and open a new editor window, then, as Phil noted,
typing 're.' and waiting brings up a list of re attributes, whereas 'datetime.'
does not. A year ago, 'textwrap.' did not, whereas now it does, thus
illustratig the arbitrary nature of current behavior.
Phil's proposal is to make 'datetime.' act like 're.' by importing datetime.
There are two things I do not like about this. First, if there is no 'import
re' in the file, then putting, say, 're.DOTALL' into the file is a bug in that
it will be a NameError when the file is run. I might rather make 'import re'
work like 'import datetime', that is fail, by not using sys.module as a backup.
Second, the import is done in a process that does not belong to the editor,
adding a name binding where is does not belong, and will have to be done again
when the file is run.
Phil notes that the current workaround it to do the import in the shell (which,
as noted, does it in the wrong place) or run the file (which, as noted, deleted
the current process). If there were a separate process for each editor, then
either running the process or doing the import would not have the problems
listed above. If we did do an auto import, it would be under the presumption
that it would be imported into that particular process in a later run. We
could also think about doing something else, like checking whether 'import xxx'
is in the file and either inserting it or at least warning the user to do so.
I would add to the docstring that even after running the editor file and before
running anything else, there can still be problems. If one adds 'from mod
import SomeClass' and types 'SomeClass.', there will be no help. This patch
will not help either. Getting completions for 'sc.', where 'sc' is an instance
of SomeClass, without running code, is an even harder problem. There is, in a
sense, no substitute for running the code up to the point where name completion
is wanted. Perhaps an explicit Show Completions or Cntl-Space should do so.
This would be more feasible with a separate process so it did not have the side
effect of killing the existing user process.
Name completion seems fairly common; I wonder how other editors handle it.
---
In my previous post, I suggested that get_entity does too much by copying to
namespaces into one, looking up one name, and discarding the new combined
namespace. Looking more, it also occurs to me that the eval is not needed, as
eval(name, namespace) is the same as getattr(name, namespace). I believe the
following would do what the current get_entity does. it now does.
def get_entity(name): # should be a standalone utility function
try:
ob = __main__.__dict__[name]
except KeyError:
try:
ob = sys.modules[name]
except KeyError:
raise NameError('cannot find %s' % name) from
[issue22358] Unnecessary JUMP_FORWARD(0) (NOP) in if statements without else or elif
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: This is a duplicate of issue11471. Explicit check for NULL is not needed because the asdl_seq_LEN() macro checks its argument for NULL. -- resolution: - duplicate stage: - resolved status: open - closed superseder: - If without else generates redundant jump versions: -Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22358 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11471] If without else generates redundant jump
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: LGTM. Attila Fazekas just has provided almost the same patch in issue22358. -- stage: patch review - commit review versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11471 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21112] 3.4 regression: unittest.expectedFailure no longer works on TestCase subclasses
Michael Foord added the comment: The patch looks good to me. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21112 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20071] What should happen if someone runs ./python -m ensurepip in the build environment?
Changes by Ned Deily n...@acm.org: -- nosy: +dstufft, ncoghlan, ned.deily versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20071 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20417] ensurepip should not be installed with --without-ensurepip
Changes by Ned Deily n...@acm.org: -- nosy: +ncoghlan ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20417 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22359] Remove incorrect uses of recursive make
New submission from Jonas Wagner: The attached patch fixes issues with Python's Makefile, which manifest when doing parallel builds. The Makefile invoked make recursively for some targets. This caused some files (which were depended upon by multiple targets) to be built by both the original make and the sub-make. Besides duplicate work, this caused failed builds with non-threadsafe compilers. The proposed patch removes recursive calls to make, and instead builds all targets in the same make process. -- components: Build files: makefile_parallel.patch keywords: patch messages: 226563 nosy: Sjlver priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Remove incorrect uses of recursive make type: compile error versions: Python 3.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36570/makefile_parallel.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22359 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22360] Adding manually offset parameter to str/bytes split function
New submission from Christoph Wruck:
Currently we have a split function which splits a str/bytestr into
chunks of their underlying data. This works great for the most tivial jobs.
But there is no possibility to pass an offset parameter into the split
function which indicates the next user-defined starting index.
Actually the next starting position will be build upon the last starting
position (of found sep.) + separator length + 1.
It should be possible to manipulate the next starting index by changing this
behavior into:
last starting position (of found sep.) + separator length + OFFSET.
NOTE: The slicing start index (for substring) stay untouched.
This will help us to solve splitting sequences with one or more consecutive
separators. The following demonstrates the actually behavior.
s = 'abc;;def;hij'
s.split(';')
['abc', '', 'def', 'hij']
This works fine for both str/bytes values.
The following demonstrates an offset variant of split function.
s = 'abc;;def;hij'
s.split(';', offset=1)
['abc', ';def', 'hij']
The behavior of maxcount/None sep. parameter should be generate the same
output as before.
A change will be affect (as far as I can see):
- split.h
- split_char/rsplit_char
- split/rsplit
--
messages: 226564
nosy: cwr
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Adding manually offset parameter to str/bytes split function
type: enhancement
versions: Python 3.5
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22360
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19693] make altinstall make install behaviour differs from make install
Nick Coghlan added the comment: No change for 3.x (unless something changed on the pip side that I'm not aware of). For 2.7, the Makefile changes, at least for the install and altinstall targets, were deliberately excluded from the backport PEP. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19693 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20417] ensurepip should not be installed with --without-ensurepip
Nick Coghlan added the comment: As Donald notes, this was explicitly covered in the PEP: the onus is on the distros to make ensurepip and pyvenv work in a way that complies with their debundling requirements (e.g. by using rewheel, or redirecting to the system installer). The --without-ensurepip flag is there to disable running it at install time. Fully removing the ensurepip module is not a supported configuration - if a distro wants to do that, they're going to have to carry a patch. -- resolution: - wont fix stage: patch review - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20417 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22353] re.findall() documentation lacks information about finding THE LAST iteration of repeated capturing group (greedy)
Mateusz Dobrowolny added the comment: The official help https://docs.python.org/3/library/re.html?highlight=findall#re.findall in fact contains more information, especially the one mentioned in http://bugs.python.org/issue3384. Regarding my issue - I am afraid it was my misunderstanding, because it looks like Regular Expressions return always LAST match and Python re.findall reutrns what it is said to be: the list of groups. And since I repeat a captured group, I get only the last match. More here for example here: http://www.regular-expressions.info/captureall.html I was learning regexp yesterday, and first I reported this without knowing everytnig about capturing groups. If returning the last match for repeting a capturing group is defined within RegEx itself, than there is no need to mention it in Python documentation... -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22353 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22361] Ability to join() threads in concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor
New submission from Luca Falavigna: I have a program which waits for external events (mostly pyinotify events), and when events occur a new worker is created using concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor. The following snippet represents shortly what my program does: from time import sleep from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor def func(): print(start) sleep(10) print(stop) ex = ThreadPoolExecutor(1) # New workers will be scheduled when an event # is triggered (i.e. pyinotify events) ex.submit(func) # Dummy sleep sleep(60) When func() is complete, I'd like the underlying thread to be terminated. I realize I could call ex.shutdown() to achieve this, but this would prevent me from adding new workers in case new events occur. Not calling ex.shutdown() leads to have unfinished threads which pile up considerably: (gdb) run test.py Starting program: /usr/bin/python3.4-dbg test.py [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x7688e700 (LWP 17502)] start stop ^C Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt. 0x76e41963 in select () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (gdb) info threads Id Target Id Frame 2Thread 0x7688e700 (LWP 17502) python3.4-dbg 0x77bce420 in sem_wait () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 * 1Thread 0x77ff1700 (LWP 17501) python3.4-dbg 0x76e41963 in select () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (gdb) Would it be possible to add a new method (or a ThreadPoolExecutor option) which allows to join the underlying thread when the worker function returns? -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 226569 nosy: dktrkranz priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Ability to join() threads in concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor type: enhancement versions: Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22361 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22360] Adding manually offset parameter to str/bytes split function
Steven D'Aprano added the comment:
I'm afraid I don't understand the purpose of this feature request, or what the
behaviour is.
You show a simple example:
s = 'abc;;def;hij'
s.split(';', offset=1)
['abc', ';def', 'hij']
but I don't understand why you want to keep the second semi-colon. I would have
thought this would be more useful:
# treat runs of the separator as if it were a single separator
['abc', 'def', 'hij']
It might help if you explain under what circumstances you would use this. Also,
how does the caller choose a value for offset? Say, I read a string from a data
file, or from the user. How do I know what offset to use?
I'm not sure I understand what this offset parameter is supposed to do in
general. Here are some examples showing what I think you want, can you tell me
if I'm right?
'spam--eggs--cheesetoast'.split('-', offset=1)
-- ['spam', '-eggs', '-cheese', '-', '-toast']
'spam--eggs--cheese--toast'.split('-', offset=8)
-- ['spam', '-eggs--cheese', '-toast']
--
nosy: +steven.daprano
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22360
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22362] Warn about octal escapes 0o377 in re
New submission from Serhiy Storchaka: Currently the re module accepts octal escapes from \400 to \777, but ignore highest bit. re.search(r'\542', 'abc') _sre.SRE_Match object; span=(1, 2), match='b' This behavior looks surprising and is inconsistent with the regex module which preserve highest bit. Such escaping is not portable across different regular exception engines. I propose to add a warning when octal escape value is larger than 0o377. Here is preliminary patch which adds UserWarning. Or may be better to emit DeprecationWarning and then replace it by ValueError in future releases? -- components: Library (Lib), Regular Expressions files: re_octal_escape_overflow.patch keywords: patch messages: 226570 nosy: ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka priority: normal severity: normal stage: patch review status: open title: Warn about octal escapes 0o377 in re type: enhancement versions: Python 3.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36571/re_octal_escape_overflow.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22362 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22360] Adding manually offset parameter to str/bytes split function
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Such problems are solved by using regular expressions.
re.findall('(?:^|(?=;)).?[^;]*', 'abc;;def;hij')
['abc', ';def', 'hij']
--
nosy: +serhiy.storchaka
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22360
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22355] inconsistent results with inspect.getsource() / inspect.getsourcelines()
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +yselivanov ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22355 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22363] argparse AssertionError with add_mutually_exclusive_group and help=SUPPRESS
New submission from Zacrath: Executing the attached script causes an AssertionError. Traceback (most recent call last): File bug.py, line 18, in module parser.format_usage() File /usr/lib/python3.4/argparse.py, line 2318, in format_usage return formatter.format_help() File /usr/lib/python3.4/argparse.py, line 287, in format_help help = self._root_section.format_help() File /usr/lib/python3.4/argparse.py, line 217, in format_help func(*args) File /usr/lib/python3.4/argparse.py, line 338, in _format_usage assert ' '.join(opt_parts) == opt_usage AssertionError The script was tested in a clean Python installation. If any of the arguments are removed, there is no AssertionError exception. If help=SUPPRESS is removed, there is no AssertionError exception. This bug appears to have existed since Python 3.2, the first version that included argparse. -- files: bug.py messages: 226572 nosy: Zacrath, bethard priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: argparse AssertionError with add_mutually_exclusive_group and help=SUPPRESS type: behavior versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36572/bug.py ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22363 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20071] What should happen if someone runs ./python -m ensurepip in the build environment?
Nick Coghlan added the comment: The whole sys.path initialisation scheme is pretty broken when running from a source checkout, so the short answer is it won't work, and it isn't really fixable in a maintenance release. System Python 3: sys.path = [ '/home/ncoghlan/devel/py3k', '/usr/lib64/python33.zip', '/usr/lib64/python3.3', '/usr/lib64/python3.3/plat-linux', '/usr/lib64/python3.3/lib-dynload', '/home/ncoghlan/.local/lib/python3.3/site-packages', '/usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages', '/usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages', ] My source checkout: sys.path = [ '/home/ncoghlan/devel/py3k', '/usr/local/lib/python35.zip', '/home/ncoghlan/devel/py3k/Lib', '/home/ncoghlan/devel/py3k/Lib/plat-linux', '/home/ncoghlan/devel/py3k/build/lib.linux-x86_64-3.5', '/home/ncoghlan/devel/py3k/Modules', '/home/ncoghlan/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages', ] We should probably have an explicit check for that in ensurepip so it bails out as an unsupported operation rather than doing something weird. Looking in sys.path for os.path.join(os.path.dirname(sys.executable), 'Lib') should be a fairly reliable indicator that we're running from a source checkout. Actually *fixing* it to do something sensible would require a lot of work on the sys.path initialisation code, and I frankly consider that impractical given the current state of getpath.c. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20071 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20071] What should happen if someone runs ./python -m ensurepip in the build environment?
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Note that if I find time to implement the startup sequence redesign for PEP 432/issue #22257 (which is finally starting to look like it may actually happen some time in the next few months), a proper fix may end up being possible for 3.5. We shouldn't bet on that, though, and the explicit failure is definitely the best we'll be able to do for 3.4 and the 2.7 backport. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20071 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22359] Remove incorrect uses of recursive make
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +doko ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22359 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22364] Unify error messages of re and regex
New submission from Serhiy Storchaka:
In some cases standard re module and third-party regex modules raise exceptions
with different error messages.
1. re.match(re.compile('.'), 'A', re.I)
re:Cannot process flags argument with a compiled pattern
regex: can't process flags argument with a compiled pattern
2. re.compile('(?Pfoo_123')
re:unterminated name
regex: missing
3. re.compile('(?Pfoo_123a)(?P=foo_123')
re:unterminated name
regex: missing )
4. regex.sub('(?Pax)', r'\ga', 'xx')
re:unterminated group name
regex: missing
5. re.sub('(?Pax)', r'\g', 'xx')
re:unterminated group name
regex: bad group name
6. re.sub('(?Pax)', r'\ga a', 'xx')
re:bad character in group name
regex: bad group name
7. re.sub('(?Pax)', r'\g-1', 'xx')
re:negative group number
regex: bad group name
8. re.compile('(?Pfoo_123a)(?P=!)')
re:bad character in backref group name '!'
regex: bad group name
9. re.sub('(?Pax)', r'\g', 'xx')
re:missing group name
regex: missing
10. re.compile('a\\')
re.sub('x', '\\', 'x')
re:bogus escape (end of line)
regex: bad escape
11. re.compile(r'\1')
re:bogus escape: '\1'
regex: unknown group
12. re.compile('[a-')
re:unexpected end of regular expression
regex: bad set
13. re.sub(b'.', 'b', b'c')
re:expected bytes, bytearray, or an object with the buffer interface, str
found
regex: expected bytes instance, str found
14. re.compile(r'\w', re.UNICODE | re.ASCII)
re:ASCII and UNICODE flags are incompatible
regex: ASCII, LOCALE and UNICODE flags are mutually incompatible
15. re.compile('(abc')
re:unbalanced parenthesis
regex: missing )
16. re.compile('abc)')
re:unbalanced parenthesis
regex: trailing characters in pattern
17. re.compile(r'((.)\1+)')
re:cannot refer to open group
regex: can't refer to an open group
Looks as in one case re messages are better, and in other cases regex messages
are better. In any case it would be good to unify error messages in both
modules.
--
components: Library (Lib), Regular Expressions
messages: 226575
nosy: ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Unify error messages of re and regex
type: enhancement
versions: Python 3.5
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22364
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22364] Unify error messages of re and regex
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: 18. re.compile(r'.???') re:multiple repeat regex: nothing to repeat at position 3 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22364 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22327] test_gdb failures on Ubuntu 14.10
Changes by Philippe Devalkeneer phil.le.bienheur...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +flupke ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22327 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22360] Adding manually offset parameter to str/bytes split function
Christoph Wruck added the comment:
Hi Steven
exactly - you're right with this.
'spam--eggs--cheesetoast'.split('-', offset=1)
-- ['spam', '-eggs', '-cheese', '-', '-toast']
'spam--eggs--cheese--toast'.split('-', offset=8)
-- ['spam', '-eggs--cheese', '-toast']
Okay - the name offset might be an unfortunate choice and you are right that
this could be hard to understand for a caller.
One more examples:
The following removes all escape signs to process the octal escape sequences in
a second way if the first three characters are digits.
'spam\\055055-eggs-rest'.split('\\', offset=1)
-- ['spam', '055', '\\055-eggs-', '\\rest']
# could speed up the split built-in func if a caller knows that every chunk is
3 chars long?
'tic-tac-toe'.split('-', offset=3)
A caller could use the offset parameter to keep all separators between
the last found and offset if it's a part of a chunk. Or if he awaiting a
separator followed by itself which should be keeped - in doubt with the same
length of separator.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22360
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14076] sqlite3 module ignores placeholders in CREATE TRIGGER code
Changes by Philippe Devalkeneer phil.le.bienheur...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +flupke ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14076 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22240] argparse support for python -m module in help
Miki Tebeka added the comment: Anything else I need to solve to get this patch accepted? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22240 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22360] Adding manually offset parameter to str/bytes split function
R. David Murray added the comment: If you want to do complex splitting, the supported way to do so is re.split. Feel free to take this to python-ideas if you think there is sufficient reason for baking a particular additional splitting functionality into str.split. -- nosy: +r.david.murray resolution: - rejected stage: - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22360 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22240] argparse support for python -m module in help
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com: -- stage: - patch review ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22240 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22360] Adding manually offset parameter to str/bytes split function
Christoph Wruck added the comment: Serhiy, you will be right if you've to split a complex string such spliting strings with more than one separator. In this case I would prefer a regex bases solution too. Otherwise we could actually use the re-lib for every of those jobs without using the fast built-in str/bytes split function. Unfortunately lags re.split/findall again str/bytes split function. -- resolution: rejected - status: closed - open ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22360 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21929] Rounding properly
Robert added the comment: I'm not sure if this is related or not, but on 3.4.1 I get the following: print(round(float(3/2))) 2 (as expected) print(round(float(5/2))) 2 (expected 3, as float should round .5 up) -- nosy: +fenofonts ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21929 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16662] load_tests not invoked in package/__init__.py
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw ba...@python.org: -- versions: +Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16662 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22359] Remove incorrect uses of recursive make
Changes by Brett Cannon br...@python.org: -- nosy: +brett.cannon ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22359 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11471] If without else generates redundant jump
Changes by Jesús Cea Avión j...@jcea.es: -- nosy: +jcea ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11471 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16662] load_tests not invoked in package/__init__.py
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw ba...@python.org: -- assignee: michael.foord - barry ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16662 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16662] load_tests not invoked in package/__init__.py
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw ba...@python.org: -- versions: -Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16662 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22365] SSLContext.load_verify_locations(cadata) does not accept CRLs
New submission from Ralph Broenink: Issue #18138 added support for the cadata argument in SSLContext.load_verify_locations. However, this argument does not support certificate revocation lists (CRLs) to be added (at least not in PEM format): ssl.SSLError: [PEM: NO_START_LINE] no start line (_ssl.c:2633) The documentation of this method is rather vague on this subject and does not state explicitly this is not allowed: This method can also load certification revocation lists (CRLs) in PEM or or DER format. In order to make use of CRLs, SSLContext.verify_flags must be configured properly. I think CRLs should be allowed to be loaded using the cadata argument. However, the documentation could use some polishing too: At least one of cafile or capath must be specified. is outdated since the introduction of cadata. -- components: Extension Modules messages: 226582 nosy: Ralph.Broenink priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: SSLContext.load_verify_locations(cadata) does not accept CRLs versions: Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22365 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22365] SSLContext.load_verify_locations(cadata) does not accept CRLs
Changes by Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +alex, christian.heimes, dstufft, giampaolo.rodola, janssen, pitrou ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22365 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21929] Rounding properly
Geoffrey Spear added the comment: Robert: That is not related. Python 3's round() function, as documented, rounds halves to the even choice; what you describe is the expected behavior. -- nosy: +geoffreyspear ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21929 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22339] Incorrect behavior when subclassing enum.Enum
Kiss György added the comment: Thanks for the tip! That looks much better. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22339 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16662] load_tests not invoked in package/__init__.py
Barry A. Warsaw added the comment: One thing I really do not like about Rob's last patch is that it exacerbates the documentation discrepancy for loadTestsFromModule(). As previously mentioned, use_load_tests arg was already not documented, and now the patch adds another undocumented pattern default arg. Undocumented unofficial APIs are really a fib - we treat them as official APIs for backward compatibility reasons anyway, so I think it behooves us to document them. In the same vein, the load_tests Protocol really should tell the truth about its third argument - i.e. it will not always be None. As Michael suggests in http://bugs.python.org/issue16662#msg200274 I think we should just remove use_load_tests. We'll still need to document the new pattern=None, unless there's a better way to handle that. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16662 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22299] resolve() on Windows makes some pathological paths unusable
Steve Dower added the comment:
Right, what the prefix actually means is treat this path as a blob and don't
do any processing. Some of the things that 'processing' includes are:
* CWD
* invalid names ('foo.' - 'foo')
* adjacent backslashes ('a\\b' - 'a\b')
* forward slashes ('a/b' - 'a\b')
* (probably) short/long file names ('progra~1' - 'Program Files')
A nice side-effect is that you can also use path names longer than 260
characters, provided your path name is correctly normalized already.
Really, the test for whether to keep or remove the prefix should be to remove
the prefix and try and resolve the path again. If it succeeds, remove the
prefix; otherwise, keep it. This can only really be done as part of the
resolve() call, which would address the original issue, but it may be quite a
perf. hit.
I'd still be inclined to add the prefix in str() if the final path length is
greater than 260 characters, if only because we go from zero chance of it
working to a non-zero chance. Unfortunately, there seems to be no way to
process a long path to make it 'safe' to add the prefix (though we can do a few
of the things and increase the chances) as GetFinalPathName will not work on a
long path. FWIW, paths longer than 260 chars are a mess and everyone knows it,
but it's really really hard to fix without breaking back-compat.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22299
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22253] ConfigParser does not handle files without sections
Guido van Rossum added the comment: It looks like this feature request tries to change an existing (ancient) module into something it isn't. At the very least can you point to a spec for the syntax of POSIX config files? I always thought they were essentially shell scripts, which suggests that they might have a more complex (and different) quoting syntax than ConfigParser, so there might be cases where the interpretation of a line in a POSIX config file would be different than the interpretation of the same line in a .ini file. -- nosy: +gvanrossum ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22253 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue826897] Proto 2 pickle vs dict subclass
Andres Riancho added the comment: Well, closing this as wont-fix is far from ideal. +4 years have past from the last activity in this issue but people are still being hit by this issue. In my case I'm not creating any special sub-class, I just use one of Python's built-in libs: ```python import cPickle import Cookie c = Cookie.SimpleCookie() c['abc'] = 'def' unpickled_highest = cPickle.loads(cPickle.dumps(c, cPickle.HIGHEST_PROTOCOL)) unpickled_default = cPickle.loads(cPickle.dumps(c)) print c['abc'].value, c['abc'].value print unpickled_default['abc'].value, unpickled_default['abc'].value print unpickled_highest['abc'].value, unpickled_highest['abc'].value assert unpickled_default['abc'].value == c['abc'].value assert unpickled_highest['abc'].value == c['abc'].value ``` I know there is a work-around (subclass SimpleCookie, override methods, etc.) but it's still going to be something that others will have to implement on their own, they are going to spend time debugging the issue until they reach this bug report, etc. Batteries included should focus on cutting down development time, and this issue increases dev time by introducing strange/hidden limitations to pickle. Is there any plan to actually fix this in the long term? -- nosy: +Andres.Riancho ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue826897 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16662] load_tests not invoked in package/__init__.py
Barry A. Warsaw added the comment: pattern will have to be documented and accepted as official API -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16662 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16662] load_tests not invoked in package/__init__.py
Barry A. Warsaw added the comment: So, I think what I'm going to do is change the sig of the method to: def loadTestsFromModule(self, module, *args, pattern=None, **kws): I.e. the new `pattern` arg will be keyword-only. *args and **kws will be parsed for use_load_tests usage and a deprecation warning will be issued if found, but the argument will be ignored. load_tests() will always be called if it's found. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16662 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue826897] Proto 2 pickle vs dict subclass
Andres Riancho added the comment: Django's issue [0] shows the ugly code people write to work around this python bug. [0] https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15863 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue826897 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22353] re.findall() documentation lacks information about finding THE LAST iteration of repeated capturing group (greedy)
Guido van Rossum added the comment: Then let's close this issue. -- resolution: - not a bug status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22353 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue826897] Proto 2 pickle vs dict subclass
Changes by Andres Riancho andres.rian...@gmail.com: -- versions: +Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue826897 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue826897] Proto 2 pickle vs dict subclass
Changes by Andres Riancho andres.rian...@gmail.com: -- type: - behavior ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue826897 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22253] ConfigParser does not handle files without sections
Paul Moore added the comment: It's not unreasonable as a new feature, but the default behaviour shouldn't change. It matches ini files (like it or not, ConfigParser parses ini-style files - the docs even say so), and sectionless values are not standard ini format. I'd suggest a new __init__ option, allow_unnamed_section (default False) that permits variables to be placed before the first section header. I'd further suggest that the names be treated as if they were in a section with name '', for consistency of access with other sections. It's plausible that people might want the defaults section to be the unnamed section. If so, that could be another option, default_is_unnamed (default False, if True this implies allow_unnamed_section). But I'm not sure the additional complexity is worth it. -- nosy: +pmoore ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22253 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22366] urllib.request.urlopen shoudl take a context (SSLContext) argument
New submission from Alex Gaynor: Instead of the ca* arguments it currently takes, these can all be encapsulated into an SSLContext argument, which the underlying http.client already supports. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 226594 nosy: alex, christian.heimes, dstufft, giampaolo.rodola, janssen, orsenthil, pitrou priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: urllib.request.urlopen shoudl take a context (SSLContext) argument versions: Python 3.4, Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22366 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22366] urllib.request.urlopen shoudl take a context (SSLContext) argument
Alex Gaynor added the comment: Attached patch against the default branch adds support for this. -- keywords: +needs review, patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36573/urlopen-context.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22366 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16662] load_tests not invoked in package/__init__.py
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset d0ff527c53da by Barry Warsaw in branch 'default': - Issue #16662: load_tests() is now unconditionally run when it is present in http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/d0ff527c53da -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16662 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16662] load_tests not invoked in package/__init__.py
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw ba...@python.org: -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16662 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21931] Nonsense errors reported by msilib.FCICreate for bad argument
Jeffrey Armstrong added the comment: Is this patch going to be accepted? It fixes actual incorrect code in msilib, and it seems to have stagnated -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21931 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20597] PATH_MAX already defined on some Windows compilers
Jeffrey Armstrong added the comment: Was this ever accepted? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20597 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22364] Unify error messages of re and regex
Steven D'Aprano added the comment: I'm dubious about this issue. It suggests that the wording of the exceptions is part of the API of the two modules. If the idea is just to copy the best error messages from one module to the other, then I guess there is no harm. But if the idea is to guarantee to keep the two modules' messages in sync, then I think it is unnecessary and harmful. -- nosy: +steven.daprano ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22364 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16662] load_tests not invoked in package/__init__.py
Robert Collins added the comment:
Thanks for landing this barry, there's a couple quirks with your improvements -
loadTestsFromModule(mod, foo, bar) will raise a TypeError but not warn about
foo the way loadTestsFromModule(mod, foo) will.
Secondly, the TypeError has an off-by-one error in its output:
loadTestsFromModule(mod, foo, bar) will claim 2 arguments were passed. Three
were.
diff -r d0ff527c53da Lib/unittest/loader.py
--- a/Lib/unittest/loader.pyMon Sep 08 14:21:37 2014 -0400
+++ b/Lib/unittest/loader.pyTue Sep 09 07:32:05 2014 +1200
@@ -79,12 +79,12 @@
# use_load_tests argument. For backward compatibility, we still
# accept the argument (which can also be the first position) but we
# ignore it and issue a deprecation warning if it's present.
-if len(args) == 1 or 'use_load_tests' in kws:
+if len(args) or 'use_load_tests' in kws:
warnings.warn('use_load_tests is deprecated and ignored',
DeprecationWarning)
kws.pop('use_load_tests', None)
if len(args) 1:
-raise TypeError('loadTestsFromModule() takes 1 positional argument
but {} were given'.format(len(args)))
+raise TypeError('loadTestsFromModule() takes 1 positional argument
but {} were given'.format(len(args) + 1))
if len(kws) != 0:
# Since the keyword arguments are unsorted (see PEP 468), just
# pick the alphabetically sorted first argument to complain about,
diff -r d0ff527c53da Lib/unittest/test/test_loader.py
--- a/Lib/unittest/test/test_loader.py Mon Sep 08 14:21:37 2014 -0400
+++ b/Lib/unittest/test/test_loader.py Tue Sep 09 07:32:05 2014 +1200
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@
# however use_load_tests (which sorts first) is ignored.
self.assertEqual(
str(cm.exception),
-'loadTestsFromModule() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were
given')
+'loadTestsFromModule() takes 1 positional argument but 3 were
given')
@warningregistry
def test_loadTestsFromModule__use_load_tests_other_bad_keyword(self):
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16662
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16662] load_tests not invoked in package/__init__.py
Robert Collins added the comment: OH! One more thing I just spotted, which is that this change causes non-'discover' unittest test loading to invoke load_tests. IMO this is the Right Thing - its what I intended when I described the protocol a few years back, but we should document it, no? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16662 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue826897] Proto 2 pickle vs dict subclass
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Alexandre or Antoine, do either of you want to either reopen or verify that this dict subclass pickle issue was properly closed as won't fix? -- nosy: +alexandre.vassalotti, pitrou ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue826897 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17401] io.FileIO closefd parameter is not documented nor shown in repr
Robert Collins added the comment: Its more than just a docs issue - AFAICT it isn't possible to tell if closefd is set after the object is created. The presence of the parameter in the signature is there, but it isn't documented *where the bulk of the FileIO parameters are* - there are docs for mode for instance. Why would we force users to follow breadcrumbs for one parameter but not other ones? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17401 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16662] load_tests not invoked in package/__init__.py
Michael Foord added the comment: I agree, load_tests should be honoured even when not invoked through discovery. If that wasn't the case it was an unfortunate oversight on my part! -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16662 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue826897] Proto 2 pickle vs dict subclass
Andres Riancho added the comment: FYI, I'm using Python 2.7.6 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue826897 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22240] argparse support for python -m module in help
paul j3 added the comment: When I apply `prog3.diff` to my 3.5.0dev, and run python3 -m unittest Lib/test/test_argparse.py I get 2 failures, both over 'usage: python3 -m [unit]test'. It also fails with python3 test_argparse.py I suspect it would also fail if I ran the tests with `nosetests` (though I'm not setup to use that in the development version). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22240 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17401] io.FileIO closefd parameter is not documented nor shown in repr
Robert Collins added the comment: Oh - the the 'open' function docs are fine - they are just a pointer. I was specifically referring to the class docs around line 513 of Doc/library/io.rst. Attached is a patch that changes repr to show this attribute and extends the docs to document this as part of FileIO. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36574/issue17401.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17401 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17381] IGNORECASE breaks unicode literal range matching
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: No, issue12728 is more complicate case. Here is a patch which fixes this issue and issue3511. -- assignee: - serhiy.storchaka keywords: +patch stage: - patch review versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.3 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36575/re_ignore_case_range.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17381 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22366] urllib.request.urlopen shoudl take a context (SSLContext) argument
Alex Gaynor added the comment: Added a versionchanged directive to the docs. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36576/urlopen-context.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22366 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22367] Please add F_OFD_SETLK, etc support to fcntl.lockf
New submission from Andrew Lutomirski: Linux 3.15 and newer support a vastly superior API for file locking, in which locks are owned by open file descriptions instead of by processes. This is how everyone seems to expect POSIX locks to work, but now they can finally work that way. Please add some interface to these locks to fcntl.lockf. One option would be to use them by default and to fall back to standard POSIX locks if they're not available. I don't know whether this would break existing code. See http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/fcntl.2.html for details. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 226610 nosy: Andrew.Lutomirski priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Please add F_OFD_SETLK, etc support to fcntl.lockf type: enhancement versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22367 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16662] load_tests not invoked in package/__init__.py
Robert Collins added the comment: @michael - ah I think I inverted the sense of the old parameter. It was defaulting True. So - no need to document anything extra:) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16662 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19746] No introspective way to detect ModuleImportFailure in unittest
Robert Collins added the comment: Here is an implementation. I'm probably missing some finesse in the docs. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36577/issue19746.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19746 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16662] load_tests not invoked in package/__init__.py
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 92b292d68104 by Barry Warsaw in branch 'default': A few tweaks for issue16662 based on feedback from Robert Collins. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/92b292d68104 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16662 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7559] TestLoader.loadTestsFromName swallows import errors
Robert Collins added the comment: I've just put a patch up for the related issue http://bugs.python.org/issue19746 I'll poke at this one briefly now, since I'm across the related code. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7559 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22361] Ability to join() threads in concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor
Josh Rosenberg added the comment: Can you explain what benefit this would provide? Forcing the thread to exit gets you relatively little benefit. If it's an infrequently used executor, I suppose you avoid the cost of leaving worker threads blocked waiting for work, but that cost is tiny, and you pay for it with increased overhead to dispatch new tasks since they have to create new threads instead of using existing worker threads. -- nosy: +josh.rosenberg ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22361 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7559] TestLoader.loadTestsFromName swallows import errors
Robert Collins added the comment: Ok, here is an implementation that I believe covers everything Michael wanted. I examined the other patches, and can rearrange my implementation to be more like them if desired - but at the heart of this this bug really has two requested changes: - deferred reporting of error per Michaels request - report missing attributes on packages as an ImportError (if one occurred) and thus my implementation focuses on those changes. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36578/issue7559.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7559 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18232] running a suite with no tests is not an error
Robert Collins added the comment: @Terry in principle you're right, there are an arbitrary number of things that can go wrong, but in practice what we see is either catastrophic failure where nothing is loaded at all *and* no error is returned or localised failure where the deferred reporting of failed imports serves quite well enough. The former is caused by things like the wrong path in a configuration file. @ezio sure - a boolean option would meet the needs reported to me, I was suggesting a specific implementation in an attempt to be generic enough to not need to maintain two things if more was added in future. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18232 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22361] Ability to join() threads in concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor
Changes by Ned Deily n...@acm.org: -- nosy: +bquinlan ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22361 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22363] argparse AssertionError with add_mutually_exclusive_group and help=SUPPRESS
Zacrath added the comment: This assert statement is only reached when the usage line is long enough that it needs to be wrapped. Which is why the assertion does not happen when an argument is removed. opt_usage is being compared to this string: [-h] [--arg2 ARG2] [--arg3 ARG3] [--arg4 ARG4] [--arg5 ARG5] [--arg6 ARG6] opt_usage in this case has the value: [-h] [--arg2 ARG2] [--arg3 ARG3] [--arg4 ARG4] [--arg5 ARG5] [--arg6 ARG6] There is an extra space after [-h]. The value of opt_usage comes from _format_actions_usage. And that is where the bug is. Just before _format_actions_usage returns, the usage string is: [-h] [ ] [--arg2 ARG2] [--arg3 ARG3] [--arg4 ARG4] [--arg5 ARG5] [--arg6 ARG6] The method uses this regexp: [ *] To remove the extra brackets. But that leaves the extra space after the brackets. The attached patch changes the regexp to: [ *] ? So that the extra space is also removed. The patch also adds a testcase based on the script that reproduces the -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36579/bugfix.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22363 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
