On Wednesday, July 15, 2015 at 11:30:40 PM UTC-5, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 07/15/2015 07:03 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
too much to quote
I think you've missed the whole point of the OP's project.
Obviously my reply was not only too much to quote, but
apparently, and sadly, too much to read!
On 16 July 2015 at 20:03, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
The trouble with that is that it can quickly run you out memory when
you accidentally trigger infinite recursion. A classic example is a
simple wrapper function...
def print(msg):
print(ctime()+ +msg)
With the recursion
Hello,
I was trying to see how some have implemented a hashtable. I took a gather at
dictobject.h/.c. It seems that underneath it all it's a linked list and that
is used in order to store the actual information (I'm looking at PyDictEntry.)
Am I correct in my assumption or is there more to
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - out of date
stage: - resolved
status: pending - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24630
___
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Joonas Liik liik.joo...@gmail.com wrote:
That all sounds reasonable. However that can be looked another way.
Soppose you have some code that traverses some tree, a strange
imbalanced tree (say from some xml)
It is, semantically at least, a reasonable aproach
On 07/16/2015 01:07 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
The point is, people keep insisting that there are a vast number of
algorithms which are best expressed using recursion and which require TCO to
be practical, and yet when asked for examples they either can't give any
examples at all, or they give
I was trying to see how some have implemented a hashtable. I took a gather
at dictobject.h/.c. It seems that underneath it all it's a linked list and
that is used in order to store the actual information (I'm looking at
PyDictEntry.)
Am I correct in my assumption or is there more to
On 16 July 2015 at 20:49, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
This sounds like a denial-of-service attack. If you can state that no
reasonable document will ever have more than 100 levels of nesting,
then you can equally state that cutting the parser off with a tidy
exception if it exceeds
R. David Murray added the comment:
Please open individual issues to address individual modules that you would like
to contribute to improving. Adding/fixing help is often best done by rewriting
the argument parsing...contributions have been made to improve several modules
already. In most
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 03:34 am, Joonas Liik wrote:
Now i admit that it is possible to have infinite recursion but it is
also possiblew to have infinite loops. and we don't kill your code
after 1000 iterations of a while loop so why should we treat recursion
any differently?
Because a while
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 08:41 pm, Antoon Pardon wrote:
On 07/16/2015 10:07 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wednesday 15 July 2015 19:29, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Suppose I start with the following:
def even(n):
True if n == 0 else odd(n - 1)
def odd(n):
False if n == 0 else even(n - 1)
On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 1:14:22 AM UTC-7, INADA Naoki wrote:
How about `python3 -m venv` ?
I guess that works, thanks.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:54 AM, David Karr davidmic...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just learning more about Python (although I've been a Java dev for many
years, and C/C++
On 16 July 2015 at 21:58, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 03:34 am, Joonas Liik wrote:
Now i admit that it is possible to have infinite recursion but it is
also possiblew to have infinite loops. and we don't kill your code
after 1000 iterations of a while loop
On 7/16/2015 7:45 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
Traceback are not the only or even the most useful
tool for debugging code. The current stack trace
doesn't even contain the value's of the variables
on the stack.
R. David Murray added the comment:
I can't see doing io in __repr__ ever making sense, so I'm not sure this is a
use case we care about. But Vinay might not have any objection to removing
locking if it is redundant, so we'll see what he has to say.
--
On 7/15/2015 9:03 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
You may have solved your input capturing problem, and i
don't think a GUI is the preferred solution for a
graphically deficient device anyhow, but you may well need a
GUI in the future, and this would be a fine example from which
to learn.
This really
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Fine by me. What is the mapping API that needs to be implemented though?
Have a look at collections.MutableMapping.
--
Zach
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu writes:
On 7/15/2015 9:51 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
What well-defined data type exists with the following properties:
* Mapping, key → value.
* Each key is a sequence (e.g. `tuple`) of items such as text strings.
* Items in a key may be the sentinel `ANY`
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Thanks. The part which puzzle me though: How do we teach the mapping
type about that matching behaviour?
I'm not sure you really need a mapping type per se. The benefit of
something like Python's dict is that it gives
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com writes:
I'm not sure you really need a mapping type per se.
My reasons include (but I can probably think of more) testing membership
via the ‘key in mapping’ syntax.
with the match any concept, there's actually a potential for
ambiguities, which means you need
On 07/15/2015 10:53 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info writes:
You can't use a dict for the mapping, not unless you're smarter than
me, due to the requirement to hash the keys.
Dang. It's the mapping that I really need to solve, I think. A mapping
that has a custom
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
Benchmark results look good to me (although a header line is missing) and seem
to match my expectations. Sounds like we should allow this change.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us writes:
On 07/15/2015 10:53 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Are those the ‘__contains__’, ‘__getitem__’ methods? What actually
is the API of a mapping type, that would need to be customised for
this application?
The problem is that potential key matches are found by
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
I think this is due to PEP 420 Namespace Packages.
It works on Python 2 too:
$ ls execdir/
foo.py __main__.py
$ cat execdir/foo.py
print(foo imported)
$ cat execdir/__main__.py
import foo; print(main imported)
$ python execdir/
foo imported
main imported
$
On 07/15/2015 11:19 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/15/2015 5:29 AM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Can you explain how you would do mutual recursive functions?
Suppose I start with the following:
def even(n):
True if n == 0 else odd(n - 1)
def odd(n):
False if n == 0 else even(n - 1)
How
How about `python3 -m venv` ?
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:54 AM, David Karr davidmichaelk...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm just learning more about Python (although I've been a Java dev for
many years, and C/C++ before that).
A book I'm reading (Learning Python Network Programming) refers to running
New submission from Alex Walters:
I use the *.msi installers for python to automate deployment of... an absurd
number of python installations. I have been able to do this relatively easily,
as the Windows installer didn't change much between 2.6 and 3.4 (possibly much
longer than that, but I
Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au:
What well-defined data type exists with the following properties:
* Mapping, key → value.
* Each key is a sequence (e.g. `tuple`) of items such as text strings.
* Items in a key may be the sentinel `ANY` value, which will match any
value at that
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 5c3812412b6f by Raymond Hettinger in branch '3.5':
Issue #24583: Fix crash when set is mutated while being updated.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/5c3812412b6f
New changeset 05cb67dab161 by Raymond Hettinger in branch 'default':
Issue #24583:
On Wednesday 15 July 2015 19:29, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Suppose I start with the following:
def even(n):
True if n == 0 else odd(n - 1)
def odd(n):
False if n == 0 else even(n - 1)
Well, both of those always return None, so can be optimized to:
even = odd = lambda x: None
:-)
Robin Becker ro...@reportlab.com:
which is said to be not primitive recursive ie cannot be unwound
into loops; not sure whether that implies it has to be recursively
defined or can perhaps be broken down some other way. For more
eye-glazing
You only need a single while loop plus primitive
Steve Hayes wrote in message
news:gaibqatads4eamjchr9k4f5tau30un2...@4ax.com...
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:31:31 -0700 (PDT), trentonwesle...@gmail.com
wrote:
Greetings!
You been Invited as a Beta User for TheGongzuo.com ( Absolutely Extended
Trial).
We bring to you TheGongzuo.com, Top notch
I'm ill, so I am not trusting my own reasoning further than I can
jump (not too far today) but I don't think you have a problem that
is well-suited to a mapping. But it seems like a perfect fit
for a tree, to me.
Laura
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
..
The point is, people keep insisting that there are a vast number of
algorithms which are best expressed using recursion and which require TCO to
be practical, and yet when asked for examples they either can't give any
examples at all, or they give examples that are not well-suited to
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
See also #24632.
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
type: - enhancement
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17359
___
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com:
--
components: +Installation
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24642
___
___
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
Fixing the obvious mistake (failing to return anything) leads to the next
mistake. When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
def even(n):
return n%2 == 0
def odd(n):
return n%2 !=
On 16/07/2015 09:07, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
.
Fixing the obvious mistake (failing to return anything) leads to the next
mistake. When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
def even(n):
return n%2 == 0
def odd(n):
return n%2 != 0
..
what about
def
Matthieu Gautier added the comment:
The bug is also present in Python 2.7.
Is it possible to backport this fix ?
--
versions: +Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23319
On 07/16/2015 10:07 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wednesday 15 July 2015 19:29, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Suppose I start with the following:
def even(n):
True if n == 0 else odd(n - 1)
def odd(n):
False if n == 0 else even(n - 1)
Well, both of those always return None, so can be
Changes by Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24583
___
Changes by Ronald Oussoren ronaldousso...@mac.com:
--
nosy: +ronaldoussoren
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24621
___
___
Zachary Ware zachary.ware+pyl...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au
wrote:
Fine by me. What is the mapping API that needs to be implemented though?
Have a look at collections.MutableMapping.
Thank you, that's great! I hadn't realised
On 16/07/2015 07:37, Ben Finney wrote:
Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us writes:
On 07/15/2015 10:53 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Are those the ‘__contains__’, ‘__getitem__’ methods? What actually
is the API of a mapping type, that would need to be customised for
this application?
The problem is
Davide Rizzo added the comment:
As far as I understand, assuming dir/ contains a __main__.py file
$ python dir
is equivalent to
$ python dir/__main__.py
in that it's behaviourally nothing more than executing a script in that dir and
setting sys.path accordingly. This is the same in Python 2
On 16/07/2015 08:09, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 16/07/2015 07:37, Ben Finney wrote:
Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us writes:
On 07/15/2015 10:53 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Are those the ‘__contains__’, ‘__getitem__’ methods? What actually
is the API of a mapping type, that would need to be customised
On 07/16/2015 12:43 AM, Gregory Ewing wrote:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
But it doesn't need to be all or nothing. How about the following
possibility.
When the runtime detects a serie of tail calls, it will keep the bottom three
and the top three backtrace records of the serie.
Whatever value
On 7/16/2015 12:30 AM, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 07/15/2015 07:03 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
too much to quote
I think you've missed the whole point of the OP's project. He doesn't
want to make a GUI. He simply wants to have his program do something
like blink an LED when someone presses a big
-Original Message-
From: Python-list [mailto:python-list-
bounces+dk068x=att@python.org] On Behalf Of Mark Lawrence
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 3:23 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Where is pyvenv.py in new Python3.4 environment on
CentOS7?
On 15/07/2015 22:54,
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
unzip can't proceed this file too.
$ unzip -v not_working.zip
Archive: not_working.zip
End-of-central-directory signature not found. Either this file is not
a zipfile, or it constitutes one disk of a multi-part archive. In the
latter case the
On 16/07/2015 08:11, Ben Finney wrote:
Zachary Ware zachary.ware+pyl...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Fine by me. What is the mapping API that needs to be implemented though?
Have a look at collections.MutableMapping.
Thank
Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be writes:
On 07/13/2015 05:44 PM, Th. Baruchel wrote:
Hi, after having spent much time thinking about tail-call elimination
in Python (see for instance http://baruchel.github.io/blog/ ), I finally
decided to write a module for that. You may find it at:
Matthew Barnett added the comment:
There's an executable installer; it's a .exe instead of a .msi.
--
nosy: +mrabarnett
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24642
___
On 07/16/2015 01:11 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
Fixing the obvious mistake (failing to return anything) leads to the next
mistake. When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
def even(n):
Robin Becker wrote:
I believe the classic answer is Ackermann's function
http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/RecursionInTheAckermannFunction/
which is said to be not primitive recursive ie cannot be unwound into
loops; not sure whether that implies it has to be recursively defined or
can
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
Of course they could be rather trivially reimplemented. They would
also become rather ugly and less easy to comprehend.
Here is one way to do the odd, even example.
def even(n):
return odd_even('even',
New submission from James Salter:
For python 3.5, PC/pyconfig.h contains the following for vs2015 support:
/* VS 2015 defines these names with a leading underscore */
#if _MSC_VER = 1900
#define timezone _timezone
#define daylight _daylight
#define tzname _tzname
#endif
This breaks any python
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
On 07/16/2015 01:45 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
I would say, that someone should get over himself.
Traceback are not the only
Zachary Ware added the comment:
I suppose we'll have to resort to
#ifndef _Py_timezone
#if _MSC_VER = 1900
#define _Py_timezone _timezone
#else
#define _Py_timezone timezone
#endif
#endif
...
--
components: +Build, Windows -Extension Modules
nosy: +paul.moore, steve.dower, tim.golden,
On 07/16/2015 03:47 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
Any collection of functions that tail calls each other can rather
trivially be turned into a state machine like the above. You can
just paste in the code of the
On 07/16/2015 04:00 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
Fine, I should have been more clear.
The stack trace as it is generally produced on stderr after an uncought
exception, doesn't contain the values of the
On 07/16/2015 01:45 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
I would say, that someone should get over himself.
Traceback are not the only or even the most useful
tool for debugging code. The current stack trace
doesn't
Steve Dower added the comment:
Or we could define _timezone on those platforms that don't have the underscore.
I'm not hugely fussed either way. We need to fix this though.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
My point was that I have yet to see
anything that demands TCO and can't be algorithmically improved.
And how is this point relevant? Why should I care about what you have
not seen? Will it give me new insights
STINNER Victor added the comment:
Can't we move the #define only in .c files where they are needed? Or in a
private header (not included by Python.h)?
--
nosy: +haypo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24643
Steve Dower added the comment:
That's probably an option, though it would break extensions that use `timezone`
expecting it to work. But it seems like any change is going to cause that.
I prefer defining _Py_timezone, since at least we can offer something that is
portable for all Python 3.5
On 07/16/2015 04:27 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
My point was that I have yet to see
anything that demands TCO and can't be algorithmically improved.
And how is this point relevant? Why should I care about what
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Joonas Liik liik.joo...@gmail.com wrote:
Wouldn't it be possible to have like a dynamically
sized stack so that you can grow it endlessly
with some acceptable overhead..
That would pretty much take care of the stack-overflow
argument without many painful side
On 07/16/2015 09:43 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
True. That said, though, it's not a justification for dropping stack
frames; even in the form that's printed to stderr, there is immense
value in them. It may be possible to explicitly drop frames that a
programmer believes won't be useful, but a
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
On 07/16/2015 12:43 AM, Gregory Ewing wrote:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
But it doesn't need to be all or nothing. How about the following
possibility.
When the runtime detects a serie of tail calls, it will keep
===
Announcing bcolz 0.10.0
===
What's new
==
This is a cleanup-and-refactor release with many internal optimizations
and a few bug fixes. For users, the most important improvement is the
new-and-shiny context manager for bcolz objects. For example
New submission from Antony Lee:
Support for python -mrunnable-stdlib-module [-h|--help] is a bit patchy right
now:
$ python -mpdb -h
usage: pdb.py [-c command] ... pyfile [arg] ...
help elided
$ python -mpdb --help
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/python3.4/runpy.py, line
Brad Larsen added the comment:
Yeah, this appears to be fixed along with #24552.
--
status: open - pending
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24630
___
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
On 07/16/2015 04:00 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
Fine, I should have been more clear.
The stack trace as it is generally
Aaron Hill added the comment:
I've added a test case to exercise reset()
--
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file39934/fix-multibytecodec-segfault-with-test.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23247
Wouldn't it be possible to have like a dynamically
sized stack so that you can grow it endlessly
with some acceptable overhead..
That would pretty much take care of the stack-overflow
argument without many painful side effects on
the semantics at least..
--
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Robin Becker ro...@reportlab.com wrote:
..
The point is, people keep insisting that there are a vast number of
algorithms which are best expressed using recursion and which require TCO
to
be practical, and yet when asked for examples they either
On Wednesday, July 15, 2015 at 10:45:12 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
A GUI is another form of console.
And a blindingly obvious association is another form of
patronizing! What's next, are you going to tell us that a
Volvo is a street-legal Scandinavian version of an armored
personal
Justin Bronder added the comment:
On 16/07/15 20:03 +, R. David Murray wrote:
R. David Murray added the comment:
Can you expand on the deadlock? Are you saying that the extra locking is
causing the deadlock?
--
nosy: +r.david.murray, vinay.sajip
versions: -Python 3.2,
Changes by Aaron Meurer aaron.meu...@continuum.io:
--
nosy: +Aaron Meurer
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19918
___
___
On 07/16/2015 11:22 AM, Rick Johnson wrote:
On Wednesday, July 15, 2015 at 11:30:40 PM UTC-5, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 07/15/2015 07:03 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
too much to quote
I think you've missed the whole point of the OP's project.
Obviously my reply was not only too much to quote,
On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 3:11:56 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
Where's the latest survey results? I think the numbers don't agree
with you any more.
Not that there's a source for that info, but a quick survey of yahoo
results certainly continues to show more v2 activity.
--anytime--
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Joonas Liik liik.joo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 July 2015 at 20:49, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
This sounds like a denial-of-service attack. If you can state that no
reasonable document will ever have more than 100 levels of nesting,
then you can
New submission from Justin Bronder:
The Queue backing the QueueHandler is already sufficiently locking for
thread-safety.
This isn't a huge issue, but the QueueHandler is a very nice built-in which
could be used to work around a deadlock I've encountered several times. In
brief, functions
Steve Dower added the comment:
It's not, but #include python.h in any extension will make it available for
you, so it's very likely that extensions have simply used it without adding
their own conditional compilation for the various interpretations of whether
timezone is standard or not.
Bit
On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 3:11:56 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
Where's the latest survey results? I think the numbers don't agree
with you any more.
What? You think the handful of regulars on this list in any
way shape or form somehow represents the multitude of *REAL*
python programmers
Mark Shannon added the comment:
+1 from me.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23601
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:36 PM, yoursurrogate...@gmail.com
yoursurrogate...@gmail.com wrote:
If I understand correctly, lookup would not be a constant, yes?
On the contrary, that's what you desire, nearly constant time
execution. To the greatest extent possible, you want the linked lists
to be
New submission from Jussi Pakkanen:
Create a dummy certificate and build an ssl context like this:
ctx = ssl.SSLContext(ssl.PROTOCOL_TLSv1)
ctx.verify_mode = ssl.CERT_REQUIRED
ctx.load_verify_locations(cadata=dummy_certificate)
Then try to connect to a public service like this:
u =
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Rick Johnson
rantingrickjohn...@gmail.com wrote:
but a vast majority of the Python community is currently
using, and will for many years continue using, Python3.0.
Where's the latest survey results? I think the numbers don't agree
with you any more.
ChrisA
--
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 35a6fe0e2b27 by Victor Stinner in branch '3.4':
Closes #23247: Fix a crash in the StreamWriter.reset() of CJK codecs
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/35a6fe0e2b27
--
nosy: +python-dev
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - resolved
STINNER Victor added the comment:
For me, it's not the responsability of python.h to ensure that the
timezone symbol is available.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24643
___
Steve Dower added the comment:
Agreed. However, I also don't want extensions to stop building because of a
change we make. But since that's inevitable here, let's go with Zach's original
suggestion and use a name that won't conflict. (IIRC, I originally put the
#ifdefs in each file and was
New submission from Antony Lee:
Currently the argparse docs mention the special values +, * and ? by
their actual values instead of argparse.{ONE_OR_MORE,ZERO_OR_MORE,OPTIONAL},
but argparse.REMAINDER is mentioned as is. It seems easier to just use its
actual value (...) in the docs as well.
New submission from Mark Shannon:
Issue 23601 advocates using the small object allocator for dict-keys objects
and the results of tests are good.
Using the small object allocator for dict value-arrays as well seems like the
obvious next step.
--
components: Interpreter Core
keywords:
On 7/16/2015 2:02 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 07/16/2015 06:35 AM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Here is one way to do the odd, even example.
def even(n):
return odd_even('even', n)
def odd(n):
return odd_even('odd', n)
def odd_even(fn, n):
while fn is not None:
if fn ==
Nobody seemed to notice that I just posted a fairly typical tail call
function:
def setvalue(self, keyseq, value, offset=0):
try:
next = keyseq[offset]
except IndexError:
Mark Shannon added the comment:
Yes, but that shouldn't block this issue.
I've opened issue 24648 instead.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23601
___
On 07/16/2015 12:14 PM, Joonas Liik wrote:
You are giving the programmer a choice between run out of stack and
crash and mutilate interpreter internals and crash or zero out the
hard drive this is not a real choice..
+1
--
~Ethan~
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
R. David Murray added the comment:
Can you expand on the deadlock? Are you saying that the extra locking is
causing the deadlock?
--
nosy: +r.david.murray, vinay.sajip
versions: -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
