Mike McClain writes:
> Let's say I want something that does most or all of foo's
> functionality plus a little more and maybe tweek some of foo's
> output, so I write a wrapper around foo and call it bar.
> If inside bar are the call to foo, as well as methods baz(),
> buz() and bug() that mak
This is regarding numpy array. I am a bit confused how parts of the array are
being accessed in the example below.
1 import scipy as sp
2 data = sp.genfromtxt("web_traffic.tsv", delimiter="\t")
3 print(data[:10])
4 x = data[:,0]
5 y = data[:,1]
Apparently, line 3 prints the first 10 entries in t
Let's say I want something that does most or all of foo's
functionality plus a little more and maybe tweek some of foo's
output, so I write a wrapper around foo and call it bar.
If inside bar are the call to foo, as well as methods baz(),
buz() and bug() that make their magic and bar ends up pe
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 11:10 AM, bartc wrote:
> On 19/05/2018 02:00, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 18 May 2018 20:42:05 -0400, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>>
>>> Unfortunately -- in the current era, "text" means "a defined
>>
>> encoding",
>>
>> Text has ALWAYS meant "a defined encodi
On 19/05/2018 02:00, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2018 20:42:05 -0400, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
Unfortunately -- in the current era, "text" means "a defined
encoding",
Text has ALWAYS meant "a defined encoding". It is just that for a long
time, people could get away with assu
On 19/05/2018 01:42, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2018 22:53:06 +0100, bartc declaimed the
following:
I've worked with text files for 40 years. Now Python is telling me I've
been doing it wrong all that time!
Look at the original code I posted from which this Python was based.
Tha
On Fri, 18 May 2018 20:42:05 -0400, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> Unfortunately -- in the current era, "text" means "a defined
encoding",
Text has ALWAYS meant "a defined encoding". It is just that for a long
time, people could get away with assuming that the encoding they used was
the *onl
On 19/05/2018 01:00, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 7:53 AM, bartc wrote:
I've worked with text files for 40 years. Now Python is telling me I've been
doing it wrong all that time!
Look at the original code I posted from which this Python was based. That
creates a file - just a
On Fri, 18 May 2018 22:53:06 +0100, bartc wrote:
> I've worked with text files for 40 years. Now Python is telling me I've
> been doing it wrong all that time!
Welcome to the 20th Century! We interchange text and data with
people from all over the world now, and one or two of them use
characters
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 7:53 AM, bartc wrote:
> I've worked with text files for 40 years. Now Python is telling me I've been
> doing it wrong all that time!
>
> Look at the original code I posted from which this Python was based. That
> creates a file - just a file - without worrying about whether
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 02:55:52PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> You work someplace pretty unique. Everyplace I've worked has done the
> whole top-posting and include the whole damn thread in reverse order
> thing. It just doesn't work. The attached reverse-chronological
> history doesn't seem t
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 07:56:41AM -0700, Rich Shepard wrote:
> Allow me to add an additional reason for trimming and responding
> beneath each quoted section: it puts the response in the proper
> context.
And another one I learned recently on a similar conversation on another
mailing list (tha
On 18/05/2018 19:57, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 4:48 AM, bartc wrote:
The translation was straightforward, EXCEPT that I wasted an hour trying to
figure out to write /a single byte/ to a file. The following eventually
worked, using a binary file as a text one had Unicode prob
On 18/05/2018 20:15, Alexandre Brault wrote:
On 2018-05-18 02:48 PM, bartc wrote:
Note this version doesn't use any imports at all.
Except your version doesn't read its parameter from the command line
args and doesn't output to standard output, which all of the others do.
That's why the other
On Thursday, May 17, 2018 at 4:54:11 AM UTC-7, Jpn Jha wrote:
> Dear Team
> Please attached Python_PyCharm Interpreter doc and zoom it .
>
> The screen shots are explanatory.
The Python mailing list is text-only. Your screen shots were removed.
In general, please don't use screenshots when as
On 2018-05-18 02:48 PM, bartc wrote:
> On 18/05/2018 18:27, bartc wrote:
>
>> (BTW here's a port of that benchmark based on the Lua code:
>>
>> https://pastebin.com/raw/ivDaKudX
>
> And here's the payoff: I was able to use this version to port it to
> Python. One which works better the the origi
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 4:53 AM, bartc wrote:
> On 18/05/2018 19:36, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 3:27 AM, bartc wrote:
>
>
>> Once again, you're confusing *porting* with *emulating*.
>
>
> This is the point. Those libraries are specific to Python and cannot be
> ported.
>
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 4:48 AM, bartc wrote:
> The translation was straightforward, EXCEPT that I wasted an hour trying to
> figure out to write /a single byte/ to a file. The following eventually
> worked, using a binary file as a text one had Unicode problems, but it's
> still hacky.
You can't
On 18/05/2018 19:36, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 3:27 AM, bartc wrote:
Once again, you're confusing *porting* with *emulating*.
This is the point. Those libraries are specific to Python and cannot be
ported.
And very often they don't just provide general support that ca
On 18/05/2018 18:27, bartc wrote:
(BTW here's a port of that benchmark based on the Lua code:
https://pastebin.com/raw/ivDaKudX
And here's the payoff: I was able to use this version to port it to
Python. One which works better the the originals, as they wrote output
to the screen (/binar
On 5/18/2018 7:40 AM, Alferdize wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alferdize
Date: Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:13 PM
Subject: sys module does not contain ps1
To: python-list@python.org
It is giving error like I have given below
import sys
sys.ps1
Traceback (most recent call las
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 3:27 AM, bartc wrote:
> On 18/05/2018 15:47, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:37 AM, bartc wrote:
>>>
>>> Have a look at some of the implementations here (to test some Mandelbrot
>>> benchmark):
>>>
>>>
>>> https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net
On 18/05/2018 15:47, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:37 AM, bartc wrote:
Have a look at some of the implementations here (to test some Mandelbrot
benchmark):
https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/performance/mandelbrot.html
The three Python examples all
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 2:51 AM, MRAB wrote:
> I have the same version (Python 3.7.0b3). Here, sys has 'ps1' and 'ps2', but
> not 'last_traceback', 'last_type' or 'last_value'.
They aren't there till they're needed:
$ python3
Python 3.8.0a0 (heads/literal_eval-exception:ddcb2eb331, Feb 21 2018,
i have a project at :
README :
https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ/css-script/blob/master/README.md
SITE :
https://abdur-rahmaanj.github.io/css-script/
and i want to refractor the main file :
https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ/css-script/blob/master/css_script/main.py
if this was an old project o
On 2018-05-18 12:40, Alferdize wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alferdize
Date: Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:13 PM
Subject: sys module does not contain ps1
To: python-list@python.org
It is giving error like I have given below
import sys
sys.ps1
Traceback (most recent call last
Grant Edwards :
> And most people seem to believe that if they read more that the first
> two sentences of any e-mail it might trigger the apocolypse or give
> their cat scabies or something else dreadful.
I quickly glance at the hundred or so subject lines every morning and
open the one or two th
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 1:09 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> If the thread forks, and someone is brought into one of the forks to
> help with an issue brought up in THAT fork, then the context will
> generally be sufficient for that.
That assumes that they don't need any information that was posted in
On 5/18/18 10:38 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:30 AM, Richard Damon
> wrote:
>> I would divide the two communities/cultures differently. Top Posting is
>> reasonable, effective and common in an environment where the primary
>> recipients of the message can be assumed to ha
On 2018-05-18, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2018 13:25:52 +0100, Paul Moore wrote:
>
>> In "Corporate" cultures like where I work (where IT and business
>> functions interact a lot, and business users typically use tools
>> like Outlook) top-posting is common, conventional, and frankly,
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:37 AM, bartc wrote:
> Have a look at some of the implementations here (to test some Mandelbrot
> benchmark):
>
> https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/performance/mandelbrot.html
>
> The three Python examples all use 'import sys' and 'import multipr
On 18/05/2018 13:29, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2018 12:09:02 +0100, bartc wrote:
On 18/05/2018 02:45, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2018 02:17:39 +0100, bartc wrote:
Normally you'd use the source code as a start point. In the case of
Python, that means Python source code.
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:30 AM, Richard Damon
wrote:
> I would divide the two communities/cultures differently. Top Posting is
> reasonable, effective and common in an environment where the primary
> recipients of the message can be assumed to have read, and likely
> remembered, the previous mes
On 5/18/18 8:25 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 18 May 2018 at 12:08, Rhodri James wrote:
> There are two completely independent cultures here. In "Corporate"
> cultures like where I work (where IT and business functions interact a
> lot, and business users typically use tools like Outlook) top-posting
On Fri, 18 May 2018 13:25:52 +0100, Paul Moore wrote:
> In "Corporate"
> cultures like where I work (where IT and business functions interact a
> lot, and business users typically use tools like Outlook) top-posting is
> common, conventional, and frankly, effective.
I don't believe that email is
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alferdize
Date: Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:13 PM
Subject: sys module does not contain ps1
To: python-list@python.org
It is giving error like I have given below
>>> import sys
>>> sys.ps1
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
sys.
On 18/05/18 13:25, Paul Moore wrote:
Arguing about how the community's conventions are wrong is also
impolite:-)
It's not an argument, it's a contradiction :-)
I'm reminded of the old stereotypes of Brits speaking
English NICE AND LOUDLY to foreigners to help them understand what
we're saying
On Fri, 18 May 2018 12:09:02 +0100, bartc wrote:
> On 18/05/2018 02:45, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 May 2018 02:17:39 +0100, bartc wrote:
>>
>>> Normally you'd use the source code as a start point. In the case of
>>> Python, that means Python source code. But you will quickly run into
>>
On 18 May 2018 at 12:08, Rhodri James wrote:
> On 17/05/18 23:44, Paul wrote:
>>
>> I've been using email for thirty years, including thousands of group
>> emails
>> at many tech companies, and no one has ever suggested, let alone insisted
>> on, bottom posting.
>
> I've been using email for thirt
bartc writes:
> On 17/05/2018 23:49, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Paul wrote:
>
>>> I've been using email for thirty years, including thousands of group emails
>>> at many tech companies, and no one has ever suggested, let alone insisted
>>> on, bottom posting. If s
On 5/18/18 7:09 AM, bartc wrote:
On 18/05/2018 02:45, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2018 02:17:39 +0100, bartc wrote:
Normally you'd use the source code as a start point. In the case of
Python, that means Python source code. But you will quickly run into
problems because you will often
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 9:29 PM, bartc wrote:
> On 17/05/2018 23:49, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Paul wrote:
>
>
>>> I've been using email for thirty years, including thousands of group
>>> emails
>>> at many tech companies, and no one has ever suggested, let alon
On 17/05/2018 23:49, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Paul wrote:
I've been using email for thirty years, including thousands of group emails
at many tech companies, and no one has ever suggested, let alone insisted
on, bottom posting. If someone's late to a thread they
On 18/05/2018 02:45, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2018 02:17:39 +0100, bartc wrote:
Normally you'd use the source code as a start point. In the case of
Python, that means Python source code. But you will quickly run into
problems because you will often see 'import lib' and be unable to
On 17/05/18 23:44, Paul wrote:
I've been using email for thirty years, including thousands of group emails
at many tech companies, and no one has ever suggested, let alone insisted
on, bottom posting.
I've been using email for thirty years, etc, etc, and I've always
insisted on proper quoting,
On 18/05/18 02:45, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
To successful port anything but the most trivial code, you actually have
to understand *both* languages -- including the syntax, semantics, built-
in language features, AND libraries.
A point that was once made to me about translating human languages is
46 matches
Mail list logo
