Alex Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Have you seen/heard of Jim lately? Cause I haven't. By the time he was
the lead of the AspectJ team his charismatic presence was everywhere (at
least around that project).
He wasn't at OSCON this year, but I hope to see him at Pycon next year.
I
NicolasG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The problem is that I would like to work as a Python programmer but
all the job vacancies I can find requires a couple of years of
professional experience ... that I don't have. How a wanna be
programmer can start working as a programmer if there is no
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:57:17 -0700, Nagarajan wrote:
a = []
import csv
reader = csv.reader(open(filename, r), delimiter='\t' )
for row in reader:
a.append( row )
I would keep a reference to the file to close it properly and the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
code files? What's the regular expression for
locating a number with an arbitrary number of digits
seperated into an arbitrary number of blocks of an
arbitray number of digits with an arbitrary number
of whitespace characters between each block?
Kenneth Love [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Python in a Nutshell (2nd ed.)
...
I am a slow reader. So, if Doctests are mentioned in any of the above,
I haven't encountered it yet.
Yep, I cover doctest in the chapter on testing, debugging, profiling and
optimizing.
Alex
--
Carsten Haese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 09:22:32 +0530, Rustom Mody wrote
Can someone who knows about python internals throw some light on why
x in dic
is cheaper than
dic.has_key(x)
??
I won't claim to know Python internals, but compiling and disassembling
Hendrik van Rooyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ReTrY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm writing a program with Tkinter GUI, When the program is running it
need to be updated every five seconds (data comes from internet). How
should I do that ? How to make a function in main loop ?
Short
beginner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I have a simple list reconstruction problem, but I don't really know
how to do it.
I have a list that looks like this:
l=[ (A, a, 1), (A, a, 2), (A, a, 3), (A, b, 1), (A,
b, 2), (B, a, 1), (B, b, 1)]
What I want to do is to reorganize
Dennis Lee Bieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:45:04 -0700, Chris Carlen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed the following in
comp.lang.python:
The more I play with Python, the more I like it. Perhaps I will
understand OOP quicker than I thought. What I've learned so far
Tim Churches [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
malkarouri wrote:
On 13 Jul, 17:18, 78ncp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi...
how to implementation algorithm latent semantic indexing in python
programming...??
Of course you are aware that LSA is patented..
There is a US patent on it, sealed in
Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently discovered a bug in one of my programs that surprised me
because I thought Python's dynamic type checking would have
caught it.
Suppose I have a function that returns an integer, such as
def numItems: return len(self.items)
Syntax errors (you
MD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Alex,
Thanks for your reply. It was exactly what I was looking for. Two
additional questions
1) Is there anyway to find out which modules a variable belongs to
when I have only its name (and its not qualified with the complete
name like module.varname)
MD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Alex,
Thanks for the answer. Are there any C defines (for e.g. STRING,
BOOLEAN) corresponding to each Python type?
No, I know of no such defines -- what good would they do?
Alex
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
MD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to access variables defined in my Python program in
a C module extension for Python. Is this possible? I looked at the
Python C API reference but didn't find anything there that could help
me.
If they're global variables of a certain module
James T. Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
You can start writing all your code now as: print() --- calling
the statement as if it were a function. Then you're future Python
...except that your output format will thereby become disgusting...:
name = 'Alex'
print 'Hello', name, 'and
78ncp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi...
how to implementation algorithm latent semantic indexing in python
programming...??
You may get more responses (as in, 0!-) if you give some URL about what
this algorithm is supposed to do.
Alex
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Chris Carlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I've read of OOP, I don't get it. I have also found some
articles profoundly critical of OOP. I tend to relate to these articles.
OOP can be abused (particularly with deep or intricate inheritance
structures). But the base concept is simple
Donn Cave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've wondered if programmers might differ a lot in how much they
dread errors, or how they react to different kinds of errors.
That's quite possible. I'm reminded of a by-now commonplace theory,
well summarized at
Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
for uf in user_files:
uf = uf.strip().lower()
if uf:
file_skip_list.append(uf)
This is fine; however, another reasonable alternative is:
if not uf.isspace():
file_skip_list.append(uf.strip().lower())
I prefer yours
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Ah, I answered you on the Italian NG before seeing you had also posted
the same request here. What I proposed there was (untested):
import codecs
_rimedi = { u'\x2019': ' }
def rimedia(exc):
if isinstance(exc, (UnicodeEncodeError,
Dennis Lee Bieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Think VMS was the most applicable for that behavior... Haven't seen
any dynamic priorities on the UNIX/Linux/Solaris systems I've
encountered...
Dynamic priority scheduling is extremely common in Unixen today (and has
been for many
Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
En Thu, 05 Jul 2007 01:19:32 -0300, Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
What command do you mean when you say update main_dict with
dlfl_dict?
I think Alex Martelly was refering to use main_dict.update(dlfl_dict)
(Python code) or
Alex Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
frameworks (TestNG is not a unit testing framework,
but a full flavored testing framework that fits perfectly functional
testing, integration testing, and with some of the
very advanced features even performance and load testing).
Nice! Does it
Neil Cerutti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Besides, a string is an excellent epresentation for a zip code,
since arithmetic upon them is unthinkable.
Absolutely! Excel, unless you remedied that later with a column
operation, would turn some East Coast zipcodes into 3- and 4-digit
numbers (dropping
Kay Schluehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
half of the community is happy with Emacs and the other half wants to
program in a VS-like environment, neither consensus nor progress has
Calling all vi/vim users (and we'll heartily appreciate the support of
TextMate fans, BBEdit ones, etc, etc) --
Roy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Rubin wrote:
E.g. your program might pass its test and run properly for years
before some weird piece of input data causes some regexp to not quite
work.
Then you get a bug report, you fix it, and you add a
Aahz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
This works in all versions of Python back to 1.5.2 IIRC. reversed() is
a moderately new built-in function;
Yep: it came with Python 2.4, first alpha just 4 years ago, final
release about 3 years and 8 months ago. Moderately new seems an
appropriate tag.
Alex Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
- when testing from outside the class definition, the function is
already attached to the class instance and this is the reason why its
type is instancemethod
To be more precise: when you access any attribute of a class (or
instance thereof), Python
Marc Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I am trying to create a function, where I pass a dictionary with a
lits of strings, and try to return a
a list of strings, for all variations, any ideas ?
Thanks
def getAllVariants(someDict):
keys = someDict.keys()
for x in keys:
Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
PyObject *rstring = PyRun_String( cmd, Py_file_input, main_dict,
dlfl_dict );
You're passing difl_dict as the locals to PyRun_String -- but a
function has its own locals, so it won't use those locals. Just update
main_dict with difl_dict (that's the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm considering learning Python...but with the python 3000 comming
very soon, is it worth waiting for?? I know that the old style of
coding python will run parallel with the new, but I mean, its going to
come to an end eventually.
It will be years
Frank Swarbrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why might one choose to use ActivePython instead of using the free CPython?
I believe ActivePython is also free, and it's packaged up differently
(with more 3rd party modules accompanying it than the standard Python
distribution), which might make it
Donn Cave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli) wrote:
Dynamic typing is recommended, they conclude, when programs must be
as flexible as possible. I recommend reading the Agile Manifesto to
understand why maximal flexibility
Martin Durkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
def rev(x):
mylist = []
for char in x:
mylist.append(char)
mylist.reverse()
for letter in mylist:
print letter
However, compare the incredible
dlomsak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
search and return takes a fraction of a second. For a large return (in
this case 21,000 records - 8.3 MB) is taking 18 seconds. 15 of those
seconds are spent sending the serialized results from the server to
the client. I did a little bit of a blind
Jay Loden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
For what it's worth, with python 2.5 on my Macbook:
Hmmm, doesn't look to me as if it's worth much...:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jloden]$ python -m timeit 's = onomatopoeia; s =
s.join(s[::-1])'
since what you're doing is...:
s = onomatopoeia
s =
Bruno Desthuilliers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I still maintain that the primary *practical* reason behind static
typing is to provide optimization clues for the compiler. You can (or at
It's definitely a helpful aspect, yes -- given that compilers able to
infer types are still not very
Bruno Desthuilliers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Hmmm... For a dinausor, C seems well alive. Can you remind me which
So do chickens.
I'm afraid I didn't get the joke... Are you saying that C is a rather,
well, primitive language ?
The joke's just based on the fact that (based on
Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Evan Klitzke
wrote:
I have a question about the internal representation of sets in Python.
If I write some code like
if x in some_list:
do_something()
the lookup for the in
John Nagle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PEP 3107 is static typing without enforcement, which is not a good thing.
Wrong: PEP3107 is a syntax for adding arbitrary metadata annotations (so
that said annotations don't get squished where they don't belong, such
as decorators or docstrings, as they used
Jyotirmoy Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a newcomer to Python. I have just discovered nested list
comprehensions and I need help to understand how the if-clause
interacts with the multiple for-clauses. I have this small program:
def multab(n):
print 'multab',n
return
Bjoern Schliessmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...
Mh, strange, I personally like to use this.a in C++, to make clear
I use an instance variable.
That would be nice, unfortunately your C++ compiler will refuse that,
and force you to use this-a instead;-).
Many programming shops use naming
Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli) writes:
print [(m,n) for m in range(5) for n in multab(m) if m2]
Sure, just place the if clause where it needs to apply (between the two
for clauses) [apart from the fact that this example is best expressed
DavidM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Seems that I have to allow a 'punishment free' threshold of complexity,
otherwise the population stagnates.
Sounds like you've hit on a good simulation of life: to get innovation,
you must be very tolerant of errors!-)
Alex
--
A.T.Hofkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that again now with the default implementation of the
object.__eq__ and object.__hash__ methods. I believe these methods should
not exist until the programmer explicitly defines them with a suitable
notion of equivalence.
Anybody have a
Scott David Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 21:11:42 -0700, Alex Martelli wrote a lot, with lots
of YELLING.
Given the amount of SHOUTING in your post, and the fact that you feel so
strongly about the trivial question of the redundant use
Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 11:03:03 -0700, Scott David Daniels wrote:
The global statement in Write_LCD_Data is completely unnecessary. The
only time you need global is if you want to reassociate the global
name to another object (such as LCD = LCD + 1
Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
It's never _wrong_ to use the global statement, even if it is strictly
unnecessary for the Python compiler.
So, repeat that global statement ninetyseven times -- that's not
wrong, either, in exactly the same sense in which it's not wrong
Dave Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I still think it would be handy to easily specify the expected types of
function arguments. I sometimes write code in this pattern:
def foo(a, b):
a, b - instances of Bar
assert isinstance(a, Bar)
assert isinstance(b, Bar)
# do
Neil Cerutti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In C++ they are used most often for factory functions, since they
conveniently have access to the class's private members, and
don't want or need an existing instance. Python seems to have
adopted this use-case (ConfigParser, for example), but without a
kaens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/20/07, Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is exactly the problem - there is no some more static typing.
There is static typing - or not. You can't have it just a bit.
Couldn't a language be made so that if you declared a variable like,
Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ethan Kennerly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I really like properties for readonly attributes,
Python doesn't have readonly attributes,
Many Python types do, e.g.:
def f(): pass
...
def g(): pass
...
f.func_name = 'zap'
f.func_code = g.func_code
f
Tom Gur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
which IDE would you recommend for a python ?
It depends on that python's tastes and preferences. Like many others
who have already responded, I prefer an editor (VIM) and a separate
commandline/terminal; I know of many others who share another
responder's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have been working at this problem, and I think I need a permutation
algorithm that does
the following:
Given a list of elements that are either a character or a character
follows by a number, e.g.
['a', 'b', 'c1', 'd', 'e1', 'f', 'c2',
Ethan Kennerly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
There are a lot of Python mailing lists. I hope this is an appropriate one
for a question on properties.
yep, it's a fine one.
But a gotcha bit me in the behavior of properties that I didn't expect.
If another function accesses an underlying
David Wahler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Tuples are immutable (can't be modified once created). Try this:
def BDllids():
conn = sqlite.connect('tasques.db')
cursor = conn.cursor()
cursor.execute('SELECT * FROM tasques')
a = [row[0] for row in cursor]
return
Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
perception that, at their roots, Scheme, C and Python share one
philosophical underpinning (one that's extremely rare among programming
languages as a whole) -- an appreciation of SIMPLICITY AND UNIFORMITY as
language characteristics.
Out
7stud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious, have you tried _Python for Dummies_?
No, I haven't. Unfortunately, I don't ever consider Dummies books.
That type of marketing appeals to certain people and not others. I'm
one of the others. I'll definitely take a look at it the next time
Cousin Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I think the Original Sin in that regard was PL/I: it tried to have all
...
tended to have two or more ways to perform any given task, typically
inspired by some of the existing languages, often with the addition of
new ones made out of
Bruno Desthuilliers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Josiah Carlson a écrit :
(snip)
Well, the particular operation is typically called 'currying a
function',
pedantic
it's not 'currying' but 'partial application'.
Currying is somehow the reverse of partial : it's a way of building a
lazy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
key1={key11=[1,2] , key12=[6,7] , }
...
Im processesing HUGE(~100M inserts into the dictionary) data.
What will you need from the saved version later? If you need lookups
by single keys or key pairs then a relational DB may be best; if you
need to
7stud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The reference book Python in a Nutshell is excellent, however its
index is so bad I hesitate to recommend it. A reference book should
have a thorough index--you shouldn't have to hunt through the chapters
trying to find the particular topic you are
Neil Cerutti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-06-12, Antoon Pardon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-06-11, Terry Reedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More so than supporters of most other languages, in particular
Scheme?
Well to my knowledge (which could be vastly improved), scheme
doesn't
Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
QOTW: That's the Martellibot for you. Never use a word where a paragraph
with explanatory footnotes will do.
Sigh. I miss him on c.l.py. - Simon Brunning
Funny -- didn't Simon write this in 2005 referring to an essay of mine
that I had posted in
Mark Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Martelli wrote:
Josiah Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pitfall of Python is knowing whether an operation is destructive or not.
If it returns None, it probably changes the content of an object.
A reasonable heuristic, but with lots
Mark Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Martelli wrote:
Mark Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, GMP is a pain to compile (especially on Mac OS X), but I believe
Just mentioning this in case you want to give Scheme another chance
Thanks. I'll take a look at it.
You're welcome
Sébastien Vincent sebastien_nimp73@ wrote:
I would like to know if it's possible to retrieve the name of a method when
you're inside it. For example, in the following script, I would like to
assign _s so that it prints you are in method1.
***
class
Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For most types, there are macros like PyXxxx_Check and
PyXxxx_CheckExact. But not for descriptors, and I want to test if a
certain object is a descriptor or not. May I define
PyMethodDescr_Check, by example, along the lines of similar checks, or
the
Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you ever do, it's trivial to write your own enumerate():
def enumerate(seq):
index = 0
for item in seq:
yield (index, item)
index += 1
That's a heck of a lot slower than the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3, 22:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
angle is a ratio of two length and
dimensionless.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angle#Units_of_measure_for_ang
les
only dimensionless values can be a argument of a sine and exponent!
Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Useful or a bad idea?
I have a module that defines a number of exceptions which inherit from
various built-ins like KeyError, ValueError etc. I'm considering defining
an abstract module exception like MyModuleError, and having all my real
exceptions
Mark Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I picked Chicken Scheme for OS X. Things started well, and even the web
...
that; but I found that it ultimately depended on gmp, which turned out a
pain to compile.
Yes, GMP is a pain to compile (especially on Mac OS X), but I believe
that the
Josiah Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pitfall of Python is knowing whether an operation is destructive or not.
If it returns None, it probably changes the content of an object.
A reasonable heuristic, but with lots of exceptions, alas:
somedict.get(somekey)
will often return None
py_genetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex, thanks for the advise:
class PosRecords(tables.IsDescription):
class A(object):
self.__init__(self, args):
This makes 0 sense; maybe you should learn elementary Python syntax well
_before_ trying advanced stuff, no?
I accidently
Andreas Beyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I found the following quite cryptic code, which basically reads the
first column of some_file into a set.
In Python I am used to seeing much more verbose/explicit code. However,
the example below _may_ actually be faster than the usual for line in
Raj B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
My question is about how special methods are stored internally in
Python objects.
Consider a new-style class which implements special methods such as
__call__ and __new__
class C(type):
def __call__(...):
body
class B:
samwyse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Actually, I'm surprised that the PEP does as much as it does. If tuples
are implemented as S-expressions, then something like this:
Tuples are implemented as compact arrays of pointer-to-PyObject (so are
lists, BTW). So, for example, a 10-items tuple
Raj B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, special methods populate the slots in the structures which
Python
uses to represent types. Objects/typeobject.c in the Python source
distribution does the hard work, particularly in function type_new
Thanks for that quick response. I am
py_genetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this possible or is there a better way. I need to create a new
class during runtime to be used inside a function. The class
definition and body are dependant on unknows vars at time of exec,
thus my reasoning here.
class
Steve Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
for has_chars, frags in itertools.groupby(lines,
lambda x: len(x) 0):
Hmmm, it appears to me that itertools.groupby(lines, bool) should do
just the same job, just a bit faster and simpler, no?
Alex
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Historically, it's only Java and the Windows world (including non-
standard Windows-style C++) that use forcedCase significantly (C#
draws from both).
I remember meeting that style first in the X Window System (now commonly
known as X11, but it was
Charles Vejnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for both suggestions.
I have indeed tried gmpy. For me, it's not very important to choose between
numpy or gmpy.
I hope I won't be off topic. But, as I told you before, I have a C library
using long double numbers and I would like to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
and I'm not connected to the internet and I run the program, I get:
my-names-computer.local
When I'm connected to the internet, I get:
dialup-9.999.999.999.dial9.xxx.level9.net
That would bug me to high hell. A router in the middle would
jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm totally new to Python and was hoping someone might be able to
answer a few questions for me:
1. What are your views about Python vs Perl? Do you see one as
better than the other?
Yep: if I didn't find Python more readable, maintainable and
walterbyrd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 18, 10:24 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli) wrote:
I think that Ruby, which roughly speaking sits somewhere between Python
and Perl, is closer to Python than Perl is.
I don't know much about Ruby, but it does not seem to be commonly used
Paul McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an inverse function to the builtin 'id'? The poster who
No, there isn't.
Now is there anything better than this search technique to get back a
variable, given its id?
For your own classes/types, you could override __new__ to maintain a
Jarek Zgoda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Nogradi napisa?(a):
For example, it HAS been published elsewhere that YouTube uses lighttpd,
not Apache: http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/wiki/PoweredByLighttpd.
How do you explain these, then:
http://www.youtube.com/results.xxx
walterbyrd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- IMO: the most comparable language to Python, is Perl. Both are
scripting languages. Both are free, multi-platform, and multi-purpose.
Both are also very popular.
I think that Ruby, which roughly speaking sits somewhere between Python
and Perl, is closer
Terry Reedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| 1) What -existing- examples of the use of Python to create social
| web applications are there? These include chat, collaboration,
| forum boards, and editable content pages, RSS feeds.
|
| I know I use a lot of these, but under pressure I'm not
Victor Kryukov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
And although http://www.python.org/about/quotes/ lists many big names
and wonderful examples, be want more details. E.g. our understanding
is that Google uses python mostly for internal web-sites, and
performance is far from perfect their. YouTube
Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
import gmpy
a = 2**177149-1
b = gmpy.mpz(2**177149-1)
a==b
True
print '%d' % (b)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File pyshell#4, line 1, in module
print '%d' % (b)
TypeError: int argument required
So although the
Aldo Cortesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus spake Steven D'Aprano ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Perhaps you aren't aware that doing something by eye is idiomatic
English for doing it quickly, roughly, imprecisely. It is the opposite of
taking the time and effort to do the job carefully and
Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
automated -- if the patch uses an unexpected #-*- coding: blah line, or
No need -- a separate PEP (also by Martin) makes UTF-8 the default
encoding, and UTF-8 can encode any Unicode character you like.
Alex
--
Aldo Cortesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus spake Steven D'Aprano ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
If you're relying on cursory visual inspection to recognize harmful code,
you're already vulnerable to trojans.
What a daft thing to say. How do YOU recognize harmful code in a patch
submission?
Paddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 13, 12:13 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli) wrote:
As somebody else alredy pointed out, the lambda is supererogatory (to
say the least).
What a wonderful new word!
I did not know what supererogatory meant, and hoped it had nothing to
do
manatlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
def addaclass(aninst, onemoreclass):
aninst.__class__ = type(aninst.__aclass__.__name__,
(aninst.__aclass__, onemoreclass), {})
...
b=gtk.Button(the_label)
addaclass(b,MoreMethods)
...
TypeError: __class__ assignment: only for
Bruno Desthuilliers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Disallowing this does *not* guarantee in any way that
identifiers are understandable for English native speakers.
I'm not an English native speaker. And there's more than a subtle
distinction between not garantying and encouraging.
I agree
Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
En Sat, 12 May 2007 20:13:48 -0300, Alex Martelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
Cesar G. Miguel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---
L = []
file = ['5,1378,1,9', '2,1,4,5']
str=''
for item in file:
L.append([float(n) for n
Cesar G. Miguel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 12, 3:40 pm, Dmitry Dzhus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually I'm trying to convert a string to a list of float numbers:
str = '53,20,4,2' to L = [53.0, 20.0, 4.0, 2.0]
str=53,20,4,2
map(lambda s: float(s), str.split(','))
Last
manatlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got an instance of a class, ex :
b=gtk.Button()
I'd like to add methods and attributes to my instance b.
I know it's possible by hacking b with setattr() methods. But i'd
like to do it with inheritance, a kind of dynamic subclassing,
without
101 - 200 of 1652 matches
Mail list logo
