I'm pleased to finally announce PyGtkImageView 1.1.0!
Description
---
GtkImageView is a simple image viewer widget for GTK+. Similar to the
image viewer panes in gThumb or Eye of Gnome. It makes writing image
viewing and editing applications easy. Among its features are:
* Mouse and
I'm pleased to finally announce PyGtkImageView 1.2.0!
Description
---
GtkImageView is a simple image viewer widget for GTK+. Similar to the
image viewer panes in gThumb or Eye of Gnome. It makes writing image
viewing and editing applications easy. Among its features are:
* Mouse and
# do other non-extension-related tests here
if basename.find( Makefile ) != -1:
return text/x-makefile
I believe this can be nicelier written as:
if Makefile in basename:
--
mvh Björn
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
hi all, i´m doing a search engine using python for the spider and php
to make a web for the search. The Database i have choosen is
postgreSQL. Do you think it is a good choosen? Any suggestion?
Databases are implementation details! Considering the database should
be deferred as long as
The process seem slow. I've submitted two patches and haven't gotten
any response so far, but it has only been three weeks. Other patches
seem to be idling for months. I'm not complaining, just want to know
why the process is so slow and what you can do when you submit
patches/bug reports to speed
I am quite new to Python, and have a straight simple question.
In C, there is for (init; cond; advance). We all know that.
In Python there are two ways to loop over i=A..B (numerical.):
1) i = A
while iB:
...do something...
i+=STEP
This is indeed quite ugly. You rarely need
I like it alot! My only minor complaint is that the name is to long.
Also I *really wish* the Namespace could do this:
r, g, b = col = Namespace(r = 4, g = 3, b = 12)
But alas, I guess that's not doable within the scope of the Namespace PEP.
--
mvh Björn
--
put it) PyUnit project. I'm sorry if this is a obvious question or one
that has already been answered, but unit-testing sounds interesting and
I'm not sure where to start.
Hi Ryan. I belive this (http://www.xp123.com/xplor/xp0201/index.shtml)
is a good way to learn about unit testing by
Christmas came early this year. Thank you all nice Python developers.
--
mvh Björn
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Some more decorator examples.
How to create abstract methods using an @absractmethod decorator:
http://www.brpreiss.com/books/opus7/html/page117.html
Generics, property getters and setters. I don't know what these
decorators are supposed to do:
http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~edloper/pydecorators.html
I haven't read any Python paper books myself but as Christmas is
coming up, I've checked up on what Python books other people
recommend. Everyone who has reviewed Python books seem to like these
books:
* Python Essential Reference
* Python Cookbook
* Python in a Nutshell
The last two are both
I think it would be cool if you could refer to instance variables
without prefixing with self. I know noone else thinks like me so
Python will never be changed, but maybe you can already do it with
Python today?
.import sys
.
.def magic():
.s =
.for var in
Thank you for your replies. But they don't deal with my original
question. :) I have read the thousands of posts all saying self is
good and they are right. But this time I want to be different m-kay?
I figure that there might be some way to solve my problem by doing
this:
.def
The more features a language has, the harder it becomes to learn. An
example of that is C++ which has almost everything. Classes, structs,
templates, strange keywords that noone uses like auto, inline const,
passing by reference/value, enum, union, lots of macros, multiple
inheritance, namespaces
how the situation
is handled in Java and C++.
Alex Martelli:
Björn Lindqvist:
I think it would be cool if you could refer to instance variables
without prefixing with self. I know noone else thinks like me so
Some do -- Kent Beck's excellent book on TDD-by-example has a specific
grouse against
I like C++ templates so that you can ensure that a list only contain
items of one type. I also like the JMP instruction in x86 assembler,
you could do some nasty tricks with that.
--
mvh Björn
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Python has one feature that I really hate: There are certain special
names like 'file' and 'dict' with a predefined meaning. Yet, it is
allowed to redefine these special names as in
dict = [1:'bla']
dir(__builtins__)
Yes, rebinding builtin names accidentally is an annoying and I think
The Cookbook features another interesting way to do it:
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/204297
--
mvh Björn
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I like count() and appendlist() or whatever they will be named. But I
have one question/idea:
Why does the methods have to be put in dict? Can't their be a subtype
of dict that includes those two methods? I.e.:
.histogram = counting_dict()
.for ch in text:
.histogram.count(ch)
Then maybe
py.test is awesome, but there is one slight flaw in it. It produces to
much output. All I want to see when all tests pass is All X passes
succeded! (or something similar). py.test's output can be
distracting.
--
mvh Björn
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Please do not reply to spam. Replying to spam makes it much harder for
spam filters to catch all the spam or will produce very many false
positives. Atleast that's how gmail's filter works. And if you must
reply, please change the subject line.
On 13 Apr 2005 17:50:06 -0500, .@bag.python.org
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Carl Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for ...:
...
exhausted:
...
broken:
...
The meaning is explicit. While else seems to mean little there.
So I may like something similar for Python 3.x (or the removal of the
else).
I
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Hendrik van Rooyen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
foo = [1,2,3,4]
x = foo.append(5)
print x
What will be the output (choose one):
1) [1,2,3,4]
2) [1,2,3,4,5]
3) That famous picture of Albert Einstein sticking out his tongue
4) Nothing - no output
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Paul Boddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17 Mar, 01:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote:
PyCon is what YOU make of it. If you want to change PyCon, propose a
presentation or join the conference committee (concom) -- the latter only
requires signing up
Here is an interesting math problem:
You have a number X 0 and another number Y 0. The goal is to
divide X into a list with length Y. Each item in the list is an
integer. The sum of all integers is X. Each integer is either A or A +
1, those should be evenly distributed.
Example:
17 // 5 = 3
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Arnaud Delobelle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
def make_slope(distance, parts):
step = distance / float(parts)
intstep = int(step)
floatstep = step - intstep
steps = []
acc = 0.0
for i in range(parts):
acc +=
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Lee Sander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a float array ( eg [-1.3, 1.22, 9.2, None, 2.3] ) but there are
many missing vlaues which are represented as None. I would like to
remove all such instances in one go.
There is a remove function but it
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Aldo Cortesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus spake Matthieu Brucher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
How does it compare to the nose framework ?
As far as the base unit testing functionality is concerned, I think
they try to address similar problems. Both have
I think twisted is overkill for this problem. Threading, elementtree
and urllib should more than suffice. One thread polling the server for
each race with the desired polling interval. Each time some data is
treated, that thread sends a signal containing information about what
changed. The gui
I have a large set of documents in various text formats. I know that
each document contains its authors name, email and phone number.
Sometimes it also contains the authors home address.
The task is to find out the name, email and phone of as many documents
as possible. Since the documents are
2008/10/20 william paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have a list that looks like:
name = name1 name2 name3 name4
and I would like to be able to arrange randomly this list, like:
name = name 2 name 1 name3 name4
name = name4 name2 name1 name3
I have tried with random.shuffle, but still no
2008/10/25 Pedro Borges [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there a way to improve the interpreter startup speed?
In my machine (cold startup) python takes 0.330 ms and ruby takes
0.047 ms, after cold boot python takes 0.019 ms and ruby 0.005 ms to
start.
How are you getting those numbers? 330 μs is still
2008/10/26 James Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:23 AM, BJörn Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How are you getting those numbers? 330 μs is still pretty fast, isn't
it? :) Most disks have a seek time of 10-20 ms so it seem implausible
to me that Ruby would be able to cold
2008/10/27 James Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 5:40 PM, David Cournapeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depends on the tool: build tool and source control tools are example
it matters (specially when you start interfaciing them with IDE or
editors). Having fast command line tools
Open('3rd', 'w').writelines(set(open('2nd').readlines())-set(open('1st')))
2008/5/29, loial [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have a requirement to compare 2 text files and write to a 3rd file
only those lines that appear in the 2nd file but not in the 1st file.
Rather than re-invent the wheel I am
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Russ P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 2, 6:41 am, Carl Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are not realizing that only useful(**) thing about data hiding is
that some code has access to the data, other code does not. If you
hide data equally from everyone
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Antoon Pardon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now of course noone would defend such a limitation on the grounds
that one doesn't need the general case and that the general case
will only save you some vertical space.
But when it came to the ternary operator that was
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Karsten Heymann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although your problem has already been solved, I'd like to present a
different approach which can be quite a bit faster. The most common
approach seems to be using a dictionary:
summed_up={}
for user,vote in pairs:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a scenario where I have a list like this:
UserScore
1 0
1 1
1 5
2 3
2 1
3 2
4 3
4
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
I'd like learn some basic unit testing with python.
I red some articles about different testing framework like unittest or
nose, but I'm a bit confused: what is the best choice? I'm not a
professional developer (I'm a
On 6/22/07, Eduardo EdCrypt O. Padoan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remember that pure CPython has no different compile time and
runtiime. But Psyco and ShedSkin could use the annotations the way
they want.
.
def compile(source: something compilable,
filename: where the compilable
On 7/9/07, Emin.shopper Martinian.shopper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Experts,
What is the preferred doc extraction tool for python? It seems that there
are many very nice options (e.g., pydoc, epydoc, HappyDoc, and lots of
others), but what is the standard tool or at least what is the tool
On 7/13/07, John Nagle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can sometimes get better performance in C++ than in C, because C++
has inline. Inline expansion happens before optimization, so you
can have abstractions that cost nothing.
C99 has that too.
Python is a relatively easy language,
On 8/5/07, Franz Steinhäusler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello NG,
wWhat are the best programs in your opinion, written entirly
in pyhton, divided into categories like:
a) Games
b) Utilities/System
c) Office
d) Web/Newsreader/Mail/Browser
For b; trac: http://trac.edgewall.org/ There
On 8/11/07, Helmut Jarausch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I find out the predefined decorators?
There are two in the standard library, @classmethod for declaring
class methods and @staticmethod for declaring static methods. They are
listed at the built ins page
On 8/13/07, Bjoern Schliessmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
unpedagogically not separated from ordinary functions.
Decorators _are_ ordinary functions. Remember the syntactic sugar
in this thread?
Remember also that syntactic sugar is important. Case in point, the
OP
On 8/16/07, Gerardo Herzig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@is_logued_in
def change_pass():
bla
bla
And so on for all the other functions who needs that the user is still
loged in.
where obviosly the is_logued_in() function will determine if the dude is
still loged in, and THEN execute
On Dec 11, 2007 4:06 PM, Neil Cerutti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, did you have an specific need for a do-while construct?
Perhaps we could show you the alternatives.
I have wanted do-while loops in exactly one kind of algorithms, when
you generate something and you have to keep trying
On Jan 24, 2008 8:08 AM, Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
En Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:00:53 -0200, Mike Kent [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Gabriel, thank you for clarifying the source of this behavior. Still,
I'm surprised it would be hard-coded into Python. Consider an
interactive
In Python, the direct translation of this is a for loop. When the
index doesn't matter to me, I tend to write it as:
for _ in xrange (1,n):
some code
An alternative way of indicating that you don't care about the loop
index would be
for dummy in xrange (1,n):
some code
I usually
2008/8/22 Peter Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DrScheme is an implementation of Scheme that is very newbie-friendly.
It has several limited sub-languages, etc.
So maybe a command line option can be added to Python3 ( -
newbie ? :-) ) that just switches on similar
2008/8/22 Terry Reedy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[snip]
On the left, click [+] for Language Reference
(3.0: The Python language reference).
Language Reference
(for language lawyers)
Language Lawyer? That's almost as worser than Grammar Nazi, no wonder
no one is finding anything there.
--
mvh Björn
2008/9/3 Hendrik van Rooyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Steven D'Aprano stev...bersource.com.au wrote:
Is there a better way of doing this than the way I am going about it?
Not sure if its better, but I would keep the messages in a table or dict and
have different tables or dicts for different levels
L = somelist
idx = 0
while True:
item = L[idx]
# Do something with item
idx = (idx + 1) % len(L)
wouldn't it be cool if there was an itertool like this:
def circulate(L, begin = 0, step = 1):
idx = begin
while True:
yield L[idx]
idx = (idx + step) % len(L)
On Nov 13, 2007 3:43 PM, Carsten Haese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 15:12 +0100, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
L = somelist
idx = 0
while True:
item = L[idx]
# Do something with item
idx = (idx + 1) % len(L)
For begin=0 and step=1, itertools.cycle does
On Nov 23, 2007 11:54 PM, Steven D'Aprano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:38:24 +, BJörn Lindqvist
wrote:
I like that a lot. This saves 12 characters for the original example and
removes the need to wrap it.
7return math.sqrt(.x * .x + .y * .y + .z * .z
On Nov 22, 2007 2:08 PM, Colin J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexy:
Sometimes I
avoid OO just not to deal with its verbosity. In fact, I try to use
Ruby anywhere speed is not crucial especially for @ prefix is better-
looking than self.
Ruby speed
On Nov 24, 2007 11:55 AM, jakub silar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Below is my coding standard - I'm lazy, even lazy to persuade
comutinties into strange (imho) language syntax extensions.
class Vector:
def __init__(s, x, y, z):
s.x = x
s.y = y
How is the code different from shlex.split?
--
mvh Björn
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 5/29/07, Eric S. Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A huge reason why this is important because the vast majority of software
developers who are injured fall off the economic ladder. They leave the
profession and had very few options for work that doesn't involve significant
handy is. The
On 30 May 2007 08:25:48 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am creating a distro of Python to be licensed as GPL am
wondering, what would anyone suggest as to 3rd party modules being put
into it (non-commercial of course!)? I know I'd put MySQLdb into it at
the very least.
On 27 May 2007 10:49:06 -0700, 7stud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 27, 11:28 am, Steve Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The groupby method has its uses, but it's behavior is
going to be very surprising to anybody that has used
the group by syntax of SQL, because Python's groupby
method
On 6/10/07, Stef Mientki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can realize it with a simple switch within each function,
but that makes the code much less readable:
def Some_Function():
if simulation_level == 1:
... do things in a way
elif simulation_level == 2:
... do things in
On 6/15/07, Ping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sum(1 for i in a_list if a_callable(i))
--
Carsten Haesehttp://informixdb.sourceforge.net
This works nicely but not very intuitive or readable to me.
First of all, the generator expression makes sense only to
trained eyes. Secondly, using
I patched Objects/listobject.c to support
L.count(value, cmp=None, key=None).
I tested it with the same script above by replacing slist
with built-in list. It worked correctly with this small
test. The patch is below (126 lines, I hope that's not
Great! If you want this change included
In python I must kick off a sort on the line before I start the
iteration. (This does make sense because at the end of the day the sort
has complete BEFORE the for loop can proceed - that is... until the day
when python lists have a secondary index ;-).
group_list=group_dict.keys()
On 6/20/07, Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not true that the sort must complete (or that the whole file must
be read for that matter), Python has cool generators which makes the
above possible.
That's not possible, the input must be read completely before sorted() can
Personally, I would like to see macros in Python (actually Logix
succeeding is good enough). But I am no language designer and the
community has no interest in it. When I absolutely need macros, I will
go elsewhere.
One must wonder, when is that? When do you absolutely need macros?
--
mvh
community has no interest in it. When I absolutely need macros, I will
go elsewhere.
I *like* 1..5 (ada, ruby) instead of range(5). If I had macros, I would
have done it myself for *my* code.
I think this example more is a symptom of a childish need to get
things your way than of a
void
usage(const char *proggie)
{
errx(EXIT_FAILURE, Usage: %s ip address, proggie);
}
int
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
struct in_addr addr;
if (argc != 2 || !inet_aton(argv[1], addr)) {
usage(argv[0]);
}
(void)printf(%s\n,
/* $Id: dotquad.c 3529 2005-10-01 10:15:22Z dyoung $ */
/*
* Copyright (c) 2003, 2004 David Young. All rights reserved.
*
* This code was written by David Young.
[snip code]
Am I the only one who found it hilarious that this piece of code was made
up of 24 lines of actual code
Hello,
I have some very serious trouble getting cookes to work. After a lot
of work (urllib2 is severly underdocumented, arcane and overengineerd
btw) I'm finally able to accept cookes from a server. But I'm still
unable to return them to a server. Specifically the script im trying
to do logs on
On 4 Jul 2006 08:38:47 -0700, Gaurav Agarwal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Steven, Actually i wanted a do text processing for my office
where I can view all files in the system and use the first three to
give a summary of the document. Instead of having somebody actually
entering the
On 19 Mar 2007 07:41:59 -0700, Ben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have recently learned how list comprehension works and am finding it
extremely cool. I am worried, however, that I may be stuffing it into
places that it does not belong.
What's the most pythony way to do this:
even = []
for x
On 4 Apr 2007 06:15:18 -0700, lancered [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During the calculation, I noticed an apparent error of
inverion of a 19x19 matrix. Denote this matrix as KK, U=KK^ -1, I
found the product of U and KK is not equivalent to unit matrix! This
apparently violate the
Here is some sample tuna:
['[7:55pm] P0ke My teachings goes back to the last iceage.\r\n',
'[7:55pm] %Zack ahh now it does\r\n', '[7:55pm] %Zack ok\r\n',
'[7:55pm] P0ke Or it is down just for you.\r\n', '[7:55pm] @FC3
which one? that -12000 ice age or the one before\r\n', '[7:55pm]
P0ke the
On 4/10/07, Carsten Haese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i = p.index(current_player)
opponents = p[:i-1] + p[i+1:]
An alternative is this:
opponents = tuple(x for x in p if x is not current_player)
You may disagree, but in my opinion, the alternative is better because
it is a more natural
On 4/10/07, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Boddie wrote:
On 10 Apr, 11:48, Antoon Pardon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-04-10, Duncan Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a cost to every new language feature: it has to be implemented,
documented, maintained, and above
On 4/10/07, Carsten Haese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
opponents = tuple(x for x in p if x is not current_player)
Your alternative is wrong because it wont raise ValueError if
current_player is not present in the tuple. Please revise your
solution.
You have a point. Here is my revised
while not game_has_ended:
for current_player in p:
player_does_something(current_player)
I'm curious why someone would even consider using a tuple in this case
regardless. I think that much of the desire for tuple.index is because
people use a tuple where they could have a list,
Your idea isn't new and has already been discussed lots of time
before. It was once planned to be implemented in py3k, but no longer
is.
One of the problems is that with a using statement, you always have
to decide whether your code repeats some prefix enough times to use a
using statement.
On 14 Apr 2007 07:24:32 -0700, jamadagni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You already can emulate the using statement like this:
You can emulate only assignments like this. How would you emulate
function calls, like the ones in my example?
You can't, of course. But using the with statement:
using
On 4/14/07, BJörn Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14 Apr 2007 07:24:32 -0700, jamadagni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You already can emulate the using statement like this:
You can emulate only assignments like this. How would you emulate
function calls, like the ones in my example
This comes up so often that I wonder whether Python should issue a warning
when it sees [] or {} as a default argument.
What do people think? A misuse or good use of warnings?
I think Python should reevaluate the default values.
--
mvh Björn
--
On 4/17/07, Mirco Wahab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason why I answered your posting at all (besides
seeing your x-post going into 5 ng's) is your mentioning
of 'God'. According to christian tradition (which is
somehow on topic in a Perl group) it is exactly the
case of Jesus (imho), who
On 4/29/07, Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To do that, I needed to generate an index table first. In the book
Numerical Recipes in Pascal by William Press et al there is a procedure
to generate an index table (46 lines of code) and one for a rank table
(five lines).
51 lines total.
On 30 Apr 2007 11:02:19 -0700, Bas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stupid question, but would it be possible to somehow merge xrange
(which is supposed to replace range in py3k) and slice? Both have very
similar start, stop and step arguments and both are lightweight
objects to indicate a range. But
On 8/20/06, Dave Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really, really good documentation.
Dave
... Which is the one thing no Python web framework provides. :( A
framework with really good documentation (preferably translated into
multiple languages) would be, I'm sure, the PHP/Ruby on Rails killer
Mechanize (http://wwwsearch.sourceforge.net/mechanize/) is another
option, it can even fill out forms!
--
mvh Björn
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 8/17/07, Gerardo Herzig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
def is_logued_in():
if not user.is_logged_in():
raise NotLoggedInError
It costs you one more line, but reduces complexity. And if you are
worried about that extra line you can put it in a function
On 8/22/07, Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22 ago, 10:00, BJörn Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I said, you can accomplish the exact same thing by calling a
function from within the function that requires the user to be logged
in.
def change_pass
On 8/24/07, Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
En Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:20:21 -0300, BJörn Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribi�:
def check_user_logged_in(func):
def f(*args, **kwargs):
if global_state.the_user.is_logged_in:
return func(*args, **kwargs
On 8/30/07, Carsten Haese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the Pythonic way
try:
i = somelist.index(thing)
# Do something with i
except IndexError:
# Do something if thing not found
That is not the Pythonic way. # Do something with i might also raise
an IndexError and they you are
I'm pleased to finally announce GtkImageView 1.5.0. I'm even more
pleased to ALSO announce PyGtkImageView 1.0.0:
Description
---
GtkImageView is a simple image viewer widget for GTK+. Similar to the
image viewer panes in gThumb or Eye of Gnome. It makes writing image
viewing and editing
On 9/12/07, Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The name self is just a convention. You can give it any name you
wish. Using s is common.
Not it's not common. And the name self is a convention codified in
PEP8 which you shouldn't violate.
And I agree with the OP that the convention is
On 9/16/07, Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I'm being unfair, but it seems to me that the attitude is similar:
'there's no point optimizing the common case of printing (say) ints
stored in a list, Just In Case the programmer wants the incredibly rare
case of setting sys.stdout
On 9/16/07, GeorgeRXZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well you are speed
That's an awesome party trick! But before I mail this to everyone at
the office, must have a better sentence. Well you are speed is to
gibberish. Something microsoft+evil... hm..
--
mvh Björn
--
On 9/16/07, J. Cliff Dyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know a good solution (preferably in python) for rasterizing
SVG or other vector graphics.
I'm thinking something like
vector_image = SVGFile(path_to_image)
raster_image = vector_image.rasterize(format, (width, height), dpi)
On 9/29/07, Chris Pax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I recently been trying to use the inspect module to inspect the
arguments of gtk objects, such as gtk.Button. I tried like this:
inspect.getargspec(gtk.Button.__init__)
and get the fallowing error:
File stdin, line 1, in module
On 10/8/07, Sanjay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I am using pytz.common_timezones to populate the timezone combo box of
some user registration form. But as it has so many timezones (around
400), it is a bit confusing to the users. Is there a smaller and more
practical set? If not, some
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
