Ian Kelly wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Americans celebrate March 14th as 3.14; some Europeans celebrate July
22nd as 22/7 (which is 3.142857, fairly close to 3.14159). We claim
both, and also June 28th (aka Tau Day or Two Pi Day, 6.28).
Hey
Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
I just had an idea, it occurred to me that the pass statement is pretty
similar to the print statement, and similarly to the print() function,
there could be a pass() function that does and returns nothing.
Example:
def pass():
return
try:
Ross Ridge wrote:
Ross Ridge rri...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
No, they're very much alike. That's why all your arguments for print
as function also apply just as well to pass a function. Your arguments
had very little to do what what print actually did.
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com
A few more bug fixes, and I actually included the documentation this
time. :) It can be found at http://python.org/pypi/dbf, and has been
tested on CPythons 2.4 - 2.7, and PyPy 1.8.
dbf v0.94.003
=
dbf (also known as python dbase) is a module for reading/writing
dBase III, FP,
Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
(Although if you think about the implementation of dicts as hash tables,
it does seem likely that it is trivial to enforce this -- one would have
to work *harder* to break that
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Python's promise is much stronger than merely deterministic: while it
does not promise what order the keys will be returned, it does promise
that whatever that order turns out to be, they will returned in the same
order as the matching values (unless you modify the dict
John Ladasky wrote:
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 9:32:33 PM UTC-7, Ethan Furman wrote:
What code does `pass` run? When do we pass parameters to `pass`? When
do we need to override `pass`?
Answers: None. Never. Still waiting for a reply from the OP for a use
case.
When I brought up
John Ladasky wrote:
I had very similar thoughts about eight months ago, and posted them here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/comp.lang.python/CB_5fek2b8A
I'm no computer science guru, but the idea that pass should be a function
rather than a statement continues to appeal
Simon Cropper wrote:
On 27/07/12 05:31, Ethan Furman wrote:
A few more bug fixes, and I actually included the documentation this
time. :) It can be found at http://python.org/pypi/dbf, and has been
tested on CPythons 2.4 - 2.7, and PyPy 1.8.
[snip]
Ethan,
That's great.
Can you comment
Pedro Kroger wrote:
Pyknon is a simple music library for Python hackers.
Sounds cool. How is 'Pyknon' pronounced?
It's available on PyPI and its homepage is
http://kroger.github.com/pyknon/
I would suggest you change the theme -- using Firefox 3.6 the page is
very difficult to read.
Pedro Kroger wrote:
On Jul 30, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us
mailto:et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
Pedro Kroger wrote:
Pyknon is a simple music library for Python hackers.
Sounds cool. How is 'Pyknon' pronounced?
I pronounce it similarly as google translate does:
So
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/31/2012 4:49 PM, Chris Kaynor wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
Another example: KeyError and IndexError are both subscript errors,
but there is no SubscriptError superclass, even though both work
thru the same mechanism -- __getitem__. The
SQLite has a neat feature where if you give it a the file-name of
':memory:' the resulting table is in memory and not on disk. I thought
it was a cool feature, but expanded it slightly: any name surrounded by
colons results in an in-memory table.
I'm looking at the same type of situation
Peter Otten wrote:
Ethan Furman wrote:
SQLite has a neat feature where if you give it a the file-name of
':memory:' the resulting table is in memory and not on disk. I thought
it was a cool feature, but expanded it slightly: any name surrounded by
colons results in an in-memory table.
I'm
Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 21/07/2012 00:59, Ethan Furman wrote:
Getting closer to a stable release.
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as CPython.
Get your copy at http://python.org/pypi/dbf.
Bug reports
subhabangal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, August 3, 2012 5:19:46 PM UTC+5:30, Subhabrata wrote:
Dear Group,
I am trying to call the values of one function in the another function in the
following way:
def func1():
num1=10
num2=20
print The Second Number is:,num2
Ole Martin Bjørndalen wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
SQLite has a neat feature where if you give it a the file-name of ':memory:'
the resulting table is in memory and not on disk. I thought it was a cool
feature, but expanded it slightly: any name
Mark Lawrence wrote:
With arrogance like that German by any chance?
Comments like that are not appropriate on this list. Please don't make
them.
~Ethan~
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[redirecting back to list]
Ole Martin Bjørndalen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
Ole Martin Bjørndalen wrote:
You can do this by implementing either __getitem__ or __iter__, unless the
streaming flag would also make your table not in memory.
Cool
John Mordecai Dildy wrote:
I am currently using python 2.6 and am not going to install the newer versions
of python and i am looking for people that are still using ver 2.6 in python to
help with with the code line:
sentence = All good things come to those who wait.
then im getting this
Tom P wrote:
consider a nested loop algorithm -
for i in range(100):
for j in range(100):
do_something(i,j)
Now, suppose I don't want to use i = 0 and j = 0 as initial values, but
some other values i = N and j = M, and I want to iterate through all
10,000 values in sequence - is
Ed Leafe wrote:
When converting from paradigms in other languages, I've often been
tempted to follow the accepted pattern for that language, and I've almost
always regretted it.
+1
When in doubt, make it as Pythonic as possible.
+1 QOTW
~Ethan~
--
Indexes have a new method (rebirth of an old one, really):
.index_search(
match,
start=None,
stop=None,
nearest=False,
partial=False )
The defaults are to search the entire index for exact matches and raise
NotFoundError if it can't find anything.
match is the search
Tim Chase wrote:
On 08/15/12 18:26, Ethan Furman wrote:
.index_search(
match,
start=None,
stop=None,
nearest=False,
partial=False )
The defaults are to search the entire index for exact matches and raise
NotFoundError if it can't find anything.
The question
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:26:09 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
Indexes have a new method (rebirth of an old one, really):
.index_search(
match,
start=None,
stop=None,
nearest=False,
partial=False )
[...]
Why index_search rather than just
Ramchandra Apte wrote:
Are they the same object
Yes.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hans Mulder wrote:
On 8/08/12 04:14:01, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
NoneType raises an error if you try to create a second instance. bool
just returns one of the two singletons (doubletons?) again.
py type(None)()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
TypeError: cannot
MRAB wrote:
On 16/08/2012 02:22, Ethan Furman wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:26:09 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
Indexes have a new method (rebirth of an old one, really):
.index_search(
match,
start=None,
stop=None,
nearest=False,
partial
MRAB wrote:
On 16/08/2012 17:13, Ethan Furman wrote:
Currently there are:
.index(data) -- returns index of data in Index, or raises error
.query(string) -- brute force search, returns all matching records
.search(match) -- binary search through table, returns all matching
MRAB wrote:
On 16/08/2012 16:40, Ramchandra Apte wrote:
On 16 August 2012 21:00, Mark Lawrence wrote:
and bottom reads better than top
[snip]
Look you are the only person complaining about top-posting.
GMail uses top-posting by default.
I can't help it if you feel irritated by it.
Chris Angelico wrote:
PLEASE add attribution back in. It's not about he-said/she-said, it's
about honesty and clarity in reporting. It's far easier to understand
the conversation when we know who said each part [. . .]
+1
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Prasad, Ramit wrote:
Willem Krayenhoff
Any idea why print isn't working here?
I tried restarting my Command prompt. Also, print doesn't work inside a class.
Ramit,
The standard for attribution is something along the lines of:
Prasad, Ramit wrote:
or
Willem Kayenhoff wrote:
Just
Peter wrote:
Thanks for the link Malcolm, I'll have a look at it. What is
particularly interesting (at first glance), is that the author has
mixed Tkinter with ttk as it suited i.e. look at this line:
f1 = tkinter.Frame(nb, background=red)
If ttk was being used purely (from tkinter import *;
peterob wrote:
Im completely confinvalided from email library. When you parse email from
file it creates object Message.
f = open(emailFile, 'r')
msg = email.message_from_file(f)
f.close()
How can I access RAW header of email represented by object msg? I dont
wanna access each header field by
monkeys paw wrote:
I have the following file:
FileInfo.py:
import UserDict
class FileInfo(UserDict):
store file metadata
def __init__(self, filename=None):
UserDict.__init__(self)
self[name] = filename
When i import it like so:
import FileInfo
i get this error:
Jon Herman wrote:
Hello all,
I am pretty new to Python and am trying to write data to a file.
However, I seem to be misunderstanding how to do so. For starters, I'm
not even sure where Python is looking for these files or storing them.
The directories I have added to my PYTHONPATH variable
Dan Stromberg wrote:
Are you on windows?
You probably should use / as your directory separator in Python, not \.
In Python, and most other programming languages, \ starts an escape
sequence, so to introduce a literal \, you either need to prefix your
string with r (r\foo\bar) or double
John Harrington wrote:
Here's a script that illustrates the problem. Any help would be
appreciated!:
#BEGIN SCRIPT
import re
outlist = []
myfile = raw.tex
fin = open(myfile, r)
lineList = fin.readlines()
fin.close()
for i in range(0,len(lineList)):
On 3/18/2011 6:25 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us
mailto:et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
Dan Stromberg wrote:
Are you on windows?
You probably should use / as your directory separator in Python
John Ladasky wrote:
On Mar 28, 2:25 am, Andrea Crotti andrea.crott...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed some time ago in a program that needed speed that deepcopy in
particular is incredibly slow, but I guess is normal since it has to
copy every bit of the data structure.
That may be, but when it
John Parker wrote:
I have written the following code so far but get an error.
infile = open(scores.txt, r)
lines = infile.readlines()
infile.close()
tokens = lines.split(,)
[snip]
error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File Score_8.py, line 38, in module
tokens = lines.split(,)
harrismh777 wrote:
Chris Rebert wrote:
Yes. py2exe is a tool which generates such Windows executables:
http://www.py2exe.org/
Interesting... but it can't possibly be creating .exe files
(compiling)...
Yes and no. The python program is not being compiled. The Python
system, along with
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I have a package with some tests. The tests are not part of the package
Do you mean they are not importable, as in
-- from spam import tests
or they are not distributed? Because it seems to me that distributing
them would be worthwhile to at least some of the folks
Wehe, Marco wrote:
I am doing a search through a list of files but the text the casing
doesn't match. My list is all upper case but the real files are all
different. Is there a smooth way of searching through the list without
going full on regular expressions?
path =
Westley Martínez wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 01:41 -0500, harrismh777 wrote:
Freedom isn't free... you have to fight for it... always.
Why should a business listen to you? You're not gonna buy any software
anyways.
From a thread a few months back I can say there are a couple companies
r wrote:
The code above implements an interactive session (a REPL). Therefore,
what I'd like to get is an error information printed out at the output
as soon as it becomes available.
Couple ideas:
1) Instead of yielding the error, call some global print function, then
continue on; or
2)
candide wrote:
Le 08/04/2011 18:43, Ian Kelly a écrit :
In bool(x=5), x=5 is also not an expression. It's passing the
expression 5 in as the parameter x, using a keyword argument.
You are probably right but how do you deduce this brilliant
interpretation from the wording given in the
Mel wrote:
Python is a pragmatic language, so all the rules come pre-broken.
+1 QOTW
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
James Mills wrote:
Are we done with this discussion yet ? :)
*sigh* It was a slow day yesterday and I have
a funny feeling it's going to be the same today!
Regardless of anyone's subjective opinions as to what
was clear - I still stand by what I said.
I think I see your point -- the OP said:
Westley Martínez wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 16:06 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
-- def func():
-- var1 = something()
-- var2 = something_else('this')
-- return? var1.hobgle(var2)
-- var3 = last_resort(var1)
-- return var3.wiglat(var2)
The question mark makes the programmer
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:48:31 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
Westley Martínez wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 16:06 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
-- def func():
-- var1 = something()
-- var2 = something_else('this') -- return?
var1.hobgle(var2)
-- var3
James Mills wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:39 AM, rantingrick rantingr...@gmail.com wrote:
[weapon of mass-snippitude]
James,
*Please* don't re-post his crap.
~Ethan~
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
geremy condra wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:50 PM, harrismh777 harrismh...@charter.net wrote:
My major professor once told me, You know you've won the argument when they
start calling you names!
I think your professor should have said you know you've won the
argument when you can prove
Westley Martínez wrote:
Also, why aren't Opera and Google criticized for their proprietary
browsers (Chrome is essentially a proprietary front-end)? Is it because
their browsers follow web standards, or is it because we have demonized
Microsoft?
My biggest gripe with Microsoft as that they
Chris Angelico wrote:
lst=[]
for i in xrange(1,1000): # arbitrary top, don't like this
try:
lst.append(parse_kwdlist(dct[Keyword%d%i]))
except KeyError:
break
Possibly overkill:
import dbf
table = dbf.from_csv(csvfile) # fields get names f0, f1, f2, ...
Gerald Britton wrote:
However, I would like a deeper
understanding of why I cannot use foo as an unqualified variable
inside the method in the class. If Python allowed such a thing, what
problems would that cause?
8
script with possible
Gerald Britton wrote:
For my
final attempt, I add the prefix a. to my use of foo
class a():
... foo = 'foo'
... def g(x):
... return a.foo
...
The first parameter to any method in a class* is going to be the
instance of that class, and is usually named 'self'. So your
Gerald Britton wrote:
I now understand the Python does
not consider a class definition as a separate namespace as it does for
function definitions. That is a helpful understanding.
That is not correct. Classes are separate namespaces -- they just
aren't automatically searched. The only
chad wrote:
Let's say I have the following
class BaseHandler:
def foo(self):
print Hello
class HomeHandler(BaseHandler):
pass
Then I do the following...
test = HomeHandler()
test.foo()
How can HomeHandler call foo() when I never created an instance of
BaseHandler?
You
Kyle T. Jones wrote:
Ethan Furman wrote:
chad wrote:
Let's say I have the following
class BaseHandler:
def foo(self):
print Hello
class HomeHandler(BaseHandler):
pass
Then I do the following...
test = HomeHandler()
test.foo()
How can HomeHandler call foo() when I
Hans Georg Schaathun wrote:
List comprehension is understood even by readers with no experience
with python.
There's nothing magically understandable about a list comp -- the first
time I saw one (which was in Python), I had to learn about them.
~Ethan~
--
For anybody interested in composition instead of multiple inheritance, I
have posted this recipe on ActiveState (for python 2.6/7, not 3.x):
http://code.activestate.com/recipes/577658-composition-of-classes-instead-of-multiple-inherit/
Comments welcome!
~Ethan~
--
Carl Banks wrote:
That's not what we mean by composition. Composition is when one object
calls upon another object that it owns to implement some of its behavior.
Often used to model a part/whole relationship, hence the name.
Hmmm. Okay -- any ideas for a better term? Something that
James Mills wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
Hmmm. Okay -- any ideas for a better term? Something that describes taking
different source classes and fusing them into a new whole, possibly using
single-inheritance... Frankenstein, maybe? ;)
I'd
Carl Banks wrote:
Here is my advice on mixins:
[snip]
Cool. Thanks!
~Ethan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Ian Kelly wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
For anybody interested in composition instead of multiple inheritance, I
have posted this recipe on ActiveState (for python 2.6/7, not 3.x):
http://code.activestate.com/recipes/577658-composition
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
I'm writing-up more guidance on how to use super() and would like to
point at some real-world Python examples of cooperative multiple
inheritance.
Don't know if you are still looking for examples, but I recently came
across a thread in Python-Dev which had an example
harrismh777 wrote:
Grant Edwards wrote:
I give up. You don't seem to understand the C language defintion or
what is commonly meant by pass by reference.
ah, don't give up... here is a link that might help to clarify some of
these semantics... me thinks:
Ian Kelly wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:57 PM, dmitrey dmitre...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, it doesn't work, it turn out to be dict_items:
next({1:2}.items())
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
TypeError: dict_items object is not an iterator
So call
harrismh777 wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
attribution lost wrote:
and implies in any case that li does not exist
It does nothing of the sort. If li doesn't exist, you get a NameError.
That was the point. 'not' implies something that is not logical;
which is irony extreme since
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
But that's wrong! Names (little boxes) can't point to *slots in a list*,
any more than they can point to other names! This doesn't work:
-- L = [None, 42, None]
-- a = L[0]
-- L[0] = 23
-- print(a) # This doesn't work!
23
Minor nitpick -- having a comment saying
James Wright wrote:
Hello,
Howdy!
def create_report_index(report): #Here we are creating a simple
index.html file from data in a text file
newfile = open(report + '.html', 'w') #Create the index file using
report name
for each_value in D4[report]:
[clean_name, _] =
James Wright wrote:
Thank you Ethan,
This is what I see now:
# python render4.py
current each_value is: vsr
Traceback (most recent call last):
File render4.py, line 115, in module
create_report_index(each_item)
File render4.py, line 26, in create_report_index
[clean_name, _] =
James Wright wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
Change your print line to:
print(D4[%s] = %s % (report, each_value))
After that, you'll have to track down how D4 is being created to see where
'vsr' is coming from.
It does not appear to show
James Wright wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
James Wright wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
Change your print line to:
print(D4[%s] = %s % (report, each_value))
After that, you'll have to track down how D4 is being created to see
where
Ian Kelly wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
Anybody care to chime in with their usage of this construct?
You should start with PEP 3106. The main idea is that dict.keys() and
dict.items() can be treated as frozensets, while still being more
lightweight than lists
Hans Georg Schaathun wrote:
On 11 May 2011 13:36:02 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
: In this case, the interpretation of an arbitrary object as a boolean is
: peculiar for python.
:
: Incorrect. It is widespread among many languages. Programmers have
Hans Georg Schaathun wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 13:50:54 -0400, Prasad, Ramit
ramit.pra...@jpmchase.com wrote:
: I find this argument to be flawed. Should I stop using built-in
: generators instead of range/xrange for looping through lists?
: Certainly for loops with loop counting are
Rodrick Brown wrote:
I'm having a hard time dealing with the following scenario
My class takes a hash like the following:
rdargs =
{'env:'prod','feed':'opra','hostname':'host13dkp1','process':'delta','side':'a','zone','ny'}
All the keys in this hash can be optional.
I'm having a hard time
Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Ian hobso...@gmail.com wrote:
In the real world lists of zero items do not exist.
You don't go shopping with a shopping list of zero items.
Actually, yes you do. You maintain your shopping list between trips;
whenever you need something,
Roy Smith wrote:
I recently observed in the checking if a list is empty thread that a
list and a subclass of list can compare equal:
class MyList(list):
I'm a subclass
l1 = []
l2 = MyList()
print type(l1), type(l2)
print type(l1) == type(l2)
print l1 == l2
Roy Smith wrote:
On May 12, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Eric Snow wrote:
That definitely makes it unclear.
I don't think it's unclear at all. It's very clear. Clearly wrong :-)
While it is wrong (it should have 'built-in' precede the word 'types'),
it is not wrong in the way you think -- a
Andrew Berg wrote:
On 2011.05.12 02:25 PM, MRAB wrote:
You can raise an exception wherever you like! :-)
If I raise an exception that isn't a built-in exception, I get something
like NameError: name 'HelloError' is not defined. I don't know how to
define the exception.
class
Roy Smith wrote:
On May 12, 2:29 pm, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
While it is wrong (it should have 'built-in' precede the word 'types'),
it is not wrong in the way you think -- a subclass *is* a type of its
superclass.
Well, consider this:
class List_A(list):
A list subclass
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2011 09:43:23 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
MyList is a list -- just a more specific kind of list -- as can be seen
from its mro; this is analogous to a square (2 sets of parallel lines
joined at 90 degree angles, both sets being the same length) also being
In Python 3 one can say
-- huh = bytes(5)
Since the bytes type is actually a list of integers, I would have
expected this to have huh being a bytestring with one element -- the
integer 5. Actually, what you get is:
-- huh
b'\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00'
or five null bytes. Note that this is an
Joe Leonardo wrote:
Totally baffled by this…maybe I need a nap. Writing a small function to
reject input that is not a list of 19 fields.
def breakLine(value):
if value.__class__() != [] and value.__len__() != 19:
print 'You must pass a list that contains 19 fields.'
else:
Felipe Bastos Nunes wrote:
2011/5/17 Ethan Furman wrote:
In Python 3 one can say
-- huh = bytes(5)
Since the bytes type is actually a list of integers, I would have
expected this to have huh being a bytestring with one element -- the
integer 5. Actually, what you get is:
-- huh
b'\x00
Corey Richardson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/17/2011 02:47 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
In Python 3 one can say
-- huh = bytes(5)
Since the bytes type is actually a list of integers, I would have
expected this to have huh being a bytestring with one element
Ian Kelly wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
The big question, though, is would you do it this way:
some_var = bytes(23).replace(b'\x00', b'a')
or this way?
some_var = bytes(b'a' * 23)
Actually, I would just do it this way:
some_var = b'a' * 23
Ian Kelly wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
The big question, though, is would you do it this way:
some_var = bytes(23).replace(b'\x00', b'a')
or this way?
some_var = bytes(b'a' * 23)
Actually, I would just do it this way:
some_var = b'a' * 23
Andrew Berg wrote:
ElementTree doesn't seem to have been updated in a long time, so I'll
assume it won't work with Python 3.
I don't know how to use it, but you'll find ElementTree as xml.etree in
Python 3.
~Ethan~
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Several folk have said that objects that compare equal must hash equal,
and the docs also state this
http://docs.python.org/dev/reference/datamodel.html#object.__hash__
I'm hoping somebody can tell me what horrible thing will happen if this
isn't the case? Here's a toy example of a class I'm
Chris Rebert wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
Several folk have said that objects that compare equal must hash equal, and
the docs also state this
http://docs.python.org/dev/reference/datamodel.html#object.__hash__
I'm hoping somebody can tell me
Peter Otten wrote:
Ethan Furman wrote:
Several folk have said that objects that compare equal must hash equal,
and the docs also state this
http://docs.python.org/dev/reference/datamodel.html#object.__hash__
I'm hoping somebody can tell me what horrible thing will happen if this
isn't
Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
Ethan Furman wrote:
Several folk have said that objects that compare equal must hash equal,
and the docs also state this
http://docs.python.org/dev/reference/datamodel.html#object.__hash__
I'm hoping somebody can tell me what horrible thing will happen if this
isn't
Ethan Furman wrote:
Several folk have said that objects that compare equal must hash equal,
and the docs also state this
http://docs.python.org/dev/reference/datamodel.html#object.__hash__
Two things I didn't make clear originally:
I'm using Python3.
My objects (of type Wierd) obey
Peter Otten wrote:
Ethan Furman wrote:
Peter Otten wrote:
Ethan Furman wrote:
Several folk have said that objects that compare equal must hash equal,
and the docs also state this
http://docs.python.org/dev/reference/datamodel.html#object.__hash__
-- class Wierd():
... def __init__(self
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 5/25/2011 8:01 AM, John Bokma wrote:
to. Like I already stated before: if Python is really so much better
than Python readability wise, why do I have such a hard time dropping
Perl and moving on?
[you meant 'than Perl'] You are one of the people whose brain fits Perl
tkp...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the guidance - it was indeed an issue with reading in
binary vs. text., and I do now succeed in reading the last line,
except that I now seem unable to split it, as I demonstrate below.
Here's what I get when I read the last line in text mode using 2.7.1
and
701 - 800 of 3757 matches
Mail list logo
