Christoph Zwerschke wrote:
Now as I'm thinking about it, wouldn't it be nice to have the cartesian
products on Python sets? Maybe also a method that returns the power set
of a set (the set of all subsets), or the set of all subsets with a
given length.
For defining powersets it might
Tim Peters wrote:
[Kay Schluehr]
I concur and I wonder why CAS like e.g. Maple that represent floating
point numbers using two integers [1] are neither awkward to use nor
inefficient.
My guess is that it's because you never timed the difference in Maple
-- or, perhaps, that you did
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Christoph Zwerschke wrote:
Sometimes I was missing such a feature.
What I expect as the result is the cartesian product of the strings.
I've been thinking of it as well. I'd like it for lists too:
range(3)**2
[(0,0), (0,1), (0,2), (1,0), (1,1), (1,2), (2,0),
Bengt Richter wrote:
On 19 Jan 2006 01:19:06 -0800, Kay Schluehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to manipulate a deeply nested list in a generic way at a
determined place. Given a sequence of constant objects a1, a2, ..., aN
and a variable x. Now construct a list from them recursively:
L
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:48:26 +, Steve Holden wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 04:25:01 +, Bengt Richter wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:16:22 +0100, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gerhard_H=E4ring?=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
floating points are
I want to manipulate a deeply nested list in a generic way at a
determined place. Given a sequence of constant objects a1, a2, ..., aN
and a variable x. Now construct a list from them recursively:
L = [a1, [a2, [[aN, [x]]...]]
The value of x is the only one to be changed. With each value of
Paul Boddie wrote:
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
Fuzzyman wrote:
web.py has the great advantage that (allegedly) you can migrate apps
from CGI to FastCGI, mod_python, WSGI.
This isn't an advantage of web.py over other frameworks. You can do the
same thing with Django, because it has a
I wonder why this expression works:
decimal.Decimal(5.5)**1024
Decimal(1.353299876254915295189966576E+758)
but this one causes an error
5.5**1024
Traceback (most recent call last):
File interactive input, line 1, in ?
OverflowError: (34, 'Result too large')
Another quirk is the follwoing:
Steve Holden wrote:
If Mr. interpreter is as slick as he is why doesn't he convert the
float by himself? This is at most a warning caused by possible rounding
errors of float.
Indeed, as the documentation says: This serves as an explicit
reminder of the details of the conversion
Peter Otten wrote:
Kay Schluehr wrote:
I want to manipulate a deeply nested list in a generic way at a
determined place. Given a sequence of constant objects a1, a2, ..., aN
and a variable x. Now construct a list from them recursively:
L = [a1, [a2, [[aN, [x]]...]]
The value
Derek wrote:
Hi,
I am looking to port Python to an embedded platform (an ARM7 device with
fairly limited memory, capable of running an RTOS, but not an OS, such as
Linux). I came across DePython from a few years ago, but it seems to have
died a death.
Does anybody have advice? I am looking
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2006-01-19, Kay Schluehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody have advice? I am looking for any tricks, features I can
disable, etc so I can get the python core to be a small as possible (100k
would be good).
Have you thought about using a JVM as the Python
I'd be interested in what people think about bundling one of the
diverse Python webframeworks with the Python distribution which will be
just there as like Tcl/Tk+Tkinter for GUI-programming. Its not that I
don't trust people to make qualified decisions on their own or that I
actually believe in
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
Fuzzyman wrote:
web.py has the great advantage that (allegedly) you can migrate apps
from CGI to FastCGI, mod_python, WSGI.
This isn't an advantage of web.py over other frameworks. You can do the
same thing with Django, because it has a WSGI backend; people run
Max M wrote:
First of they would need to make Python a strategic platform for
corporations, so that it was used practically everywhere on Windows.
Then it would have the powerbase to change the lanuage and make an
incompatible version that they could control.
As far as I can see C## has
Luis M. González wrote:
Is it good to have Python running on Java and .NET?
Sure, why not?
At least for Jython we already know from the Jython homepage that it is
the great hope of the Java platform to survive in future and far
beyond. With a comparable fate dotNET and Microsoft survive till
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While preparing a Python411 podcast about classes and OOP, my mind
wondered far afield. I found myself constructing an extended metaphor
or analogy between the way programs are organized and certain
philosophical ideas. So, going where my better angels dare not, here
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:00:51 -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
The other way I thought of is to create a separate class that consists
of the variables and to use the
from file name import *
in all of the files (namespaces) where it is needed.
Except for one
D H wrote:
Kay Schluehr wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to learn GUI programming in Python, but have to confess I
am finding it difficult.
Don't do it if you can prevent it.
What kind of helpful advice is that?
Conclusion: if you are already familiar with BASIC I
Mike Meyer wrote:
Ok, I've given it the interface I want, and made it less of an
attractive nuisance.
http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/try_python/ is now ready for people to
play with. There's no tutorial information on it yet, that's the next
thing to do. However, I won't be able to work on it
gsteff wrote:
So I'm wondering, what is
innovative about Python, either in its design or implementation? Or is
its magic really just in combining many useful features of prior
languages in an unusually pleasant way?
Greg
The latter.
Alex Martelli wrote:
Aahz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Hrm. I don't recall anything about typeclasses, so my suspicion is that
you were writing something lengthy and above my head. Can you write
something reasonably short about it? (I'm asking partly for your
benefit, because if it
Tolga wrote:
As far as I know, Perl is known as there are many ways to do
something and Python is known as there is only one way. Could you
please explain this? How is this possible and is it *really* a good
concept?
Do you know about the existence of god, just or scientific truth? Of
course
Alex Martelli wrote:
I don't see why your typeclass illustration does not apply to ABCs as
Because in a class, A or B or not, this code WOULD mean mutual recursion
(and it can't be checked whether recursion terminates, in general). In
a typeclass, it means something very different -- a
Gabriel Zachmann wrote:
I understand the Wikipedia article on Polymorphism
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymorphism_%28computer_science%29 )
that it doesn't make sense to talk about polymorphism in a fully dynamically
typed language -- does the Python community agree?
Maybe you should
In almost any case I install a Python package via distutils some
directories in the package tree are left behind e.g. the docs,
licenses, tests etc. I wonder if there is some rationale behind this?
Should it be left to the creative freedom of the user to copy the
docs whereever she wants or is
Harald Armin Massa wrote:
Dr. Armin Rigo has some mathematical proof, that High Level Languages
like esp. Python are able to be faster than low level code like
Fortran, C or assembly.
I am not wise enough to understand that proof.
Maybe I understood those papers totally wrong and he was
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to learn GUI programming in Python, but have to confess I
am finding it difficult.
Don't do it if you can prevent it.
GUI - toolkits are very complex beasts and at least to me a source of
pain far more as a joy. Python cannot help you making them
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
Perhaps now the answer top your question is more obvious: there is by no
means universal agreement on what an ordered dictionary should do.
Given the ease with which Python allows you to implement your chosen
functionality it would be
Steve R. Hastings wrote:
It should be possible to define operators using punctuation,
alphanumerics, or both:
]+[
]add[
]outer*[
Seems like you look for advanced source-code editors.Some ideas are
around for quite a while e.g. here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intentional_programming
I'm
Christoph Zwerschke wrote:
That would be also biased (in favour of Python) by the fact that
probably very little people would look for and use the package in the
cheese shop if they were looking for ordered dicts.
Does anyone actually use this site? While the Vaults offered a nice
place and a
A.M. Kuchling wrote:
On 22 Nov 2005 01:41:44 -0800,
Kay Schluehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone actually use this site? While the Vaults offered a nice
place and a nice interface the Cheese Shop has the appeal of a code
slum.
Looking at the Cheese Shop's home page at
http
Ron wrote:
Hello,
I'm attempting to develop a plugin framework for an application that I'm
working on. I wish to develop something in which all plugins exist in a
directory tree. The framework need only be given the root of the tree. The
framework then uses os.path.walk to search all for
Bengt Richter wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:27:22 +0100, Christoph Zwerschke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
if you restructure the list somewhat
d = (
('pid', ('Employee ID', 'int')),
('name', ('Employee name', 'varchar')),
('sal',
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
huh? if you want a list, use a list.
d = [('a', {...}), ('b', {})]
If one wants uniform access to a nested data structure like this one
usually starts writing a wrapper class. I do not think the requirement
is anyhow deeper than a standard wrapper around such a
pcmanlin wrote:
because i have a problem that python's oo feature is so great, but
maybe when the project become larger, python's no-declaration cannot
mapping the design to practice?
I am not sure about it.
As far cartoon-ware ( UML ) is concerned note that it is NOT Pythons
Stefan Arentz wrote:
Stuart Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm already using it for a ton of things - I want to try and get broader
acceptance in the organisation for it to be made and 'officially supported
product'.
IMO that is what you need to communicate: 'already using it for a
Probably some of you know the amazing demo application for wxPython.
When you open the Listbook demo in the
Core Windows/Contols folder, replace there wx.LB_DEFAULT by wx.LB_RIGHT
and resize the main window the listbox on the right side moves into the
area of colored panel. This is a surprise to
Robin Becker wrote:
Kay Schluehr wrote:
Robin Becker wrote:
I thought that methods were always overridable.
In this case the lookup on the
class changes the behaviour of the one and only property.
How can something be made overridable that is actually overridable? I
didn't know
Robin Becker wrote:
I thought that methods were always overridable.
In this case the lookup on the
class changes the behaviour of the one and only property.
How can something be made overridable that is actually overridable? I
didn't know how to better express the broken polymorphism of
Robin Becker wrote:
Is there a way to override a data property in the instance? Do I need to
create
another class with the property changed?
--
Robin Becker
It is possible to decorate a method in a way that it seems like
property() respects overridden methods. The decorator cares
The Eternal Squire wrote:
My main question regarding this is: even if I am successful, would the
results be rejected out of hand by y'all as not meeting the Zen of
Python?
Have you ever asked a Zen master about Zen?
Kay
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I got a problem deleting objects, which are placed in a hirarchy
Asume we have the following code:
class parent:
MyChilds = [] # this list is filled with childs
def AddChild(self,
George Sakkis wrote:
Ron Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to implement simple svg style colored complex objects in
tkinter and want to be able to inherit default values from other
previously defined objects.
I want to something roughly similar to ...
class
Alex Martelli wrote:
try it (and read the Timbot's article included in Python's sources, and the
sources themselves)...
Just a reading advise. The translated PyPy source
pypy/objectspace/listsort.py might be more accessible than the
corresponding C code.
Kay
--
Steve Holden wrote:
could ildg wrote:
Python is wonderful except that it has no real private and protected
properties and methods.
Every py object has dict so that you can easily find what fields and
methods an obj has,
this is very convenient, but because of this, py is very hard to
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
James Stroud wrote:
There needs to be an email filter that, when a thread is begun by a specific
user . . . it cans every
message in that thread.
The tried-and-true solution is both simple and civil, Don't feed the
trolls.
Raymond
People like very much
Catalin Marinas wrote:
Hi,
Sorry if this was previously discussed but it's something I miss in
Python. I get around this using isinstance() but it would be cleaner
to have separate functions with the same name but different argument
types. I think the idea gets quite close to the Lisp/CLOS
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Slashdot there is a discussion about the future C#3.0:
http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/05/09/18/0545217.shtml?tid=109tid=8
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vcsharp/future/
The extensions enable construction of compositional APIs
Laszlo Zsolt Nagy wrote:
Hello,
Do you know how to implement a really efficient self reordering list in
Python? (List with a maximum length. When an item is processed, it
becomes the first element in the list.) I would like to use this for
caching of rendered images.
I wonder why you don't
PyPK wrote:
If I have a list say
lst = [1,1,1,1,3,5,1,1,1,1,7,7,7]
I want to group the list so that it returns groups such as
[(0,3),4,5,(6,9),(10,12)]. which defines the regions which are similar.
Thanks,
Hi,
I got a solution without iterators and without comparing adjecent
elements!
Steve Holden wrote:
Kay Schluehr wrote:
Mike Meyer wrote:
Yes, but the function sorted is more useful than a list method
sorted in a duck typing language.
I don't see what this has to do with duck typing? sorted() is simply
a generic function accepting different types. I'm
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
1) The existing tool is inadequate for the task at hand and OO subclassing
is overrated/overhyped to fix this problem. Even when you override
base classes with your own stuff, you're still stuck with the larger
*architecture* of the original design. You really
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's say I define a list of pairs as follows:
l = [('d', 3), ('a', 2), ('b', 1)]
Can anyone explain why this does not work?
h = {}.update(l)
and instead I have to go:
h = {}
h.update(l)
to initialize a dictionary with the given list of pairs?
when an
Mike Meyer wrote:
Yes, but the function sorted is more useful than a list method
sorted in a duck typing language.
I don't see what this has to do with duck typing? sorted() is simply
a generic function accepting different types. I'm not aware that
sorted() requires a specific interface of
Terry Reedy wrote:
Kay Schluehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On the other hand there exists no sorted() method for tuples or lists
like join() for strings but it is implemented as a function in Python24
that returns a new sorted container. I consider
David Duerrenmatt wrote:
Is there a way to use old pyd files (Python 1.5.2) with a newer version
of Python without recompiling them?
Because the source code is not available anymore, I'm wondering whether
it's possible or not to change few bytes with a hex editor (version
number?). I'd like
One of the main reasons Pythons anonymous function lambda is considered
to be broken is Pythons disability to put statements into expressions
and support full functionality. Many attempts to improve lambdas syntax
had also been attempts to break the expression/statement distinction in
one or the
Terry Hancock wrote:
On Wednesday 07 September 2005 05:29 am, Kay Schluehr wrote:
Instead of pushing statements into expressions one can try to do it the
other way round and model expressions with the functionality of
statements.
Alternative syntax proposals:
(a) (COND1,EXPR1
Terry Reedy wrote:
Kay Schluehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, as I explained it is not a ternary operator and it can't easily be
implemented using a Python function efficiently because Python does not
support lazy evaluation.
By *carefully* using the flow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dude - this business is so confusing that you actually have to *think*
about it!
but python is all about simplicity.
with python, when I program - I don't think *about* it - I think it. or
something - don't make me think about it.
so how about a reyield or some
Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
x = [ yield r for r in iterable ]
Which is quite different from
x = (yield) in iterable
which is currently (PEP 342) equivalent to
_ = (yield)
x = _ in iterable
So, no further tinkering with yield, I'm afraid.
Reinhold
Is the statement
yield from
Sybren Stuvel wrote:
-Get rid of extra variables by shifting them inline (e.g.:
a=1;b=2;c=a+b -- c=1+2)
This is already excess functionality IMO.
I don't think that Rex talked about his programming style but about
three and only three refactoring methods survived in BRM from ~30
Fowler
Bengt Richter wrote:
How about interpreting seq[i] as an abbreviation of seq[i%len(seq)] ?
That would give a consitent interpretation of seq[-1] and no errors
for any value ;-)
Cool, indexing becomes cyclic by default ;)
But maybe it's better to define it explicitely:
seq[!i] =
Bengt Richter wrote:
How about interpreting seq[i] as an abbreviation of seq[i%len(seq)] ?
That would give a consitent interpretation of seq[-1] and no errors
for any value ;-)
Cool, indexing becomes cyclic by default ;)
But maybe it's better to define it explicitely:
seq[!i] =
Bengt Richter wrote:
range(9)[4:-!0:-1] == range(5)
True
Interesting, but wouldn't that last line be
range(9)[4:-!0:-1] == range(5)[::-1]
Ups. Yes of course.
Life can be simpler with unbound limits.
Hm, is !0 a di-graph symbol for infinity?
What if we get full unicode on our screens?
Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
Kay Schluehr wrote:
Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
x = [ yield r for r in iterable ]
Which is quite different from
x = (yield) in iterable
which is currently (PEP 342) equivalent to
_ = (yield)
x = _ in iterable
So, no further tinkering
This should help:
http://epydoc.sourceforge.net/fields.html
Kay
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steven Bethard wrote:
The slice of s from i to j with step k is defined as the sequence of
items with index x = i + n*k such that 0 = n (j-i)/k.
This seems to contradict list behavior though.
range(10)[9:-1:-2] == []
No, both is correct. But we don't have to interpret the second slice
Bryan Olson wrote:
Steven Bethard wrote:
Well, I couldn't find where the general semantics of a negative stride
index are defined, but for sequences at least[1]:
The slice of s from i to j with step k is defined as the sequence of
items with index x = i + n*k such that 0 = n
Simon Brunning wrote:
On 8/15/05, Rocco Moretti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which lead me to the question - what's the difference between a library
and a framework?
If you call its code, it's a library. If it calls yours, it's a framework.
Pretty!
I don't think it is an oversimplification.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:19:19 +0100
phil hunt wrote:
According to Wikipedia, the Liskov substitution principle is:
Let q(x) be a property provable about objects x of type T. Then
q(y) should be true for objects y of type S where S is a subtype of T
To
EP wrote:
But sometimes a rugged individual can be even more rugged and more individual
if said individual has the support of friends by which to vet ideas and, by
absorbing counterpoint, to develop one's own thoughts even further.
And it is kind of nice when you have two teams drilling a
Nicolas Fleury wrote:
It is necessary to maintain a
dictionary of types (to avoid redundacy) and simple things like:
def makeType(someArgument):
class MyObject:
someArgument = someArgument
return MyObject
are not allowed.
def makeClass(cls_name, **kw):
return
Nicolas Fleury schrieb:
Kay Schluehr wrote:
def makeClass(cls_name, **kw):
return type(cls_name,(), kw)
MyObject = makeClass(MyObject,a=8)
MyObject
As said to Bengt, a place is needed to write the class definition.
There's no need for metaclass in that case:
def makeType(a, b
Paul Rubin schrieb:
Having a good FFI is certainly an important feature but Python
programs should first and foremost be Python programs.
Python was originally created as an extension language for C. In some
sense it is an abstraction layer for C libs.
Compare the
situation with Java or
Bengt Richter wrote:
It occurs to me that we have the PEP process for core python, but no PEP
process
for the python app/lib environment. What about starting a PEEP process
(Python Environment Enhancement Proposals) modeled on PEPs, where those
motivated
to formalize their pet projects or
Hi Bastard,
one of the main reasons PyPy gets funded by the EU was the promise to
port Python to embedded systems ( but not necessarily very memory
restricted ones ). The project seems to be in a state where the team
tries to get rid of the CPython runtime alltogether and reaching some
autonomy.
Eric Pederson wrote:
Raise your hand if you think the best technology wins!
Who is interested in such a matter? Is this a forum dedicated to some
programming language or a popularity contest?
If Python dies in a few years / looses attention but the Python Zen
survives in another language I have
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
Kay Schluehr wrote:
Eric Pederson wrote:
Raise your hand if you think the best technology wins!
Who is interested in such a matter? Is this a forum dedicated to some
programming language or a popularity contest?
If Python dies in a few years / looses
Use the strip() method.
Example:
\t abc\n.strip()
abc
Variants are lstrip() and rstrip().
Regards,
Kay
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
No good news for scripting-language fans:
http://www.phpmag.net/itr/news/psecom,id,23284,nodeid,113.html
Regards
Kay
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've heard 2 people complain that word 'global' is confusing.
Perhaps 'modulescope' or 'module' would be better?
Am I the first peope to have thought of this and suggested it?
Is this a candidate for Python 3000 yet?
Chris
Maybe a solution would be best that is
John Roth wrote:
Another thing that stands out: the explicit versus dynamic typing debate
has moved on from program correctness (which is a wash) to
other areas that explicit (or derived) type information can be used
for. I see this in PyFit: the languages where explicit type information
is
Paul Rubin wrote:
Cliff Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It didn't say what they left PHP, Perl and Python for (if you are to
even believe their findings).
PHP has been losing programmers in droves... to Ruby on Rails, but I'm
not sure how that is bad news for scripting-language fans.
Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
In practise any Python GUI is going to contain code from otyher
languages since if it was coded all the way down in python it would
be too slow.
Oh, I could imagine that a MFC-like wrapper around win32gui, or another
one around Xlib wouldn't be slower that
Ed Leafe wrote:
On Sunday 31 July 2005 01:02, phil hunt wrote:
You mightn't have, but I suspect more Python programers who've
written GUI apps have used Tkinter than any of the other APIs.
Not that I'm a particular fan of it, it's just I like
standardisation, because then you get
Cliff Wells wrote:
My objection with wrappers around wrappers around wrappers is that I
have no hope ever watching the ground. If some error occurs, which
layer has to be addressed? Which developing group is reponsible? My own
or that of team A, team B, team C ... ? The baroque concept is
Paolino wrote:
The second point also shows my perplexities about functions namespace:
def function():
function.foo='something'
a=function.foo
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in ?
AttributeError: 'function' object has no attribute 'foo'
How should I read
Tim Roberts schrieb:
Scott David Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What kind of shenanigans must a parser go through to translate:
x**2 with(x)x**3 with(x)
this is the comparison of two functions, but it looks like a left-
shift on a function until the second with is encountered.
Mike Meyer schrieb:
I know, lambda bashing (and defending) in the group is one of the most
popular ways to avoid writing code. However, while staring at some Oz
code, I noticed a feature that would seem to make both groups happy -
if we can figure out how to avoid the ugly syntax.
This
Paul Rubin wrote:
Kay Schluehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Examples:
f = ( || x=0 then f(x) || True then f(-x) from (x,) )
g = ( || x 0 then self._a -x || self._a - 0 from (x,))
Is this an actual language? It looks sort of like CSP. Python
with native parallelism, m
Dark Cowherd wrote:
-Quote - Phillip J. Eby from dirtsimple.org
Python as a community is plagued by massive amounts of
wheel-reinvention. The infamous web framework proliferation problem is
just the most egregious example.
Why is Python blessed with so much reinvention? Because it's often
Some indications:
for i in range(5):
... x = lambda x:x
... y = lambda y:y
... print x,y,xy,id(x)id(y)
...
function lambda at 0x00EE83F0 function lambda at 0x00EE8FB0
True True
function lambda at 0x00EE8AB0 function lambda at 0x00EE83F0
False False
function lambda at 0x00EE8FB0
Jan Danielsson wrote:
Hello all,
I have written a simple whiteboard application. In my application, I
want to be able to set draw attributes. This part works. I have a
dictionary object which contains stuff like:
self.attr['Pen.Color'] = ...
self.attr['Pen.Thickness'] = ...
Now, the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
hi
i bassically need it cuz i am appyling to colleges this year and
i know this kind of stuff really helps.
besides since i am learning python i thought i might get some credit
for it as well.
its bassically for a mention in my resume/bio-data/appliccation
i am
Andreas Kostyrka schrieb:
(These are the people look for Pearl and Pyhton programmers ;) )
Or Phyton :)
Kay
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Ron Adam wrote:
Kay Schluehr wrote:
Here might be an interesting puzzle for people who like sorting
algorithms ( and no I'm not a student anymore and the problem is not a
students 'homework' but a particular question associated with a
computer algebra system in Python I'm currently
Diez B.Roggisch wrote:
I have to admit that I don't understand what you mean with the
'constant parts' of an expression?
From what I percieved of your example it seemed to me that you wanted to
evaluate the constants like 7*9 first, so that an expression like
a * 7 * 9 * b
with
The documentation of the Python console behaviour is not correct
anymore for Python 2.4.1. At least for the Win2K system I'm working on
'Ctrl-Z' does not shut down the console but 'Ctrl-D' etc.
The Python interpreter tells me instead:
quit
'Use Ctrl-Z plus Return to exit.'
Nah, 'Ctrl-Z' is now
501 - 600 of 713 matches
Mail list logo
