Steve Holden wrote:
Mohsen Akbari wrote:
Dear guys,
I'm a newbie in python and I have this problem with the code that I'm
writing. There is a very long line which I wish to output it to a text
file.But when I do this, in the output file, the result appears in two
lines. I thought maybe that's
mattia wrote:
Il Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:56:33 +, Brad Harms ha scritto:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:29:45 +, mattia wrote:
Il Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:19:24 -0800, Jon Clements ha scritto:
On Dec 9, 11:53 pm, mattia ger...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all, can you provide me a simple code snippet to
mudit tuli wrote:
For a single byte, struct.pack('B',int)
For two bytes, struct.pack('H',int)
what if I want three bytes ?
Four bytes and then discard the most-significant byte:
struct.pack('I', int)[ : -1]
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Jeremy wrote:
I just profiled one of my Python scripts and discovered that 99% of
the time was spent in
{built-in method sub}
What is this function and is there a way to optimize it?
Thanks,
Jeremy
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
marlowe wrote:
I wrote this program, but i have a feeling like there might be a more
practical way of writing it. Can someone give me an idea of how to
simplify this? Here is an example of the csv file i am using. This
program calculates the exponential moving average of the 20 day range.
Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
Hi all,
Hi have a set of classes that represent mathematical objects which can
be represented as a string using a 'latex' method (after Knuth's famous
typesetting system). As I want to be able to typeset some builtin types as
well, I have a generic function, latex(), as
Paul Rubin wrote:
Gregory Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz writes:
Actually I gather it had a lot to do with the fact that the Germans
made some blunders in the way they used the Enigma that seriously
compromised its security. There was reportedly a branch of the German
forces that used their
galileo228 wrote:
On Feb 16, 9:40 pm, galileo228 mattbar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 16, 8:48 pm, John Bokma j...@castleamber.com wrote:
galileo228 mattbar...@gmail.com writes:
Using BeautifulSoup, mechanize, and urllib, I've constructed the
following:
Kurt Mueller wrote:
Am 01.09.2009 um 09:39 schrieb Terry Reedy:
But this same problem also extends into monies, nation states, units
of measure, etc.
There is, of course, an international system of measure. The US is the
only major holdout. (I recall Burma, or somesuch, is another.) An
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:09:03 +0100, MRAB wrote:
Python did always have True and False.
Oops! I meant didn't, of course.
$ python1.5
Python 1.5.2 (#1, Apr 1 2009, 22:55:54) [GCC 4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat
4.1.2-27)] on linux2
Copyright 1991-1995 Stichting
superpollo wrote:
Steve Holden ha scritto:
superpollo wrote:
Patrick Maupin ha scritto:
On Apr 2, 2:41 pm, Andreas Waldenburger use...@geekmail.invalid
wrote:
While everyone else is mocking you: Can you please elaborate on why
you
want to know and what kind of problem you're trying to solve
On 06/08/2012 01:58, MRAB wrote:
On 06/08/2012 01:09, Rotwang wrote:
On 06/08/2012 00:46, PeterSo wrote:
I am just starting to learn Python, and I like to use the editor
instead of the interactive shell. So I wrote the following little
program in IDLE
# calculating the mean
data1=[49, 66,
On 2014-04-25 18:53, Charles Hixson wrote:
What is the proper way to delete selected items during iteration of a
map? What I want to do is:
for (k, v) in m.items():
if f(k):
# do some processing of v and save result elsewhere
del m[k]
But this gives (as should be
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101120.zip is a new version of the regex module.
The match object now supports additional methods which return information on
all the successful matches of a repeated capture group.
The API was inspired by that of .Net
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101121.zip is a new version of the regex module.
The captures didn't work properly with lookarounds or atomic groups.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19723/issue2636-20101121.zip
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
I'd be interested in having a go if I knew what the desired behaviour was, ie
unit tests to confirm what was 'correct'.
How should it handle line breaks? Should it treat them like any other
whitespace as at present, should
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101123.zip is a new version of the regex module.
Oops, sorry, the weird behaviour of msg11 was a bug. :-(
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19786/issue2636-20101123.zip
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
textwrap_2010-11-23.diff is my attempt to provide a fix, if it's wanted/needed.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19791/textwrap_2010-11-23.diff
___
Python tracker rep
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
The spans say this:
for m in re.finditer('((.d.)*)*', 'adb'):
print(m.span())
(0, 3)
(3, 3)
There's an non-empty match followed by an empty match.
IHMO, not a bug.
--
nosy: +mrabarnett
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
Re the regex module (issue #2636), would a good compromise be:
regex.escape(user_input, special_only=True)
to maintain compatibility?
--
nosy: +mrabarnett
___
Python tracker rep
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101130.zip is a new version of the regex module.
Added 'special_only' keyword parameter (default False) to regex.escape. When
True, regex.escape escapes only 'special' characters, such as '?'.
--
Added file
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101207.zip is a new version of the regex module.
It includes additional checks against pathological regexes.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19965/issue2636-20101207.zip
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101210.zip is a new version of the regex module.
I've extended the additional checks of the previous version.
It has been tested with Python 2.5 to Python 3.2b1.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20001
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
I use Windows XP, so I can't help with MacOS X.
From the error log it looks like it doesn't like the sources for Python either!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
The regex module is intended to replace the re module, so its default behaviour
is the same: in Python 2, regexes default to matching ASCII, and in Python 3,
they default to matching Unicode.
If you want to use a regex on a Unicode
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101224.zip is a new version of the regex module.
Case-insensitive matching is now faster.
The matching functions and methods now accept a keyword argument to release the
GIL during matching to enable other Python
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
I've been trying to push the history to Launchpad, completely without success;
it just won't authenticate (no such account, even though I can log in!).
I doubt that the history would be much use to you anyway
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
It does have an SSH key. It's probably something simple that I'm missing.
I think that the only change I'm likely to make is to a support script I use;
it currently uses hard-coded paths, etc, to do its magic
Changes by Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com:
--
nosy: +mrabarnett
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6210
___
___
Python-bugs
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101228.zip is a new version of the regex module.
Sorry for the delay, the fix took me a bit longer than I expected. :-)
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20176/issue2636-20101228.zip
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
Regarding syntax, I'm undecided between:
raise with new_exception
and:
raise new_exception with caught_exception
I think that the second form is clearer:
try:
...
exception SomeException as ex
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101228a.zip is a new version of the regex module.
It now compiles the pattern quickly.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20182/issue2636-20101228a.zip
___
Python
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101229.zip is a new version of the regex module.
It now compiles the pattern quickly.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20185/issue2636-20101229.zip
___
Python tracker
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101230.zip is a new version of the regex module.
I've delayed the building of the tables for fast searching until their first
use, which, hopefully, will mean that fewer will be actually built.
--
Added file
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
The project is now at:
https://code.google.com/p/mrab-regex/
Unfortunately it doesn't have the revision history. I don't know why not.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
msg124904: It would, of course, be slower on first use, but I'm surprised that
it's (that much) slower afterwards.
msg124905, msg124906: I have those matching now.
msg124931: The sources are in TortoiseBzr, but I couldn't upload
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
Even after much uninstalling and reinstalling (and reboots) I never got
TortoiseSVN to work properly, so I switched to TortoiseHg. The sources are now
at:
https://code.google.com/p/mrab-regex-hg
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
Why not? :-)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636
___
___
Python
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
Just to check, does this still work with your changes of msg124959?
regex.search(r'\d{4}(\s*\w)?\W*((?!\d)\w){2}', XX)
For me it fails to match!
--
___
Python tracker rep
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
I've just done a bug fix. The issue is at:
https://code.google.com/p/mrab-regex-hg/
BTW, Jacques, I trust that your regression tests don't test how long a regex
takes to fail to match, because a bug could cause such a non-match
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
That line crept in somehow.
As it's been there since the 2010-12-24 release and you're the first one to
have a problem with it (and you've already fixed it), it looks like a new
upload isn't urgently needed (I don't have any other
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
I've reduced the size of some internal tables.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
Argument 4 of re.subn(...) is 'count', the maximum number of replacements to
perform, but you're passing in the MULTILINE flag, which happens to have the
integer value 8, hence you're limiting the maximum number of replacements to 8
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
It's a known issue (see issue #1662581, for example).
There's a new implementation at PyPI which doesn't have this problem:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex
--
nosy: +mrabarnett
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
I've just found that:
[1] + foo()
crashes, but:
[1].__add__(foo())
gives:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File pyshell#25, line 1, in module
[1].__add__(foo())
TypeError: can only concatenate list
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
Re: msg107776.
If it looks like an integer (ie, can be converted to an integer by 'int') then
it's positional, otherwise it's a key. An optimisation is to perform a quick
check upfront to see whether it starts like an integer
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
That's a good question. :-)
Possibly just an optional sign followed by one or more digits.
Another possibility that occurs to me is for it to default to positional if it
looks like an integer, but allow quoting to force
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
Your original:
{0[-1]}.format('fox')
is a worse gotcha than:
{-1}.format('fox')
because you're much less likely to want to do the latter.
It's one of those things that it would be nice to have fixed, or we could just
add
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
Issue #2636 resulted in the new regex module (also available on PyPI), so this
issue is addressed by that, but there's no patch for the re module.
--
___
Python tracker rep
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100706.zip is a new version of the regex module.
I've added your examples to the unit tests. The module now passes.
Keep up the good work! :-)
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17877/issue2636-20100706
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
Should a regex compile if a group is referenced before it's defined?
Consider this:
(?:(?(2)(a)|(b))+
Other regex implementations permit forward references to groups.
BTW, I had a look at the re module, found it too difficult
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
I started with trying to modify the existing re module, but I wanted to make
too many changes, so in the end I decided to make a clean break and start on a
new implementation which was compatible with the existing re module
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
The file at:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex
was downloaded 75 times, if that's any help. (Now reset to 0 because of the bug
fix.)
If it's included in 3.2 then there's the question of whether it should replace
the re module
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
As a crude guide of the speed difference, here's Python 2.6:
re regex
bm_regex_compile.py 86.53secs 260.19secs
bm_regex_effbot.py 13.70secs8.94secs
bm_regex_v8.py 15.66secs
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100709.zip is a new version of the regex module.
I've moved most of the regex module's Python code into a private module.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17912/issue2636-20100709.zip
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
Here's a patch for Python 3.1, if anyone's still interested after 5 years. :-)
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +mrabarnett
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17930/from_template.diff
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100719.zip is a new version of the regex module.
Just a few more tweaks for speed.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18054/issue2636-20100719.zip
___
Python tracker
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
This has already been reported in issue #3511.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100725.zip is a new version of the regex module.
More tweaks for speed.
re regex
bm_regex_compile.py 87.05secs 278.00secs
bm_regex_effbot.py 14.00secs6.58secs
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
No.
Wouldn't that break compatibility with 're'?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
That's a possibility.
I must admit that I don't entirely understand it enough to implement it (the OP
said I don't believe that the algorithm for this is a
whole lot more complicated), and I don't have a need for it myself
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
(1) would break existing code. It would also mean that you wouldn't have access
to the start and end positions of the matches either.
(2) would also break existing code which is expecting a list. It's like the
change that happened
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
Ah, I see what you mean. I still think you're wrong, though! :-)
The 'for' loop is doing is basically this:
it = re.finditer(r'(\w+):(\w+)', text)
try:
while True:
match_object = next
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
I agree with Kamil and Germán. I would've expected negative indexes for
sequences to work. Negative indexes for fields is a different matter.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100814.zip is a new version of the regex module.
I've added default Unicode word boundaries and renamed the Pattern and Match
classes.
Over to you, Alex. :-)
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18532
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
These have been added to the new 'regex' module. See issue #2636 or PyPI at:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex
--
nosy: +mrabarnett
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
If you're on Windows (x86, 32-bit) then compilation isn't necessary - just use
the appropriate _regex.pyd.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7255
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100816.zip is a new version of the regex module.
Unfortunately I came across a bug in the handing of sets. More unit tests added.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18541/issue2636-20100816.zip
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100824.zip is a new version of the regex module.
More speedups. Getting towards Perl speed now, depending on the regex. :-)
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18621/issue2636-20100824.zip
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100912.zip is a new version of the regex module.
More speedups. I've been comparing the speed against Perl wherever possible. In
some cases Perl is lightning fast, probably because regex is built into the
language
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
Another flag? Hmm.
How about this instead: if a scoped flag appears at the end of a regex (and
would therefore normally have no effect) then it's treated as though it's at
the start of the regex. Thus:
foo(?i)
is treated like
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
The tests for re include these regexes:
a.b(?s)
a.*(?s)b
I understand what Georg said previously about some people preferring to put
them at the end, but I personally wouldn't do that because some regex
implementations
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
OK, so would it be OK if there was, say, a NEW (N) flag which made the inline
flags (?flags) scoped and allowed splitting on zero-width matches?
--
___
Python tracker rep
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100913.zip is a new version of the regex module.
I've removed the ZEROWIDTH flag and added the NEW flag, which turns on the new
behaviour such as splitting on zero-width matches and positional flags. If the
NEW flag
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
Does this request still stand? If so then I'll add it to the new regex module.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1708652
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100918.zip is a new version of the regex module.
I've added 'pos' and 'endpos' arguments to regex.sub and regex.subn and
refactored a little.
I can't think of any other features that need to be added or see any more
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
'$' matches at the end of the string or at a newline at the end of a string (if
multiline mode isn't turned on). '\Z' matches only at the end of the string.
If not even the OP is convinced of the need, then I have no objection
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
I've started on a module called 'texttools'. So far it has Levenshtein and
Porter (both coded in C).
If there's interest I'll put it on PyPI.
Suggestions for other additions?
--
nosy: +mrabarnett
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
I use Python 3, where len(\U00010337) == 2 on a narrow build.
Yes, wide Unicode on a narrow build is a problem:
regex.findall(\\U00010337, a\U00010337bc)
[]
regex.findall((?i)\\U00010337, a\U00010337bc)
[]
I'm not sure how
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101009.zip is a new version of the regex module.
It appears from a posting in python-list and a closer look at the docs that
string positions in the 're' module are limited to 32 bits, even on 64-bit
builds. I think
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
I am not able to build or test a 64-bit version. The update was to the source
files to ensure that if it is compiled for 64 bits then the string positions
will also be 64-bit.
This change was prompted by a poster who tried to use
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
That's a bug. I'll fix it as soon has I've reinstalled the SDK. sigh/
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101029.zip is a new version of the regex module.
I've also added to the unit tests.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19419/issue2636-20101029.zip
___
Python tracker
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101030.zip is a new version of the regex module.
I've also added yet more to the unit tests.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19422/issue2636-20101030.zip
___
Python
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101030a.zip is a new version of the regex module.
This bug was a bit more difficult to fix, but I think it's OK now!
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19435/issue2636-20101030a.zip
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101101.zip is a new version of the regex module.
I hope it's finally fixed this time! :-)
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19456/issue2636-20101101.zip
___
Python
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101102.zip is a new version of the regex module.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19460/issue2636-20101102.zip
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101102a.zip is a new version of the regex module.
msg120204 relates to issue #1519638 Unmatched group in replacement. In
'regex' an unmatched group is treated as an empty string in a replacement
template. This behaviour
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
It's a bug caused by trying to avoid getting stuck when a zero-width match is
found. Basically the fix is to advance one character after a zero-width match,
but that doesn't always give the correct result.
There are a number
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101106.zip is a new version of the regex module.
Fix for issue 10328, which regex also shared.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19514/issue2636-20101106.zip
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
It looks like a similar problem to msg116252 and msg116276.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20101113.zip is a new version of the regex module.
It now supports Unicode 6.0.0.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19597/issue2636-20101113.zip
___
Python tracker rep
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
Earlier this week I discovered that .Net supports repeated capture and its API
suggested a much cleaner approach than what Perl offered, so I'll be adding it
to the regex module at:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex
The new
Matthew Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I know what you mean about the dependencies!
My current problem is that now I'm working with the current trunk, which
means using Visual C++ Express 2008 instead of 2005. When debugging it's
behaving like the debug info is out of date
Matthew Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Used Visual C++ Express 2005 and the PC\VS8.0 directory. Same problem.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3825
Matthew Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
_sre.c is over 6000, but it does contain macros. I didn't have this
problem when based on Python 2.5.2 in Express 2005.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3825
Changes by Matthew Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file11530/regex_2.6rc2.diff
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3825
Matthew Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Bugfix.
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11532/regex_2.6rc2.diff
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3825
Matthew Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I wonder whether it could be put into Python 3 where certain breaks in
backwards compatibility are to be expected.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3262
Matthew Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Fixed the matching of word boundaries when searching and matching in
substrings.
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11543/regex_2.6rc2+1.diff
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org
1 - 100 of 551 matches
Mail list logo
