game_designer writes:
> Perhaps like Xah Lee I find, after many years of Lisp programming,
> these discussions increasingly frustrating and even, in some sense,
> amazing. We can speculate all we want about syntax and semantics of
> programing languages. What counts in the end are really the PRAG
Lawrence D'Oliveiro writes:
> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the Elisp
> built into Emacs?
Probably not. It depends on how you want to define "in common use". Is
Emacs still in common use?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
