Jp Calderone wrote:
I'm not saying boo hoo lambdas are crippled fix them waah. I'm
saying
Lambdas and generator comprehensions are not comparable in this
sense and
arguments based on one should not be used to support positions about
the
other.
This post and Michael Spencer's post which
Xah Lee wrote:
I think i'll just post snippets of my comments as i find them. (and
feel like exposing)
[ snipped ]
That is a very good analysis. Can you submit a documentation patch? I
would, but I'm too lazy to contribute. That doesn't mean I'm not
thankful for your efforts, though!
p
--
Has anyone written a Queue.Queue replacement that avoids busy-waiting?
It doesn't matter if it uses os-specific APIs (eg
WaitForMultipleObjects). I did some googling around and haven't found
anything so far.
Because I know someone will ask: no, the busy-waiting hasn't been a
problem in my app.
Peter Hansen wrote:
I don't believe the term busy-wait applies here.
[Explanation]
Yes, well, you're right. I was thinking of calling it
slacker-waiting but didn't want to come off too cute.
p
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Srijit Kumar Bhadra wrote:
Hello,
Here is an example of Multithreaded Pipe Server and Client using the
excellent ctypes library (Windows).
Coincidentally, the other day I just used named pipes in for the first
time. I recommend using the excellent win32api extension; I believe it
is included
