James wrote:
Doesn't work for classes because self has no global reference.
True. To make it work one would need to track instances and names and
do comparisons... and so on. So it's not worth it. ;-)
Cheers,
Ron
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Andrew Jaffe wrote:
Hi,
I have a class with various class-level variables which are used to
store global state information for all instances of a class. These are
set by a classmethod as in the following (in reality the setcvar method
is more complicated than this!):
class
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
def replace_word(source, newword):
Replace the first word of source with newword.
return newword + + .join(source.split(None, 1)[1:])
import time
def test():
t = time.time()
for i in range(1):
s = replace_word(aa to become, /aa/)
KraftDiner wrote:
I have a base class called Shape
And then classes like Circle, Square, Triangle etc, that inherit from
Shape:
My quesiton is can a method of the Shape class call a method in Circle,
or Square etc...?
This looks familiar. :-)
Yes, it can if it has references to them.
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 21:41:58 +, Ron Adam wrote:
Don't forget a string can be sliced. In this case testing before you
leap is a win. ;-)
Not much of a win: only a factor of two, and unlikely to hold in all
cases. Imagine trying it on *really long* strings
KraftDiner wrote:
Well here is a rough sketch of my code...
This is giving my two problems.
1) TypeError: super() argument 1 must be type, not classobj
2) I want to be sure the the draw code calls the inherited classes
outline and not its own...
class Shape:
def __init__(self):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
interesting. seems that if ' ' in source: is a highly optimized code
as it is even faster than if str.find(' ') != -1:' when I assume they
end up in the same C loops ?
The 'in' version doesn't call a function and has a simpler compare. I
would think both of those
Hi, I found the following to be a useful way to access arguments after
they are passed to a function that collects them with **kwds.
class namespace(dict):
def __getattr__(self, name):
return self.__getitem__(name)
def __setattr__(self, name, value):
On Monday 24 October 2005 19:06, Ron Adam wrote:
Hi, I found the following to be a useful way to access arguments after
they are passed to a function that collects them with **kwds.
class namespace(dict):
def __getattr__(self, name):
return self.__getitem__(name
Simon Burton wrote:
Yes!
I do this a lot when i have deeply nested function calls
a-b-c-d-e
and need to pass args to the deep function without changing the
middle functions.
Yes, :-) Which is something like what I'm doing also. Get the
dictionary, modify it or validate it somehow,
of
creating a new object?
Cheers,
Ron
On Monday 24 October 2005 19:53, Ron Adam wrote:
James Stroud wrote:
Here it goes with a little less overhead:
py class namespace:
... def __init__(self, adict):
... self.__dict__.update(adict)
...
py n = namespace({'bob':1, 'carol':2, 'ted':3, 'alice
James Stroud wrote:
Here it goes with a little less overhead:
py class namespace:
... def __init__(self, adict):
... self.__dict__.update(adict)
...
py n = namespace({'bob':1, 'carol':2, 'ted':3, 'alice':4})
py n.bob
1
py n.ted
3
James
How about...
class
Duncan Booth wrote:
Ron Adam wrote:
James Stroud wrote:
Here it goes with a little less overhead:
example snipped
But it's not a dictionary anymore so you can't use it in the same places
you would use a dictionary.
foo(**n)
Would raise an error.
So I couldn't do:
def foo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
unfortunately the result from py2exe won't run eventhough the original
script runs without problems. The trouble is I'm at a loss as to where
to start looking!
Martin.
Just a guess, Make sure any your file names aren't the same as any of
the module names
Bengt Richter wrote:
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:20:21 GMT, Ron Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or worse, the dictionary would become not functional depending on what
methods were masked.
And this approach reverses that, The dict values will be masked by the
methods, so the values can't effect
the.theorist wrote:
So that it'll be easier to remember the next time I find myself in the
same situation on a different task, I'll extend the discussion
somewhat.
Coming from C, I had expected that I'd get a new empty dict every time
the __init__ function ran. Guido (or some other
Duncan Booth wrote:
No, I didn't think it was malice which is why I just added what I
considered to be a polite request at the end of my message. I assumed that
most people either knew the phrase or could find out in a few seconds using
Google so there wasn't much point in rehashing the
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-10-25, Steven D'Aprano schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Can somebody remind me, what is the problem Antoon is trying to solve here?
Well there are two issues. One about correct behaviour and one about
practicallity.
The first problem is cmp. This is what the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
which file names do you mean?
-Martin.
I've ran across a case where I copied a module from the python libs
folder to my source directory, it would work fine before I built with
py2exe, but afterwards it would give a file not found error. I haven't
quite
David Poundall wrote:
However, what I really would like is something like...
class c_y:
def __init__(self):
self.P1 = [0, 'OB1', 0 ]
self.P2 = [0, 'OB1', 1 ]
self.P3 = [0, 'OB1', 2 ]
self.P4 = [0, 'OB1', 3 ]
Because that way I can also hold binary
David Poundall wrote:
Sadly Ron, c_y can only see index and showall in your example.
Well, don't give up! The approach is sound and I did say it was
untested. Here's a tested version with a few corrections. :-)
Cheers,
Ron
class Pump(object):
def __init__(self, name, ptype,
Alex Martelli wrote:
Ron Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
class namespace(dict):
def __getattr__(self, name):
return self.__getitem__(name)
...
Any thoughts? Any better way to do this?
If any of the keys (which become attributes through
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-10-26, Ron Adam schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Adding complexity to cmp may not break code, but it could probably slow
down sorting in general. So I would think what ever improvements or
alternatives needs to be careful not to slow down existing sorting cases
Steve Holden wrote:
Sean McIlroy wrote:
hi all
i recently wrote a script that implements a puzzle. the interface
mostly consists of a bunch of colored disks on a tkinter canvas. the
problem is that the disks change their colors in ways other than the
way they're supposed to. it
Sean McIlroy wrote:
i'm using the canned colors (pink, orange, etc). should i try
changing to explicit color specifications to see if that makes a
difference? i'm not sure what the other guy meant by a soft toy, but
i take it the idea is to try and construct a correctness proof for the
Steve Holden wrote:
Francesco Bochicchio wrote:
Il Mon, 31 Oct 2005 06:23:12 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
And yet the stupidity continues, right after I post this I finnally
find an answer in a google search, It appears the way I seen it is to
create a class for each button and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
i have a dictionary defined as
execfunc = { 'key1' : func1 }
to call func1, i simply have to write execfunc[key1] .
but if i have several arguments to func1 , like
execfunc = { 'key1' : func1(**args) }
how can i execute func1 with variable args?
using
Neal Norwitz wrote:
Ron Adam wrote:
Eval or exec aren't needed. Normally you would just do...
execfunc['key1'](**args)
If your arguments are stored ahead of time with your function...
Committed revision 41366.
Committed revision 41366 ?
You could then do...
func, args
Tuvas wrote:
I've been trying to build a fairly simple message box in tkinter, that
when a button is pushed, will pop up a box, that has a line of text, an
entry widget, and a button, that when the button is pushed, will return
the value in the line of text. However, while I can read the
Tuvas wrote:
Do you have any info on dialogs? I've been trying to find some, without
alot of success...
Be sure and look at the examples in python24/lib/lib-tk. The Dialog.py
file there does pretty much what you want.
In the dialog caller example I gave, it should have been ...
def
Tieche Bruce A MSgt USMTM/AFD wrote:
I am new to python,
Could someone explain (in English) how and when to use self?
I have been reading, and haven't found a good example/explanation
Bruce Tieche ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hi, Sometimes it's hard to get a simple answer to programming
Brendan wrote:
How many is LOOONG? Ten? Twenty? One hundred?
About 50 per Model
If it is closer to 100 than to 10, I would suggest
putting your constants into something like an INI file:
[MODEL1] # or something more meaningful
numBumps: 1
sizeOfBumps: 99
[MODEL2]
numBumps: 57
James Stroud wrote:
Hello All,
How does one make an arbitrary class (e.g. class myclass(object)) behave like
a list in method calls with the *something operator? What I mean is:
You need to base myclass on a list if I understand your question.
class myclass(list):
def
Gordon Airporte wrote:
The dialogs in tkColorChooser, tkFileDialog, etc. return useful values
from their creation somehow, so I can do stuff like this:
filename = tkFileDialog.askopenfilename( master=self )
I would like to make a Yes/No/Cancel dialog that can be used the same
way
Alex Martelli wrote:
Ron Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Stroud wrote:
And, how about the **something operator?
James
A dictionary would be pretty much the same except subclassed from a
dictionary of course.
I believe this one is correct (but I have not checked in-depth
Bengt Richter wrote:
On 08 Nov 2005 08:07:34 -0800, Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dcrespo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hex(255)[2:]
'ff'
'%x'%255 is preferable since the format of hex() output can vary. Try
hex(33**33).
Not to mention ([EMAIL PROTECTED] deleted ;-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
which feature of python do you like most?
I've heard from people that python is very useful.
Many people switch from perl to python because they like it more.
I am quite familiar with perl, I've don't lots of code in perl.
Now, I was curious and interested in
Bengt Richter wrote:
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:42:45 GMT, Ron Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bengt Richter wrote:
On 08 Nov 2005 08:07:34 -0800, Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dcrespo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hex(255)[2:]
'ff'
'%x'%255 is preferable since the format of hex
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Lonnie Princehouse wrote:
[a-z0-9_] means match a single character from the set {a through z,
0 through 9, underscore}.
\w should be a bit faster; it's equivalent to [a-zA-Z0-9_] (unless you
specify otherwise using the locale or unicode flags), but is handled more
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Ron Adam wrote:
The \w does make a small difference, but not as much as I expected.
that's probably because your benchmark has a lot of dubious overhead:
I think it does what the OP described, but that may not be what he
really needs.
Although the test to find
Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
with the current syntax L[i:i+1] returns [L[i]], with nxlist it returns
L[i+1] if i0.
L=range(10)
L[1:2]==[L[1]]==[1]
L[-2:-1]==[L[-2]]==[8]
L=nxlist(range(10))
L[1:2]==[L[1]]==[1]
L[-2:-1]==[L[-1]]==[9] # not [L[-2]]
IMHO in this case current list slicing is
Magnus Lycka wrote:
Ron Adam wrote:
Slicing is one of the best features of Python in my opinion, but
when you try to use negative index's and or negative step increments
it can be tricky and lead to unexpected results.
Hm... Just as with positive indexes, you just need to understand
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
Yes, I've been surprised how this thread has gone on and on.
it's of course a variation of
You can lead an idiot to idioms, but you can't make him
think ;-)
as long as you have people that insist that their original
Steve Holden wrote:
It's a common misconception that all ideas should be explainable simply.
This is not necessarily the case, of course. When a subject is difficult
then all sorts of people bring their specific misconceptions to the
topic, and suggest that if only a few changes were made
Bengt Richter wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 18:09:51 +0200, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTOH, ISTM we must be careful not to label an alternate alpha-version
way to model the real world as a misunderstanding just because it is
alpha,
and bugs are apparent ;-)
Thanks! I couldn't
Terry Reedy wrote:
Ron Adam wrote:
However, I would like the inverse selection of negative strides to be
fixed if possible. If you could explain the current reason why it does
not return the reverse order of the selected range.
To repeat, the current reason is compatibility
Patrick Maupin wrote:
I previously wrote (in response to a query from Ron Adam):
In any case, you asked for a rationale. I'll give you mine:
L = range(10)
L[3:len(L):-1] == [L[i] for i in range(3,len(L),-1)]
True
After eating supper, I just realized that I could probably make my
Steve Holden wrote:
Ron Adam wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
What misconception do you think I have?
This was not an ad hominem attack but a commentary on many attempts to
improve the language.
Ok, No problem. ;-)
No one has yet explained the reasoning (vs the mechanics
Patrick Maupin wrote:
Ron Adam wrote:
This should never fail with an assertion error. You will note that it
shows that, for non-negative start and end values, slicing behavior is
_exactly_ like extended range behavior.
Yes, and it passes for negative start and end values as well
Magnus Lycka wrote:
Ron Adam wrote:
Ok, lets see... This shows the problem with using the gap indexing
model.
L = range(10)
[ 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ] # elements
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 # index's
L[3::1] - [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] 3rd index
Bengt Richter wrote:
Then the question is, do we need sugar for reversed(x.[a:b])
or list(reversed(x.[a:b])) for the right hand side of a statement,
and do we want to to use both kinds of intervals in slice assignment?
(maybe and yes ;-)
Yes, I think this is the better way to do it, as this
Michael Hudson wrote:
Ron Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With current slicing and a negative step...
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ]
-9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 -0
r[-3:] - [7, 8, 9]# as expected
r[-3::-1] - [7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0] # surprise
The seven is include
Kirk Job Sluder wrote:
The only way to keep confidential stuff secure is to shred it, burn it,
and grind the ashes.
I think the fundamental problem is that that most customers don't want
actual security. They want to be able to get their information by
calling a phone number and saying
James Stroud wrote:
On Saturday 10 September 2005 15:02, Ron Adam wrote:
Kirk Job Sluder wrote:
I would think that any n digit random number not already in the data
base would work for an id along with a randomly generated password that
the student can change if they want. The service provider
Kirk Job Sluder wrote:
Ron Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would think that any n digit random number not already in the data
base would work for an id along with a randomly generated password
that the student can change if they want. The service provider has
full access to the data
Paul Rubin wrote:
Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But there is a difference: writing assembly is *hard*, which is why we
prefer not to do it. Are you suggesting that functional programming is
significantly easier to do than declarative?
I think you mean imperative. Yes, there is
Terry Reedy wrote:
You cannot tell whether a function object will act
recursive or not just by looking at its code body. Trivial examples:
I was thinking last night that maybe it would be useful to be able to
define a function explicitly as a recursive object where it's frame is
reused on
While playing around with the inspect module I found that the
Blockfinder doesn't recognize single line function definitions.
Adding the following two lines to it fixes it, but I'm not sure if it
causes any problems anywhere else.
elif self.indent == 0:
raise EndOfBlock,
Delaney, Timothy (Tim) wrote:
Ron Adam wrote:
While playing around with the inspect module I found that the
Blockfinder doesn't recognize single line function definitions.
Adding the following two lines to it fixes it, but I'm not sure if it
causes any problems anywhere else.
elif
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 12:16:15 +0200, sven wrote:
to make sure that an operation yields a boolean value wrap a bool()
around an expression.
None, 0 and objects which's len is 0 yield False.
so you can also do stuff like that:
Are there actually any usage cases for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
Can anyone point me to a resource that describes the best way of
organising a python project? My project (gausssum.sf.net) is based
around a class, and has a GUI that allows 'easy-access' to the methods
of the class. What is the best or typical directory
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Ah, that's a good example, thanks, except I notice you didn't actually
cast to bool in them, eg: (min value max) * value
It wasn't needed in these particular examples. But it could be needed
if several comparisons with 'and' between them are used.
It just seems odd
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:07:54 +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
I wish the Linux Standard Base folks would specify that settings files
should all go into a subdirectory like ~/settings rather than filling up
the home directory with cruft. That was acceptable in the days
Tony Houghton wrote:
I'm using pygame to write a game called Bombz which needs to save some
data in a directory associated with it. In Unix/Linux I'd probably use
~/.bombz, in Windows something like
C:\Documents And Settings\user\Applicacation Data\Bombz.
There are plenty of messages in
Steve Holden wrote:
Ron Adam wrote:
2. Expressions that will be used in a calculation or another
expression.
By which you appear to mean expressions in which Boolean values are
used as numbers.
Or compared to other types, which is common.
This matters because if you aren't
Steve Holden wrote:
Ron Adam wrote:
Tony Houghton wrote:
I'm using pygame to write a game called Bombz which needs to save some
data in a directory associated with it. In Unix/Linux I'd probably use
~/.bombz, in Windows something like
C:\Documents And Settings\user\Applicacation Data
Tony Houghton wrote:
This works on Win XP. Not sure if it will work on Linux.
import os
parent = os.path.split(os.path.abspath(os.sys.argv[0]))[0]
file = parent + os.sep + '.bombz'
Ooh, no, I don't want saved data to go in the installation directory. In
general that
Terry Hancock wrote:
On Thursday 22 September 2005 12:26 pm, Ron Adam wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
Ron Adam wrote:
True * True
1 # Why not return True here as well?
Why not return 42? Why not return a picture of a banana?
My question still stands. Could it be helpful
Bengt Richter wrote:
It seems lately all my posts have been coming back to me as bounced emails,
and I haven't emailed them ;-(
I've been getting bounce messages like (excerpt):
...
Yes, I get them too. Plugging http://deimos.liage.net/ into a browser get:
This domain is parked,
Wayne Sutton wrote:
OK, I'm a newbie...
I'm trying to learn Python have had fun with it so far. But I'm having
trouble following the many code examples with the object self. Can
someone explain this usage in plain english?
Thanks,
Wayne
I'll give it a try..
When you have a class
Terry Reedy wrote:
Bengt Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems lately all my posts have been coming back to me as bounced
emails,
and I haven't emailed them ;-(
They are gatewayed to the general python email list. But bouncing list
emails back to
Erik Max Francis wrote:
Ron Adam wrote:
When you call a method of an instance, Python translates it to...
leader.set_name(leader, John)
It actually translates it to
Person.set_name(leader, John)
I thought that I might have missed something there.
Is there a paper on how
.
Anyway... just wishful thinking. I'm sure there are a lot of problems
that would need to be worked out. ;-)
Cheers,
Ron Adam
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Or you could put the method in the class and have all instances recognise
it:
py C.eggs = new.instancemethod(eggs, None, C)
py C().eggs(3)
eggs * 3
Why not just add it to the class directly? You just have to be sure
it's a class and not an instance of a class.
Michael Spencer wrote:
All is explained at:
http://users.rcn.com/python/download/Descriptor.htm#functions-and-methods
and further at:
http://www.python.org/pycon/2005/papers/36/pyc05_bla_dp.pdf
For objects, the machinery is in object.__getattribute__ which
transforms b.x into
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
This still seems not quite right to me... Or more likely seems to be
missing something still.
(But it could be this migraine I've had the last couple of days
preventing me from being able to concentrate on things with more than
a few levels of complexity.)
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 14:52:56 +, Ron Adam wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Or you could put the method in the class and have all instances recognise
it:
py C.eggs = new.instancemethod(eggs, None, C)
py C().eggs(3)
eggs * 3
Why not just add it to the class directly
Micah Elliott wrote:
Please read/comment/vote. This circulated as a pre-PEP proposal
submitted to c.l.py on August 10, but has changed quite a bit since
then. I'm reposting this since it is now Open (under consideration)
at http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0350.html.
Thanks!
How about an
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:42:21 +, Ron Adam wrote:
def beacon(self, x):
...print beacon + %s % x
...
Did you mean bacon? *wink*
Of course... remembering arbitrary word letter sequences is probably my
worst skill. ;-) That, and I think for some reason
Terry Reedy wrote:
Ron Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually I think I'm getting more confused. At some point the function
is wrapped. Is it when it's assigned, referenced, or called?
When it is referenced via the class.
Ok, that's what I suspected
Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
Rocco Moretti wrote:
Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
Hi,
after Guido's pronouncement yesterday, in one of the next versions of Python
there will be a conditional expression with the following syntax:
X if C else Y
Any word on chaining?
That is, what would happen with
Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
Ron Adam
I think I'm going to make it a habit to put parentheses around these
things just as if they were required.
Yes, that's the best way to make it readable and understandable.
Reinhold
Now that the syntax is settled, I wonder if further discussion
Ivan Shevanski wrote:
To continue with my previous problems, now I'm trying out classes. But
I have a problem (which I bet is easily solveable) that I really don't
get. The numerous tutorials I've looked at just confsed me.For intance:
class Xyz:
... def y(self):
...
Ron Adam wrote:
Also,
In your example 'q' is assigned the value 2, but as soon as the method
'y' exits, it is lost. To keep it around you want to assign it to self.y.
Ooops, That should say ...
To keep it around you want to assign it to self.q. ---self.q
Cheers,
Ron
--
http
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 06:59:04 +, Antoon Pardon wrote:
x = 12.0 # feet
# three pages of code
y = 15.0 # metres
# three more pages of code
distance = x + y
if distance 27:
fire_retro_rockets()
And lo, one multi-billion dollar Mars lander starts braking
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-10-03, Steven D'Aprano schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 06:59:04 +, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Well I'm a bit getting sick of those references to standard idioms.
There are moments those standard idioms don't work, while the
gist of the OP's remark
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-10-04, Ron Adam schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-10-03, Steven D'Aprano schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And lo, one multi-billion dollar Mars lander starts braking either too
early or too late. Result: a new crater on Mars, named after the NASA
Bengt Richter wrote:
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:10:58 GMT, Ron Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at it from a different direction, how about adding a keyword to
say, from this point on, in this local name space, disallow new
names. Then you can do...
def few(x,y):
a = 'a'
b = 'b'
i
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Ron Adam wrote:
Is there a way to conditionally decorate? For example if __debug__ is
True, but not if it's False? I think I've asked this question before. (?)
the decorator is a callable, so you can simply do, say
from somewhere import debugdecorator
Steve wrote:
I'm trying to run a Python program on Unix and I'm encountering some
behavior I don't understand. I'm a Unix newbie, and I'm wondering if
someone can help.
I have a simple program:
#! /home/fergs/python/bin/python
import sys, os
Can anyone show me an example of of using dis() with a traceback?
Examples of using disassemble_string() and distb() separately if
possible would be nice also.
I'm experimenting with modifying the dis module so that it returns it's
results instead of using 'print' it as it goes. I want to
Jesse Noller wrote:
60% from list 1 (main_list[0])
30% from list 2 (main_list[1])
10% from list 3 (main_list[2])
I know how to pull a random sequence (using random()) from the lists,
but I'm not sure how to pick it with the desired percentages.
Any help is appreciated, thanks
-jesse
Ron Adam wrote:
Can anyone show me an example of of using dis() with a traceback?
Examples of using disassemble_string() and distb() separately if
possible would be nice also.
[cliped]
But I still need to rewrite disassemble_string() and need to test it
with tracebacks.
Cheers
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2005 15:20:12 +0200, Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen wrote:
Ok, so I thought, how about creating a decorator that caches the
function results and retrieves them from cache if possible, otherwise it
calls the function and store the value in the cache for the
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Ron Adam wrote:
In effect, 'cache' and 'fn' are replaced by the objects they reference
before the cached_result function is returned.
not really; accesses to free variables always go via special cell objects
(rather than direct object references), and the compiler
Timothy Smith wrote:
i have reproduced the error in this code block
#save values in edit
self.FinaliseTill.SaveEditControlValue()
if
Decimal(self.parent.TillDetails[self.TillSelection.GetStringSelection()]['ChangeTinBalance']))
== Decimal('0'):
#box must be
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
For what it is worth, Python is compiled AND interpreted -- it compiles
byte-code which is interpreted in a virtual machine. That makes it an
compiling interpreter, or maybe an interpreting compiler, in my book.
Good points, and in addition to this, the individual byte
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Timothy Smith wrote:
i have NO idea what in there could be making it have such a strange
error. it just says error when you try run it. there nothing terribly
strange being done.
i am still coming across this error it's driving me nuts. usually i
can find what's
I'm trying to implement simple svg style colored complex objects in
tkinter and want to be able to inherit default values from other
previously defined objects.
I want to something roughly similar to ...
class shape(object):
def __init__(self, **kwds):
# set a bunch
George Sakkis wrote:
Ron Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to implement simple svg style colored complex objects in
tkinter and want to be able to inherit default values from other
previously defined objects.
I want to something roughly similar to ...
class shape(object
1 - 100 of 505 matches
Mail list logo
