Re: Mathematica 7 compares to other languages

2008-12-01 Thread anonymous . c . lisper
On Dec 1, 2:23 am, Xah Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 30, 7:30 pm, Xah Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>some stuff Are you a bot? I think you failed the Turing test after the 8th time you posted the exact same thing... I'm completely serious. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Mathematica 7 compares to other languages

2008-12-01 Thread anonymous . c . lisper
On Nov 30, 10:30 pm, Xah Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > some stuff You are a bot? I think you failed the Turing test when you posted the same thing 20 times. A rational human would realize that not too many people peruse this newsgroup, and that most of them have already seen the wall of text

Re: Mathematica 7 compares to other languages

2008-12-01 Thread anonymous . c . lisper
On Dec 1, 8:29 pm, Lew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > A rational human would realize that not too many people peruse this > > newsgroup, > > and that most of them have already seen the wall of text post that you > > generate every time. > > Just out of curiosity, what do

Re: Lisp mentality vs. Python mentality

2009-04-25 Thread anonymous . c . lisper
On Apr 25, 2:06 am, Carl Banks wrote: > In answering the recent question by Mark Tarver, I think I finally hit > on why Lisp programmers are the way they are (in particular, why they > are often so hostile to the "There should only be one obvious way to > do it" Zen). > > Say you put this task to