On Aug 14, 1:01 pm, vippstar vipps...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would you fill your website with junk?
The OP made it clear:
Just wanted to express some frustration with whitespace-mode.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jun 13, 7:07 pm, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
writes C interpreter in C.
The criteria would be the small size and high readability of the code.
For crying out loud, the best any compiler can do is make optimal
machine language. Many C compilers can do that over most inputs. So
can many Lisp compilers if you give the right type data. So it's a
moot point.
The only point to discuss would be that Scheme - in the R5 version of
the spec at
One point that might be interesting, you do include C++ in your post.
Therefore some compare/contrast of C++ class member function
invocation rate versus Lisp object method invocation rate might be
meaningful. I'm sure if you Google back through comp.lang.lisp you
will find plenty on it already.
On Jun 14, 3:34 pm, Raymond Toy toy.raym...@gmail.com wrote:
There was even one example where the C compiler made spectacularly bad
code. I only needed 6 pointer registers (the arch has 8), but the
compiler decided to use only one or two and spilled and reloaded them
from the stack for each
On Jul 24, 6:42 pm, Emmy Noether emmynoeth...@gmail.com wrote:
I have already spent 4 hours scanning/processing to a stage where I
got a decent OCR which needs hand-verification of pages. I need 4 or 8
volunteers depending on whether one want to do two pages each or 1
page each. Its an hour of
On Jun 10, 8:24 pm, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
wrote:
What applets? Have you ever seen a java applet? Last time I saw one
it must have been fifteen years ago.
I have a Java applet that I use for GUI front end on some of my Lisp
work - when HTML forms and pages aren't
Are you using your qooxlisp thingy?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I think the problem with so-called forward looking or highest
level languages is that they tend to become domain specific. What
Lispers are always saying is construct your own high level language
out of your favorite Lisp. Of course no one else will use it then, or
even discuss it, unless you
