Is there a function/class/module/whatever I can use to
look at objects? I want something that will print the object's
value (if any) in pretty-printed form, and list all it's attributes
and their values. And do all that recursively.
I want to be able to find out everything about an object that
__repr__ almost always only prints a summary of it's
object, not the detailed internal structure that I want to
see. When it prints values, that are not pretty-printed,
nor are the objects that constitute the value printed
recursively.
Writing my own __repr__() is emphatically what I don't
want
Chris Mellon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18 Nov 2005 14:05:05 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- snip --
Writing my own __repr__() is emphatically what I don't
want to do! That is no better than debugging by inserting
print statements, a technique from the 1980's.
It's
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Is there a function/class/module/whatever I can use to
look at objects? I want something that will print the object's
value (if any) in pretty-printed form, and list all it's attributes
and their values. And do all that
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Is there a function/class/module/whatever I can use to
look at objects? I want something that will print the object's
value (if any) in pretty-printed form, and list all it's attributes
and their values. And do all that
Shi Mu wrote:
How to run a function to make [1,2,4] become [[1,2],1,4],[2,4]]?
Thanks!
You want [[1,2],[1,4],[2,4]]? That is, all combinations of 2 items
from
the list? You might want to look at:
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/190465
import * from xpermutations
[x
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so what would an entry-level Python programmer expect from this
piece of code?
for item in a.reverse():
print item
for item in a.reverse():
print item
I would expect it to first print a in reverse then a as it was.
a=[1,2,3]
Colin J. Williams wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Is there a function/class/module/whatever I can use to
look at objects? I want something that will print the object's
value (if any) in pretty-printed form, and list all it's
Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 08:53:07 -0800, rurpy wrote:
I am not a complete newb at python, but I am still pretty new.
I too thought immediately that the output should be 3,2,1, 1,2,3.
What you are saying is that a.reverse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ii. The other problem is easier to explain by example.
Let it=iter([1,2,3,4]).
What is the result of zip(*[it]*2)?
The current answer is: [(1,2),(3,4)],
but it is impossible to determine this from the docs,
which would allow [(1,3),(2,4)] instead
Mike Meyer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think this is just another (admittedly minor) case of Python's
designers using Python to enforce some idea of programming
style purity.
You say that as if it were a bad thing.
Well, there are many languages that promote a specific
style of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* It is bug-prone -- zip(x,x) behaves differently when x is a sequence
and when x is an iterator (because of restartability). Don't leave
landmines for your code maintainers.
Err thanks for the advice, but they are *my* code
Alex Martelli wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
language, yea, I guess I think it's bad. A general
purpose language should strive to support as wide a
varity of styles as possible.
Definitely NOT Python's core design principle, indeed the reverse of it.
Priciples are fine if not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I do too mostly. On rereading my post, it seems I overreacted
a bit. But the attitude I complained about I think is real, and has
led to more serious flaws like the missing if-then-else expression,
something I use in virtually
Alex Martelli wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
language, yea, I guess I think it's bad. A general
purpose language should strive to support as wide a
varity of styles as possible.
Definitely NOT Python's core design principle, indeed the reverse of it.
Priciples are fine if not
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Daniel Crespo wrote:
Let me tell you something: I'm not a one-liner coder, but sometimes It
is necesary.
For example:
I need to translate data from a DataField to Another.
def Evaluate(condition,truepart,falsepart):
if condition:
return truepart
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
led to more serious flaws like the missing if-then-else expression,
something I use in virtually every piece of code I write, and which
increases readability.
you obviously need to learn more Python idioms. Python works better
if you use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it seems that quite some people
don't see the language as the creator or wants them to see it.
Here's my two cents on this recurring theme.
While nothing forces a particular programming style, there is some
Magnus Lycka wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a reminder that the change is inplace. How arrogant! While
I'm sure the designers had kindly intentions. my memory, though
bad, is not that bad, and I object to being forced to write code
that is more clunky than need be, because the
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
def convert(old):
new = dict(
CODE=old['CODEDATA'],
DATE=old['DATE']
)
if old['CONTACTTYPE'] == 2:
new['CONTACT'] = old['FIRSTCONTACT']
else:
new['CONTACT']
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't find your code any more readable than the OP's
equivalent code:
the OP's question was
How you do this in a practic way without
the use of one-line code ?
I know. But you compared the readability of code with
one-liners and
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the thing that's in favour is then-if-else, not if-then-else.
Sorry if I confused you, I though it was clear that I meant the
concept, not a specific syntactical implementation.
yup, but if you care readability about,
Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Different programming styles are appropriate for different
tasks, different times and different places, different people.
And like morality, government, or economics, I do not believe
that one style of programming fits all
Alex Martelli wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
cookbook recipies of which there are already several good
collections, but shorter things like, copy(sequence) is spelled
sequence[:].
No way:
from collections import deque
d=deque([1,2,3])
d[:]
Traceback (most recent call
Cameron Laird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Among the treasures available in The Wiki is the current
copy of the Sorting min-howto:
http://www.amk.ca/python/howto/sorting/sorting.html
snip
Why is this a treasure when it is way out of date?
1. There is no mention of the key or
Tony Meyer wrote:
Among the treasures available in The Wiki is the current
copy of the Sorting min-howto:
http://www.amk.ca/python/howto/sorting/sorting.html
Why is this a treasure when it is way out of date?
Note that the updated version of this is at:
Why doesn't the following work? It generates a NameError: global
name 'data' is not defined error.
import timeit
global data
data = [3,8,4,8,6,0,5,7,2,1]
env = global data; x = data
print timeit.Timer('x.sort()', env).timeit()
print timeit.Timer('x.sort(cmp=cmp', env).timeit()
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gee, I wonder if I typed sort into the search box on the wiki it might
turn up something useful? Well, what do you know?
2 results of about 4571 pages. (0.19 seconds)
1. HowTo/Sorting
2. SortingListsOfDictionaries
Are we talking about the same Search
Tony Meyer wrote:
Among the treasures available in The Wiki is the current
copy of the Sorting min-howto:
http://www.amk.ca/python/howto/sorting/sorting.html
Why is this a treasure when it is way out of date?
Note that the updated version of this is at:
Alex Martelli wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why doesn't the following work? It generates a NameError: global
name 'data' is not defined error.
import timeit
global data
data = [3,8,4,8,6,0,5,7,2,1]
env = global data; x = data
print timeit.Timer('x.sort()',
Michael Williams wrote:
Hi All,
I'm looking for a quality Python XML implementation. All of the DOM
and SAX implementations I've come across so far are rather
convoluted. Are there any quality implementations that will (after
parsing the XML) return an object that is accessible by name?
Peter Hansen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Are we talking about the same Search box (at the top right of the
wiki page, and labeled search? Well, yes I did enter sort and
got (as I said) a long list of archived maillist postings.
No, he's talking about
Tony Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's site:, but even if you just left that out and used
'wiki.python.org sorting how to', the first link is the one you're
after. Laziness is no excuse.
You miss my point. Having outdated documentaion distributed
with Python is the problem. Have
Tony Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, the standard responce of don't complain, fix it yourself is
bogus too. There are plenty of people on this list willing to sing
python's
praises, for balance, there should be people willing to openly
point out
python's flaws.
This makes no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--snip--
rurpy Well, I'm not totally sure but I think I would be willing to a
rurpy least try contributing something. A large amount of the time I
rurpy waste when writing Python programs is directly attributable
Gary Herron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--snip--
So just use a def. It is constantly pointed out on
this list that the lambda provides no extra expressive power, it is
merely a shortcut
No, it is not merely a shortcut. It often allows one to avoid
polluting
Scott David Daniels wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I've been bitching about documentation in another
thread, I'm curious... Would it be obvious to anyone of
low to intermediate python skills that using global would
not work in this case? Would it be obvious that using an
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't believe my name, etnic heritage, gender, age, employer or
school, or part of the world I live in, have any bearing on the
contents of my postings.
perhaps not, but it's not what you think that's important here. and I sure
cannot
Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or, better still, by an accomplished writer who has access to the
code's author. This was indeed my experience in writing the docs for
previously undocumented modules. The author was happy to help me by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--snip--
If you prefer the latest documentation, bookmark this page:
http://www.python.org/dev/doc/devel/index.html
Thanks I will keep that in mind. But the obvious risk is that it
will refer to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and, as you just found out, a rather restrictive one
at that.
In part because Python's designers failed to make print a function
or provide an if-then-else expression.
Why would one need print in lambda ? I like ternary
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian I think it would be very useful if there was reference (not just
Ian tutorial) documentation for all the syntax, special semantics like
Ian magic methods, and all the functions and objects in builtins.
It's pretty common to have a User's Guide as well as
Michael Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A.M. Kuchling wrote:
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 10:29:33 -0800,
Michael Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not that helpful. Miscellaneous Services, in particular, gives no clue
to
treasures it contains. I would prefer, for example, to see the data
Adam Olsen wrote:
On 12/7/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam I don't expect everything to make the transition. Are discussions
Adam of atoms and fragments of BNF really better than calling them
Adam expressions and linking to CPython's Grammar file?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The library reference has so many modules that the table of contents
is very large. Again, not really a problem that we can fix;
splitting it up into separate manuals doesn't seem like it would
help.
Iain I like the Global Module Index in
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The builtins section should be moved to the language
reference manual. The material it documents is part
of the language definition, not part of an add-on library.
the standard library is not an add-on. you're confused.
/F
Your probably
Steven Bethard wrote:
--snip--
I think some people were hoping that instead of adding these things to
the standard library, we would come up with a better package manager
that would make adding these things to your local library much simpler.
STeVe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian I think the point is that there is the core language, and from a
Ian user's perspective builtins and statements and syntax are all the
Ian same thing. When you import a module, it's more-or-less obvious
Ian where you find information about the module
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Ian Bicking wrote:
the standard library is not an add-on. you're confused.
I think the point is that there is the core language, and from a user's
perspective builtins and statements and syntax are all the same thing.
When you import a module, it's more-or-less
The code below should be pretty self-explanatory.
I want to read two files in parallel, so that I
can print corresponding lines from each, side by
side. itertools.izip() seems the obvious way
to do this.
izip() will stop interating when it reaches the
end of the shortest file. I don't know how
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But that is exactly the behaviour of python iterator, I don't see what
is broken.
izip/zip just read from the respectives streams and give back a tuple,
if it can get one from each, otherwise stop. And because python
iterator can only go in one direction, those
Duncan Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Otten wrote:
from itertools import izip, chain, repeat
def prt_files (file1, file2):
file1 = chain(file1, repeat())
file2 = chain(file2, repeat())
for line1, line2 in iter(izip(file1, file2).next, (, )):
print
holes in it. I spend WAY too much time
trying to figure out how to do something that should be
easy, but isn't because someone thought that it might
hurt the purity of the language or violate some principle.
pissed-offedly-yr's, rurpy
FLAME OFF
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
izip's uses can be partitioned two ways:
1. All iterables have equal lengths
2. Iterables have different lengths.
Case 1 is no problem obviously.
In Case 2 there are two sub-cases:
I don't understand this. Why do you need look ahead?
Just before I posted, I got it (I think) but didn't want to
rewrite everything. The need for unget() (or peek(), etc)
is to fix the thrown-away-data problem in izip(), right?
As an easier alternative, what about leaving izip() alone
and
Bengt Richter wrote:
On 5 Jan 2006 15:48:26 GMT, Antoon Pardon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006-01-04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But here is my real question...
Why isn't something like this in itertools, or why shouldn't
it go into itertools?
R. Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, a bit of an exaggeration.
Recently, I've been using Python more seriously, and in using the
debugger I think one of the first things I noticed was that there is
no restart (R in perldb) or run (gdb) command.
I was pleasantly pleased discover how
EP wrote:
Luis M. González wrote:
Will Microsoft hurt Python?
I think it is naive to ignore the fact that Microsoft could hurt Python,
though there may be nothing anyone can do.
How?
- create a more prevalent version of Python that is less Pythonic or
undermines some of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike I don't use pdb a lot either - and I write a *lot* of Python.
Ditto. I frequently just insert prints or enable cgitb. Sometimes I enable
line tracing for a specific function and the functions it calls using a
tracing decorator. There are lots of things that
Michael Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bengt Richter wrote:
...
from itertools import repeat, chain, izip
it = iter(lambda z=izip(chain([3,5,8],repeat(Bye)),
chain([11,22],repeat(Bye))):z.next(), (Bye,Bye))
for t in it: print t
...
(3,
Tim Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xah Lee (1) is a write-only poster who pontificates but never reads
replies, and (2) cares not a whit that the rest of us believe him to be a
moron.
I find him offensive, and a pontificator as you said, but I
don't think
Tim Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xah Lee (1) is a write-only poster who pontificates but never reads
replies, and (2) cares not a whit that the rest of us believe him to be a
moron.
I find him offensive, and a pontificator as you said, but I
don't think he is a moron. He has complained
EP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis M. González wrote:
Will Microsoft hurt Python?
I think it is naive to ignore the fact that Microsoft could hurt Python,
though there may be nothing anyone can do.
How?
- create a more prevalent version of Python that is less Pythonic or
undermines
Tim Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xah Lee (1) is a write-only poster who pontificates but never reads
replies, and (2) cares not a whit that the rest of us believe him to be a
moron.
I find him offensive, and a pontificator as you said,
but I don't think he is a moron. He has complained
Max Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the hard way(in that you have to do it yourself):
def prntime(ms):
s=ms/1000
m,s=divmod(s,60)
h,m=divmod(m,60)
d,h=divmod(h,24)
return d,h,m,s
Or abstracted...
def decd (n, base):
Decompose numeric
Apoologies for the multiple posts -- please blame Google.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
...snip...
afaik, the Python Language Reference never defines the word reference.
It carefully defines words like object and value, though, and terms like
call by object or call by object reference are perfectly understandable
if you use the words as they are defined in
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Proposal
I am gathering data to evaluate a request for an alternate version of
itertools.izip() with a None fill-in feature like that for the built-in
map() function:
map(None, 'abc', '12345') #
Anton Vredegoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I already sent some reply via google, got a server error, resent, got a
confirmation that my message was posted, but it doesn't show up and also
there's no way to retrieve my message except fishing in the cache?
Yesterday I had a post not showing
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...snip...
afaik, the Python Language Reference never defines the word reference.
It carefully defines words like object and value, though, and terms like
call by object or call by object reference are perfectly understandable
if you use the words as
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Duncan Booth wrote:
One example of padding out iterators (although I didn't use map's fill-in
to implement it) is turning a single column of items into a multi-column
table with the items laid out across the rows first. The last row may have
to
Donn Cave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Fredrik Lundh wrote:
| ...snip...
| afaik, the Python Language Reference never defines the word reference.
| It carefully defines words like object and value, though, and terms
like
| call by
Another Python docs problem...
I was trying to use imp.find_module().
imp.find_module(mymod, ./subdir)
ImportError: No frozen submodule named ./subdir.mymod
subdir/mymod.py definately exists, has reasonable
permissions, etc.
After a lot of reading and re-reading the docs,
trying various
Tony Meyer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another Python docs problem...
I was trying to use imp.find_module().
[...]
I saw not a hint of this in the docs. In fact
they seem to say that the first (unworking)
form *should* work. Bye bye about two
hours altogether...
I thought I
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
History of zip()
PEP 201 (lock-step iteration) documents that a fill-in feature was
contemplated and rejected for the zip() built-in introduced in Py2.0.
In the years before and after, SourceForge logs show no requests for
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Turns out that you have to do
imp.find_module(mymod, [./subdir])
I saw not a hint of this in the docs. In fact
they seem to say that the first (unworking)
form *should* work.
from the find_module documentation:
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
afaik, the Python Language Reference never defines the word reference.
It carefully defines words like object and value, though, and terms
like
call by object or call by object
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
from the find_module documentation:
find_module( name[, path])
Try to find the module _name_ on the search path _path_.
If _path_ is a list of directory names,
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How well correlated in the use of map()-with-fill with the
(need for) the use of zip/izip-with-fill?
[raymond]
Close to 100%. A non-iterator version of izip_longest() is exactly
equivalent to map(None, it1, it2, ...).
Donn Cave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Donn Cave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
So you've had time to think about how you would define value, in a
few words. Any ideas?
Not yet. The reason is
Steve Holden wrote:
[...snipped a long and very helpful post addressing some
questions I had regarding the nature of an object's value
in python...]
Sorry for the belated reply Steve (I had some access
problems) but did want to let you know I found that post
very informative, and wanted to thank
Steve Holden wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...snip...]
Well, perhaps if you'd read the intro to the documentation (more
carefully), or if you were more used to reading programming manuals,
you'd quickly have recognised
[, path]
as meaning precisely that the path argument is
Andrae Muys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am still left with a difficult to express feeling of
dissatifaction at this process.
Plese try to see it from the point of view of
someone who it not a expert at Python:
Here is izip().
My conception is it takes two
Andrae Muys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for the posting Andrae, it has increased my
knowledge.
No problem, happy to help.
But my original point was there are cases (often involving
file iterators) where the problem's complexity seems to be
on the same order as problems
I need to parse little snipits of xml that come from a file
that has a large DTD that defines hundreds or entities.
But when these snipits are parsed (with elementtree.XML())
without the DTD, the entities are undefined and cause a
parse failure.
Is there any way to tell elementtree to not fail on
On Apr 11, 9:42 pm, Jean-Claude Neveu jcn-france1...@pobox.com
wrote:
My regexp that I'm matching against is: ^\$\£?\d{0,10}(\.\d{2})?$
Here's how I think it should work (but clearly
I'm wrong, because it does not actually work):
^\$\£? Require zero or one instance of $ or £ at the
On Jun 1, 2:47 am, Alia Khouri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we open up the discussion here about how to improve setuptools
which has become the de facto standard for distributing / installing
python software. I've been playing around with ruby's gems which seems
to be more more mature and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 2, 5:06 pm, Peter Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are taking the wrong approach here.
Don't build SQL statements as strings; you are enabling the next SQL
injection attack. Pass parameters using the DB API instead.
Don't use regular expressions to parse a
On Jun 3, 2:55 pm, Filipe Fernandes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't given up on pyparsing, although I'm now heavily leaning
towards PLY as an end solution since lex and yacc parsing is available
on other platforms as well.
Keep in mind that PLY's compatibility with YACC is functional,
not
On Jun 24, 7:30 pm, CodeHunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a = '8868'
b = u'\u8868'
I want to convert a to b
who can help me ?
thank you very much!
a='8868'
unichr(int(a,16))
u'\u8868'
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Dec 20, 6:35 am, Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand that the Win32 has been said to be itself poorly
documented, so perhaps that the documentation that comes with the
modules is of similar quality is no coincidence. Maybe I'm still too
young in my programming to grasp the good of
On Aug 27, 11:12 pm, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 21:11:26 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to read text line-by-line from a text file, but want to ignore
only the first line. I know how to do it in Java (Java has been my
primary language for
Is there an effcient way (more so than cgi) of using Python
with Microsoft IIS? Something equivalent to Perl-ISAPI?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Waldemar Osuch wrote:
What Roger says and also:
http://pyisapie.sourceforge.net/
Thanks for your and Roger's responses.
I looked at pyisapie and there seems to be almost no
dvcumentation -- no sample code and the single readme
is pretty opaque.The pywin isapi has a couple of
examples but
Steve Holden wrote:
If you want CGI then there's no need for an ISAPI filter specific to
your programming language - you just need to associate .py requests with
the Python interpreter.
If you want to use Python as an Active Scripting language (i.e. in the
same way that VBScript is used)
Atanas Banov wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pure cgi is too slow. Active Scripting means ASP, yes?
I need something that will do cgi scripts (a lot of which I already
have
and can modify but don't want to rewrite extensively,
Atanas Banov wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pure cgi is too slow. Active Scripting means ASP, yes?
I need something that will do cgi scripts (a lot of which I already
have
and can modify but don't want to rewrite extensively,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Atanas Banov wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pure cgi is too slow. Active Scripting means ASP, yes?
I need something that will do cgi scripts (a lot of which I already
have
and can modify but
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Gregory Petrosyan wrote:
1) From 2.4.2 documentation:
There are two new valid (semantic) forms for the raise statement:
raise Class, instance
raise instance
2) In python:
raise NameError
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in ?
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The OP points out an ambiguity in the docs, and as usual,
gets told he can't read, etc. How typical.
where did anyone tell the OP that he can't read?
it could be that the tutorial author expected you
to read chapter 8 before you read
1 - 100 of 509 matches
Mail list logo
