Re: How far can stack [LIFO] solve do automatic garbage collection and prevent memory leak ?

2010-08-25 Thread Alex McDonald
On 25 Aug, 01:00, Hugh Aguilar hughaguila...@yahoo.com wrote: On Aug 24, 4:17 pm, Richard Owlett rowl...@pcnetinc.com wrote: Hugh Aguilar wrote: [SNIP ;] The real problem here is that C, Forth and C++ lack automatic garbage collection. If I have a program in which I have to worry

Re: How far can stack [LIFO] solve do automatic garbage collection and prevent memory leak ?

2010-08-24 Thread Alex McDonald
On 24 Aug, 01:00, Hugh Aguilar hughaguila...@yahoo.com wrote: On Aug 21, 12:32 pm, Alex McDonald b...@rivadpm.com wrote: Scintilla gets about 2,080,000 results on google; blather gets about 876,000 results. O Hugh, you pseudo-intellectual you! with gutter language such as turd

Re: How far can stack [LIFO] solve do automatic garbage collection and prevent memory leak ?

2010-08-21 Thread Alex McDonald
On 21 Aug, 06:42, Standish P stnd...@gmail.com wrote: On Aug 20, 3:51 pm, Hugh Aguilar hughaguila...@yahoo.com wrote: On Aug 18, 6:23 pm, Standish P stnd...@gmail.com wrote: On Aug 17, 6:38 pm, John Passaniti john.passan...@gmail.com wrote: You asked if Forth borrowed lists from

Re: How far can stack [LIFO] solve do automatic garbage collection and prevent memory leak ?

2010-08-21 Thread Alex McDonald
On 21 Aug, 17:58, Hugh Aguilar hughaguila...@yahoo.com wrote: On Aug 21, 5:29 am, Alex McDonald b...@rivadpm.com wrote: On 21 Aug, 06:42, Standish P stnd...@gmail.com wrote: Admittedly, I am asking a question that would be thought provoking to those who claim to be experts

Re: How far can stack [LIFO] solve do automatic garbage collection and prevent memory leak ?

2010-08-18 Thread Alex McDonald
On 18 Aug, 11:09, spinoza spinoza1...@yahoo.com wrote: On Aug 18, 1:21 am, Standish P stnd...@gmail.com wrote: This you might want to take this to the Forth people because they are marketing their language as a cure for all that plagues programming today. No, they're not. That I