how can I block all threads for a specific amount of time? (i need to
sleep whole process for testing purposes). i thought of accessing GIL
and sleep for some amount of time, but I don't know how to do this and
whether GIL is recursive.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
i have a generator that raises an exception when calling next(),
however if I try to catch the exception and print the traceback i get
only the line where next() was called
while True:
try:
iterator.next()
except StopIteration:
break
except Exception, e:
traceback.print_exc()
On Sep 5, 11:47 am, Peter Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexandru Moșoi wrote:
i'm facing the following problem:
class Base(object):
def __getattr__(self, attr): return lambda x: attr + '_' + x
def dec(callable):
return lambda *args: 'dec_' + callable(*args)
class
On Sep 5, 1:13 pm, Peter Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexandru Mosoi wrote:
On Sep 5, 11:47 am, Peter Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexandru Moșoi wrote:
i'm facing the following problem:
class Base(object):
def __getattr__(self, attr): return lambda x: attr + '_' + x
def
how is Queue intended to be used? I found the following code in python
manual, but I don't understand how to stop consumers after all items
have been produced. I tried different approaches but all of them
seemed incorrect (race, deadlock or duplicating queue functionality)
def worker():
On Aug 27, 1:06 pm, Gerhard Häring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexandru Mosoi wrote:
how is Queue intended to be used? I found the following code in python
manual, but I don't understand how to stop consumers after all items
have been produced. I tried different approaches but all of them
On Aug 27, 2:54 pm, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Queue raises an Empty exception when there are no items left in the
queue. Put the q.get() call in a try block and exit in the except
block.
Wrong. What if producer takes a long time to produce an item?
Consumers
will find the queue empty and
On Aug 27, 12:45 pm, Alexandru Mosoi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how is Queue intended to be used? I found the following code in python
manual, but I don't understand how to stop consumers after all items
have been produced. I tried different approaches but all of them
seemed incorrect (race
supposing that I have a server (an instance of SocketServer()) that
waits for a connection (ie is blocked in accept()) and in another
thread i want to stop the server, how do I do that?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
why doesn't logging throw any exception when it should? how do I
configure logging to throw exceptions?
try:
... logging.fatal('asdf %d', '123')
... except:
... print 'this line is never printed'
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
how can i do an atomic read+increment? something like
with lock:
old = atomic_int
atomic_int += 1
but in one operation
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
i want to execute a python script using exec open('script.py'). how do
I pass arguments?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Aug 18, 6:02 pm, Alexandru Mosoi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how can I catch (globally) exception that were not caught in a try/
catch block in any running thread? i had this weird case that an
exception was raised in one thread, but nothing was displayed/logged.
I found that normally
how do I execute another python script under a different process? I
want the script to be run using the same interpretoer as the one
running current script. I tried using os.execlp but I don't know how
to get the name/path of the interpreter.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Aug 18, 11:34 am, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
import sys, subprocess
subprocess.call([sys.executable, -c, print 'hello'])
hello
0
10x :). exactly what I was looking for.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
how can I catch (globally) exception that were not caught in a try/
catch block in any running thread? i had this weird case that an
exception was raised in one thread, but nothing was displayed/logged.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Aug 18, 6:18 pm, Paul McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 18, 10:02 am, Alexandru Mosoi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how can I catch (globally) exception that were not caught in a try/
catch block in any running thread? i had this weird case that an
exception was raised in one thread
On Aug 12, 7:46 pm, Calvin Spealman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The best answer is: Don't do that!
That isn't how you test things. Write test scripts, probably using the
unittest framework. You'll save yourself time and trouble having
easily reproducible tests. Many people suggested reload(),
I want to derive a base class, such that some methods are decorated.
The only thing I have in mind is:
class Base(object):
def A(self, x): pass
def B(self, y): pass
class Derived(Base):
@decorator
def A(self, x): Base.A(self, x)
Is this correct approach? How can avoid call to
does anyone know a nice implementation of callbacks in python? i have
issues mixing named unamed parameters. i want build a callback over
a function such that some parameters are passed when callback is
created and the rest are passed when the function is called.
example:
callback =
On Aug 14, 12:02 am, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
your use of the word callback is a bit unusual, and your example isn't
valid Python code, but it looks as if functools.partial might be what
you need:
http://docs.python.org/lib/module-functools.html
my current implementation
I'm using python's interpreter's to run various commands (like a
normal shell). However if sources are modified changes are not
reflected so I have to restart interpreter. Is there any way to avoid
restarting this?
example:
import blah
blah.Blah()
# ... blah.Blah() changed
blah.Blah()
# ...
22 matches
Mail list logo
