Denis Kasak added the comment:
Anything still left to do that is stalling this? I just got bitten by it when
trying to use modulefinder.
--
nosy: +dkasak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40
On 2018-03-13 23:56, Denis Kasak wrote:
On 2018-03-10 02:13, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
But I've stared at this for an hour and I can't see how to extend the
result to three coordinates. I can lay out a grid in the order I want:
1,1,1 1,1,2 1,1,3 1,1,4 ...
2,1,1 2,1,2 2,1,3 2,1,4
n, m = c(i)
return c(n) + (m,)
Applying c3 to the natural numbers gives the sequence you wanted:
s = map(c3, count(1))
pprint([next(s) for _ in range(10)])
[(1, 1, 1),
(2, 1, 1),
(1, 1, 2),
(1, 2, 1),
(2, 1, 2),
(1, 1, 3),
(3, 1, 1),
(1, 2, 2),
(2, 1, 3),
(1, 1, 4)]
--
Denis Kasak
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
with contain a
randomByWeight method.
In all probability, forename and surname *are* instances of RandomName
and contain the randomByWeight() method.
--
Denis Kasak
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
Denis Kasak wrote
You could, however, argue that the swap function doesn't work as
expected (e.g. from a Pascal or a C++ POV) simply because the
underlying objects aren't mutable. The objects *do* get passed
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com wrote:
Denis Kasak wrote:
I assure you I am not confused about Python's object model / calling
system. I was arguing, from a purely theoretical standpoint, that the
same system Python uses could be described in terms of
call
, it's a rather convoluted way of explaining what happens and
calling it pass-by-object feels much better. :-)
--
Denis Kasak
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
of
encodings in existence today, the only real solution to the problem is
clearly stating your content-type. Since MIME is the most accepted way
of doing this, it should be the preferred way, RFC'ed or not.
--
Denis Kasak
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
encode all Unicode code points, while
the latter can only encode those in the BMP.
--
Denis Kasak
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
- why was UCS-2
chosen over plain UTF-16 or UTF-8 in the first place for Python's
internal storage?
--
Denis Kasak
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
-size
indexing; UTF-16 essentially for the same reason (plus there was
no point to UTF-16, since there were no assigned characters outside
the BMP).
Yes, I failed to realise how long ago the unicode data type was
implemented originally. :-)
Thanks for the explanation.
--
Denis Kasak
--
http
would have also known
if you had read the message of the exception more carefully. :P
You passed the arguments for strptime() the wrong way around. Just
pass them in reverse and your problem will be fixed.
--
Denis Kasak
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Lionel lionel.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
ResourcefilePath
'C:\\C8Example1.slc.rsc'
snip
C:\C8Example1.slc.src
The extension you used in the interactive shell differs from the one
you used in the class code (i.e. rsc vs src).
--
Denis Kasak
--
http
the same error with 2.6 on Windows once you correct this.
(note to Giampaolo: sorry, resending this because I accidentally
selected reply instead of reply to all)
--
Denis Kasak
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Thorsten Kampe
thors...@thorstenkampe.de wrote:
* Denis Kasak (Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:22:32 +0100)
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Giampaolo Rodola' gne...@gmail.com
wrote:
snip
print unicode('\u20ac')
\u20ac
Shouldn't this be
print unicode(u'\u20ac
Peter Otten wrote:
Denis Kasak wrote:
Basically, it reverses the list in place, so it modifies the list which
called it. It does not return a /new/ list which is a reversed version
of the original, as you expected it to. Since it doesn't return anything
explicitly, Python makes it return None
, which is False, naturally.
Try this:
spam = ['a', 'n', 'n', 'a']
eggs = spam[:]
if spam.reverse() == eggs:
print Palindrome
Also, 'list' is a really bad name for a list, since this is the name of
the builtin type object for the list type.
--
Denis Kasak
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman
reason why it wouldn't work
with a loop. Am I missing something?
--
Denis Kasak
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
see a good reason why it wouldn't work
with a loop. Am I missing something?
--
Denis Kasak
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Scott David Daniels wrote:
Denis Kasak wrote:
...
spam = []
for i in range(10):
... spam.append(lambda: i)
spam[0]()
9
spam[1]()
9
Manually creating the lambdas and appending them to a list works as
expected, naturally; I don't see a good reason why it wouldn't work
with a loop. Am I
'classobj' is not defined
You can compare it against the ClassType object located in the types module.
import types
class b:
def __init__(self):
self.c = 1
def d(self):
print self.c
type(b) == types.ClassType
True
--
Denis Kasak
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
Mike Schilling wrote:
Threaded mail-readers too, screen-based editors , spell-checkers, all
useless frills.
Interestingly enough, I have explained my opinion in the part of the
post you have trimmed. On the other hand, things you mentioned are far
from being useless. They introduce no
John Bokma wrote:
You can't be sure: errors in the handling of threads can cause a buffer
overflow, same for spelling checking :-D
Yes, they can, provided they are not properly coded. However, those
things only interact locally with the user and have none or very limited
interaction with
John Bokma wrote:
Ulrich Hobelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Bokma wrote:
http://www.phpbb.com/mods/
Great. How can I, the user, choose, how to use a mod on a given web
server?
Ask the admin?
And that is, in your opinion, completely comparable to running your own,
private
John Bokma wrote:
so use Lynx :-)
One forum I visit is about scorpions. And really, it talks a bit easier
about scorpions if you have an image to look at :-D.
In short: Usenet = Usenet, and www = www. Why some people want to move
people from www to Usenet or vice versa is beyond me. If
T Beck wrote:
Wasn't the point... I never said they were. HTML is at version 4.0(I
think?) now, AND we've added extra layers of stuff you can use
alongside of it. The internet is a free-flowing evolving place... to
try to protect one little segment like usenet from ever evolving is
just
CBFalconer wrote:
Mike Schilling wrote:
Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
Mike Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
l v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
Xah Lee wrote:
(circa 1996), and email should be text only (anti-MIME, circa 1995),
I think e-mail should be text only. I
Mike Schilling wrote:
I see a difference between X would be useful for A, B, and C and Y will
always be the only proper way.
Don't you?
Y would not be useful because of the bandwidth it consumes, the malware
it would introduce, the additional time spent focusing on the format
rather
28 matches
Mail list logo
