On 2018-07-15 15:52, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 14:17:51 +0300, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>
>> Steven D'Aprano :
>>
>>> On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 11:43:14 +0300, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Paul Rubin :
> I don't think Go is the answer either, but it probably got strings
> right.
On 2018-07-12 18:00, Chris Angelico wrote:
> What do you mean by "fix"? Make the 'x' bind eagerly? That would break
> basically every other use of closures.
No. I mean make each x a new variable--closures would work as before,
for-loops would change. If we have subscopes, it seems natural that
On 2018-07-12 14:03, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Dealing with reference cycles is generally done *periodically* rather
> than immediately (CPython disposes of unreferenced objects immediately
> upon last deref). You can avoid having a dedicated cycle detection
> pass by using a mark-and-sweep GC, but
On 2018-07-12 10:59, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 01:37:24 -0700, aleiphoenix wrote:
>
>> My question is, does except ... as ... create a new scope from outer
>> block, causing 'err' be hidden from outer scope? Is this intentional?
>
> No, it is not a new scope, and yes, it is
From: Ed Kellett
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--Xw5fa1GFtucLPGBT1sLtLtUpmbraGkiYl
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="lDyl22ZCUIEM3fl5YMnfJ3B8O9bwBCY9r";
protected-headers="v1"
From: Ed Kellett
To: python-list@python.org
Message-ID: <
On 2018-06-23 06:21, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Let's start finding all the edge cases that don't work, so I can work
> on fixing them :)
Very long functions (or, more specifically, functions with a very large
number of consts) will likely prove annoying.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
On 2018-06-19 11:21, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Isn't it nice how comments, being terminated exclusively by
> end-of-line, allow the introduction of subtle bugs? Let's see how many
> people spot the (presumably deliberate) bug in Steve's code here.
Hardly subtle.
It does also make them considerably
are you someone's ironic 3rd-year art project
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2018-06-18 13:18, Chris Angelico wrote:
> 1) Parse the code, keeping all the non-essential parts as well as the
> essential parts.
> 2) Find the comments, or find the annotations
> 3) If comments, figure out if they're the ones you want to remove.
> 4) Reconstruct the file without the bits you
On 2018-06-17 10:19, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Anyone here use IronPython, Jython or PyPy?
>
> Does inspect.getstack always work? Is it considered an implementation
> detail for CPython or something promised to work on any compliant
> Python interpreter?
>
> I see that it doesn't even exist on
On 2018-06-13 05:24, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Oh wait, your code isn't anything remotely sane. But for the rest of
> us, large files aren't a problem.
I don't like large files--I think mostly because files are an
organisational tool, they're quite good at that job, and one might as
well use them.
On 2018-06-08 03:42, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Apart from the one odd bug with SimpleHTTPServer not properly sending
> back 500s, I very much doubt that the original concern - namely that
> os.path.exists() and os.stat() raise ValueError if therels a %00 in
> the URL - can be abused effectively.
On 2018-06-07 14:32, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I'm following the instructions here:
>
> https://docs.python.org/3/library/http.server.html
>
>
> and running this from the command line as a regular unprivileged user:
>
> python3.5 -m http.server 8000
>
> What I expected was a directory listing
13 matches
Mail list logo
