Sriram Rajagopalan added the comment:
ping.
Gentle reminder to review the patch
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Sriram Rajagopalan added the comment:
ping
--
nosy: +bglsriram
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue26779>
___
___
Pyth
Changes by Sriram Rajagopalan <bglsri...@gmail.com>:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file42486/bdbfix.patch
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python
Changes by Sriram Rajagopalan <bglsri...@gmail.com>:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file42508/bdbfix.patch
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python
New submission from Sriram Rajagopalan:
Consider this simple python program -
1 #!/usr/bin/python
2
3 import pdb
4 import sys
5 import traceback
6
7 def trace_exception( type, value, tb ):
8 traceback.print_tb( tb )
9 pdb.post_mortem( tb )
10
11 sys.excepthook
Sriram Rajagopalan added the comment:
Opened issue 26460 for fixing the leap day bug in datetime.datetime.strptime()
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/i
New submission from Sriram Rajagopalan:
$ python
Python 3.5.1 (default, Dec 7 2015, 12:58:09)
[GCC 5.2.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>>
>>>
>>>
Sriram Rajagopalan added the comment:
datetime.strptime() uses the return value of _strptime() [ which returns 1900
for 29th Feb without an year ] and eventually ends up calling
datetime_new()->check_date_args() [ datetimemodule.c ] with 29th Feb 1900 and
eventual failure.
Should we enha
