On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt
The comment clearly states owned by current thread, not owned by any
thread. The latter would also be useless, as that can change concurrently
at any time when owned by a different thread, so making decisions on this
state is futile.
Agree.
Hi list,
I just noticed that in /usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py
class _Condition(_Verbose):
...
def _is_owned(self):
# Return True if lock is owned by current_thread.
# This method is called only if __lock doesn't have
_is_owned().
if self.__lock.acquire(0):
Hi,
Nikhil Verma writes:
In [9]: (k for k,v in for_patient_type.iteritems() if v == 'Real')
You can use dict comprehension, just change () to {}.
for_patient_type = {37: u'Test', 79: u'Real', 80: u'Real', 81: u'Real', 83:
u'Real', 84: u'Real', 91: u'Real', 93: u'Real'}
{k:v for k,v in
A.T.T
Thanks a lot.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Jones wrote:
Wenhua Zhao wrote:
A.T.T
Thanks a lot.
If you could elaborate a bit more, it might be helpful. I'm guessing
you want something like StringIO or cStringIO.
- jmj
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
a = b | 1
a = b if b != nil
else a =1
Is there such expression in python?
Thanks a lot!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
