New submission from andrew cooke :
The code below, when invoked with -h, prints:
(.env) [andrew@localhost py]$ python -m tests_sa.argparse_bug -h
usage: argparse_bug.py [-h] (-a A | [-b B | -c C)]
options:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-a A
-b B
-c C
where the final two
Hi,
The following code worked on Python 3.2, but no longer works in 3.4. Did
something change, or have I always been doing something dumb?
(I realise the code is pointless as is - it's the simplest example I can give
of a problem I am seeing with more complex code).
class Foo:
... def
But then nothing will be passed to __init__ on the subclass.
Andrew
class Foo:
... def __new__(cls, *args, **kargs):
... print('new', args, kargs)
... super().__new__(cls)
...
class Bar(Foo):
... def __init__(self, a):
... print('init', a)
...
Bar(1)
new
On Wednesday, 13 May 2015 11:36:12 UTC-3, Thomas Rachel wrote:
Am 13.05.2015 um 15:25 schrieb andrew cooke:
class Foo:
... def __new__(cls, *args, **kargs):
... print('new', args, kargs)
... super().__new__(cls, *args, **kargs)
new (1,) {}
Traceback (most
On Wednesday, 13 May 2015 13:37:23 UTC-3, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 5/13/2015 9:25 AM, andrew cooke wrote:
The following code worked on Python 3.2, but no longer works in 3.4.
Bugfixes break code that depends on buggy behavior. See
https://bugs.python.org/issue1683368
Your code also fails
On Wednesday, 13 May 2015 11:56:21 UTC-3, Ian wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:45 AM, andrew cooke and...@acooke.org wrote:
class Foo:
... def __new__(cls, *args, **kargs):
... print('new', args, kargs)
... super().__new__(cls)
...
class Bar(Foo):
... def
New submission from andrew cooke:
Using python 3.3, if I try to run __main__ I see this error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/lib/python3.3/runpy.py, line 140, in _run_module_as_main
mod_name, loader, code, fname
andrew cooke added the comment:
can't see how to edit posts, so adding as a comment, this is what triggers the
bug:
PYTHONPATH=src python -m simplessl
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18422
New submission from andrew cooke:
Apparently the limited support for -m is standard behaviour - see
http://bugs.python.org/issue18422 - but it's not documented at
http://docs.python.org/3/using/cmdline.html#cmdoption-m
That should say, somewhere, that it only applies to leaf modules
andrew cooke added the comment:
in case anyone else ends up here through google...
the problem described here is not related to the linked issue. it was just a
missing `__init__.py` in the module (plus sucky error messages).
the following works fine:
.
├── README.md
├── src
andrew cooke added the comment:
what is rietveld?
and why is this marked as easy? it seems like it involves issues that aren't
described well in the spec - it requires some kind of canonical way to describe
urls with (and without) parameters to solve completely.
--
nosy: +acooke
andrew cooke added the comment:
thanks (only subscribed to this now, so no previous email).
my guess is that google are assuming a dumb regexp so
http://example.com/foo?
in a rule does not match
http://example.com/foo
and also i realised that http://google.com/robots.txt doesn't
When I use a config file things seem to work (in other projects), but for my
current code I hoped to configure logging from Python.
I distilled my problem down to the following test, which does not print
anything. Please can someone explain why? I was expecting the module's logger
to
similarly, if i run the following, i see only done:
from logging import DEBUG, root, getLogger
if __name__ == '__main__':
root.setLevel(DEBUG)
getLogger(__name__).debug(hello world)
print('done')
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Friday, 28 December 2012 21:56:46 UTC-3, Peter Otten wrote:
Other revolutionary ideas: read the docs
http://docs.python.org/dev/howto/logging.html#logging-basic-tutorial ;)
how do you think i knew about the root handler without reading the damn docs
you condescending asshole?
anyway,
andrew cooke and...@acooke.org added the comment:
hi - i'm the original author (may be using a different account). as far as i
remember, i raised this because it seemed relevant given the link i gave. if
you've looked at the issue and think your approach would work, or that this
should
andrew cooke and...@acooke.org added the comment:
perhaps it could just work in a simple, consistent way?
in my original report i wondered whether there was a significant performance
hit. but so far the objections against fixing this seem to be (1) a lawyer
could be convinced the current
Changes by andrew cooke and...@acooke.org:
--
nosy: -acooke
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12029
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
hi,
please, what am i doing wrong here? the docs say
http://docs.python.org/release/3.1.3/library/stdtypes.html#comparisons in
general, __lt__() and __eq__() are sufficient, if you want the conventional
meanings of the comparison operators but i am seeing
assert 2 three
E
New submission from andrew cooke and...@acooke.org:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7306522/combining-itertools-and-multiprocessing/7307078
suggests (and the idea itself seems reasonable) that it would sometimes be
useful for multiprocessing to operate correctly (ie lazily) with lazy input
http://bugs.python.org/issue12029
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
New submission from andrew cooke and...@acooke.org:
Hi,
In general, registering a class with an ABC is equivalent to making it a
subclass (isinstance and issubclass are patched through ABCMeta). However,
this does not work for exceptions (see example below, where exception is not
caught
This isn't hugely surprising, but doesn't seem to be documented. Is it a bug,
or worth raising as one, or have I misunderstood?
Python 3.2 (r32:88445, Feb 27 2011, 13:00:05)
[GCC 4.5.0 20100604 [gcc-4_5-branch revision 160292]] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more
Thanks for finding that reference in the data model docs! I was about to post
a bug report because in PEP 3119 it says otherwise:
The primary mechanism proposed here is to allow overloading the built-in
functions isinstance() and issubclass(). The overloading works as follows:
The call
I didn't phrase that very well. I do see the point about this being an
instance lookup on a class...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
What I do in Lepl is use two stages. The first calls the type/metaclass
directly and the second subclasses that. This avoids using the sugar that
changes between 2 and 3.
So, for example, in
http://code.google.com/p/lepl/source/browse/src/lepl/matchers/matcher.py#40 I
have
_Matcher =
(1) Python's docs use Sphinx, which uses restructured text as a markup. You
can generate man pages from restructured text using rst2man (which is installed
on my computer, probably as part of python/docutils).
HOWEVER I imagine it's not going to work very well, if at all, because Sphinx
uses
Hi,
I've been staring at this problem, in various forms, all day. Am I missing
something obvious, or is there some strange hardwiring of isinstance? This is
with Python 3.2.
class A(metaclass=ABCMeta):
@classmethod
def __instancecheck__(cls, instance): return
Also, there's something strange about the number of arguments (they're not
consistent between the two examples - the A to __instancecheck__ should not
be needed). Yet it compiles and runs like that. Very confused :o(
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
OK, sorry, I see the mistake. I'm confusing __class__ on the instance and on
te class (the latter being the metaclass). Sorry again, Andrew
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
If you look at the code in
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/6adbf5f3dafb/Lib/collections/__init__.py#l49
the attribute __root is checked for, and only created if missing. Why?
I ask because, from what I understand, the __init__ method will only be called
when the object is first being
Is that normal? I mean, OK, it's possible (and yes I forgot it could be called
directly), but is there any usual reason to do so?
I guess what I'm asking is: if I'm writing library code should I be this
careful? (I've written quite a lot of Python code without this ever biting
me, but maybe
In the code below I use __prepare__ to change the class dictionary so that a
tuple is stored in __setitem__(). Since __getitem__() removes the tuple I
wasn't expecting any problems, but it seems that __init__ is being retrieved
via some other mechanism. Why? Is a copy of the dict being made
Sorry I should probably have made clear that this is Python 3.2
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Yes, I think you're right, thanks. Makes sense from an efficiency POV.
Luckily, it turns out I don't need to do that anyway :o)
Cheers,
Andrew
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
== 'three'
print('woop')
On Thursday, April 7, 2011 7:31:16 PM UTC-3, andrew cooke wrote:
class TupleDict(dict):
'''Stores additional info, but removes it on __getitem__().'''
def __setitem__(self, key, value):
print('setting', key, value)
super(TupleDict
This conflicts with any parameter named return. Wouldn't it have been better
to use - as the key? Is there any way this can be changed?
Andrew
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Sorry, ignore that. I just realised that return will be a reserved word, so
that can't happen. Andrew
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi,
I just downloaded, built and altinstalled Python3.2 on Linux x64. I noticed
that in /usr/local/bin I have two identical (says diff) binaries called
Python3.2 and Python3.2m. Is this expected? I can find very little reference
to them apart from a short discussion in python-dev where
[Sorry I clicked the wrong button so I think my prev reply went only to Tom]
Thanks. Yes, they're hard linked. And the bug report mentions PEP 3149 which
says that m means --with-pymalloc was used
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3149/
Cheers,
Andrew
--
http://bugs.python.org/issue9179
On Jul 5, 9:38 pm, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
andrew cooke wrote:
On Jul 5, 8:56 pm, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
andrew cooke wrote:
What am I missing this time? :o(
Nothing. It's a bug. :-(
Sweet :o)
Thanks - do you want me
New submission from andrew cooke and...@acooke.org:
from re import compile
# these work as expected
assert compile('(a)b(?=b)(c)').match('abc')
assert not compile('(a)b(?=c)(c)').match('abc')
assert compile('(a)b(?=c)(c)').match('abc')
assert not compile('(a)b(?=b)(c)').match('abc
andrew cooke and...@acooke.org added the comment:
I hope the above is clear enough (you need to stare at the regexps for a time)
- basically, lookback with a group conditional is not as expected (it appears
to be evaluated as lookahead?). Also, some patterns compile that probably
shouldn't
andrew cooke and...@acooke.org added the comment:
If it's any help, these are the equivalent tests as I think they should be
(you'll need to translate engine(parse(... to compile(...)
http://code.google.com/p/rxpy/source/browse/rxpy/src/rxpy/engine/backtrack/_test/engine.py?r
andrew cooke and...@acooke.org added the comment:
I thought someone was working on the re module these days? I thought there I'd
seen some issues with patches etc?
Anyway, short term, sorry - no patch. Medium/long term, yes it's possible, but
please don't rely on it.
The simplest way
andrew cooke and...@acooke.org added the comment:
Ah good point, thanks.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9179
___
___
Python-bugs
As ever, I guess it's most likely I've misunderstood something, but in
Python 2.6 lookback seems to actually be lookahead. All the following
tests pass:
from re import compile
assert compile('(a)b(?=(?(2)x|c))(c)').match('abc')
assert not
On Jul 5, 8:56 pm, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
andrew cooke wrote:
What am I missing this time? :o(
Nothing. It's a bug. :-(
Sweet :o)
Thanks - do you want me to raise an issue or will you?
Cheers,
Andrew
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
This is a bit embarassing, but I seem to be misunderstanding how \b
works in regexps.
Please can someone explain why the following fails:
from re import compile
p = compile(r'\bword\b')
m = p.match(' word ')
assert m
My understanding is that \b matches a space
On May 29, 11:24 am, Duncan Booth duncan.bo...@invalid.invalid
wrote:
andrew cooke and...@acooke.org wrote:
Please can someone explain why the following fails:
from re import compile
p = compile(r'\bword\b')
m = p.match(' word ')
assert m
[...]
You
On May 2, 3:54 pm, Andreas Löscher andreas.loesc...@s2005.tu-
chemnitz.de wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for an easy to use parser. I am want to get an overview
over parsing and want to try to get some information out of a C-Header
file. Which parser would you recommend?
Best,
Andreas
I develop
Hi,
The latest Lepl release includes an implementation of RFC 3696 - the
RFC that describes how best to validate email addresses and HTTP
URLs. For more information please see http://www.acooke.org/lepl/rfc3696.html
Lepl's main page is http://www.acooke.org/lepl
Because Lepl compiles to
FYI, Fourthought's PyXML has a module called uri.py that contains
regexes for URL validation. I've over a million URLs (harvested from
the Internet) through their code. I can't say I checked each and every
result, but I never saw anything that would lead me to believe it was
Is the third case here surprising to anyone else? It doesn't make
sense to me...
Python 2.6.2 (r262:71600, Oct 24 2009, 03:15:21)
[GCC 4.4.1 [gcc-4_4-branch revision 150839]] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
from re import compile
p1 = compile('a\x62c')
On Apr 11, 8:12 pm, Lie Ryan lie.1...@gmail.com wrote:
In the first case, *python* will unescape the string literal '\x62' into
letters 'b'. In the second case, python will unescape the double
backslash '\\' into a single slash '\' and *regex* will unescape the
single-slash-62 into 'b'. In the
On Apr 11, 7:18 pm, Paul McGuire pt...@austin.rr.com wrote:
[...]
So I would say the surprise isn't that case 3 didn't match, but that
case 2 matched.
Unless I just don't get what you were testing, not being an RE wiz.
Case 2 is the regexp engine interpreting escapes that appear as
literal
On Jan 29, 11:22 am, Peter Otten __pete...@web.de wrote:
The name is looked up in the code object. As that is immutable you have to
make a new one:
[details snipped]
thanks very much! sorry i didn't reply earlier - been travelling.
(also, thanks to any other replies - i'm just reading through
On Jan 29, 5:37 pm, Gabriel Genellina gagsl-...@yahoo.com.ar
wrote:
The decorator module is a very fine addition to anyone's tool set -- but
in this case it is enough to use the wraps() function from the functools
standard module.
ah, thanks! i thought something like this existed in the
On Jan 29, 11:50 am, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
new.function and new.code will let you construct new objects with
different values (and copying over whichever existing attributes you
want to preserve).
unfortunately new is deprecated and dropped from 3. i can't see how
the same
On Jan 30, 7:17 pm, andrew cooke and...@acooke.org wrote:
On Jan 29, 5:37 pm, Gabriel Genellina gagsl-...@yahoo.com.ar
wrote:
The decorator module is a very fine addition to anyone's tool set -- but
in this case it is enough to use the wraps() function from the functools
standard
On Jan 29, 1:09 pm, Michele Simionato michele.simion...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jan 29, 2:30 pm, andrew cooke and...@acooke.org wrote:
Is there any way to change the name of the function in an error
message? In the example below I'd like the error to refer to bar(),
for example
Is there any way to change the name of the function in an error
message? In the example below I'd like the error to refer to bar(),
for example (the motivation is related function decorators - I'd like
the wrapper function to give the same name)
def foo():
... return 7
...
foo.__name__ =
New submission from andrew cooke and...@acooke.org:
There are two related issues here. The first is, I think, a simple bug:
When I try to register a function as a subclass of an ABC I get the error:
TypeError: issubclass() arg 2 must be a class or tuple of classes
Looking at the code
On Sep 21, 10:59 am, Nobody nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
I have a similar question.
What I want: a tokeniser generator which can take a lex-style grammar (not
necessarily lex syntax, but a set of token specifications defined by
REs, BNF, or whatever), generate a DFA, then run the DFA on
On Sep 24, 7:12 am, Carl Banks pavlovevide...@gmail.com wrote:
with capture_changed_bindings() as changed:
b = 5
c = 4
d = 6
print changed
test()
Quick and dirty, not robust at all. But you get the idea.
Carl Banks
brilliant. using the with context is
On Sep 24, 5:20 am, Steven D'Aprano
ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au wrote:
Speaking as a user (although not of Andrew's domain specific language),
I'd like to say to developers PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE don't try to help me
with half-baked unreliable solutions that only work sometimes.
This is a bit vague, I'm afraid, but is there any way for me to take
code like:
a = Foo()
beta = Bar()
and somehow attach the string a to the Foo instance and beta to
the Bar instance. At some later point in the program I want to be
able to look at the Bar instance and say to the user
For example, I assume it's possible to somehow access the dictionary
for the current block, but I can't see how to do this after
assignment. If I do it in the Foo constructor, for example, a will
not yet be bound.
On Sep 23, 8:15 pm, andrew cooke and...@acooke.org wrote:
This is a bit vague
On Sep 23, 8:40 pm, Rhodri James rho...@wildebst.demon.co.uk
wrote:
eggs[42] = Foo()
beans['spam'] = Foo()
chips.spam = Foo()
spam[eggs.beans['chips']] = Foo()
spam.append(Foo())
these are valid points, but in practice the main use (for the
restricted application i care about) is si,ple
On Sep 23, 10:11 pm, Dave Angel da...@ieee.org wrote:
This comes up periodically in this list, and the answer is always
something like: you can't get there from here.
Well, I'm both flexible and desperate, so this is a possible route
(perhaps near enough):
import sys
class Foo(object):
for the record, googling for f_back.f_locals reveals a wide variety
of similar hacks and also a cleaner way to access the current frame:
inspect.currentframe()
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sep 19, 9:34 pm, Peng Yu pengyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 19, 6:05 pm, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
http://nedbatchelder.com/text/python-parsers.html
This is more a less just a list of parsers. I would like some detailed
guidelines on which one to choose for various parsing
On Sep 20, 8:11 am, Peng Yu pengyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 6:50 AM, andrew cooke and...@acooke.org wrote:
On Sep 19, 9:34 pm, Peng Yu pengyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 19, 6:05 pm, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
http://nedbatchelder.com/text/python-parsers.html
On Sep 19, 11:39 pm, TerryP bigboss1...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
For flat data, simple unix style rc or dos style ini file will often
suffice, and writing a parser is fairly trivial; in fact writing a
[...]
python already includes parsers for .ini configuration files.
[...]
The best way to
One word of warning - the documentation for that format says at the
beginning that it is compressed in some way. I am not sure if that
means within some program, or on disk. But most parsers will not be
much use with a compressed file - you will need to uncompress it first.
--
The file size of a wig file can be very large (GB). Most tasks on this
file format does not need the parser to save all the lines read from
the file in the memory to produce the parsing result. I'm wondering if
pyparsing is capable of parsing large wig files by keeping only
minimum required
also, parsing large files may be slow. in which case you may be
better with a non-python solution (even if you call it from python).
your file format is so simple that you may find a lexer is enough for
what you want, and they should be stream oriented. have a look at the
shlex package that is
I don't quite understand this point. If I don't use a parser, since
python can read numbers line by line, why I need a lexer package?
for the lines of numbers it would make no difference; for the track
definition lines it would save you some work.
as you said, this is a simple format, so the
So for the track definition, using a lexer package would be better
than using regex in python, right?
they are similar. a lexer is really just a library that packages
regular expressions in a certain way. so you could write your own
code and you would really be writing a simple lexer. the
On Sep 20, 9:12 am, andrew cooke and...@acooke.org wrote:
ps is there somewhere can download example files? this would be
useful for my own testing. thanks.
i replied to a lot of your questions here; any chance you could reply
to this one of mine?
the wig format looks like it could be a good
On Sep 20, 3:16 pm, Peng Yu pengyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:35 PM, andrew cooke and...@acooke.org wrote:
On Sep 20, 9:12 am, andrew cooke and...@acooke.org wrote:
ps is there somewhere can download example files? this would be
useful for my own testing. thanks.
i
andrew cooke and...@acooke.org added the comment:
Came here wondering how best to solve this myself.
I already subclass the request handler to do client validation (password
etc) and it stuck me that a simpler solution would be to use thread
local storage.
This avoids having to modify dispatch
On Aug 12, 8:52 am, Dave Angel da...@ieee.org wrote:
Supply us with just enough source code to actually try it, give the full
error message including traceback, and tell us what you expected to
see. Also tell us Python version (sys.version)
So far you've done none of these. When I try the
Is there a way to make this work (currently scope and join are
undefined at runtime when the inner class attributes are defined):
class _StreamFactory(object):
@staticmethod
def __call__(lines, source, join=''.join):
class Line(object):
__source = source
correction: source and join are undefined. Sorry, Andrew
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Aug 5, 10:46 am, Martin P. Hellwig martin.hell...@dcuktec.org
wrote:
Hi List,
On several occasions I have needed (and build) a parser that reads a
binary piece of data with custom structure. For example (bogus one):
BE
+-+-+-+-+--++
|
David Bolen wrote:
andrew cooke and...@acooke.org writes:
However, when printed via format_exc(), this new exception still has
the old exception attached via the mechanism described at
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3134/ (this is Python 3.0).
If you're in control of the format_exc
I have some (library) code where an exception is caught and, since the
underlying cause is rather obscure, a different exception is raised that
more clearly explains the issue to the caller.
However, when printed via format_exc(), this new exception still has the
old exception attached via the
http://groups.google.com/group/beautifulsoup/browse_thread/thread/d416dd19fdaa43a6
http://jjinux.blogspot.com/2008/10/python-some-notes-on-lxml.html
andrew
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message gu0ofm$oj9$0...@news.t-online.com, Peter Otten wrote:
While it may not matter here using placeholders instead of manually
escaping user-provided values is a good habit to get into.
Until you hit things it can't deal with.
The post you are replying to
against parameters.
andrew
Nick wrote:
On May 8, 1:49 pm, andrew cooke and...@acooke.org wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message gu0ofm$oj9$0...@news.t-online.com, Peter Otten wrote:
While it may not matter here using placeholders instead of manually
escaping user-provided values
Paul Hemans wrote:
Hi Andrew,
The reason I am using mapped objects is that I need to abstract from the
database implementation allowing the replication to target a number of
different platforms. This will definitely slow things down.
have you looked at sqlalchemy's generic sql support? you
not sure i've read all the posts on this, and i don't fully understand the
problem, but someone's mentioned sqlalchemy, so here's my experience with
that and large updates using mapped objects.
1 - don't commit each object as you modify it. instead, process a whole
pile in memory and then
on the more general point about exactly how to handle large data sets, i
found this article interesting -
http://highscalability.com/unorthodox-approach-database-design-coming-shard
andrew
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
I do this:
binops = ['add', 'sub', 'mul', 'div', 'radd', 'rsub'] # etc
unops = ['neg', 'abs', invert'] # etc
binop_meth =
def __%s__(self, other):
return type(self)(int.__%s__(self, other))
unop_meth =
def __%s__(self):
return
Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
andrew cooke and...@acooke.org writes:
Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
class MyInt(int):
for op in binops:
exec binop_meth % (op, op)
for op in unops:
exec unop_meth % (op, op)
del op
what's the del for?
Without it, 'op' would end
andrew cooke wrote:
[...]
but when you need to access instances by more than one value (.bar and
.baz) then typically that's a hard problem, and there's a trade-off
somewhere. you might find writing a special container that contains two
dicts is useful. if so, you might want to use weak
Jeremiah Dodds wrote:
I've been looking over some of my code, and I've found something I do that
has a bit of a smell to it. I've searched the group and docs, and haven't
found much of anything that solves this particular problem, although I may
just not be searching correctly.
Anyhow, I
Peter Otten wrote:
John Posner wrote:
Given how common string maniuplations are, I guess I'm surprised that
Python hasn't yet made contains() into both a string-module function
*and* a string-object method.
Could you explain why you prefer 'contains(belly, beer)'
or 'belly.contains(beer)'
are you on the mailing list (python-list@python.org) or reading via google
groups? groups is full of junk, but the list is filtered. the (filtered)
list is also available via gmane and similar.
(disclaimer - i also use spamassasin so it's possible that is cleaning the
mail up, but this
1 - 100 of 362 matches
Mail list logo
