On Nov 12, 10:52 pm, John O'Hagan resea...@johnohagan.com wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:47:26 +, John O'Hagan wrote:
I have a generator function which takes as arguments another generator
and a dictionary of other generators like this:
On Oct 23, 7:29 am, Roger Davis r...@hawaii.edu wrote:
snip
Are there any Python debuggers with a decent GUI out there at all that
will work on a Mac with the following features: (i) ability to pass in
a sys.srgv[] list that the program would otherwise see without the
debugger, (ii) display
On Nov 10, 10:02 am, Mel mwil...@the-wire.com wrote:
xoff wrote:
I was wondering what the best method was in Python programming for 2
discontinued ranges. e.g. I want to use the range 3 to 7 and 17 to 23.
Am I obliged to use 2 for loops defining the 2 ranges like this:
for i in range
On Oct 31, 11:46 pm, iwawi iwawi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 loka, 21:48, Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.com wrote:
PRJ01001 4 00100END
PRJ01002 3 00110END
I would like to pick only some columns to a new file and put them to a
certain places (to match previous data) -
On Nov 1, 1:58 am, iwawi iwawi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 marras, 09:59, cbr...@cbrownsystems.com
cbr...@cbrownsystems.com wrote:
On Oct 31, 11:46 pm, iwawi iwawi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 loka, 21:48, Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.com wrote:
PRJ01001 4 00100END
PRJ01002
On Oct 31, 12:48 pm, Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.com wrote:
PRJ01001 4 00100END
PRJ01002 3 00110END
I would like to pick only some columns to a new file and put them to a
certain places (to match previous data) - definition file (def.csv)
could be something like this:
On Oct 31, 4:27 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-
central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
In message
687bcb76-0093-4d68-ba56-0390a3e1e...@30g2000yql.googlegroups.com,
cbr...@cbrownsystems.com wrote:
I should note that efficiency is not an issue to me here; this is for
when you have, say, a list
On Oct 28, 11:56 am, Arnaud Delobelle arno...@gmail.com wrote:
cbr...@cbrownsystems.com cbr...@cbrownsystems.com writes:
It's clear but tedious to write:
if 'monday in days_off or tuesday in days_off:
doSomething
I currently am tending to write:
if any([d for d in ['monday
On Oct 29, 2:43 am, Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-
cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:16:42 -0700, cbr...@cbrownsystems.com wrote:
It's clear but tedious to write:
if 'monday in days_off or tuesday in days_off:
doSomething
I currently am tending to write:
if any
It's clear but tedious to write:
if 'monday in days_off or tuesday in days_off:
doSomething
I currently am tending to write:
if any([d for d in ['monday', 'tuesday'] if d in days_off]):
doSomething
Is there a better pythonic idiom for this situation?
Cheers - Chas
--
On Oct 28, 9:23 am, John Posner jjpos...@optimum.net wrote:
On 10/28/2010 12:16 PM, cbr...@cbrownsystems.com wrote:
It's clear but tedious to write:
if 'monday in days_off or tuesday in days_off:
doSomething
I currently am tending to write:
if any([d for d in ['monday
On Oct 28, 10:05 am, Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:33 AM, cbr...@cbrownsystems.com
cbr...@cbrownsystems.com wrote:
On Oct 28, 9:23 am, John Posner jjpos...@optimum.net wrote:
On 10/28/2010 12:16 PM, cbr...@cbrownsystems.com wrote:
It's clear
On Sep 22, 3:39 pm, Baba raoul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 22, 9:18 pm, Baba raoul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 22, 3:38 pm, nn prueba...@latinmail.com wrote:
On Sep 21, 6:39 pm, Baba raoul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
query level: beginner
as part of a learning exercise i have
On Aug 17, 2:44 pm, Baba raoul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 16, 6:28 pm, cbr...@cbrownsystems.com
cbr...@cbrownsystems.com wrote:
First, suppose d = gcd(x, y, z); then for some x', y', z' we have that
x = d*x', y = d*y', z = d*z'; and so for any a, b, c:
could you explain the notation
On Aug 18, 10:52 am, Baba raoul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chas
Thanks for that and i agree on your last remark :)
re the number of required consecutive passes required:
The number of required consecutive passes is equal to the smallest
number because after that you can get any amount of
On Aug 18, 11:50 am, John Posner jjpos...@optimum.net wrote:
On 8/18/2010 1:38 PM, cbr...@cbrownsystems.com wrote:
To go the other way, if d = 1, then there exists integers (not
neccessarily positive) such that
a*x + b*y + c*z = 1
That fact is non-trivial, although the proof isn't *too
On Aug 16, 1:23 am, Roald de Vries downa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 15, 2010, at 11:51 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Baba raoul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mel,
indeed i thought of generalising the theorem as follows:
If it is possible to buy n, n+1,…, n+(x-1) sets
On Aug 16, 11:04 am, Baba raoul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chas, Roald,
These are all complicated formula that i believe are not expected at
this level. If you look at the source (see my first submission) you
will see that this exercise is only the second in a series called
Introduction to
18 matches
Mail list logo
