Re: is python Object oriented??

2009-02-04 Thread thmpsn . m . k
On Feb 4, 3:11 am, Bruno Desthuilliers bruno. 42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid wrote: thmpsn@gmail.com a écrit : On Feb 3, 1:14 am, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: (snip) after all, we have used FILE* for years and I have no idea about the FILE structure. Your lack

Re: is python Object oriented??

2009-02-03 Thread thmpsn . m . k
On Feb 3, 1:14 am, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Russ P. russ.paie...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 2, 7:48 pm, Rhodri James rho...@wildebst.demon.co.uk wrote: On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:16:01 -, Russ P. russ.paie...@gmail.com wrote: Here we go again.

Re: is python Object oriented??

2009-02-03 Thread thmpsn . m . k
On Feb 3, 12:05 pm, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:36 AM,  thmpsn@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 3, 1:14 am, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Russ P. russ.paie...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 2, 7:48 pm, Rhodri James

Re: is python Object oriented??

2009-02-02 Thread thmpsn . m . k
On Feb 2, 2:55 am, Stephen Hansen apt.shan...@gmail.com wrote: This is proven by your statement above, whereby you are driving a user away, simply because the language, in one small aspect, does not give him what he wants, and the tenor of this thread has been very much: That's how it is

Re: is python Object oriented??

2009-02-01 Thread thmpsn . m . k
On Feb 1, 1:50 am, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch bj_...@gmx.net wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:28:14 -0800, thmpsn.m.k wrote: On Jan 31, 2:27 pm, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote: Do you honestly believe that C++'s private members are really private? Privateness is only enforced during

Re: is python Object oriented??

2009-01-31 Thread thmpsn . m . k
On Jan 30, 12:15 am, Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com wrote: - Python supports encapsulation. Prefixing an attribute/method with an underscore indicates that other programmers should treat it as 'private'. However, unlike BD languages, Python itself does nothing to enforce this privacy, leaving

Re: is python Object oriented??

2009-01-31 Thread thmpsn . m . k
On Jan 30, 2:32 pm, Michael Torrie torr...@gmail.com wrote: Veerendra Ganiger wrote: Python is not purely object oriented programming, because we can write functions without any class. You are right, predefined class attributes are available when we write or execute a piece of python code

Re: is python Object oriented??

2009-01-31 Thread thmpsn . m . k
On Jan 31, 2:27 pm, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote: thmpsn@gmail.com schrieb: But it's only a faking, and things such as inheritance and polymorphism are implemented clumsily (actually I'm not even sure about polymorphism). And of course, there are still no private members.

Python in C

2008-12-29 Thread thmpsn . m . k
I've just downloaded Python's mainstream implementation (CPython), which is written in C. Not to my surprise, I feel like I'm looking at unstructured spaghetti, and I'm having trouble figuring out how it all works together. (Please bear with me; I'm just going through the usual frustration that