En Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:04:33 -0200, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu
escribió:
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
En Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:00:16 -0200, John Machin sjmac...@lexicon.net
escribió:
I didn't think your question was stupid. Stupid was (a) CP/M recording
file size as number of 128-byte
On 2009-01-14, Gabriel Genellina gagsl-...@yahoo.com.ar wrote:
En Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:04:33 -0200, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu
escribió:
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
En Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:00:16 -0200, John Machin sjmac...@lexicon.net
escribió:
I didn't think your question was stupid.
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
En Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:00:16 -0200, John Machin sjmac...@lexicon.net
escribió:
I didn't think your question was stupid. Stupid was (a) CP/M recording
file size as number of 128-byte sectors, forcing the use of an in-band
EOF marker for text files (b) MS continuing to
En Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:00:16 -0200, John Machin sjmac...@lexicon.net
escribió:
I didn't think your question was stupid. Stupid was (a) CP/M recording
file size as number of 128-byte sectors, forcing the use of an in-band
EOF marker for text files (b) MS continuing to regard Ctrl-Z as an EOF