PyScripter does it for me.
http://code.google.com/p/pyscripter/
jab
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:02:01 +0100, Дамјан Георгиевски wrote:
I don't know what an IBQ is.
+IBQ- seems to be the way your newsreader displays the dashes that
where in Ben's posting. I see em dash characters there:
I see IBQ too ... also weird is that he has Content-Type: text/plain;
I don't know what an IBQ is.
+IBQ- seems to be the way your newsreader displays the dashes that
where in Ben's posting. I see em dash characters there:
I see IBQ too ... also weird is that he has
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-7
--
дамјан ( http://softver.org.mk/damjan/ )
Give me
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:01 PM, bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Eduardo O. Padoan:
You are almost *describing* reinteract:
- Thank you for the link and the software, I have not tried it yet,
but from the screencast it looks quite nice.
- I am glad that there are people that don't think
On Thursday 22 January 2009 08:13:49 Vic Kelson wrote:
How about IDLE? It's a nice tool for the Python programmer. I've tried
lots of IDEs, but when it comes down to it, on small-to-medium jobs I
am be very productive indeed using IDLE...
--v
--
bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Years ago I have found this nice small program, TextCalc:
http://www.atomixbuttons.com/textcalc/
Despite being very limited and being not integrated with
everything else, it's so handy that for me in certain situations
it's the right tool to use when I have
I use the Python shell daily, plus of course normal editors to edit
python scripts. They both are very useful for different purposes. But
the default interactive shell isn't much handy if you want to modify
the past code to run it again, or you want to embed a bit of text in
the code, or if you
bearophileh...@lycos.com writes:
I use the Python shell daily, plus of course normal editors to edit
python scripts. They both are very useful for different purposes.
But the default interactive shell isn't much handy if you want to
modify the past code to run it again, or you want to embed a
bearophileh...@lycos.com writes:
I use the Python shell daily, plus of course normal editors to edit
python scripts. They both are very useful for different purposes.
But the default interactive shell isn't much handy if you want to
modify the past code to run it again, or you want to embed a
bearophileh...@lycos.com a écrit :
I use the Python shell daily, plus of course normal editors to edit
python scripts. They both are very useful for different purposes. But
the default interactive shell isn't much handy if you want to modify
the past code to run it again, or you want to embed a
Ben Finney:
Adding an editor to Python solves this problem only for Python.
I'm sure that once such editor (I use the word editor for lack of a
better term) is created, it can also be quickly adapted with other
dynamic languages, like Ruby, TCL, Lua, Io, Perl, Awk, ecc. Probably
it can't be
Several guys are working on a MatLab like editor / IDE, based on wxPython,
including myself ;-) see
http://mientki.ruhosting.nl/data_www/pylab_works/pw_debug.html
e.g. with F9 it runs either the selected code or if nothing selected the
whole code
or even more powerfull (depending on your
How about IDLE? It's a nice tool for the Python programmer. I've tried
lots of IDEs, but when it comes down to it, on small-to-medium jobs I
am be very productive indeed using IDLE...
--v
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:13:49 -0800 (PST), Vic Kelson vic.kel...@gmail.com
wrote:
How about IDLE? It's a nice tool for the Python programmer. I've tried
lots of IDEs, but when it comes down to it, on small-to-medium jobs I
am be very productive indeed using IDLE...
--v
I find
Doug Morse wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:13:49 -0800 (PST), Vic Kelson vic.kel...@gmail.com
wrote:
How about IDLE? It's a nice tool for the Python programmer. I've tried
lots of IDEs, but when it comes down to it, on small-to-medium jobs I
am be very productive indeed using IDLE...
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:10 AM, bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
I use the Python shell daily, plus of course normal editors to edit
python scripts. They both are very useful for different purposes. But
the default interactive shell isn't much handy if you want to modify
the past code to run
Steve Holden wrote:
Doug Morse wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:13:49 -0800 (PST), Vic Kelson vic.kel...@gmail.com
wrote:
How about IDLE? It's a nice tool for the Python programmer. I've tried
lots of IDEs, but when it comes down to it, on small-to-medium jobs I
am be very productive indeed
Eduardo O. Padoan:
You are almost *describing* reinteract:
- Thank you for the link and the software, I have not tried it yet,
but from the screencast it looks quite nice.
- I am glad that there are people that don't think that Emacs is
(despite being good) the alpha and omega of editing.
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:17:57 -0800, bearophileHUGS wrote:
Ben Finney:
Many of us solve this by using a single full-featured programmer's
editor that allows invoking a program +IBQ- written in any of *dozens
or hundreds* of different languages +IBQ- from within the editor.
I don't know
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch:
+IBQ- seems to be the way your newsreader displays the dashes that where
in Ben's posting. I see em dash characters there:
I see, thank you. I never finish to see all the weird things of the
Web (through google groups).
Bye,
bearophile
--
20 matches
Mail list logo
