On 21/07/2012 00:59, Ethan Furman wrote:
Getting closer to a stable release.
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as CPython.
Get your copy at http://python.org/pypi/dbf.
Bug reports, comments, and kudos
On 2012/07/21 11:49 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
and PS is spelt p.s. :)
Ahem, the absolutely authoritative reference on the subject:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postscript
says PS or P.S.
--
Regards
Alex
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 03/08/2012 13:50, Alex Strickland wrote:
On 2012/07/21 11:49 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
and PS is spelt p.s. :)
Ahem, the absolutely authoritative reference on the subject:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postscript
says PS or P.S.
I'm sorry but you can't read my writing[1].
[1] another
Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 21/07/2012 00:59, Ethan Furman wrote:
Getting closer to a stable release.
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as CPython.
Get your copy at http://python.org/pypi/dbf.
Bug reports,
Ethan Furman wrote:
Alex Strickland wrote:
Not supported: index files:
I have been using http://sourceforge.net/projects/harbour-project/ for
years where a guy called Przemyslaw Czerpak has written an absolutely
bullet proof implementation of NTX and CDX for DBF. Maybe it will
interest you.
Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
I'll support 3.3+, but not with the same code base: I want to use all the
cool features that 3.3 has! :)
The trouble with double-codebasing is that you have double
maintenance. But sure. So long as
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
This mailing list is about helping our fellow Python developers improve
their skills and solve problems. That doesn't just mean *coding*
problems, it also means helping them to write better documentation and
promote their software better.
Indeed it is, and your
Simon Cropper wrote:
Question 1 - What version of VFP will dbf work with? Is VFP9 OK?
As long as you don't use auto-incrementing fields nor varchar fields
you'll be fine.
Question 2 - You statement of compatibility is unclear.
Works with CPython 2.4 - 2.7. (Tested)
Works with PyPy
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
Works with CPython 2.4 - 2.7. (Tested)
Have you considered supporting 3.2/3.3 at all? It's often not
difficult to make your code compatible with both. Or is there some
dependency that is locked to 2.X?
ChrisA
--
Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
Works with CPython 2.4 - 2.7. (Tested)
Have you considered supporting 3.2/3.3 at all? It's often not
difficult to make your code compatible with both. Or is there some
dependency that is locked to
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
I'll support 3.3+, but not with the same code base: I want to use all the
cool features that 3.3 has! :)
The trouble with double-codebasing is that you have double
maintenance. But sure. So long as your time isn't under
On 21/07/12 05:26, Ethan Furman wrote:
dbf (also known as python dbase) is a module for reading/writing
dBase III, FP, VFP, and soon Clipper, .dbf database files. It's
an ancient format that still finds lots of use.
Other than the caring for the ancient legacy data, it is still widely
used in
Hi
Getting closer to a stable release.
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as CPython.
Get your copy at http://python.org/pypi/dbf.
Bug reports, comments, and kudos welcome! ;)
Not supported: index
On 21/07/2012 21:57, Alex Strickland wrote:
Hi
Getting closer to a stable release.
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as CPython.
Get your copy at http://python.org/pypi/dbf.
Bug reports, comments, and
Alex Strickland wrote:
Hi
Getting closer to a stable release.
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as CPython.
Get your copy at http://python.org/pypi/dbf.
Bug reports, comments, and kudos welcome! ;)
Getting closer to a stable release.
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as CPython.
Get your copy at http://python.org/pypi/dbf.
Bug reports, comments, and kudos welcome! ;)
~Ethan~
--
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:59:21 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
Getting closer to a stable release.
Excellent! That's fantastic news! I've been waiting for a stable release
of dbf for months! I just have one question.
What is dbf?
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
On 21 Jul 2012 00:50:13 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as CPython.
Get your copy at http://python.org/pypi/dbf.
I don't generally click
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Temia Eszteri lamial...@cleverpun.com wrote:
On 21 Jul 2012 00:50:13 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as
On 21/07/12 09:59, Ethan Furman wrote:
Getting closer to a stable release.
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and works on PyPy (and
hopefully the other implementations as well ;), as well as CPython.
Get your copy at http://python.org/pypi/dbf.
Bug reports, comments, and kudos
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 19:56:59 -0700, Temia Eszteri wrote:
I don't generally click on arbitrary links to find out whether or not
the link is something that interests me enough to click on it.
Can't really call a cheese shop link arbitrary. It's in the best place
it could be for providing info
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 13:02:55 +1000, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Temia Eszteri lamial...@cleverpun.com
wrote:
On 21 Jul 2012 00:50:13 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
Latest version has a simpler, cleaner API, and
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:59:21 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
Getting closer to a stable release.
Excellent! That's fantastic news! I've been waiting for a stable release
of dbf for months! I just have one question.
What is dbf?
:)
dbf (also known as python dbase) is a
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 13:30:40 +1000, Simon Cropper wrote:
Works with PyPy, OK.
Hopefully works with other implementations, Hm, what does this mean?
I guess that Ethan means that his library definitely works with PyPy and
CPython, because he has tested it on those, and that he expects that it
On 21 Jul 2012 03:34:44 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
tl;dr
Easy there, tiger. No need to get riled up over a single nitpick over
phrasing.
~Temia
--
Invective! Verb your expletive nouns!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
Unless the software is so well-known that everybody knows what it is...
I've yet to meet ANY piece of software that's like that. Even with
releases of CPython (arguably the primary point of this list) it
26 matches
Mail list logo
