I am sure people have thought of this before, but I cant find where.
I think that python should adapt a way of defining different types of
mapping functions by proceeding a letter before the curly brackets.
i.e ordered = o{}, multidict = m{} (like paste multidict). So you
could define an
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 04:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
kindly kin...@gmail.com wrote:
Am I crazy to think this is a good idea? I have not looked deeply
pythons grammer to see if it conflicts with anything, but on the
surface it looks fine.
I'd say on the surface it looks like perl ;)
I'd prefer to use
On Jun 14, 12:25 pm, Mike Kazantsev mk.frag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 04:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
kindly kin...@gmail.com wrote:
Am I crazy to think this is a good idea? I have not looked deeply
pythons grammer to see if it conflicts with anything, but on the
surface it looks
Hi,
this kind of stuff is commonly discussed on the python-ideas mailing list.
You might want to search that list and/or repost this over there.
Stefan
kindly wrote:
I am sure people have thought of this before, but I cant find where.
I think that python should adapt a way of defining
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 04:36:17 -0700 (PDT)
kindly kin...@gmail.com wrote:
Python already has it for strings rfoo or ubar. So I do not think
its going against the grain.
flame_war_alert
Yes, and there's other syntactic sugar like ; (barely used),
mentioned string types, (element,), %s%var or
Stefan Behnel wrote:
Hi,
this kind of stuff is commonly discussed on the python-ideas mailing list.
You might want to search that list and/or repost this over there.
Please don't top-post here.
If the OP takes this idea to python-ideas, chances are he'll be told to take
the concept here
Stefan Behnel wrote:
Hi,
this kind of stuff is commonly discussed on the python-ideas mailing list.
You might want to search that list and/or repost this over there.
Stefan
kindly wrote:
I am sure people have thought of this before, but I cant find where.
I think that python should adapt a
The analogy with raw strings is faulty: r changes the way the compiler
interprets the characters between the quotes, it doesn't create a different
type of object.
But u does, as does the new bytestring-literal in Python3. So there is
precedent.
Diez
--
On Jun 14, 4:02 am, kindly kin...@gmail.com wrote:
I am sure people have thought of this before, but I cant find where.
I think that python should adapt a way of defining different types of
mapping functions by proceeding a letter before the curly brackets.
i.e ordered = o{}, multidict =
On Jun 14, 1:59 pm, Steven D'Aprano
st...@removethis.cybersource.com.au wrote:
Stefan Behnel wrote:
Hi,
this kind of stuff is commonly discussed on the python-ideas mailing list.
You might want to search that list and/or repost this over there.
Please don't top-post here.
If the OP
On Jun 14, 6:30 am, kindly kin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 14, 1:59 pm, Steven D'Aprano
snip
I am glad the ordered dict will be in 2.7 and 3.1. I
was just imagining what would be the next step in definition of
structures. New languages like clojure have adopted the dict as top
level. I
11 matches
Mail list logo
