On Tuesday 18 August 2009 06:45:39 Aahz wrote:
In article pan.2009.08.18.04.34...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au,
Steven D'Aprano ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au wrote:
The comments were made a week ago -- why the sudden flurry of attention?
Mainly an opportunity to flog the new
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:12:14 +0200, Hendrik van Rooyen wrote:
On Tuesday 18 August 2009 06:45:39 Aahz wrote:
In article pan.2009.08.18.04.34...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au,
Steven D'Aprano ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au wrote:
The comments were made a week ago -- why the sudden
In article 461cc6f1-fc23-4bc7-a719-6f29babf8...@o15g2000yqm.googlegroups.com,
Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a figure of speech. And besides, why would I want programming
advice from a woman? lol. Thanks for the help.
Well, I'm sorry to see this, it means I was wrong about the
Aahz wrote:
In article 461cc6f1-fc23-4bc7-a719-6f29babf8...@o15g2000yqm.googlegroups.com,
Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a figure of speech. And besides, why would I want programming
advice from a woman? lol. Thanks for the help.
Well, I'm sorry to see this, it means I
You'll know that Python is sexist the day you'll find the title 'No
women allowed' on the python main document page.
Good God I hope you're being ironic.
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:23:39 -0700, Jean-Michel Pichavant
jeanmic...@sequans.com wrote:
Aahz wrote:
In article
On 17 Aug, 19:23, Jean-Michel Pichavant jeanmic...@sequans.com
wrote:
Are you suggesting this list reject part of the community regarding its
sexual orientation, ethnicity, size, culture? If that was the case I'd
like to know about it.
Careful: you probably meant to write rejects, not reject.
On Aug 17, 8:44 am, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
In article
461cc6f1-fc23-4bc7-a719-6f29babf8...@o15g2000yqm.googlegroups.com,
Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a figure of speech. And besides, why would I want programming
advice from a woman? lol. Thanks for the help.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Carl Bankspavlovevide...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 17, 8:44 am, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
In article
461cc6f1-fc23-4bc7-a719-6f29babf8...@o15g2000yqm.googlegroups.com,
Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a figure of speech. And besides, why
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:31:51 -0700, Chris Rebert wrote:
Oh come on, one newbie making an off-color joke is not any sort of
reflection of the community as a whole.
Anyway it's pretty naive to expect what is now a large community to
avoid bad eggs altogether. Price you pay for popularity.
In article pan.2009.08.18.04.34...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au,
Steven D'Aprano ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au wrote:
The comments were made a week ago -- why the sudden flurry of attention?
Mainly an opportunity to flog the new diversity list.
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com)
10 matches
Mail list logo
