Jacob Lee wrote:
Funny enough, I'm working on a project right now that is designed for
exactly that: PARLEY, http://osl.cs.uiuc.edu/parley .
Have you seen Kamaelia? Some people have noted that Kamaelia seems to have a
number of similarities to Erlang's model, which seems to come from a common
On Wed, 09 May 2007 18:16:32 -0700, Kay Schluehr wrote:
Every once in a while Erlang style [1] message passing concurrency [2]
is discussed for Python which does not only imply Stackless tasklets [3]
but also some process isolation semantics that lets the runtime easily
distribute tasklets (
On May 10, 8:31 am, Jacob Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Funny enough, I'm working on a project right now that is designed for
exactly that: PARLEY,http://osl.cs.uiuc.edu/parley. (An announcement
should show up in clp-announce as soon as the moderators release it). My
essential thesis is that
Have you seen Candygram?
http://candygram.sourceforge.net/
jon N
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, 10 May 2007 01:03:39 -0700, jkn wrote:
Have you seen Candygram?
http://candygram.sourceforge.net/
jon N
I did look at Candygram. I wasn't so keen on the method of dispatch (a
dictionary of lambdas that is passed to the receive function). It also
only works with threads and
On Thu, 10 May 2007 00:19:11 -0700, Kay Schluehr wrote:
[snip]
I do admit that Erlang's pattern
matching would be nice, although you can get pretty far by using uniform
message formats that can easily be dispatched on -- the tuple
(tag, sender, args, kwargs)
in the case of PARLEY, which
Every once in a while Erlang style [1] message passing concurrency [2]
is discussed for Python which does not only imply Stackless tasklets
[3] but also some process isolation semantics that lets the runtime
easily distribute tasklets ( or logical 'processes' ) across physical
processes.
