Would you care to precisely define REAL size first? Consider:
atuple = (1, 2)
mylist = [(0, 0), atuple]
Should sizeof(mylist) include sizeof(atuple) ?
No, I'm talking about simple lists, without REFERENCES to another
objects into it.
I mean:
lists = [ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, (1,2), 3]
or
Hi,
The only list without references to other objects in it is [ ].
0, 1, 2, etc are objects. Every value in Python is a reference to an object.
Remco
On Jan 10, 2008 9:14 AM, Santiago Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you care to precisely define REAL size first? Consider:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:14:42 -0800, Santiago Romero wrote:
Would you care to precisely define REAL size first? Consider:
atuple = (1, 2)
mylist = [(0, 0), atuple]
Should sizeof(mylist) include sizeof(atuple) ?
No, I'm talking about simple lists, without REFERENCES to another
objects
Is there a way to check the REAL size in memory of a python object?
Something like
print sizeof(mylist)
or
print sizeof(myclass_object)
or something like that ...
Thanks.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Santiago Romero wrote:
Is there a way to check the REAL size in memory of a python object?
in standard Python, without reading the interpreter source code
carefully, no.
to get an approximate value, create a thousand (or a million) objects
and check how much the interpreter grows when you
Sion Arrowsmith wrote:
Santiago Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to check the REAL size in memory of a python object?
Something like
print sizeof(mylist)
[ ... ]
Would you care to precisely define REAL size first? Consider:
atuple = (1, 2)
mylist = [(0, 0), atuple]
Santiago Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to check the REAL size in memory of a python object?
Something like
print sizeof(mylist)
[ ... ]
Would you care to precisely define REAL size first? Consider:
atuple = (1, 2)
mylist = [(0, 0), atuple]
Should sizeof(mylist)
