Tim Chase wrote:
Is this where we tell you to shut up? gdr ;-)
Don't you mean STFU?
--
James Stroud
UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics
Box 951570
Los Angeles, CA 90095
http://www.jamesstroud.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Feb 7, 2:37 am, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
So I think python-list has become more friendly since.
I've experienced the same sort of thing. About a year ago (I think)
there were one or more regulars here who were often somewhat rude,
unfriendly, or snobbish (not naming any names).
On Feb 6, 6:23 am, Hendrik van Rooyen m...@microcorp.co.za wrote:
I think this thread has buggered up a perfectly
^^^
Such language. I'm appalled.
Mark
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Feb 5, 8:02 am, Dan Upton up...@virginia.edu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:00 AM, mk mrk...@gmail.com wrote:
(duck)
542 comp.lang.python rtfm
467 comp.lang.python shut+up
263 comp.lang.perl rtfm
45 comp.lang.perl shut+up
But over how many messages for each group? Wouldn't
Probably that [c.l.]python is becoming more popular and, like most
things as they become popular, it loses its purity... much like the
Internet in the early 1990s.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Albert Hopkins wrote:
Probably that [c.l.]python is becoming more popular and, like most
things as they become popular, it loses its purity... much like the
Internet in the early 1990s.
Several years ago when I proposed the addition of list.pop(), a couple
of people accused me of trying to
(duck)
542 comp.lang.python rtfm
467 comp.lang.python shut+up
263 comp.lang.perl rtfm
45 comp.lang.perl shut+up
Code:
import urllib2
import re
import time
def fillurlfmt(args):
urlfmt, ggroup, gkw = args
return {'group':ggroup, 'keyword':gkw, 'url': urlfmt % (gkw, ggroup)}
def
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:00 AM, mk mrk...@gmail.com wrote:
(duck)
542 comp.lang.python rtfm
467 comp.lang.python shut+up
263 comp.lang.perl rtfm
45 comp.lang.perl shut+up
But over how many messages for each group? Wouldn't the percentage of
messages containing those be more
2009/2/5 mk mrk...@gmail.com:
(duck)
542 comp.lang.python rtfm
467 comp.lang.python shut+up
263 comp.lang.perl rtfm
45 comp.lang.perl shut+up
Yes, but is there any real traffic on comp.lang.perl nowadays?
Sorry, cheap shot ;-)
--
Tim Rowe
--
mk schrieb:
(duck)
542 comp.lang.python rtfm
467 comp.lang.python shut+up
263 comp.lang.perl rtfm
45 comp.lang.perl shut+up
It appears to me that comp.lang.perl isn't even active anymore. Or
googles interface is just crappy.
c.l.perl.misc seems to be the place to search.
And raw
(duck)
542 comp.lang.python rtfm
467 comp.lang.python shut+up
263 comp.lang.perl rtfm
45 comp.lang.perl shut+up
Is this where we tell you to shut up? gdr ;-)
As others mentioned, the raw numbers don't mean much without a
total-volume-of-posts to demonstrate the percentage.
It would also be
2009/2/5 Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.com:
Is this where we tell you to shut up? gdr ;-)
[snip]
It would also be interesting to see how many of those posts are concentrated
in certain threads
And, as you have clearly demonstrated, how many of those posts also
contain a smiley or some
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Tim Rowe digi...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/5 Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.com:
Is this where we tell you to shut up? gdr ;-)
[snip]
It would also be interesting to see how many of those posts are concentrated
in certain threads
And, as you have
Tim Rowe a écrit :
2009/2/5 Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.com:
Is this where we tell you to shut up? gdr ;-)
[snip]
It would also be interesting to see how many of those posts are concentrated
in certain threads
And, as you have clearly demonstrated, how many of those posts also
mk wrote:
(duck)
542 comp.lang.python rtfm
What is so unfriendly about 'read the fine manual'?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Feb 5, 4:20 pm, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
mk wrote:
(duck)
542 comp.lang.python rtfm
What is so unfriendly about 'read the fine manual'?
You've seen a fine manual?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Mensanator wrote:
On Feb 5, 4:20 pm, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
mk wrote:
(duck)
542 comp.lang.python rtfm
What is so unfriendly about 'read the fine manual'?
You've seen a fine manual?
Yes, and I'm fine well sure this is somewhere between a silly thread and
a troll.
regards
Mensanator wrote:
On Feb 5, 4:20 pm, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
mk wrote:
(duck)
542 comp.lang.python rtfm
What is so unfriendly about 'read the fine manual'?
You've seen a fine manual?
Yes, and I and others have spent hours and hours making the Python
manuals finer.
--
Mensanator m@aol.com
On Feb 5, 4:20 pm, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
mk wrote:
(duck)
542 comp.lang.python rtfm
What is so unfriendly about 'read the fine manual'?
You've seen a fine manual?
Oh Fine!
- Hendrik
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steve Holden st...@h...eb.com wrote:
Yes, and I'm fine well sure this is somewhere between a silly thread and
a troll.
Fine reads wrong - it should be fining.
Silly? Us here on clp, silly?
What a monstrous thought!
I'll have you know this is a respectable
establishment, and you should be
20 matches
Mail list logo
