Sergei Organov wrote:
Dennis Lee Bieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:12:58 +0200, Benjamin Niemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
declaimed the following in comp.lang.python:
That's actually the versioning scheme of TeX, currently being at 3.141592
eeek My last exposure to TeX
Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sergei Organov wrote:
Dennis Lee Bieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:12:58 +0200, Benjamin Niemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
declaimed the following in comp.lang.python:
[...]
Anyway, it's unfair to speak of one of the most wonderful pieces of
Dennis Lee Bieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:40:50 +0400, Sergei Organov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
declaimed the following in comp.lang.python:
Anyway, it's unfair to speak of one of the most wonderful pieces of
software ever written in such a tone.
I refer to the
I can't wait to get my hands on version PAL9000, then we will all have
to deallocate memory *the hard way*.
/per9000
---
I'm afraid. I'm afraid, Dave. Dave, my mind is going. I can feel it.
I can feel it. My mind is going. There is no question about it.
I can feel it. I
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 22:15:15 -0400, Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
declaimed the following in comp.lang.python:
[John Salerno]
Is 'Python 3000' just a code name for version 3.0, or will it really be
called that when it's released?
The smart money is on changing
On 9 Apr 2006 20:32:07 -0700, rumours say that Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
might have written:
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
Or... just to save 3000 as a time way down the road... The next
major version of Python will be: Python PI (and each build will add
another digit... 3.1, 3.14, 3.141, ...)
I
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 22:15:15 -0400, rumours say that Tim Peters
[EMAIL PROTECTED] might have written:
[John Salerno]
Is 'Python 3000' just a code name for version 3.0, or will it really be
called that when it's released?
The smart money is on changing the name to Ecstasy, to leverage
marketing
Dennis Lee Bieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:12:58 +0200, Benjamin Niemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
declaimed the following in comp.lang.python:
That's actually the versioning scheme of TeX, currently being at 3.141592
eeek My last exposure to TeX was some 15 odd years
Is 'Python 3000' just a code name for version 3.0, or will it really be
called that when it's released?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[John Salerno]
Is 'Python 3000' just a code name for version 3.0, or will it really be
called that when it's released?
The smart money is on changing the name to Ecstasy, to leverage
marketing publicity from the hallucinogenic club drug of the same
name. class will be renamed to rave, and the
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
Or... just to save 3000 as a time way down the road... The next
major version of Python will be: Python PI (and each build will add
another digit... 3.1, 3.14, 3.141, ...)
I like this idea a lot. This way, people ALWAYS know what the next
release's name will be.
Tim Peters wrote:
[John Salerno]
Is 'Python 3000' just a code name for version 3.0, or will it really be
called that when it's released?
The smart money is on changing the name to Ecstasy, to leverage
marketing publicity from the hallucinogenic club drug of the same
name. class will be
John Salerno wrote:
Is 'Python 3000' just a code name for version 3.0, or will it really be
called that when it's released?
Actually, there's an official response these days in `PEP 3000`_:
Naming
Python 3000, Python 3.0 and Py3K are all names for the same thing. The
project is called
13 matches
Mail list logo
