[issue17590] mingw: translate gcc internal defines to python platform specific defines

Change by Irit Katriel : -- resolution: duplicate -> wont fix ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue17590] mingw: translate gcc internal defines to python platform specific defines

Change by Irit Katriel : -- resolution: -> duplicate stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed superseder: -> MinGW is unsupported - close all open issues and list them here. ___ Python tracker

[issue34216] python platform no child error

Christian Heimes added the comment: The platform module no longer uses popen(). Victor replaced the broken code with subprocess in bpo-35346. -- nosy: +christian.heimes resolution: -> fixed stage: -> resolved status: pending -> closed type: compile error -> behavior

[issue34216] python platform no child error

Irit Katriel added the comment: I was unable to reproduce this on Python 3. Is this issue only relevant to version 2.7? Can you please post a complete script that shows the issue, and specify on which system you see it? -- nosy: +iritkatriel status: open -> pending

[issue34216] python platform no child error

New submission from sachin : We are trying to utilize librosa library for some processing. When we try to load the librosa library, python platform library is triggered via the Numba library. Numba is trying to find the underlying OS which is installed. Function "_syscmd_uname" is

Re: the core values of the Python "platform"

On 14/09/17 03:22, Stefan Ram wrote: Ben Finney writes (special characters edited): As I understand it, "flat is better than nested" is talking about *hierarchies* in a code base. It's not IIUC referring to anything about the difference between expressions like you

Re: the core values of the Python "platform"

ad me to think about what the core values > > of the Python "platform" are and I thought it would be good to ask this > > question of the community. What would you consider the top (<= 5) core > > values? > > > > > Would that be close to the Zen of Python?

Re: the core values of the Python "platform"

r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes: > I have read »import this« again, after reading the above, > but there was no indication whatsoever in it that says that > it was talking about "*hierarchies* in a code base" only. Then you have no basis for claiming that the Zen of Python

Re: the core values of the Python "platform"

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Darin Gordon <dar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Bryan Cantrill gave an interesting talk recently at a Node conference about > "platform values" [1]. The talk lead me to think about what the core values > of the Python "platform" are an

the core values of the Python "platform"

Bryan Cantrill gave an interesting talk recently at a Node conference about "platform values" [1]. The talk lead me to think about what the core values of the Python "platform" are and I thought it would be good to ask this question of the community. What would you consider

[issue17590] mingw: translate gcc internal defines to python platform specific defines

Martin Panter added the comment: Here is a possible alternative patch that moves MS_WINDOWS etc from PC/pyconfig.h to "pyport.h". Not tested with standard Windows build. -- components: -Cross-Build Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file42141/MS_WINDOWS-move.patch

[issue17590] mingw: translate gcc internal defines to python platform specific defines

Martin Panter added the comment: What’s the point of allowing each macro to already be defined? I understand they may also be defined by PC/pyconfig.h, but is that possible if __MINGW32__ is defined? Is the __MINGW32__ condition needed at all? Maybe we can just blindly rely on the _WIN32 etc

Re: Python platform/framework for new RESTful web app

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Eric Frederich eric.freder...@gmail.com wrote: If I wanted to create a new web application (RESTful) today with Python what are my options given the following requirements. * Google Account authentication * Facebook authentication * Managed hosting (like

Re: Python platform/framework for new RESTful web app

For rest I would go with bottle. It's dead simple, and you can plug in anything you like. You can probably use django models as well, so you don't have to rewrite your model layer. Or django-smarter. On 27 Apr 2013 13:23, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick kwpol...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 25, 2013

Python platform/framework for new RESTful web app

If I wanted to create a new web application (RESTful) today with Python what are my options given the following requirements. * Google Account authentication * Facebook authentication * Managed hosting (like Google App Engine or Heroku) but with the ability to be self-hosted later down the road.

[issue17590] mingw: translate gcc internal defines to python platform specific defines

internal defines to python platform specific defines type: enhancement versions: Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29624/0002-MINGW-translate-gcc-internal-defines-to-python-platf.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

There is a 3rd party programmer for the LaunchPad that lets you program it in Python, but I forgot what they were called. It has an m somewhere in it and it's 3 letters. I saw it at MakerFaire. I got their card, but lost it. If I remember the name, I'll post it here. --

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

On 02/06/2012 21:47, boj wrote: There is a 3rd party programmer for the LaunchPad that lets you program it in Python, but I forgot what they were called. It has an m somewhere in it and it's 3 letters. I saw it at MakerFaire. I got their card, but lost it. If I remember the name, I'll post it

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 7:18 AM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote: Putting LaunchPad, Python and MakerFaire into Google, plus the It has an m somewhere in it and it's 3 letters, quickly led me to: http://www.mpyprojects.com -- Heh, Google's awesome :) I was just thinking Hm, three

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

On 02/06/2012 22:25, Chris Angelico wrote: On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 7:18 AM, MRABpyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote: Putting LaunchPad, Python and MakerFaire into Google, plus the It has an m somewhere in it and it's 3 letters, quickly led me to: http://www.mpyprojects.com -- Heh, Google's

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 8:09 AM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote: Look at the Software page: We use the mpy language to program the MSP430 microcontroller. MPY is short for Microcontroller PYthon.   mpy is based on the Python computer language. In fact to keep things simple it is only a

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

Tomasz Rola rto...@ceti.pl wrote: If you are on tight budget and depend so much on Python, I'm afraid you should either: a. grow your budget b. try another language such as PyMite... -- --- | Radovan Garabík

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

On 26/05/2012 12:25 PM, Paul Rubin wrote: Roy Smithr...@panix.com writes: The Rasberry Pi certainly looks attractive, but isn't quite available today. Can you run Python on an Arduino? No. YOu want a 32-bit platform with an OS and perhaps 1 meg of memory. And by the time you port Python to

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

On 05/27/2012 05:37 PM, Colin J. Williams wrote: On 26/05/2012 12:25 PM, Paul Rubin wrote: Roy Smithr...@panix.com writes: The Rasberry Pi certainly looks attractive, but isn't quite available today. Can you run Python on an Arduino? No. YOu want a 32-bit platform with an OS and perhaps 1

Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

What's the smallest/cheapest/lowest-power hardware platform I can run Python on today? I'm looking for something to use as a hardware controller in a battery-powered device and want to avoid writing in C for this project. Performance requirements are minimal. I need to monitor a few

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

Roy Smith r...@panix.com writes: The Rasberry Pi certainly looks attractive, but isn't quite available today. Can you run Python on an Arduino? No. YOu want a 32-bit platform with an OS and perhaps 1 meg of memory. And by the time you port Python to it unless it's there already, you may as

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote: What's the smallest/cheapest/lowest-power hardware platform I can run Python on today? Not counting the Rasberry Pi, then probably a wireless router or one of those cheap media streaming boxes running custom firmware. Performance requirements are minimal. I

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote: What's the smallest/cheapest/lowest-power hardware platform I can run Python on today? I'm looking for something to use as a hardware controller in a battery-powered device and want to avoid writing in C for this project. Performance requirements are

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

On Saturday, May 26, 2012 10:34:19 AM UTC-5, Roy Smith wrote: What's the smallest/cheapest/lowest-power hardware platform I can run Python on today? I'm looking for something to use as a hardware controller in a battery-powered device and want to avoid writing in C for this project.

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

In article 8ic799-gk3@chris.zbmc.eu, tinn...@isbd.co.uk wrote: Rasberry Pi is available, some have arrived, mine will arrive on Monday or Tuesday (I'm talking about UK here). Interesting. Newark is claiming they'll have 1 piece on June 18th, and no further stock until October.

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

On Sat, 26 May 2012 11:34:19 -0400, Roy Smith wrote: The Rasberry Pi certainly looks attractive, but isn't quite available today. Can you run Python on an Arduino? Things like http://www.embeddedarm.com/products/board-detail.php?product=TS-7250 are more than I need, and the $129 price

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

tinn...@isbd.co.uk writes: Rasberry Pi is available, some have arrived, mine will arrive on Monday or Tuesday (I'm talking about UK here). Early orders have been filled, more are being filled, but there is a huge backlong and therefore a long wait if you waited til now to order. If you want one

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Paul Rubin no.email@nospam.invalid wrote: If C is really intolerable I know there are some micros that can be programmed in BASIC. Ugh. Of those, I would strongly recommend going with C. ChrisA -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

In article 7x1um6928y@ruckus.brouhaha.com, Paul Rubin no.email@nospam.invalid wrote: The Raspberry Pi is not really appropriate for a low powered portable application anyway, because of relatively high power requirements compared to an 8 bitter without all that media playback stuff. It

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

Roy Smith roy at panix.com writes: What's the smallest/cheapest/lowest-power hardware platform I can run Python on today? I'm looking for something to use as a hardware controller in a battery-powered device and want to avoid writing in C for this project. It depends *which* Python.

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

Roy Smith r...@panix.com writes: It sounds like I can run one on 300mA @ 5V. For my application, I'll have about 10 A-h available at 12V (motorcycle battery). OK, the RPi should be fine power-wise in that case, though I wouldn't consider something with a 10AH motorcycle battery to be very

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

On 12-05-26 05:32 PM, Paul Rubin wrote: Roy Smithr...@panix.com writes: It sounds like I can run one on 300mA @ 5V. For my application, I'll have about 10 A-h available at 12V (motorcycle battery). OK, the RPi should be fine power-wise in that case, though I wouldn't consider something with

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

On Sat, 26 May 2012, Roy Smith wrote: What's the smallest/cheapest/lowest-power hardware platform I can run Python on today? I'm looking for something to use as a hardware controller in a battery-powered device and want to avoid writing in C for this project. Performance requirements

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

Here is my SS: 259 71 2451 On May 26, 2012, at 9:22 AM, tinn...@isbd.co.uk wrote: Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote: What's the smallest/cheapest/lowest-power hardware platform I can run Python on today? I'm looking for something to use as a hardware controller in a battery-powered device

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

Here is my SS: 259 71 2451 On May 26, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Ross Ridge rri...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote: What's the smallest/cheapest/lowest-power hardware platform I can run Python on today? Not counting the Rasberry Pi, then probably a wireless router or

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

Here is my SS: 259 71 2451 On May 26, 2012, at 9:25 AM, Paul Rubin no.email@nospam.invalid wrote: Roy Smith r...@panix.com writes: The Rasberry Pi certainly looks attractive, but isn't quite available today. Can you run Python on an Arduino? No. YOu want a 32-bit platform with an OS

Re: Smallest/cheapest possible Python platform?

Here is my SS: 259 71 2451 On May 26, 2012, at 8:34 AM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote: What's the smallest/cheapest/lowest-power hardware platform I can run Python on today? I'm looking for something to use as a hardware controller in a battery-powered device and want to avoid writing in

ANN: PiCloud's Python Platform is now open to the Public!

After 5 months in private beta, PiCloud, a cloud computing platform for the Python Programming Language, is now open to the general public. PiCloud enables Python users to leverage the power of an on-demand, high performance, and auto scaling compute cluster with as few as two lines of code! No

ANN: PiCloud's Python Platform is now open to the Public!

After 5 months in private beta, PiCloud, a cloud computing platform for the Python Programming Language, is now open to the general public. PiCloud enables Python users to leverage the power of an on-demand, high performance, and auto scaling compute cluster with as few as two lines of code! No

Re: Python platform.

On Sep 11, 8:56 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all; I wonder if there is a platform written in python. The equivalent of the Netbeans platformhttp://platform.netbeans.org/in the Python world. Do you know such a thing? Thanks a lot. Jonathan. Check out Eric

Python platform.

Hello all; I wonder if there is a platform written in python. The equivalent of the Netbeans platform http://platform.netbeans.org/ in the Python world. Do you know such a thing? Thanks a lot. Jonathan. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Python platform.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder if there is a platform written in python. The equivalent of the Netbeans platform http://platform.netbeans.org/ in the Python world. Do you know such a thing? You (or maybe the Java folks) seem to have missed that platform has a rather specific meaning in

Re: Python platform.

On Sep 11, 4:19 pm, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   I wonder if there is a platform written in python. The equivalent of   the Netbeans platformhttp://platform.netbeans.org/in the Python   world. Do you know such a thing? You (or maybe the Java folks) seem

Re: Python platform.

On Sep 11, 11:13 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sep 11, 4:19 pm, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   I wonder if there is a platform written in python. The equivalent of   the Netbeans platformhttp://platform.netbeans.org/inthe Python  

Re: Python platform.

carriere.jonat...: I want to build a desktop application. I am searching for some kind of environment that would provide all the elements ready (Windows...). Then I would have to code the business logic only. I don't think there's such thing in Python, all elements ready sounds strange :-)

Re: Python platform.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to build a desktop application. I am searching for some kind of environment that would provide all the elements ready (Windows...). Then I would have to code the business logic only. start here: http://wiki.python.org/moin/GuiProgramming The big ones are

Re: Python platform.

On Sep 11, 9:59 am, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to build a desktop application. I am searching for some kind of environment that would provide all the elements ready (Windows...). Then I would have to code the business logic only. start here:  

Re: Python platform.

On Sep 11, 11:39 am, Sean DiZazzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sep 11, 9:59 am, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to build a desktop application. I am searching for some kind of environment that would provide all the elements ready (Windows...).

Re: symbol not found involving dynlink/dlopen/embedding Python [platform information]

Sorry, I forgot to put information about my platform. Debian unstable on linux kernel 2.4.20, Debian's package of Python2.3. gcc version 3.3.3 libc version 2.3.2 libc.so.6 output follows::: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% /lib/libc.so.6 GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.2, by Roland McGrath et