[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for everyone's feedback - excellent detail - all my questions
have been answered.
BTW: Roel was correct that I got confused over the AMD and Intel naming
conventions regarding the 64 bit versions of Python for Windows. (I
missed that nuance that the Intel build
On Jul 26, 8:02 pm, Rob Williscroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin v. Löwis wrote innews:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
comp.lang.python:
I just tested, I built a default C# forms app using the AnyCPU
option and it ran as a 64 bit app (no *32 in Task Manager), this is
on XP64.
I have though
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:31:07 +0200, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Originally, AMD called it x86-64, and later renamed it to AMD64. Intel
originally implemented it under the name EM64T (for Extended Memory 64
Technology), and now calls the architecture Intel 64.
I hadn't heard Intel 64 before. That's
I hadn't heard Intel 64 before. That's a bit nervy, isn't it? Plus it
seems to conflict with their own use of IA-64 (Intel Architecture 64)
for the Itanium (vs. IA-32 for traditional x86).
Indeed. Microsoft Installer has an architecture string for the MSI file;
Intel64 there means Itanium
Dear List,
Thanks for everyone's feedback - excellent detail - all my questions
have been answered.
BTW: Roel was correct that I got confused over the AMD and Intel naming
conventions regarding the 64 bit versions of Python for Windows. (I
missed that nuance that the Intel build refered to the
Tim Roberts schreef:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For Win64-Itanium users: python-2.5.2.ia64.msi
For Win64-AMD64 users: python-2.5.2.amd64.msi
1. It looks like the 64 bit versions of Python for Windows are CPU
vendor specific, eg. it doesn't look like there's a single, universal
executable for
- AMD64 (or x86-64 or x64 or EMT64 or Intel64) is a 64-bit instruction
set from AMD which is an extension to the i386 instruction set, and runs
32-bit (and 16-bit) i386-code natively. But, and this is important,
despite the name the instruction set is also used by Intel (though they
call it
The end result of that is on a 32-bit machine IronPython runs in a
32-bit process and on a 64-bit machine it runs in a 64-bit process.
That's probably not exactly true (although I haven't checked).
When you start a .NET .exe program, the operating system needs to decide
whether to create a
(Any recommendations on a flavor of 64 bit of Linux for the Intel
architecture would be appreciated)
My recommendation is to use Debian or Ubuntu, as that's my personal
preference. As MAL said, any recent distribution that supports AMD64
should be fine (assuming you are not interested in
Martin v. Löwis wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in
comp.lang.python:
The end result of that is on a 32-bit machine IronPython runs in a
32-bit process and on a 64-bit machine it runs in a 64-bit process.
That's probably not exactly true (although I haven't checked).
When you start a
The Microsoft .NET commercial framework uses the PE architecture of the
Whats the Commercial framework ? I've only come accross 3, the
standard 32 bit one and 2 64 bit variants.
That's the name of the Microsoft .NET product available for Windows.
There are other implementations as well,
On 25 Jul, 12:35, M.-A. Lemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But then Intel Itanium is being phased out anyway
Citation needed! ;-)
Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Martin v. Löwis wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in
comp.lang.python:
I just tested, I built a default C# forms app using the AnyCPU
option and it ran as a 64 bit app (no *32 in Task Manager), this is
on XP64.
I have though installed the AMD64 version of the 2.0 framework and
AFAICT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For Win64-Itanium users: python-2.5.2.ia64.msi
For Win64-AMD64 users: python-2.5.2.amd64.msi
1. It looks like the 64 bit versions of Python for Windows are CPU
vendor specific, eg. it doesn't look like there's a single, universal
executable for Windows 64 bit platforms.
Background: I'm going to be processing some raw transaction logs that
are 30G in size. As part of this processing I may need to create some
very large dictionary structures. I will be running my scripts on a
version of Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition that supports 16G of
RAM. Yes, I could
On 2008-07-25 08:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Background: I'm going to be processing some raw transaction logs that
are 30G in size. As part of this processing I may need to create some
very large dictionary structures. I will be running my scripts on a
version of Windows 2003 Server Enterprise
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
4. Is there a stable version of IronPython compiled under a 64 bit
version of .NET? Anyone have experience with such a beast?
Can't comment on that one.
Should that matter? Isn't IronPython pure CLR?
/F
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jul 25, 5:52 am, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
4. Is there a stable version of IronPython compiled under a 64 bit
version of .NET? Anyone have experience with such a beast?
Can't comment on that one.
Should that matter? Isn't IronPython pure CLR?
/F
@python.org
Subject: Re: Questions on 64 bit versions of Python
On Jul 25, 5:52 am, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
4. Is there a stable version of IronPython compiled under a 64 bit
version of .NET? Anyone have experience with such a beast?
Can't comment on that one
19 matches
Mail list logo
