On May 23, 2:42 pm, Dave Angel da...@davea.name wrote:
On 05/23/2013 11:26 AM, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 06:44:05 -0700
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
From: prueba...@latinmail.com
To: python
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 19:29:14 -0700
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
From: dihedral88...@gmail.com
[...]
Could a separate instance like the I/O device of a subprocess
to be easily available in Python?
The next question
On 24.05.2013 17:25, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 19:29:14 -0700
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
From: dihedral88...@gmail.com
[some typical dihedral stuff]
I'm sorry but I don't understand your
lol that reminds me of George! lol
;)
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 19:28:29 +0200
From: andiper...@gmail.com
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
On 24.05.2013 17:25, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote
On May 22, 6:31 pm, Carlos Nepomuceno carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com
wrote:
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 13:26:23 -0700
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
From: prueba...@latinmail.com
To: python-l...@python.org
[...]
Maybe
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 06:44:05 -0700
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
From: prueba...@latinmail.com
To: python-list@python.org
[...]
eggs(a,f)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File pyshell#29, line 1, in module
eggs
On 05/23/2013 11:26 AM, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 06:44:05 -0700
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
From: prueba...@latinmail.com
To: python-list@python.org
[...]
You left out the part where a and f
On 5/23/2013 2:42 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
On 05/23/2013 11:26 AM, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
eggs(a,f)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File pyshell#29, line 1, in module
eggs(a,f)
File pyshell#1, line 1, in eggs
def eggs(spam, ham): return spam % ham
TypeError: not all arguments converted
To: python-list@python.org
From: tjre...@udel.edu
[...]
It's a conflict in the design. A tuple is used to supply multiple
arguments to the % operator. So if you want to have a tuple as the
first argument, you need to enclose it in another tuple.
The
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Carlos Nepomuceno
carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com wrote:
Can str.format() do the following?
f = '%d %d %d'
v = '1,2,3'
print f % eval(v)
Sure:
Python 3.2.2 (default, Sep 4 2011, 09:51:08) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]
on win32
f = {} {} {}
v = 1,2,3
Thank you! Hail Eris!!! :)
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 21:17:54 -0400
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
From: malaclyp...@gmail.com
To: carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com
CC: python-list@python.org
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:20 PM
Carlos Nepomuceno於 2013年5月22日星期三UTC+8上午2時49分28秒寫道：
From: alyssonbr...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 09:03:13 -0300
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
To: python-list@python.org
This work in 3.1+:
$ python3
Carlos Nepomuceno於 2013年5月22日星期三UTC+8上午11時38分45秒寫道：
From: steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 03:08:54 +
To: python-list@python.org
[...]
So, the only
Please stop perpetuating this myth, see
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116789.html
and http://bugs.python.org/issue14123
What myth?
The myth that % string formatting is deprecated. It is not deprecated.
Skip didn't say that it was deprecated.
I didn't mean to
On 5/21/2013 11:38 PM, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
From:steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 03:08:54 +
To:python-list@python.org
[...]
So, the only alternative to have '%,d' % x rendering the thousands
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 07:25:13 -0400
From: n...@nedbatchelder.com
[...]
You have to keep in mind that 2.7 is not getting any new features, no
matter how small they seem. If you create a patch that implements the
comma flag in %-formatting, it *might*
On Wed, 22 May 2013 05:45:12 -0500, Skip Montanaro wrote:
I didn't mean to create a tempest in a teapot. I was away from
comp.lang.python, python-bugs, and python-dev for a few years. In
particular, I didn't ever see the aforementioned thread from Feb 2012.
Had I known of that thread I
On 5/22/2013 10:58 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 22 May 2013 05:45:12 -0500, Skip Montanaro wrote:
I didn't mean to create a tempest in a teapot. I was away from
comp.lang.python, python-bugs, and python-dev for a few years. In
particular, I didn't ever see the aforementioned thread
On May 22, 2:30 pm, Ned Batchelder n...@nedbatchelder.com wrote:
On 5/22/2013 10:58 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 22 May 2013 05:45:12 -0500, Skip Montanaro wrote:
I didn't mean to create a tempest in a teapot. I was away from
comp.lang.python, python-bugs, and python-dev for a few
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 13:26:23 -0700
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
From: prueba...@latinmail.com
To: python-list@python.org
[...]
Maybe a cformat(formatstring, variables) function should be created
in the string
On 22 May 2013 23:31, Carlos Nepomuceno carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com wrote:
I still don't understand why % benefits from literals optimization
('%d'%12345) while '{:d}'.format(12345) doesn't.
There's no reason why that optimisation can't happen in principle.
However no one has written a patch
From: oscar.j.benja...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 01:30:53 +0100
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
To: carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com
CC: prueba...@latinmail.com; python-list@python.org
On 22 May 2013 23:31, Carlos
This work in 3.1+:
$ python3
Python 3.1.3 (r313:86834, Nov 28 2010, 11:28:10)
[GCC 4.4.5] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
one_number = 1234567
print('number={:,}'.format(one_number))
number=1,234,567
paz e amor (love and peace),
Alysson Bruno
From: alyssonbr...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 09:03:13 -0300
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
To: python-list@python.org
This work in 3.1+:
$ python3
Python 3.1.3 (r313:86834, Nov 28 2010, 11:28:10)
[GCC
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Carlos Nepomuceno
carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com wrote:
Thank you, but let me rephrase it. I'm already using str.format() but I'd
like to use '%' (BINARY_MODULO) operator instead.
There is no real reason to do this. `str.format()` is the new shiny
thing you
Thank you, but let me rephrase it. I'm already using str.format() but I'd
like to use '%' (BINARY_MODULO) operator instead.
That's unlikely to change. If not deprecated already string
interpolation using the modulo operator has lost favor to the string
object's format method.
You might be
On 21/05/2013 20:13, Skip Montanaro wrote:
Thank you, but let me rephrase it. I'm already using str.format() but I'd like
to use '%' (BINARY_MODULO) operator instead.
That's unlikely to change. If not deprecated already string
interpolation using the modulo operator has lost favor to the
From: kwpol...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 21:06:11 +0200
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
To: carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com
CC: python-list@python.org
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Carlos Nepomuceno
Analysing the code of stringobject.c I've found formatint() and
formatlong().
I mean _PyString_FormatLong()
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2013.05.21 14:26, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 21/05/2013 20:13, Skip Montanaro wrote:
Thank you, but let me rephrase it. I'm already using str.format() but I'd
like to use '%' (BINARY_MODULO) operator instead.
That's unlikely to change. If not deprecated already string
interpolation using
On 05/21/2013 12:06 PM, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
Thank you, but let me rephrase it. I'm already using str.format() but I'd like
to use '%' (BINARY_MODULO) operator instead.
There is no real reason to do this. `str.format()`
To: python-list@python.org
From: breamore...@yahoo.co.uk
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 20:26:41 +0100
On 21/05/2013 20:13, Skip Montanaro wrote:
Thank you, but let me rephrase it. I'm already
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 14:53:54 -0500
From: bahamutzero8...@gmail.com
To: python-list@python.org
[...]
What myth? People should indeed be using .format(), but no one said %
formatting was going away soon. Also, the suggested change to the docs
On Tue, 21 May 2013 23:22:24 +0300, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
Anyway, is it possible to overload str.__mod__() without deriving a
class? I mean to have something like:
No, not in Python. If you want to monkey-patch built-in classes on the
fly, with all the troubles that causes, use Ruby.
--
From: steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 02:42:56 +
To: python-list@python.org
On Tue, 21 May 2013 23:22:24 +0300, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
Anyway
On Tue, 21 May 2013 14:53:54 -0500, Andrew Berg wrote:
On 2013.05.21 14:26, Mark Lawrence wrote:
Please stop perpetuating this myth, see
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116789.html
and http://bugs.python.org/issue14123
What myth?
The myth that % string
On Wed, 22 May 2013 05:56:53 +0300, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
From: steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format
Specifier for Thousands Separator Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 02:42:56 +
To: python-list@python.org
On Tue, 21 May
On 2013.05.21 21:59, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2013 14:53:54 -0500, Andrew Berg wrote:
On 2013.05.21 14:26, Mark Lawrence wrote:
Please stop perpetuating this myth, see
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116789.html
and http://bugs.python.org/issue14123
From: steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 03:08:54 +
To: python-list@python.org
[...]
So, the only alternative to have '%,d' % x rendering the thousands
In article blu176-w10190cb892a0414c988a05d7...@phx.gbl,
Carlos Nepomuceno carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com wrote:
Is there a way to format integers with thousands separator (digit grouping)
like the format specifier of str.format()?
I'm currently using the following:
sys.stdout.write('Number
40 matches
Mail list logo
