Hi,
I have a question about relative performance of comparable regular expressions.
I have large log files that start with three letters month names (non-unicode).
Which would give better performance, matching with ^[a-zA-Z]{3}, or with
^\S{3} ?
Also, which is better (if different at all): \d
On Jan 13, 7:24 pm, Barak, Ron ron.ba...@lsi.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about relative performance of comparable regular
expressions.
I have large log files that start with three letters month names
(non-unicode).
Which would give better performance, matching with ^[a-zA-Z]{3
John Machin wrote:
On Jan 13, 7:24 pm, Barak, Ron ron.ba...@lsi.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about relative performance of comparable regular
expressions.
I have large log files that start with three letters month names
(non-unicode).
Which would give better performance, matching
performance of comparable regular expressions
On Jan 13, 7:24 pm, Barak, Ron ron.ba...@lsi.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about relative performance of comparable regular
expressions.
I have large log files that start with three letters month names
(non-unicode).
Which would give better
: John Machin [
]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:15
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Relative performance of comparable regular expressions
On Jan 13, 7:24 pm, Barak, Ron ron.ba...@lsi.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about relative performance of comparable regular
expressions.
I
