On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt
eckha...@satorlaser.comwrote:
Steve Ferg wrote:
On the one hand, there are developers who love big IDEs with lots of
features (code generation, error checking, etc.), and rely on them to
provide the high level of support needed to be
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Mohan Parthasarathy surut...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt eckha...@satorlaser.com
wrote:
Steve Ferg wrote:
On the one hand, there are developers who love big IDEs with lots of
features (code generation, error
I think you mean this clbuttic post:
http://osteele.com/archives/2004/11/ides
That's it! Thanks very much, Marco!!
It is good to read it again. It is like visiting a place where you
grew up years ago, and finding that it is completely different than
the way you remember it. It is surprising
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
In message 07e5af6c-d41d-4a4a-8e2e-
f27bc92c9...@f16g2000vbf.googlegroups.com, Steve Ferg wrote:
On the one hand, there are developers who love big IDEs with lots of
features (code generation, error
Thanks. Your observations would make good comments on the original
blog message that I'm seeking. Do you have a link to that blog?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Chris Rebert wrote:
On the other hand there are developers who much prefer to keep things
light-weight and simple.
Would it be fair to say the first type tends to congregate in herds,
particularly in corporate IT departments, while the latter tends to operate
on a more individual basis?
That
Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
Steve Ferg wrote:
On the one hand, there are developers who love big IDEs with lots of
features (code generation, error checking, etc.), and rely on them to
provide the high level of support needed to be reasonably productive
in heavy-weight languages (e.g. Java).
On the
Ulrich Eckhardt eckha...@satorlaser.com writes:
That said, an IDE that provides auto-completion (e.g. that gives you a list
of available class members) is a good thing in Java, because you don't have
to browse the documentation as often.
While I find at least some types of autocompletion to
Steve Ferg wrote:
On the one hand, there are developers who love big IDEs with lots of
features (code generation, error checking, etc.), and rely on them to
provide the high level of support needed to be reasonably productive
in heavy-weight languages (e.g. Java).
On the other hand there
In article mff7e6-e43@satorlaser.homedns.org,
Ulrich Eckhardt eckha...@satorlaser.com wrote:
Steve Ferg wrote:
On the one hand, there are developers who love big IDEs with lots of
features (code generation, error checking, etc.), and rely on them to
provide the high level of support
Steve Ferg wrote:
I periodically think of that blog, usually in circumstances that make
me also think Boy, that guy really got it right. But despite
repeated and prolonged bouts of googling I haven't been able to find
the article again. I must be using the wrong search terms or
something.
Hi guys,
I think this issue is long-long displute over tools and IDE-s. No need
to combine it with the question of the complexity of the programming
language used.
I know guys, who did every development project using a simple GVIM and
command line tools, and vere extremly productive. Even in
In message mff7e6-e43@satorlaser.homedns.org, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
If you took a look at Java, you
would notice that the core language syntax is much simpler than Python's.
I don't think it is. Look at things like private versus protected versus
public with or without static and final,
In message 07e5af6c-d41d-4a4a-8e2e-
f27bc92c9...@f16g2000vbf.googlegroups.com, Steve Ferg wrote:
On the one hand, there are developers who love big IDEs with lots of
features (code generation, error checking, etc.), and rely on them to
provide the high level of support needed to be reasonably
A few years ago someone, somewhere on the Web, posted a blog in which
he observed that developers, by general temperament, seem to fall into
two groups.
On the one hand, there are developers who love big IDEs with lots of
features (code generation, error checking, etc.), and rely on them to
15 matches
Mail list logo
