Ethan Furman writes:
> On 10/01/2018 04:26 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> > If there is some specific formal meaning to the above statement, I
> > don't know where it's documented. If it's not a specific formal
> > statement, that is itself troubling, because it's not clear what
> > would constitute a
On 10/02/2018 03:46 AM, Rhodri James wrote:
On 02/10/18 01:02, Ethan Furman wrote:
It should be interpreted as:
- No further discussion should take place on this thread.
- I've done what I can with the primitive tools at hand to block
any further discussion.
- Continued considerate posts
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:50 AM Rhodri James wrote:
>
> On what grounds are you suppressing debate? It is exactly and precisely
> not irrelevant to Python, since it's discussing a Python-specific change
> to known and understood computing terminology, and frankly the statement
> "Continued
On 2018-10-02, Rhodri James wrote:
> On 02/10/18 01:02, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On what grounds are you suppressing debate? It is exactly and precisely
> not irrelevant to Python, since it's discussing a Python-specific change
> to known and understood computing terminology, and frankly the
On 02/10/2018 11:46, Rhodri James wrote:
On 02/10/18 01:02, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 10/01/2018 04:26 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Ethan Furman writes:
>> This thread is closed.
>
> Coming from a moderator of this forum, I don't know how that statement
> is to be interpreted.
It should be
On 02/10/18 01:02, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 10/01/2018 04:26 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Ethan Furman writes:
>> This thread is closed.
>
> Coming from a moderator of this forum, I don't know how that statement
> is to be interpreted.
It should be interpreted as:
- No further discussion should
On 10/01/2018 04:26 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Ethan Furman writes:
>> This thread is closed.
>
> Coming from a moderator of this forum, I don't know how that statement
> is to be interpreted.
It should be interpreted as:
- No further discussion should take place on this thread.
- I've done what
