Not too keen on working with Solaris either. Did some small
configuration last time I worked there and it was all a mess. I'm
trying to convince them to switch to OpenBSD :)
Timo
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 3/22/2009 12:41 PM Chris Rebert apparently wrote:
2.6.1, the latest non-3.x release is probably best. Most libraries
haven't been ported to 3.x yet, so Python 3 has yet to become
widespread.
This seems slightly optimistic to me.
Until a week ago, there was not a NumPy release for 2.6.
Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/22/2009 12:41 PM Chris Rebert apparently wrote:
2.6.1, the latest non-3.x release is probably best. Most libraries
haven't been ported to 3.x yet, so Python 3 has yet to become
widespread.
This seems slightly optimistic to me. Until a week
Hi,
I'll have to do some scripting in the near future and I was
thinking on using the Python for it. I would like to know which
version of Python to use? Is the Python 3 ready for use or should
I stick with older releases?
Timo
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
python 2.5 is prefered;
On Mar 22, 7:22 pm, timo.my...@gmail.com (Timo Myyrä) wrote:
Hi,
I'll have to do some scripting in the near future and I was
thinking on using the Python for it. I would like to know which
version of Python to use? Is the Python 3 ready for use or should
I stick
timo.my...@gmail.com (Timo =?utf-8?Q?Myyr=C3=A4?=) wrote:
Hi,
I'll have to do some scripting in the near future and I was
thinking on using the Python for it. I would like to know which
version of Python to use? Is the Python 3 ready for use or should
I stick with older releases?
If you
2009/3/22 Timo Myyrä timo.my...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I'll have to do some scripting in the near future and I was thinking on using
the Python for it. I would like to know which version of Python to use? Is
the Python 3 ready for use or should I stick with older releases?
2.6.1, the latest
Ok, I think I'll stick with the 2.6 then. I recall it gave
warnings about things that are deprecated in 3.0 so it will make
porting the scripts to 3.0 easier.
I might try 3.0 once I know what kind of scripts are needed.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
mahesh wrote:
python 2.5 is prefered;
no it is not.
andrew
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
timo.my...@gmail.com (Timo =?utf-8?Q?Myyr=C3=A4?=) wrote:
Ok, I think I'll stick with the 2.6 then. I recall it gave
warnings about things that are deprecated in 3.0 so it will make
porting the scripts to 3.0 easier.
I might try 3.0 once I know what kind of scripts are needed.
In case
I might get summer job in doing some 2nd tier support and doing
some scripting besides that in Solaris environment. I gotta see
what kind of scripts are needed but I'd guess the 2.6 would be the
safest option.
Timo
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 17:00 +, Timo Myyrä wrote:
Ok, I think I'll stick with the 2.6 then. I recall it gave
warnings about things that are deprecated in 3.0 so it will make
porting the scripts to 3.0 easier.
I might try 3.0 once I know what kind of scripts are needed.
Yes. Develop
On Mar 23, 5:59 am, timo.my...@gmail.com (Timo Myyrä) wrote:
I might get summer job in doing some 2nd tier support and doing
some scripting besides that in Solaris environment. I gotta see
what kind of scripts are needed but I'd guess the 2.6 would be the
safest option.
Timo
Solaris? In
13 matches
Mail list logo
