Dhanyavaad (thank you)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Scott David Daniels wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... Is the Python debugger fairly stable?
Yes, but it is not massively featured. The Pythonic way is to
rarely use a debugger (test first and straightforward code should
lead to shallow bugs). Often for most of us judiciously placed
Exactly...this is how most of my Perl modules are written and tested,
actually.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody likes long-winded, abstract philosophical discussions on a
technology NG.
not even on comp.lang.python ? ;-)
/F
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody likes long-winded, abstract philosophical discussions on a
technology NG.
not even on comp.lang.python ? ;-)
I wish :-)
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC/Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott David Daniels wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... Is the Python debugger fairly stable?
Yes, but it is not massively featured. The Pythonic way is to
rarely use a debugger (test first and straightforward code should
lead to shallow bugs). Often for most of us
Scott David Daniels wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott David Daniels wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... Is the Python debugger fairly stable?
Yes, but it is not massively featured. The Pythonic way is to
rarely use a debugger (test first and straightforward code should
lead to
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On 12 Mar 2006 17:58:43 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed the
following in comp.lang.python:
Double-underscore methods are rewritten with the class name? That's an
ugly hack, but remember I'm coming from Perl. If the language doesn't
pull many other hijinks,
bruno at modulix wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have used Perl for a long time, but I am something of an experimental
person and mean to try something new. Most of my 'work' with Vector
Linux entails the use of Perl (a bit of a misnomer as it is not now a
paid position -- I am not yet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
bruno at modulix wrote:
(snip)
You don't even need this to use callbacks. Remember, functions and
methods are objects, and other objects can be callable too...
Eh?? I need an example.
Of callables ?
class FuncInDisguise(object):
def __init__(self, name):
Scott David Daniels wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The one you get with Perl stinks on ice. More than
anything else, I would like to have a powerful OO environment where I
do not have to worry about the debugger sucking
Do watch your language on this newsgroup. Lots of people read
Scott David Daniels wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... Is the Python debugger fairly stable?
Yes, but it is not massively featured. The Pythonic way is to
rarely use a debugger (test first and straightforward code should
lead to shallow bugs). Often for most of us judiciously placed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have used Perl for a long time, but I am something of an experimental
person and mean to try something new. Most of my 'work' with Vector
Linux entails the use of Perl (a bit of a misnomer as it is not now a
paid position -- I am not yet even out of K-12), and there
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... Is the Python debugger fairly stable?
Yes, but it is not massively featured. The Pythonic way is to
rarely use a debugger (test first and straightforward code should
lead to shallow bugs). Often for most of us judiciously placed
print statements suffice.
The one
Scott David Daniels wrote:
... Is the Python debugger fairly stable?
Yes, but it is not massively featured. The Pythonic way is to
rarely use a debugger (test first and straightforward code should
lead to shallow bugs). Often for most of us judiciously placed
print statements suffice.
Python closures are apparently very poor, but from what I can surmise
of the PyGTK2 page, instances of objects are dynamic enough to add new
methods, so you get your callbacks, at least.
It's true that Python's lambda is somewhat limited, but this is
rarely a problem because you can define
On 12 Mar 2006 17:58:43 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Double-underscore methods are rewritten with the class
name? That's an ugly hack, but remember I'm coming from
Perl. If the language doesn't pull many other hijinks,
that's OK.
This is GvR's way of saying do not use double-underscore
I have used Perl for a long time, but I am something of an experimental
person and mean to try something new. Most of my 'work' with Vector
Linux entails the use of Perl (a bit of a misnomer as it is not now a
paid position -- I am not yet even out of K-12), and there a lot of
things I love about
18 matches
Mail list logo
