Chris Angelico wrote:
Heavy computation might be unideal in Python, but if you can grunge it
into NumPy operations, that won't be a problem.
May take a look to Pythran too, which generate C++ code from (limited subset
of) Python code, usable as a Python compiled module or as standalone C++.
In article 52f9b6af$0$11128$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com,
Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 22:40:48 -0600, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 02/08/2014 05:54 PM, Sam wrote:
I got to know about Python a few months ago and today, I want to
develop only using Python because
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
Whether I mind shipping my source, or you mind shipping your source
isn't really what matters here. What matters is that there *are*
people/companies who don't want to expose their source. Perhaps for
reasons we don't agree
Asaf Las roeg...@gmail.com writes:
btw, Python could be language of choice for embedded systems if small
footprint
vm could be developed. had seen similar for java having 10-20 KB byte sized
interpreter with very limited set of functions.
Well, there's the newish Micro python project. Its
On 2014-02-09, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Heavy computation might be unideal in Python, but if you can grunge
it into NumPy operations, that won't be a problem.
While one might thing Python is not suitable for heavy number
crunching, it actually gets used for that a lot due to the
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 06:17:03 +0100, Skybuck Flying wrote:
I got to know about Python a few months ago and today, I want to develop
only using Python because of its code readability. This is not a healthy
bias. To play my own devil's advocate, I have a question. What are the
kinds of
On Saturday, February 8, 2014 10:43:47 PM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
PyPy can generate code which is comparable to compiled C in speed.
Perhaps you mean, if execution speed is the most important thing, using
a naive Python interpreter may not be fast enough.
Given that the OP seems to
On 02/08/2014 05:54 PM, Sam wrote:
I got to know about Python a few months ago and today, I want to develop only
using Python because of its code readability. This is not a healthy bias. To
play my own devil's advocate, I have a question. What are the kinds of software
that are not advisable
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:21 PM, CM cmpyt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, February 8, 2014 10:43:47 PM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
PyPy can generate code which is comparable to compiled C in speed.
Perhaps you mean, if execution speed is the most important thing, using
a naive Python
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 22:40:48 -0600, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 02/08/2014 05:54 PM, Sam wrote:
I got to know about Python a few months ago and today, I want to
develop only using Python because of its code readability. This is not
a healthy bias. To play my own devil's advocate, I have a
On 02/10/2014 11:35 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 22:40:48 -0600, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 02/08/2014 05:54 PM, Sam wrote:
I got to know about Python a few months ago and today, I want to
develop only using Python because of its code readability. This is not
a healthy bias. To
Le dimanche 9 février 2014 06:17:03 UTC+1, Skybuck Flying a écrit :
However there is more... Python may lack some technical language elements
like, call by reference, and perhaps other low level codes, like 8 bit, 16
bit, 32 bit integers which play a roll with interfacing with
On 09/02/2014 10:47, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Le dimanche 9 février 2014 06:17:03 UTC+1, Skybuck Flying a écrit :
However there is more... Python may lack some technical language elements
like, call by reference, and perhaps other low level codes, like 8 bit, 16
bit, 32 bit integers
I got to know about Python a few months ago and today, I want to develop only
using Python because of its code readability. This is not a healthy bias. To
play my own devil's advocate, I have a question. What are the kinds of software
that are not advisable to be developed using Python?
--
On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 15:54:30 -0800, Sam wrote:
I got to know about Python a few months ago and today, I want to develop
only using Python because of its code readability. This is not a healthy
bias. To play my own devil's advocate, I have a question. What are the
kinds of software that are
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Sam lightai...@gmail.com wrote:
I got to know about Python a few months ago and today, I want to develop only
using Python because of its code readability. This is not a healthy bias. To
play my own devil's advocate, I have a question. What are the kinds of
In article a584b0e9-1995-4189-bfac-d0c5ffc08...@googlegroups.com,
Sam lightai...@gmail.com wrote:
I got to know about Python a few months ago and today, I want to develop only
using Python because of its code readability. This is not a healthy bias. To
play my own devil's advocate, I have a
On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 21:53:00 -0500, Roy Smith wrote:
In article a584b0e9-1995-4189-bfac-d0c5ffc08...@googlegroups.com,
Sam lightai...@gmail.com wrote:
I got to know about Python a few months ago and today, I want to
develop only using Python because of its code readability. This is not
a
On 02/08/2014 05:11 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Sam lightai...@gmail.com wrote:
I got to know about Python a few months ago and today, I want to develop
only using Python because of its code readability. This is not a healthy
bias. To play my own devil's
On Sunday, February 9, 2014 5:43:47 AM UTC+2, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Nevertheless, although security by obscurity is ineffective[1], Python
supports it. You can ship only the .pyc files. For added obscurity, you
could put the .pyc files in a .zip file and ship that. For even more
obscurity,
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Michael Torrie torr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/08/2014 05:11 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Sam lightai...@gmail.com wrote:
I got to know about Python a few months ago and today, I want to develop
only using Python because of its code
I got to know about Python a few months ago and today, I want to develop
only using Python because of its code readability. This is not a healthy
bias. To play my own devil's advocate, I have a question. What are the kinds
of software that are not advisable to be developed using Python?
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Skybuck Flying
windows7i...@dreampc2006.com wrote:
Anything that needs to be super reliable.
My experience so far with Python versus Delphi has shown that Python
requires way more time to debug than Delphi.
The reason for this is the interpreter versus the
23 matches
Mail list logo
