On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:27:55 -0500 in comp.lang.python, Gerard Brunick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My way is ugly. These has to be a better way.
This may not be the slickest way, but I needed some practice with
list comprehensions (I've never really gotten used to them...)
This works with lists.
Gerard Brunick wrote:
My way is ugly. These has to be a better way.
Thanks,
Gerard
transpose funcitons/methods:
http://numeric.scipy.org/
http://numpy.sourceforge.net/numdoc/numdoc.pdf
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
My way is ugly. These has to be a better way.
Thanks,
Gerard
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Gerard Brunick said unto the world upon 08/01/06 01:27 PM:
My way is ugly. These has to be a better way.
Thanks,
Gerard
If you'd posted your way, I might well have seen if I could do it in a
nicer fashion. But, since for all I know, my best efforts would result
in the approach you already
Gerard Brunick wrote:
My way is ugly. These has to be a better way.
Thanks,
Gerard
Ugly is not necessary not the slickest. To do better, there must be
something to compare to, right?
Claudio
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Brian van den Broek wrote:
Gerard Brunick said unto the world upon 08/01/06 01:27 PM:
My way is ugly. These has to be a better way.
Thanks,
Gerard
If you'd posted your way, I might well have seen if I could do it in a
nicer fashion. But, since for all I know, my best efforts would
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:21:59 -0600, Brian van den Broek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Gerard Brunick said unto the world upon 08/01/06 01:27 PM:
My way is ugly. These has to be a better way.
Thanks,
Gerard
If you'd posted your way, I might well have seen if I could do it in a
nicer fashion.