On Nov 1, 1:13 am, Gabriel Genellina gagsl-...@yahoo.com.ar wrote:
Looks like in 3.1 this can be done with bytes+str and viceversa, even if
bytes and str don't have a common ancestor (other than object; basestring
doesn't exist in 3.x):
p3 Base = bytes
p3 Other = str
p3
p3 class
En Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:05:42 -0300, Jess Austin jess.aus...@gmail.com
escribió:
On Nov 1, 1:13 am, Gabriel Genellina gagsl-...@yahoo.com.ar wrote:
Looks like in 3.1 this can be done with bytes+str and viceversa, even
if bytes and str don't have a common ancestor (other than object;
En Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:55:27 -0300, Jess Austin jess.aus...@gmail.com
escribió:
On Oct 29, 10:41 pm, Gabriel Genellina gagsl-...@yahoo.com.ar
wrote:
We know the last test fails because the == logic fails to recognize
mySet (on the right side) as a more specialized object than frozenset
On Oct 29, 10:41 pm, Gabriel Genellina gagsl-...@yahoo.com.ar
wrote:
We know the last test fails because the == logic fails to recognize mySet
(on the right side) as a more specialized object than frozenset (on the
left side), because set and frozenset don't have a common base type
On Oct 28, 10:07 pm, Mick Krippendorf mad.m...@gmx.de wrote:
You could just overwrite set and frozenset:
class eqmixin(object):
def __eq__(self, other):
print called %s.__eq__() % self.__class__
if isinstance(other, (set, frozenset)):
return True
Jess Austin wrote:
That's nice, but it means that everyone who imports my class will have
to import the monkeypatch of frozenset, as well. I'm not sure I want
that. More ruby than python, ne?
I thought it was only a toy class?
Mick.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Oct 29, 3:54 pm, Mick Krippendorf mad.m...@gmx.de wrote:
Jess Austin wrote:
That's nice, but it means that everyone who imports my class will have
to import the monkeypatch of frozenset, as well. I'm not sure I want
that. More ruby than python, ne?
I thought it was only a toy class?
En Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:12:53 -0300, Jess Austin jess.aus...@gmail.com
escribió:
class mySet(set):
... def __eq__(self, other):
... print called mySet.__eq__()!
... if isinstance(other, (set, frozenset)):
... return True
... return set.__eq__(self,
I'm subclassing set, and redefining __eq__(). I'd appreciate any
relevant advice.
class mySet(set):
... def __eq__(self, other):
... print called mySet.__eq__()!
... if isinstance(other, (set, frozenset)):
... return True
... return set.__eq__(self,
Jess Austin schrieb:
frozenset([1]) == mySet()
False
frozenset doesn't use mySet.__eq__() because mySet is not a subclass
of frozenset as it is for set.
You could just overwrite set and frozenset:
class eqmixin(object):
def __eq__(self, other):
print called %s.__eq__() %
10 matches
Mail list logo
