2009/3/21 Randy Turner rtms...@yahoo.com:
There are a number of use-cases for object cleanup that are not covered by
a generic garbage collector...
For instance, if an object is caching data that needs to be flushed to
some persistent resource, then the GC has
no idea about this.
It seems
Hi,
I was reading a book on Python-3 programming recently and the book stated that,
while there is an __init__ method for initializing objects, there was a __del__
method but the __del__ method is not guaranteed to be called when an object is
destroyed.
If there is code in the __init__ method
__init__ is the object construction(initialization) faze
__del__ is the object destruction faze, I think GC also happens, not sure
-Alex Goretoy
http://www.goretoy.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Randy Turner wrote:
I was reading a book on Python-3 programming recently and the book stated
that, while there is an __init__ method for initializing objects, there was a
__del__ method but the __del__ method is not guaranteed to be called when an
object is destroyed.
If there is code
On Mar 21, 8:37 pm, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
Randy Turner wrote:
I was reading a book on Python-3 programming recently and the book stated
that, while there is an __init__ method for initializing objects, there was
a __del__ method but the __del__ method is not guaranteed
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 17:41 -0700, Randy Turner wrote:
Hi,
I was reading a book on Python-3 programming recently and the book
stated that, while there is an __init__ method for initializing
objects, there was a __del__ method but the __del__ method is not
guaranteed to be called when an
Subject: Re: __init__ vs. __del__
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 17:41 -0700, Randy Turner wrote:
Hi,
I was reading a book on Python-3 programming recently and the book
stated that, while there is an __init__ method for initializing
objects, there was a __del__ method but the __del__ method
