Re: appropriate python version

2008-04-06 Thread hdante
On Apr 6, 5:59 pm, xamdam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks. I am guessing the 32bit build should work anyways, same as > other 32 progs on XP 64? The right build should be the "amd64" one. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: appropriate python version

2008-04-06 Thread xamdam
Thanks. I am guessing the 32bit build should work anyways, same as other 32 progs on XP 64? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: appropriate python version

2008-04-06 Thread Michael Torrie
xamdam wrote: > Sorry if this is a stupid q, > I am trying to figure out the appropriate version of Python(2.4 or > 2.5) for an XP 64 system running on an Intel Core2 Quad. Python.org > has a to a 64bit build, but it specifies Itanium as the target. Should > I just be using the regular build? Itan

appropriate python version

2008-04-06 Thread xamdam
Sorry if this is a stupid q, I am trying to figure out the appropriate version of Python(2.4 or 2.5) for an XP 64 system running on an Intel Core2 Quad. Python.org has a to a 64bit build, but it specifies Itanium as the target. Should I just be using the regular build? I was also thinking of gettin