sturlamolden sturlamol...@yahoo.no (s) wrote:
s On 25 Aug, 01:26, Piet van Oostrum p...@cs.uu.nl wrote:
That's because it doesn't use copy-on-write. Thereby losing most of its
advantages. I don't know SUA, but I have vaguely heard about it.
s SUA is a version of UNIX hidden inside Windows
On 25 Aug, 13:33, Piet van Oostrum p...@cs.uu.nl wrote:
I have heard about that also, but is there a Python implementation that
uses this? (Just curious, I am not using Windows.)
On Windows we have three different versions of Python 2.6:
* Python 2.6 for Win32/64 (from python.org) does not
Dennis Lee Bieber wlfr...@ix.netcom.com (DLB) wrote:
DLB On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:14:17 -0700, John Nagle na...@animats.com
DLB declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general:
Multiple Python processes can run concurrently, but each process
has a copy of the entire Python system, so the
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:14:17 -0700, John Nagle na...@animats.com
declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general:
Multiple Python processes can run concurrently, but each process
has a copy of the entire Python system, so the memory and cache footprints
Dave Angel da...@ieee.org (DA) wrote:
DA Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:14:17 -0700, John Nagle na...@animats.com
declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general:
Multiple Python processes can run concurrently, but each process
has a copy of the entire Python
On 18 Aug, 22:10, Derek Martin c...@pizzashack.org wrote:
I have some simple threaded code... If I run this
with an arg of 1 (start one thread), it pegs one cpu, as I would
expect. If I run it with an arg of 2 (start 2 threads), it uses both
CPUs, but utilization of both is less than 50%.
On 24 Aug, 13:21, Piet van Oostrum p...@cs.uu.nl wrote:
But os.fork() is not available on Windows. And I guess refcounts et al.
will soon destroy the sharing.
Well, there is os.fork in Cygwin and SUA (SUA is the Unix subsytem in
Windows Vista Professional). Cygwin's fork is a bit sluggish.
sturlamolden sturlamol...@yahoo.no (s) wrote:
s On 24 Aug, 13:21, Piet van Oostrum p...@cs.uu.nl wrote:
But os.fork() is not available on Windows. And I guess refcounts et al.
will soon destroy the sharing.
s Well, there is os.fork in Cygwin and SUA (SUA is the Unix subsytem in
s Windows
On 25 Aug, 01:26, Piet van Oostrum p...@cs.uu.nl wrote:
That's because it doesn't use copy-on-write. Thereby losing most of its
advantages. I don't know SUA, but I have vaguely heard about it.
SUA is a version of UNIX hidden inside Windows Vista and Windows 7
(except in Home and Home Premium),
Jan Kaliszewski wrote:
18-08-2009 o 22:10:15 Derek Martin c...@pizzashack.org wrote:
I have some simple threaded code... If I run this
with an arg of 1 (start one thread), it pegs one cpu, as I would
expect. If I run it with an arg of 2 (start 2 threads), it uses both
CPUs, but utilization
On Aug 18, 4:58 pm, birdsong david.birds...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 18, 3:18 pm, Derek Martin c...@pizzashack.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 03:10:15PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
I have some simple threaded code... If I run this
with an arg of 1 (start one thread), it pegs one
On Aug 18, 1:10 pm, Derek Martin c...@pizzashack.org wrote:
I have some simple threaded code... If I run this
with an arg of 1 (start one thread), it pegs one cpu, as I would
expect. If I run it with an arg of 2 (start 2 threads), it uses both
CPUs, but utilization of both is less than 50%.
On Aug 18, 3:18 pm, Derek Martin c...@pizzashack.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 03:10:15PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
I have some simple threaded code... If I run this
with an arg of 1 (start one thread), it pegs one cpu, as I would
expect. If I run it with an arg of 2 (start 2
13 matches
Mail list logo
