[issue474992] python version benchmark

Change by admin : -- github: None -> 35407 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[Python-announce] Benchmark Smil vs Scikit-image (morphological features)

Hello, We've done a comparative benchmark (speed and memory usage) with Smil and Scikit-Image. Smil is a mathematical morphology dedicated library of functions. So comparisons are done only on this area. We've been working on Mathematical Morphology for more than 50 years now the discipline

[Python-announce] [ANN] Benchmark Smil vs Scikit-image (morphological features)

Hello, We've done a comparative benchmark (speed and memory usage) with Smil and Scikit-Image. Smil is a mathematical morphology dedicated library of functions. So comparisons are done only on this area. We've been working on Mathematical Morphology for more than 50 years now

[issue45332] Decimal test and benchmark are broken

Dong-hee Na added the comment: Now the code is fixed. Thanks Serhiy for the report and review :) -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue45332] Decimal test and benchmark are broken

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 282992b36f9fe27183037051f3b37210884600af by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.10': bpo-45332: Fix broken Decimal test and benchmark (GH-28680) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/282992b36f9fe27183037051f3b37210884600af

[issue45332] Decimal test and benchmark are broken

Change by miss-islington : -- nosy: +miss-islington nosy_count: 4.0 -> 5.0 pull_requests: +27044 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/28681 ___ Python tracker

[issue45332] Decimal test and benchmark are broken

Dong-hee Na added the comment: New changeset 9eed75fde226cec5a02301cfac1dc8039b5a183e by Dong-hee Na in branch 'main': bpo-45332: Fix broken Decimal test and benchmark (GH-28680) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/9eed75fde226cec5a02301cfac1dc8039b5a183e

[issue45332] Decimal test and benchmark are broken

Change by Dong-hee Na : -- keywords: +patch nosy: +corona10 nosy_count: 3.0 -> 4.0 pull_requests: +27043 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/28680 ___ Python tracker

[issue45332] Decimal test and benchmark are broken

Change by Mark Dickinson : -- nosy: +mark.dickinson ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue45332] Decimal test and benchmark are broken

New submission from Serhiy Storchaka : The test and the benchmark for the decimal module are broken in 3.10+. $ ./python Modules/_decimal/tests/deccheck.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/serhiy/py/cpython/Modules/_decimal/tests/deccheck.py", line 50, in

[issue40725] Documentation: Benchmark table in "What's new in Python 3.9" has weird values

Change by hai shi : -- nosy: +shihai1991 nosy_count: 5.0 -> 6.0 pull_requests: +20327 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21169 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue40725] Documentation: Benchmark table in "What's new in Python 3.9" has weird values

Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Thanks for the report. -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue40725] Documentation: Benchmark table in "What's new in Python 3.9" has weird values

Raymond Hettinger added the comment: New changeset 5c01ed6f9366bc6fd880c18e5a2929de72bc1be6 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.9': bpo-40725: Restore missing column of digits (GH-20313) (GH-20315) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/5c01ed6f9366bc6fd880c18e5a2929de72bc1be6

[issue40725] Documentation: Benchmark table in "What's new in Python 3.9" has weird values

Change by miss-islington : -- nosy: +miss-islington nosy_count: 4.0 -> 5.0 pull_requests: +19584 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20315 ___ Python tracker

[issue40725] Documentation: Benchmark table in "What's new in Python 3.9" has weird values

Change by Raymond Hettinger : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +19582 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20313 ___ Python tracker

[issue40725] Documentation: Benchmark table in "What's new in Python 3.9" has weird values

Change by Raymond Hettinger : -- assignee: docs@python -> rhettinger ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue40725] Documentation: Benchmark table in "What's new in Python 3.9" has weird values

Change by Rahul Kumaresan : -- nosy: +rahul-kumi ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue40725] Documentation: Benchmark table in "What's new in Python 3.9" has weird values

Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan : -- nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue40725] Documentation: Benchmark table in "What's new in Python 3.9" has weird values

ty: normal status: open title: Documentation: Benchmark table in "What's new in Python 3.9" has weird values versions: Python 3.9 ___ Python tracker <https://bug

[issue35884] Add variable access benchmark to Tools/Scripts

Raymond Hettinger added the comment: New changeset 68d228f174ceed151200e7e0b44ffc5edd4e0ea2 by Raymond Hettinger (Stefan Behnel) in branch 'master': bpo-35884: Add string-keys-only microbenchmark for dict access to var_access_benchmark.py (GH-11905)

[issue35884] Add variable access benchmark to Tools/Scripts

Change by Stefan Behnel : -- pull_requests: +11931 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue35884] Add variable access benchmark to Tools/Scripts

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 43766f82ddec84fad7a321eeec2e1cbff6ee44d2 by Miss Islington (bot) (Raymond Hettinger) in branch 'master': bpo-35884: Add missing FIFO queue benchmark (GH-11898) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/43766f82ddec84fad7a321eeec2e1cbff6ee44d2

[issue35884] Add variable access benchmark to Tools/Scripts

Change by Raymond Hettinger : -- pull_requests: +11925 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue35884] Add variable access benchmark to Tools/Scripts

Change by Raymond Hettinger : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue35884] Add variable access benchmark to Tools/Scripts

Raymond Hettinger added the comment: New changeset f75d59e1a896115bd52f543a417c665d6edc331f by Raymond Hettinger in branch 'master': bpo-35884: Add variable access benchmarking script (GH-11725) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/f75d59e1a896115bd52f543a417c665d6edc331f --

[issue35884] Add variable access benchmark to Tools/Scripts

Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Here's what the output looks like (here am comparing a fresh Py3.8 with Clang versus the same build with GCC-8): $ make distclean && ./configure && make $ py Tools/scripts/var_access_benchmark.py Speed of different kinds of variable accesses: 4.2 μs

[issue35884] Add variable access benchmark to Tools/Scripts

Change by Raymond Hettinger : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +11606 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue35884] Add variable access benchmark to Tools/Scripts

Change by Raymond Hettinger : -- keywords: +patch, patch pull_requests: +11606, 11607 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___

[issue35884] Add variable access benchmark to Tools/Scripts

model of the relative cost of various kinds of variable access -- this is useful in writing high performance code. -- components: Demos and Tools messages: 334716 nosy: rhettinger priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Add variable access benchmark to Tools/Scripts type

Re: How to benchmark a HTTP connection with requests module?

= time.clock()     queue.put((ident, r.status_code, end - start))     queue.task_done()     return queue class HTTPBenchmarkTestCase(unittest.TestCase):     url = 'http://localhost/benchmark/'     threads = 5     def setUp(self):     self.hold = True     def test_benchmark_concurrency

Re: How to benchmark a HTTP connection with requests module?

Hi Dennis, Nice pseudo code! :-) Is it possible benchmark/measure the latency of a HTTP connection for each threads by timing the duration of the requests.get method to complete? I also plan to test with gevent.monkey extension for enabling cooperative multithreading support: from gevent

How to benchmark a HTTP connection with requests module?

Hi, Is it possible to emulate a range of concurrent connections to a http server with the requests module? import os import requests from test_support import unittest class HTTPBenchmarkTestCase(unittest.TestCase):     url = 'http://localhost/benchmark/'     def setUp(self):     pass

[issue26436] Add the regex-dna benchmark

STINNER Victor added the comment: The performance project is now hosted on GitHub. I created a pull request from Serhiy's patch: https://github.com/python/performance/pull/17 So I now close this issue. Let's continue the discussion there. -- resolution: -> third party status: open ->

[issue26436] Add the regex-dna benchmark

STINNER Victor added the comment: I created https://github.com/python/performance/issues/15 -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue26436] Add the regex-dna benchmark

Changes by Serhiy Storchaka : -- components: +Regular Expressions nosy: +ezio.melotti, mrabarnett ___ Python tracker ___

[issue26436] Add the regex-dna benchmark

STINNER Victor added the comment: Serhiy: Can you please open a pull request on the new performance module? https://github.com/python/performance -- nosy: +haypo ___ Python tracker

[issue26284] Fix telco benchmark

STINNER Victor added the comment: Sorry, I'm not sure if you want to make any change to bm_telco.py of the performance. If yes, please open an issue at https://github.com/python/performance > So LGTM. Hum, it looks like you are happy, so I now close this issue :-) I'm slowly trying to move

[issue22458] Add fractions benchmark

STINNER Victor added the comment: The issue is not closed, but moved to https://github.com/python/performance/pull/10 Please continue the discussion there. I'm now slowly trying to move benchmark issues to GitHub. -- resolution: -> third party status: open ->

[issue19108] Benchmark runner tries to execute external Python command and fails on error reporting

Stefan Behnel added the comment: Let's close this as outdated. New bugs for the new project should be reported in github anyway. -- resolution: -> out of date status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue22458] Add fractions benchmark

long time (Lisp/sbcl), but apparently they have never been widely used. A fraction-only benchmark is okay, but comparing fractions/decimals in one particular "official" benchmark is a bit strange. -- ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.py

[issue22458] Add fractions benchmark

STINNER Victor added the comment: Stefan Krah added the comment: > Fractions will shine in most benchmarks where decimal is exact anyway. According to Stefan's latest message, the purpose of the benchmark is not the compare decimal to fractions, but measure the performance of fractions for

[issue22458] Add fractions benchmark

Stefan Krah added the comment: The reason is that the benchmark is a softball for fractions. Using the fastest fraction implementation (gmpy.mpq) and the best printing method for both types, gmpy.mpq seems to be about 2.5 to 3 times slower than decimal. It is however easy to generate

[issue22458] Add fractions benchmark

Stefan Behnel added the comment: > So this benchmark cannot be used to show the superiority of exact fractions. I don't see how a benchmark would be a way to show that. It's certainly not the goal of this benchmark to show that one is computationally better than the other. But if a benchm

[issue22458] Add fractions benchmark

Stefan Krah added the comment: I've left comments on GitHub. [scoder] > As I said, where ever exact calculations are needed.. Even if the formatting comment is addressed, the main problem with this benchmark is that *both* fraction and decimal calculations are in fact exact here. You

[issue22458] Add fractions benchmark

STINNER Victor added the comment: @Stefan Krah: Please review the pull request. https://github.com/python/performance/pull/10 I suggested to only run the benchmark with the fractions module. I don't see the point of running the benchmark with the decimal module

[issue22458] Add fractions benchmark

Stefan Krah added the comment: I'm also not opposed to adding it (-0.000) as long as we rename it to bm_fractions.py and change the docstring to "based on the telco benchmark". -- ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <htt

[issue22458] Add fractions benchmark

STINNER Victor added the comment: > I think string conversion should be part of this benchmark, or it should be > renamed to fraction-arith or something. The "telco" benchmark seems to be standard and well defined. I agree that we should use a different name. > That s

[issue22458] Add fractions benchmark

Stefan Krah added the comment: I think string conversion should be part of this benchmark, or it should be renamed to fraction-arith or something. The formatting function can be a significant bottleneck, and if you use Fractions for financial calculations the result will still need

[issue22881] show median in benchmark results

Changes by Stefan Behnel : -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue22458] Add fractions benchmark

Stefan Behnel added the comment: Done: https://github.com/python/performance/pull/10 Note that I didn't replace the existing telco benchmark as it is more specific to Decimal. The new benchmark makes it possible to compare the decimal and fractions modules for similar operations, though

[issue26284] Fix telco benchmark

Stefan Krah added the comment: Wow, on my machine this is very stable, great. The output should be like http://www.bytereef.org/software/mpdecimal/benchmarks/telco.py , but printing one number only should be okay. The important thing is that some decimal is printed at all to test the

[issue18899] make pystone.py Py3 compatible in benchmark suite

Changes by Berker Peksag : -- resolution: -> out of date stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue22458] Add fractions benchmark

Changes by Mark Dickinson : -- nosy: -mark.dickinson ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue26284] Fix telco benchmark

STINNER Victor added the comment: @Stefan: Can you please check bm_telco.py and maybe propose a pull request if something is wrong? -- ___ Python tracker

[issue18899] make pystone.py Py3 compatible in benchmark suite

STINNER Victor added the comment: > Oh, pystone... I didn't know we had included that particular horror in the > benchmark suite :-) pystone was removed from the new https://github.com/python/performance benchmark suite. I suggest to close this issue as outdated. -- nosy:

[issue19108] Benchmark runner tries to execute external Python command and fails on error reporting

STINNER Victor added the comment: The new https://github.com/python/performance benchmark suite has a very different design than the old https://hg.python.org/benchmarks benchmark suite: * it now only runs benchmarks in a virtual environment * dependencies are installed in the venv by pip

[issue22881] show median in benchmark results

STINNER Victor added the comment: The new https://github.com/python/performance benchmark suite now displays the median rather than the arithmetic mean (average) by default (it also displays the standard deviation). See the perf issue for a discussion about median vs mean: https://github.com

[issue22458] Add fractions benchmark

STINNER Victor added the comment: Can you please send a pull request to the new https://github.com/python/performance project? -- nosy: +haypo ___ Python tracker

[issue26284] Fix telco benchmark

STINNER Victor added the comment: I worked on a new version of the benchmark suite, it is now called performance and moved to GitHub: https://github.com/python/performance In performance 0.1.2, bm_telco.py uses BytesIO for input and six.StringIO for output. The output is just one number per

[issue26436] Add the regex-dna benchmark

. > I would add another kind of question: is it stressing something useful that > isn't already stressed by the two other regex benchmarks we already have? Yes, it is. The regex_v8 benchmark is 2x faster with regex than with re. But the regex_dna benchmark is 1.6x slower with regex than with re

[issue26436] Add the regex-dna benchmark

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: DNA matching can be done with difflib. Serious high-volume work should use compiled specialized matchers and aligners. This particular benchmark, explained a bit at https://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/regexdna-description.html#regexdna

[issue26436] Add the regex-dna benchmark

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: I would add another kind of question: is it stressing something useful that isn't already stressed by the two other regex benchmarks we already have? Given that it seems built around a highly-specialized use case (DNA matching?) and we don't even know if

[issue26436] Add the regex-dna benchmark

Brett Cannon added the comment: Terry's right about what I meant; is the code of such quality that you would let it into the stdlib? As for execution time, I would vote for increasing the input size to take 1 second as it's just going to get faster and faster just from CPU improvements

[issue26436] Add the regex-dna benchmark

and for because the former are supposedly faster. (See the loop in the middle of random_fasta.) So do we want a benchmark micro-optimized for CSF's system or written 'normally' (with for, int, and range). I did not notice any PEP 8 style violations. -- nosy: +terry.reedy

[issue26436] Add the regex-dna benchmark

han 3.2 and 3.3. I have taken input data size such that the regex-dna benchmark runs rough the same time as the slowest regex benchmark regex-compile (0.7 sec per iteration on my computer, about a minute with default options). This is 1/50 of the size used in The Computer Language Benchmarks G

[issue26436] Add the regex-dna benchmark

Brett Cannon added the comment: Oh, and how long does an execution take? -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue26436] Add the regex-dna benchmark

Brett Cannon added the comment: I assume the code looks idiomatic to you? And out of curiosity, what does the performance look like between something 3.5 and default? -- ___ Python tracker

[issue26436] Add the regex-dna benchmark

New submission from Serhiy Storchaka: Proposed patch adds the regex-dna benchmark from The Computer Language Benchmarks Game (http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/). This is artificial but well known benchmark. The patch is based on regex-dna Python 3 #5 program and fasta Python 3 #3

[issue26284] Fix telco benchmark

STINNER Victor added the comment: > Unfortunately, replacing io.BytesIO(data) with indexing does not make the > benchmark faster or more stable on my machine. Ah, I didn't check. I expected BytesIO.read() to be slower than bytes string s

[issue26284] Fix telco benchmark

Brett Cannon added the comment: If you think the string conversion should go back in, Stefan, feel free to put it back (unless Victor wants to say why he took it out). -- assignee: -> skrah ___ Python tracker

[issue26284] FIx telco benchmark

Stefan Krah added the comment: Unfortunately, replacing io.BytesIO(data) with indexing does not make the benchmark faster or more stable on my machine. BTW, string conversion of the result is actually a crucial part of the benchmark, it was taken out in http://bugs.python.org/file41802

[issue26284] Fix telco benchmark

Changes by Stefan Krah <ste...@bytereef.org>: -- title: FIx telco benchmark -> Fix telco benchmark ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.pyt

[issue26284] FIx telco benchmark

New submission from Stefan Krah: The telco benchmark is unstable. It needs some of Victor's changes from #26275 and probably a larger data set: http://speleotrove.com/decimal/expon180-1e6b.zip is too big for _pydecimal, but the one that is used is probably too small for _decimal

[issue25774] [benchmarks] Adjust to allow uploading benchmark data to codespeed

Changes by Zachary Ware : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue25774] [benchmarks] Adjust to allow uploading benchmark data to codespeed

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 9923b81a1d34 by Zachary Ware in branch 'default': Issue #25774: Add raw mode to perf.py. https://hg.python.org/benchmarks/rev/9923b81a1d34 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker

[issue25774] [benchmarks] Adjust to allow uploading benchmark data to codespeed

Zachary Ware added the comment: Fair point, I'll leave out the upload script. Thanks for the review! -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue25774] [benchmarks] Adjust to allow uploading benchmark data to codespeed

Changes by Brett Cannon : -- assignee: -> brett.cannon ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue25774] [benchmarks] Adjust to allow uploading benchmark data to codespeed

Brett Cannon added the comment: Patch LGTM, although I'm not sure why the upload script needs to be in the benchmark repo itself. -- assignee: brett.cannon -> zach.ware ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.or

[issue24934] django_v2 benchmark not working in Python 3.6

Florin Papa added the comment: No problem. Thank you for merging the patch! -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue24934] django_v2 benchmark not working in Python 3.6

Brett Cannon added the comment: Thanks for the patch, Florin! Only changes I made was to deprecate django_v2 and to set the minimum Python version to 2.7. -- resolution: -> fixed stage: commit review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python

[issue24934] django_v2 benchmark not working in Python 3.6

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 8a9b86071c15 by Brett Cannon in branch 'default': Issue #24934: Introduce the django_v2 benchmark using Django 1.9.0. https://hg.python.org/benchmarks/rev/8a9b86071c15 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python

[issue24934] django_v2 benchmark not working in Python 3.6

Florin Papa added the comment: I have adapted the existent patch to the new benchmarks codebase. Please see the new patch (django_v3_2.patch) in the files section. The benchmark expects to have django in lib/Django-1.9 folder. The Django-1.9 sources are attached separately because

[issue24934] django_v2 benchmark not working in Python 3.6

Changes by Florin Papa : Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file41222/Django-1.9.tar.gz ___ Python tracker ___

[issue24934] django_v2 benchmark not working in Python 3.6

Florin Papa added the comment: I have attached django_v3_3.patch, as the previous one did not include the added file (performance/bm_django_v3.py). -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file41223/django_v3_3.patch ___ Python tracker

[issue24934] django_v2 benchmark not working in Python 3.6

Brett Cannon added the comment: Django 1.9 is out, so when I have time I will create a django_v3 benchmark. -- ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/i

[issue25719] Deprecate spitfire benchmark

Florin Papa added the comment: No problem. Thank you! -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue25774] [benchmarks] Adjust to allow uploading benchmark data to codespeed

New submission from Zachary Ware: Here's a patch to the benchmarks repo that allows running a benchmark on a single interpreter and returning raw data, and provides a script to upload the raw data to a codespeed instance. It's a bit of a quick hack, but is effective. This is a prerequisite

[issue25719] Deprecate spitfire benchmark

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 75751d838789 by Zachary Ware in branch 'default': Issue #25719: Deprecate spitfire benchmark. https://hg.python.org/benchmarks/rev/75751d838789 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker <

[issue25719] Deprecate spitfire benchmark

Zachary Ware added the comment: Done. Thanks, Florin! -- resolution: -> fixed stage: commit review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue25705] Fix regex_compile benchmark crash

Florin Papa added the comment: No problem. Thank you for fixing this. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue25705] Fix regex_compile benchmark crash

Zachary Ware added the comment: Fixed in f7283190e896. I had actually already fixed this in my sandbox repo for speed.python.org; I just went ahead and pushed it (and a couple other very minor changes) to the main benchmark repo. Thanks for the report and patch! -- nosy: +zach.ware

[issue25719] Deprecate spitfire benchmark

Zachary Ware added the comment: +1 Unless anybody else objects in the next couple days, I'll commit this. -- nosy: +zach.ware stage: -> commit review versions: -Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker

[issue25719] Deprecate spitfire benchmark

New submission from Florin Papa: Hi all, This is Florin Papa from the Server Languages Optimizations Team at Intel Corporation. The patch submitted here deprecates the spitfire benchmark, which uses psyco. Psyco is "unmaintained and dead", according to their webs

[issue25705] Fix regex_compile benchmark crash

New submission from Florin Papa: Hi all, This is Florin Papa from the Server Languages Optimizations Team at Intel Corporation. The patch submitted here solves a crash occurring on Python 2.7 and 3.6 when running the regex_compile benchmark. The clear_cache() call was replaced with re.purge

pytest-benchmark v3.0 released!

and issues: https://github.com/ionelmc/pytest-benchmark Thanks, -- Ionel Cristian Mărieș, http://blog.ionelmc.ro -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-announce-list Support the Python Software Foundation: http://www.python.org/psf/donations/

[issue24934] django_v2 benchmark not working in Python 3.6

R. David Murray added the comment: An additional argument for waiting is issue 25486. -- type: crash -> behavior ___ Python tracker ___

[issue25426] Deprecate the regex_compile benchmark

Brett Cannon added the comment: Thanks for the pointer about re.purge(), Serhiy! -- resolution: -> fixed stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue25426] Deprecate the regex_compile benchmark

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 0da7b44c2ea3 by Brett Cannon in branch 'default': Use re.purge() to clear the re cache. https://hg.python.org/benchmarks/rev/0da7b44c2ea3 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker

[issue25426] Deprecate the regex_compile benchmark

New submission from Brett Cannon: Turns out it relies on internal APIs that either don't exist on other interpreters (e.g., IronPython), or they change which leads to breakage of the benchmark (e.g., already changed for Python 3.2 and 3.3). Probably best to retire it rather than continuing

[issue25426] Deprecate the regex_compile benchmark

Changes by Brett Cannon : -- assignee: -> brett.cannon ___ Python tracker ___ ___

  1   2   3   4   >